Author Topic: Host Censorship  (Read 2048 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rue

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 835
  • The beast feeds on fear - I feast on the beast.
  • Location: inside a matrix
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #90 on: July 03, 2019, 12:18:33 pm »
I just noticed this thread.  As you know I have been trying to make serious efforts to improve the quality of dialogue on this forum. In an effort to continue that.. here are some web-sites that can help you.

This one provides words you can use. (my favourite is meat flap)

http://onlineslangdictionary.com/lists/most-vulgar-words/

This one can help you understand the origins (etiology) of some of these words:

https://listverse.com/2015/09/29/10-offensive-english-words-with-hazy-origins/

Now given the difficulty on another thread on the origins of the word "genocide" and how it has been  used I recommend you need to refer to the above article on origins and in particularI will provide an except from it:
**** probably derived from Proto-Germanic, as it was likely present in Old English, and the letter “t” is shared with the Old Frisian kunte, the Old Icelandic kunta, and the Middle Low German kunte. Both the Latin and Germanic derive from Indo-European root words, however, as do the Greek kusos and the Sanskrit kutchi, meaning “ditch.” The word became common in the 13th and 14th centuries, with the red light districts of English towns often being called “Gropecuntlane.” However, the word also appeared in surnames like Clawecunte, Sitbithecunte, and Fillecunt.

The first written usage of “****” in the modern sense comes from the 1325 Proverbs of Hendyng, a collection of moral and religious advice in which women are told to, “Give thy cunte wisely and ask for marriage.” A 1440 medical document uses it as a technical term, saying, “In wymmen the necke of the bladdre is schort, & is maad fast to the cunte.” In the mid-19th century, the word was a derogatory term for both men and women but steadily developed its misogynistic edge in the 20th century. It was rarely seen in print until relatively modern times, being left out of the Oxford English Dictionary when it was first compiled."

In an effort to make amends to all women on this forum if the above offends may I suggest they can use these words to describe those of us with testes:

oik
pillock
sock fluid
metalplate
dribbler
skooter
skippy
Butch
Buck
Steven Segal
Harvey Weinstein
Daniel Baboon
drooler ape
syphlitic
polyp
detergent resistant
pouch monkey
urinal backfire
flesh eating disease
battery licker
non savante idiot
or
direction challenged sperm (dcp)

My mission is done for today and may I say I am pleased to see Omni found this "dumb".
 
You are welcome Omni I hope that wasn't too long  a response.














« Last Edit: July 03, 2019, 01:02:30 pm by Rue »
You have me mistaken with an eagle. I only come to eat your carcass.
Like Like x 2 Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8560
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #91 on: July 03, 2019, 01:18:19 pm »
I just noticed this thread.  As you know I have been trying to make serious efforts to improve the quality of dialogue on this forum. In an effort to continue that.. here are some web-sites that can help you.

This one provides words you can use. (my favourite is meat flap)

http://onlineslangdictionary.com/lists/most-vulgar-words/

This one can help you understand the origins (etiology) of some of these words:

https://listverse.com/2015/09/29/10-offensive-english-words-with-hazy-origins/

Now given the difficulty on another thread on the origins of the word "genocide" and how it has been  used I recommend you need to refer to the above article on origins and in particularI will provide an except from it:
**** probably derived from Proto-Germanic, as it was likely present in Old English, and the letter “t” is shared with the Old Frisian kunte, the Old Icelandic kunta, and the Middle Low German kunte. Both the Latin and Germanic derive from Indo-European root words, however, as do the Greek kusos and the Sanskrit kutchi, meaning “ditch.” The word became common in the 13th and 14th centuries, with the red light districts of English towns often being called “Gropecuntlane.” However, the word also appeared in surnames like Clawecunte, Sitbithecunte, and Fillecunt.

The first written usage of “****” in the modern sense comes from the 1325 Proverbs of Hendyng, a collection of moral and religious advice in which women are told to, “Give thy cunte wisely and ask for marriage.” A 1440 medical document uses it as a technical term, saying, “In wymmen the necke of the bladdre is schort, & is maad fast to the cunte.” In the mid-19th century, the word was a derogatory term for both men and women but steadily developed its misogynistic edge in the 20th century. It was rarely seen in print until relatively modern times, being left out of the Oxford English Dictionary when it was first compiled."

In an effort to make amends to all women on this forum if the above offends may I suggest they can use these words to describe those of us with testes:

oik
pillock
sock fluid
metalplate
dribbler
skooter
skippy
Butch
Buck
Steven Segal
Harvey Weinstein
Daniel Baboon
drooler ape
syphlitic
polyp
detergent resistant
pouch monkey
urinal backfire
flesh eating disease
battery licker
non savante idiot
or
direction challenged sperm (dcp)

My mission is done for today and may I say I am pleased to see Omni found this "dumb".
 
You are welcome Omni I hope that wasn't too long  a response.

The childishness of it makes it "too long" no matter the length.

Offline Rue

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 835
  • The beast feeds on fear - I feast on the beast.
  • Location: inside a matrix
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #92 on: July 04, 2019, 11:16:47 am »
Yes coming from the highbrow mature Omni whose intent of even responding to me was not generated by petulance but a concern for post pubescent discourse on this forum. Got it and may I say in the spirit of this thread and with much love...go phuck yourself.

"When a fat man calls me fat, I offer him a twinkie."

Rue, 2019

"Proctologists are loath to miss what they think is an opening to point their finger at."

Rue 2019



« Last Edit: July 04, 2019, 12:26:01 pm by Rue »
You have me mistaken with an eagle. I only come to eat your carcass.

Offline Rue

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 835
  • The beast feeds on fear - I feast on the beast.
  • Location: inside a matrix
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #93 on: July 08, 2019, 10:55:15 am »
Omni you are now free to  start a thread and censor me. Go ahead.
You have me mistaken with an eagle. I only come to eat your carcass.

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8560
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #94 on: July 08, 2019, 11:49:24 am »
Yes coming from the highbrow mature Omni whose intent of even responding to me was not generated by petulance but a concern for post pubescent discourse on this forum. Got it and may I say in the spirit of this thread and with much love...go phuck yourself.

"When a fat man calls me fat, I offer him a twinkie."

Rue, 2019

"Proctologists are loath to miss what they think is an opening to point their finger at."

Rue 2019

Thank you for pointing out that I am mature. The rest is a bit of a waste. Now go enjoy your twinkies.

Offline MH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #95 on: July 18, 2019, 12:11:29 pm »
Fascist rallies?

As of today those who defend scum will be considered scum.

Offline wilber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7428
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #96 on: May 05, 2020, 08:29:44 pm »
Because I will never interfere with or censor individual posters, I have just removed a topic I started because of too many personal insults. I know I can't claim to be the most civil member of this forum but I regret being any part of where this has headed.
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 799
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #97 on: May 05, 2020, 09:06:13 pm »
Bunch of ******* ****-*** **********s.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4818
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #98 on: May 06, 2020, 11:00:28 am »
Because I will never interfere with or censor individual posters, I have just removed a topic I started because of too many personal insults.

and the waldo apologizes for missing the party! By the by, nuking a thread is the ultimate censorship - ya think?

in any case, the waldo regrets putting the repeat pressure on you to do the right thing - to change your incorrectly worded thread title... which you refused even after being shown the folly of your title premise. As an appeasement measure, the following offers an appropriate summary of the nuked thread - you're welcome:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcUpDssvhPU

Offline wilber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7428
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #99 on: May 06, 2020, 04:31:23 pm »
and the waldo apologizes for missing the party! By the by, nuking a thread is the ultimate censorship - ya think?

in any case, the waldo regrets putting the repeat pressure on you to do the right thing - to change your incorrectly worded thread title... which you refused even after being shown the folly of your title premise. As an appeasement measure, the following offers an appropriate summary of the nuked thread - you're welcome:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcUpDssvhPU


I nuked everyones posts, including my own.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 04:36:24 pm by wilber »
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Bubbermiley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 799
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #100 on: May 07, 2020, 04:59:53 am »

I nuked everyones posts, including my own.
Power is glorious.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline MH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #101 on: February 13, 2021, 08:55:25 am »
@Gorgeous Graham

On another thread you made two points about MLW I don't agree with, and don't understand the basis for.

1) the reason MLW went downhill, or maybe was inundated with poor posters is because the mods were too controlling?  Why wouldn't controlling mods want to clamp down and/or kick out poor posters?
2) the assertion that Trumpites and leftists are too sides of the same coin?  Does that mean that you put all conservatives, including maybe yourself, in the same basket as Trumpites?

Offline Gorgeous Graham

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6206
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #102 on: February 13, 2021, 06:12:26 pm »
@Gorgeous Graham

On another thread you made two points about MLW I don't agree with, and don't understand the basis for.

1) the reason MLW went downhill, or maybe was inundated with poor posters is because the mods were too controlling?  Why wouldn't controlling mods want to clamp down and/or kick out poor posters?

MLW imploded due to poor moderation.  Some users were suspended or banned for nonsensical reasons in "ban-hammer" sprees, others were allowed to keep posting with impunity with no punishment even though they were clearly breaking the rules.  Many threads are locked simply due to "thread drift".  Imagine silencing all constructive discussion in a thread simply because some of it was "off-topic.

Given this, quite a few people left and came here.  I have no problem with banning or suspending problem posters, but it has to be done fairly and logically.  Power corrupts.

Quote
2) the assertion that Trumpites and leftists are too sides of the same coin?  Does that mean that you put all conservatives, including maybe yourself, in the same basket as Trumpites?

So you said: "They are not creatures of the age of reason.  They are interested in winning and imposing their culture on others."

I agree many rightwing posters are like this.  But many people on the left, including some on this forum, are like this as well.  We're in the middle of a culture war right now.  We always have been but it's just cranked up to 10 recently.  Most Trumpites and SJW's have the same agenda: winning and imposing their culture on others.  I'm in no way immune to this.  Politics is about power.  It's about controlling our laws, policies, narratives, culture etc.  For many people, listening to the other side often just gets in the way of this.
I can tell how good of a person you are by how you treat the people you disagree with.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline MH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #103 on: February 13, 2021, 07:15:10 pm »
MLW imploded due to poor moderation.  Some users were suspended or banned for nonsensical reasons in "ban-hammer" sprees, others were allowed to keep posting with impunity with no punishment even though they were clearly breaking the rules.  Many threads are locked simply due to "thread drift".  Imagine silencing all constructive discussion in a thread simply because some of it was "off-topic.

Given this, quite a few people left and came here.  I have no problem with banning or suspending problem posters, but it has to be done fairly and logically.  Power corrupts.

Ah I see now.  No, I disagree with almost everything you said.  I don't think that this place has anything to do with it either.  There are just more bad posters around.

Quote
So you said: "They are not creatures of the age of reason.  They are interested in winning and imposing their culture on others."

I agree many rightwing posters are like this.  But many people on the left, including some on this forum, are like this as well.  We're in the middle of a culture war right now.  We always have been but it's just cranked up to 10 recently.  Most Trumpites and SJW's have the same agenda: winning and imposing their culture on others.  I'm in no way immune to this.  Politics is about power.  It's about controlling our laws, policies, narratives, culture etc.  For many people, listening to the other side often just gets in the way of this.

Really ?  If you are aware of this problem and still doing it, I guess you are worse than others. 

Myself, I like this thing called political process.  It requires people who are just a little bit smart, though, and that can be a problem.  But the real problem is that it requires people to not think of themselves first and foremost in every situation.

But ok.

Also I don't think ANYONE here is an SJW or a Trumpite unless I'm mistaken.