Yawn. Yet another complete misrepresentation of what I said which you insist on doing because being dishonest is easier than acknowledging the limitations and biases inherent inherent in the research process that exists today.
A little hint: scientists are human and all humans are biased therefore all scientists are biased. Get over yourself and try to understand how the real world works.
Thanks for your utterly useless hint. Here's what you need to do. If you're going to suggest that studies are biased at best and imply that they're outright fabricated, then you need to provide
evidence of such a thing happening. Otherwise, your claim is bullshit.
Your assumption is predicated on the notion that
everyone is biased, so we can't really know
anything. It calls on us to abandon
all research and just rely on our own opinions and biases to draw conclusions.
Now if you have actual concrete
evidence that supports your claim that all of the data and results on the effectiveness of SIS is garbage, then provide it. Otherwise, you're just spreading bullshit partisan propaganda with not a single shred of support.
Prove your claim.