There are science deniers like yourself trying to paint it that way
There is that word again. Please explain what exactly think I am denying? I have said that CO2 is a GHG and the climate changing. My contempt for the ideologues claiming to be climate scientists does not mean I reject findings that have a well founded scientific basis. I only reject claims where is there is no scientific basis other than the opinion of the researcher manipulating the data.
What I also reject are idiotic policies being pushed by progressives who see climate change an excuse to hijack the moral authority of science in order to push their pet policies that have nothing to do with climate. The recent "Green New Deal" released by that Democrat in the US is a text book example. It is filled a progressive wish list of policies while it completely fails to deal with the claimed objective (i.e. it wants to close all nuclear plants in 10 years - a policy that makes zero sense if someone actually cared about CO2 emissions).
Now you can continue call me names and dismiss my legitimate concerns about the politicization of climate science. All that accomplishes is convince me that there is no point looking for compromise policies that would work toward CO2 reductions and I will cheer on Doug and Jason in their attempts to obstruct the modest policies that Trudeau wants to put in.
Or you could get out of your bubble, acknowledge that science is no where near as certain as you would like to believe and try to have a conversation with the people that are numerous enough to ensure that no effective anti-CO2 policy will ever be put in place.