2 days from now is supposed to be sunny with cloudy periods, 10% of rain. The vast majority of meteorologists forecast this. There are a small minority of meteorologists who forecast scattered showers throughout the day, 80% of rain.
This is what the climate "debate" sounds like to me. Not that I'm comparing weather with climate (you can't), the analogy just means that if there's some skeptics with different science conclusions that's fine, but if you're going to plan your day two days from now based on the weather, the only logical choice is to put more weight in the what the vast majority of scientists say than what a small minority say.
It's amazing to me how frequently one's political leanings will match what they believe about climate change. There is no "belief", there's only science, statistics/evidence, and probabilities.