Canadian Politics Today

{Climate scientists} have none of that kind of knowledge, training or data. They have a bunch of unverifiable computer models that indicate that CO2 might be a problem in the future. They have no knowledge of how the energy system works or negative consequences of eliminating fossil fuels. The people who do that have expertise are the engineers and project managers working in energy development and distribution. They are only people that could credibly claim that CO2 reductions are economically viable.

"engineers and project managers" --- please provide citation showing recognized organizations/associations of your stated, "engineers and project managers", that have declared broad & complete positions against the need for CO2 emission reduction... that have declared specific positions against particular CO2 mitigating emission reduction policies.

equally, in line with your forever/oft stated acceptance of adaptation as the sole alternate strategy & approach to mitigating emissions reduction (rather, to your stated, in isolation, adaptation only alternative to a combined approach that includes mitigation, adaptation and prevention), please provide citation showing recognized organizations/associations of your stated, "engineers and project managers", that have declared specific positions to support the need for, in isolation to mitigation/prevention, adaptation only measures & policies to attempt to manage climate change impacts... that have declared specific positions, in isolation to mitigation/prevention, in favour of adaptation only measures & policies to attempt to manage the impacts of climate change.