https://www.coastalatlas.de/imperia/md/content/gkss/zentrale_einrichtungen/bibliothek/berichte/gkss_berichte_2010/gkss_2010_9_.pdf
To the question:Only 80% answered yes. The rest were either neutral or answered no.
22. How convinced are you that climate change poses a very serious and dangerous threat to humanity?
before I actually speak to your reference: c'mon man... "only" 80%? Only?
Since when does 80% warrant an "only"?
- there does appear to be a tad liberty taken here: your original statement/claim was that, "
20% of scientists do not accept that reducing CO2 emissions "rapidly" is a useful response". Notwithstanding your quoted 'question 22' could have... should have... been tailored more precisely, your original stated interpretation of that question is open to several interpretations itself.
- in any case, your link is to an unsecured website, but I didn't need to open it as the question itself is well recognized and associates with a single survey; the 2008 survey (published in 2010) by authors Bray & von Storch... the single survey that had 370 respondents (an approximate 18% response rate).
- that's quite the broad-based leverage you're attempting to make off a single survey with a smallish response rate - yes? "Only 80%... only!"
- as for the scientific consensus itself... whether you accept the oft quoted 97% or, alternatively, >90%, surely you're not going to offer up another "only" here in terms of the scientific consensus on the (principal) causal tie to global warming - yes? What's your consensus understanding; your preferred number/range... based on what?