My opinion on the science has not changed in 10 years. The only thing that changed is you tried listening to what I say instead of making assumptions because I don't blindly trust people who have demonstrated that they are not worthy of trust.
You have completely missed my entire argument about the need to protect against group think by encouraging contrarians. Perhaps this wiki article on group think will help you understand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
The symptoms describe climate scientists almost exactly:
That said, I am not optimistic that you will be able to acknowledge the clear evidence of a problem.
If is much easier for you to "[stereotype] those who are opposed to the group as weak, evil, biased, spiteful, impotent, or stupid."
So you are still somehow convinced that over 97% of environmental scientists with peer reviewed studies that concur on climate change are simply victims of this "groupthink" thingy? I suggest looking in the mirror.
The evidence is overwhelming. Record-breaking temperatures, humidity, and sea level rise, along with many other indicators, show that the Earth is warming fast, and that all the heat-trapping emissions we release into the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels is changing our climate.
The time to act is now. But, many powerful industry interests have hindered action and have, largely through surrogates, spread dangerous myths about climate change.
One of the preferred tactics these groups use to sow confusion is to promote studies that either ignore or misrepresent the evidence of thousands of articles published in well-established and well-respected scientific journals, which show that global warming is happening and that it is caused by humans.
No matter how much contrarians try to cloak reality, the evidence is not going away.
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/scientists-agree-global-warming-happening-humans-primary-cause