Author Topic: BC v Wet'suet'en  (Read 1659 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline waldo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #420 on: March 15, 2020, 06:38:46 pm »
Highlighting those 3rd-party questions & challenges being made to the legitimacy of the existing minority subset of 5 "hereditary chiefs" presuming to speak for the Wet'suwet'en is disparaging only if that minority subset is legitimate. Member Granny, are you categorically stating those 5 "hereditary chiefs" hold/received their titles legitimately? Is that what you're saying member Granny?
I'm not one who decides that. Nor are you.

of course! You're banking on the legitimacy of that suspect minority (the claimed illegitimate 5) only because they stand against the pipeline. Of course you do. You don't respect the expressed wants... and very real needs of the 20 First Nations... of the Wet'suwet'en in favour of the pipeline; those who negotiated agreements with the province/CGL. Again, you're nothing but a fake, fraud and dishonest purveyor of bullshyte. I will go so far as to categorically state that all rights/title means to you, is its another false ploy you utilize to attempt to support your prevailing anti-pipeline agenda. That's it! You're nothing more than a down&dirty enviro-activist plying your own special brand of 21st century colonialism against First Nations... 20 First Nations... who want/accept the CGL pipeline route and the benefits/opportunities the pipeline brings to them. Why are you trying to keep the IndigenousManWoman down, member Granny - why?
Old Old x 1 View List