Not for me. They were always arbiters and please note my acceptance of the ruling, everyone. Excuse me while I shine light out of my butt...
I would have accepted the first ruling if it had made any damn sense. I have no problem supporting a court which upholds the law. Now in some cases it's too complicated for me to actually form a reasonable opinion. I'm not going to argue with a judge on complicated aspects of a law. But on something where it's stretching something like 'free expression' out of all proportion to the reality of the damn language then yeah, I'm gonna say the judge is full of crap.