https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/stuff-you-need-to-know/news/?message=50612
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I would have to. He's not interested in this place.I disagree with Kimmy. But then, I disagree with DoP too, sometimes. For me, that's what it's all about.
Disagreeing with Catholicism is considered anti-Catholic?
Noooo. Calling it 'Insidious' and words like that. Liberals would squawk if somebody said that about Muslims, why is it ok to insult Catholicism ?
I think they’re both insidious... taking children and indoctrinating them is the textbook definition of insidious.
Still, it's an insult... so...
It comes and goes like the tides. Maybe you haven't noticed since your opinions are more amenable to CA.
It’s insulting a religion.... that’s like insulting McDonalds. It’s not the same as insulting a person.
So then what schools do when they teach them about progressive social beliefs and values is insidious indoctrination?
I agree with this. As long as he refrains from saying "all Catholics", there's nothing wrong with describing a religion using its worst characteristics.
It could be called so, but since there isn't a "people" associated with social progressivism it's not the same as hate-mongering.
and sisters of mine, you did for me.’[/b]Is this hatemongering indoctrination?