It is not. Your argument is like the bank robber claiming he should get away with the crime because someone else murdered.
No its not. Who you define as a robber is not. You just don't recognize the title of ownership of the person you call a robber because you apply a double standard as to who you think should own the title and think one side has a more legitimate claim to that title than the other.
You can't get over your entrenched sense of cultural superiority and therefore sense of arrogance and entitlement to decide who owns what. Here's a hint, the title of ownership being disputed will not be settled by people like you making arbitrary moral assumptions as to right and wrong.
In fact the only analogy would be to refer to you as someone who attends
**** fights or pitbull fights and cheers for his designated animal. You still think you are at an arena cheering on slaves killing each other for the entertainment of your civilized empire.
This aint no WWE script.
Home
Contact
Login
Register