1. It's not a valid question. Nobody can rise above tribalism - not even scientists. Stephen Hawking talks about being personally annoyed at papers challenging his theories. That said, if he were still live I bet I could take him in a fight.
Trudeau says he has. Post-national state, multiculturalism.
3. Our cultures are gentle and kind to outsiders, and I consider it a sign of strength. If we were weak we'd be constantly afraid of outsiders. But "our" culture is America 2.0.
1. Are you saying aboriginals are weak for resisting a ton of outsiders coming and living in their territory? If a whole bunch of non-aboriginals came in to live on reserves and those aboriginal groups didn't like that because the demographics were trending them to soon become a minority and their cultures were being slowly replaced by non-indigenous cultures, are they weak for this view?
2, Would they be "strong" for allowing the majority of reserve populations to become non-aboriginal?
3. Do you think aboriginals should support large numbers of "outsiders" from living on their territory to the point of them becoming a minority and making indigenous culture and outsider cultures equally important?
4. Are indigenous cultures worthy of preserving?
5. Do indigenous people who want to preserve their culture differ from MAGA and Brexit folks? If so, how?
5. Is British culture, or culture in France or Sweden worthy of preserving? How does this differ from indigenous cultures, besides feelings of victim/oppressor guilt?
6. Are the Quebecois "weak" for trying to preserve their language/culture?