Author Topic: Patrick Brown #MeToo  (Read 3959 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kimmy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5033
  • Location: Kim City BC
Re: Patrick Brown #MeToo
« Reply #420 on: February 28, 2018, 09:18:55 am »
c'mon, your googly was burnin' up! Clearly, you are not the arbiter of what constitutes the labeled 'sexual misconduct'. Nor do you have standing to completely ignore, negate and trivialize the perspective and interpretation of the women accusers, particularly in the face of the accused offering no personal event particulars/details and no comment other than to simply deny the allegations.

We all have access to the accusers' stories in their own words.   We all have every right to form our own opinion about their stories. We're not required to meekly accept that these womens' stories are "deeply disturbing" and so on. We get to decide that for ourselves. And as I said repeatedly, right from day one:  even if their stories are completely true, these stories simply aren't a big deal.  This is Aziz Ansari stuff, not Harvey Weinstein stuff. And trying to ride the coat-tails of #MeToo to turn these unimportant accusations into a media bombshell will only serve to undermine the movement as a whole.

that's quite the deflection; now your second. It's really a simple question that was put to you... that you keep ignoring and deflecting from. C'mon you spent a lotta cycles in your amateur hour sleuthing to pass judgement on the accusers and discount their understanding of the events - to trivialize their accusations. With your latest statement that, "Their stories may be true or at least partly true", you're clearly adamantly and repeatedly holding up your personal interpretation of sexual misconduct over the veracity of the accusers accusations.

With all the waldoing removed, you're basically trying to argue that people must accept without question that these allegations are of great significance.  That's clearly retarded.

I'm quite surprised the accused and his legal team didn't have your awareness and insight - why did they bother denying the allegations when they could have just taken your position that the allegations don't even rise to the level of sexual misconduct?

I'm not on Patrick Brown's legal or communications strategy team. I can only assume they decided that saying "yeah, so what?" would not be well-received.

 -k
Paris - London - New York - Kim City