Canadian Politics Today

No, but if you say something, you can bet you read it on a blog, likely of Russian influence, tailored to exploit your intellectual weakness and overly emotional anger.

Not really, I just listened to Obama’s secretary of defence, who predicted Russia’s invasion back in 2016.  Because they view NATO expansion as an existential threat.  They also viewed the west’s orchestrated coup of the pro Russian Ukrainian government in 2014 the same way.  Several things can be correct at the same time.  Russia was wrong to invade Ukraine.  But NATO was wrong to threaten expansion to Russia’s border.

1. Ukraine had no intention of joining NATO back in the 2014.

2. Russia violated an agreement from 1996, where Ukraine agreed to rid itself of all nuclear weapons, and give them to Russia, in return Russia promised to always respect Ukrainian sovereignty, and the post 1991 borders of Ukraine.

.  But NATO was wrong to threaten expansion to Russia’s border.

Spoken like a true retard.

 

Not really, I just listened to Obama’s secretary of defence, who predicted Russia’s invasion back in 2016.  Because they view NATO expansion as an existential threat.  They also viewed the west’s orchestrated coup of the pro Russian Ukrainian government in 2014 the same way.  Several things can be correct at the same time.  Russia was wrong to invade Ukraine.  But NATO was wrong to threaten expansion to Russia’s border. 

Russia's neighbors joined NATO because they felt threatened by Russia.  Russia's done nothing but validate their fears over the last 20 years.  There is nothing existentially threatening about Ukraine wanting to free themselves of Russian influence given their truly horrible history under the Russian yoke and the utter hopelessness that subservience to Russia promises.  The only thing that NATO expansion threatens existentially is Vladimir Putin's delusions of Empire.  "Muh sphere of influence" is a shitty argument when nobody within it wants to be.   

Ditto.  Especially one that has no clue of recent history.  Your only option is to call people names! 😂
Everything I said is FACT.  You’re all a bunch of McCarthyist puppets controlled by the mainstream media.  They feed you the narrative, and you run with it like it’s religious dogma.  You’ve learned nothing from the recent past.

You don't actually know anything about Russian or Ukrainian history.  This is very, very clear. 

Glad to see Israel **** **** up in Iran with the drone strikes.  It's Karma for getting involved in the Ukraine situation by providing Russia drones to strike cities in Ukraine.

It’s good to see that world war 3 is well on its way! 😂

If Congresswoman Omar criticized Israel's attack you would call her anti-Semitic.

Yes, it’s interesting that you think people should have the right to criticize Israel without being anti-semitic.  Why don’t you apply that same logic to Ukraine, or vaccines?  Answer.  Because you’re a hypocrite, McCarthyite.  You only approve of nuance when it suits you, and when it supports your side.  You have no interest in applying that same standard to anything else, even though everything else has nuance too.

You are free to praise Russia but don't pretend it isn't obvious you're just repeating Russian talking points, which have no nuance at all

Then you’re free to praise anti-semites.

You're the one praising MTG and her space laser theory. How come that "trope" is, as George Santos would signal, A-OK? 👌

I’m just using your standard.  What’s wrong, you don’t like the taste of your own medicine? 😂