I know you don't like to address the arguments I actually make because those arguments can't be dismissed with tired alarmist propaganda that you endlessly spout. However, it is getting tedious. A discussion board is supposed to about discussion and ideas - not regurgitating the irrelevant talking points to keep the peanut gallery cheering. Why don't you try demonstrating that are something more than an alarmist bot by addressing the arguments I make rather than the ones you wish I would make.
say what! After relaying yet another pointed summation on your tired nattering... I did speak directly to your so-called "latest argument"... and you ignored it. Here, have another go (at ignoring it).
citation request to align with your statement/claim that, "20% of scientists do not accept that reducing CO2 emissions "rapidly" is a useful response"... you know, a response to a problem you refuse to accept in the first place.
Note: I'm not even challenging your number - I'm most curious about the particulars: who/what arrived at it/based on what. (make sure to clarify your reference to, "rapidly")
Home
Contact
Login
Register