Certainly Canadians are now proud owners of a 65 year old pipeline that generates $300 million a year in revenue. That doesn't actually get an expansion built.
not what I asked you. Let me ask another way: rather than the Liberal government purchase, what would have occurred if it had remained privately owned?
In 2016, Judge Eleanor Dawson overturned the Northern Gateway approval citing the inadequate consultation process and outlining the court's opinion of what's required. Apparently Trudeau and friends didn't bother to actually read her ruling, because Dawson delivered the exact same ruling 2 years later, citing the exact same deficiencies.
The first time was understandable because the rules were unclear. But Dawson spelled out what was required and they went and **** it up anyway.
3 Appeals Court judges ruled in each respective decision - Judge Dawson was the only judge common to both... there was a dissenting opinion in the 2016 decision; the one that reflected solely on the prior Harper Conservative government.
without regard to the specific claims/wants of each of the (-8-) respective First Nations applicants, what level of "consultation" do you believe adequate... particularly with those 2 (perhaps 3?) First Nations bands that have openly stated they will never accept the pipeline?
Home
Contact
Login
Register