Joking rescinded, it's a really crappy thing to put the environment at risk just to settle a score when the other party is just trying to protect its own constituents.
The idea that this is about "protecting constituents" is BS. This is about pandering to people with an ideological obsession with fossil fuels who are too hypocritical to go after the port of Vancouver expansion which is a much greater threat to coastal waters than the relatively small number oil tankers.
That's some real petty **** you're spewing right there.
What is petty are the self righteous NIMBYs who actually believe they are entitled to screw over other Canadians in order to gratify their own need to believe they are "saving the world' while expecting to enjoy all of the benefits that fossil fuels provide. If people in Vancouver don't want a pipeline they should learn to live without fossil fuels. It won't be pretty.