You know, applying our knowledge to problems and coming up with solutions is how we adapt right? Your comment here is like saying, "**** antibiotics. Humans need to adapt to survive." Rejecting interventions only benefits those who profit from nature's destruction. I'm sure they appreciate your support.
That's not true. But we all profit from nature's destruction because cheap fossil fuels increase our standard of living since it reduces costs on our transportation and virtually everything we buy that needs to be shipped somewhere, usually several times over as different materials and raw resources need to be shipped to several places until a final product reaches our hands. We can spend those savings on other things, thus increasing everyone's wealth. This makes the costs of getting off fossil fuels very relevant to everyone, if those fossil fuels remain cheaper than renewables.
Now yes, some companies like energy companies do profit exponentially more than the average consumer.