Author Topic: Host Censorship  (Read 651 times)

Offline cybercoma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 730
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2017, 08:01:48 pm »
Nice! An arcade that I'll never use. hehe

Offline DuckFace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2017, 07:04:25 pm »
cocksucker mothefucker bitch-tits
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Offline JMT

  • Moderator in Chief
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 940
  • Location: Waterhen, Manitoba
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2017, 08:29:00 pm »
I can see your bitch-tits.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline DuckFace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2017, 08:05:55 pm »
i see what you did there.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Offline dia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Questioner
  • Location: Fraser Valley
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2017, 06:28:42 pm »
I have joined the ranks of the banned (for a week); this is because I made a joke about shooting SJWs which is 'invoking' violence.   Another poster made a joke about pitting conservatives against each other so they could bludgeon each other to death, but that post remains.   Perhaps SJWs are in short supply so even joking about their demise is not allowed, whereas a thinning of conservatives is needed?      ;D

All joking aside, I am amused.  Especially since I was warned once, didn't see the warning, referred back to my original joke and was summarily banned for ignoring the first warning.  Ah well, I'm pretty sure I was spending too much time there anyway.   


Discussion is impossible with someone who claims not to seek the truth, but already to possess it.

Offline ?Impact

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2017, 10:45:35 am »
Ah well, I'm pretty sure I was spending too much time there anyway.

I was banned for a week, three weeks ago, for someone's interpretation of something I said. Haven't been back.

Online bcsapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 246
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2017, 11:26:25 am »
I have joined the ranks of the banned (for a week); this is because I made a joke about shooting SJWs which is 'invoking' violence.   Another poster made a joke about pitting conservatives against each other so they could bludgeon each other to death, but that post remains.   Perhaps SJWs are in short supply so even joking about their demise is not allowed, whereas a thinning of conservatives is needed?      ;D

All joking aside, I am amused.  Especially since I was warned once, didn't see the warning, referred back to my original joke and was summarily banned for ignoring the first warning.  Ah well, I'm pretty sure I was spending too much time there anyway.

You got suspended for that?  Did they give any reason why the bludgeoning post could remain?
Time for bed said Zebedee...

Offline dia

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Questioner
  • Location: Fraser Valley
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #22 on: April 03, 2017, 08:07:41 pm »
You got suspended for that?  Did they give any reason why the bludgeoning post could remain?
I think its a complaint driven system.  My post was complained about, the other wasn't.  Although from the email I got, the banning may have been cause the moderator thought I was ignoring his earlier warning.
Discussion is impossible with someone who claims not to seek the truth, but already to possess it.

Offline kimmy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2017, 09:11:09 am »
FUCK.

 -k

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1242
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2017, 11:56:27 am »
You got suspended for that?  Did they give any reason why the bludgeoning post could remain?

I have spoken to MH on that sort of issue and his reply is that they do not feel there is any requirement for consistency in their judgments.

Right now there are basically three lunatics there posting most of the topics, one allegedly from Turkey, one from the far fringes of the left whose only interest, it seems, is a frenzied condemnation of anything related to the US or the West, and the third a dullard of the far right who calls himself a white rights activist. It's sad, really, since all of them are conspiracy freaks and none of them are capable of any rational discussion.

Offline Omni

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 566
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #25 on: April 05, 2017, 12:18:30 pm »
Well if MH said that then I will wholeheartedly agree. A lack of consistency is one thing that is consistent. And MH is far from the worst over there. 

Offline cybercoma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 730
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #26 on: April 05, 2017, 12:30:51 pm »
all of them are conspiracy freaks and none of them are capable of any rational discussion.
That's the common denominator because that is one of the mods in a nutshell. These are his kinfolk: irrational conspiracy theory loving gadflies.

I've got to imagine the other two mods just banging their heads on a brick wall at this point.

For as wrong as I think you are about immigration, at least you're not an imbecile. You have honest discussions, even if I think some of your views are stupid. In other words, you don't troll and I wouldn't call you a troll even though I disagree with many of the things you say. But that's not what the majority of posts are over there now.

And even if these people honestly believe the nonsensical garbage that they post, that's irrelevant. You don't claim to have a forum for intelligent discussion and then turn around and foster bottom-of-the-barrel conspiracy trash.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2017, 12:36:35 pm by cybercoma »

Offline Omni

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 566
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #27 on: April 05, 2017, 01:42:15 pm »
That's the common denominator because that is one of the mods in a nutshell. These are his kinfolk: irrational conspiracy theory loving gadflies.

I've got to imagine the other two mods just banging their heads on a brick wall at this point.

For as wrong as I think you are about immigration, at least you're not an imbecile. You have honest discussions, even if I think some of your views are stupid. In other words, you don't troll and I wouldn't call you a troll even though I disagree with many of the things you say. But that's not what the majority of posts are over there now.

And even if these people honestly believe the nonsensical garbage that they post, that's irrelevant. You don't claim to have a forum for intelligent discussion and then turn around and foster bottom-of-the-barrel conspiracy trash.

I was recently chastised by the mod you speak of for simply hounding one of those gadfly's (the most recent 9-11 one) to try and answer a couple of pertinent questions that he obviously couldn't/wouldn't,  and that made his conspiracy theory look a little thin. I didn't realize there was such a conspiracy to protect conspiracy theories, but I'm seeing it now.

Online poochy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #28 on: April 05, 2017, 09:46:45 pm »

And even if these people honestly believe the nonsensical garbage that they post, that's irrelevant. You don't claim to have a forum for intelligent discussion and then turn around and foster bottom-of-the-barrel conspiracy trash.

That's 100 percent it in my opinion, its all so dishonest, what's the point in arguing on either side, but the way that site is run you might think they would be just as happy if it was only nutters posting and replying to their own crazy posts.

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1242
Re: Host Censorship
« Reply #29 on: April 06, 2017, 02:17:43 pm »
I was recently chastised by the mod you speak of for simply hounding one of those gadfly's (the most recent 9-11 one) to try and answer a couple of pertinent questions that he obviously couldn't/wouldn't,  and that made his conspiracy theory look a little thin. I didn't realize there was such a conspiracy to protect conspiracy theories, but I'm seeing it now.

I'll go you one better. I was admonished the other day for telling a poster who said he found nothing wrong with the writings of noted white supremacists that this showed his poor judgement.