I didn’t. I have a real problem with the way this is being done. If there is only a 50% response you could get as low as 26% of the electorate deciding to change the way we vote. If that 26% is split evenly between the three options, you could have as few as 9% deciding how we vote in future. This is a dishonest and unrepresentative way of forcing change from a bunch that says how we vote now isn’t representative. As a result, I voted for the status quo. For the record, I voted for STV in the last two reforendums so I am not against change.
Your reasons for how you voted are flawed.
The opposite is just as true.... we could be stuck with the status quo based on a low voter turnout.
If you don’t vote, you don’t get a voice.... that’s on you. My democratic vote for something shouldn’t depend on people who are too stupid or lazy to cast a ballot.
Home
Contact
Login
Register