ya, ya - you lost all credibility when you tagged one of the accusers claims as nothing more than "consensual relations"...
Ok, show me in either of the accuser accounts where anything non-consensual happened. The part where he kissed girl #2 and she told him to stop, and he stopped? The part where he took out his
**** and girl #1 gave him a hummer?
when, for some reason, you opted to ply your amateur-hour sleuthing to focus on anything but the actual allegations and perspective/interpretation of the accusers.
This is bullshit. Well before I started any "amateur-hour sleuthing", I was pointing out out that none of the allegations made against Brown amount to "abuse" or "misconduct". I asked people to explain what they thought Brown was guilty of, and people responded with either "well, he's not guilty of anything, he's just a creep" or hung their hat on the one accuser being an "underage, highschool girl", which of course isn't illegal and also isn't even true anymore.
but don't stop there! I gave you an opening to question/explain your interpretation of the motives of the accusers - for some reason you didn't bite yet... go figure!
"You gave me an opening".
You're so full of yourself.
Suggesting they have a "motive" at all suggests that they're part of a plot. I think these are just two young women who have told their stories. Their stories may be true or at least partly true. But so what?
-k