You responded to a more recent meta-analysis of 47 separate studies with a single study dating back to 2006 and you have the nerve to try to lecture anyone on here about scientific validity?
I had a specific concern about the lack of any attempt to study the risk of prolonging addictions. I found the 1 study that claimed to address that particular issue and discovered it was a joke that did not actually measure what it claimed to measure.
And your dogmatic response is "no one other that you is allowed to comment on what those studies say and do not say".
Same BS propaganda tactics that I see from you over and over again.
If you want to talk science then be precise about the questions asked and the reliability of the methods used.
If you are not willing to at least acknowledge that the question I would like answer has not been studied then you are the one rejecting science.
And stop whinging about red herrings. I never claimed SIS did not reduce over dose deaths or reduce disease transmission.
I never claimed that SIS increased drug use or crime. Studies on those points are irrelevant to my concern.