hard to have a discussion/argument when your boy O'Toole ran away and/or deflected and/or refused to answer what he meant by, "private innovation in public health care". But you're no better here: apparently, you can't even address what it means let alone offer examples of same:My preference is to fund the current systems we have adequately. You will continue to wine and moan to defend "your boy", you will not accept any criticisms of the current systems because you're a stooge for the federal party in power. You're not interested in truth you're interested in defending the power of a specific political party. You're an amazing patriot!
and you're a one-trick pony forever playing the "you're a partisan card". Other than saying nothing more than adequate funding is needed, you haven't managed to offer word one about possible improvements - instead you blindly tout 2-tier healthcare without offering any semblance of what that actually means, how it would be managed/introduced... and most pointedly how it wouldn't harm public universal health care. Talk about you being a, as you say, stooge for private healthcare! By the by, other than your bigTimeFail concerning the timeliness of walk-in clinics compared to ERs, you haven't provided any criticisms for the waldo to address... let alone the "accept" you're pining for! C'mon, get in the game, hey!