Canadian Politics Today

So you are saying we did not have science in the 70s when the population bomb and exhaustion of resources was all the rage? Both of those 'predicted by science' disasters failed to materialize.

Science it is a tool that must be used correctly to be helpful. If a field starts to demand ideological conformity by regularly ostracizing colleagues that do not parrot the preferred narrative then that field can no longer claim to be using science.

Why do you seem to think that the indicators that have been noted by the majority of climate scientists are nothing more than a "preferred narrative"? Not liking the bad news is understandable, but ignoring it is dangerous.