Author Topic: BC v Wet'suet'en  (Read 11746 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JMT

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3462
  • Location: Waterhen, Manitoba
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #180 on: February 17, 2020, 07:38:24 pm »
It's fine and good to listen to protestors, but we shouldn't be negotiating with them, it's ridiculous.  The law is the law, enforce the law.

if you want an actual insurrection, then take down the blockades by force.

Online wilber

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9167
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #181 on: February 17, 2020, 08:07:36 pm »
if you want an actual insurrection, then take down the blockades by force.

Maybe that's what it will take. Right now there are 40 ships waiting to unload in Vancouver harbour that can't because of the rail blockade, some of them with perishable cargoes. That can't go on.
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10257
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #182 on: February 17, 2020, 08:38:25 pm »
We could try flu blankets.

Zing!
"Nipples is one of the great minds of our time!" - Bubbermiley

Offline Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #183 on: February 17, 2020, 09:10:03 pm »
Ryan is in serious but non life-threatening condition.   :o  Encouraging, I would say.  I can sleep now.
Like Like x 1 View List

Online wilber

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9167
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #184 on: February 17, 2020, 09:20:03 pm »
When was young my racing heros were people like Jim Clark, Graham Hill, Jackie Stewart, Bruce McLaren etc. Losing a driver or two every year was pretty normal.  Now it is rare but maybe that makes it even more traumatic when a driver is killed or seriously hurt.
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Queefer Sutherland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10257
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #185 on: February 17, 2020, 10:51:01 pm »
I saw Ford vs Ferrari, good movie, fun too.
"Nipples is one of the great minds of our time!" - Bubbermiley

Online wilber

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9167
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #186 on: February 17, 2020, 11:45:57 pm »
I saw Ford vs Ferrari, good movie, fun too.

Haven't seen it yet. Did the movie say that Ken Miles was killed testing a car shortly after. Bandini was killed a year later at Monaco and McLaren was killed testing one of his own cars in 1970.

Jackie Stewart was quoted as saying 27 drivers were killed during his career, and average of one every three months.
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #187 on: February 17, 2020, 11:51:39 pm »
That should be a hint as to what a dumb "sport" it is.

Offline Boges

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1310
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #188 on: February 18, 2020, 08:31:35 am »
Haven't seen it yet. Did the movie say that Ken Miles was killed testing a car shortly after. Bandini was killed a year later at Monaco and McLaren was killed testing one of his own cars in 1970.


Spoiler Alert.  ::)

But yes Miles demise is shown.

Online wilber

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9167
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #189 on: February 18, 2020, 09:16:25 am »
That should be a hint as to what a dumb "sport" it is.

Much safer now. Since Senna’s death in 94 there has only been one driver fatality in F1, although there was one in  a F2 support race at the Belgian Gran Prix last year which shook everyone severely because they are so rare.  A much more dangerous sport is cross country in equestrian eventing.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2020, 09:21:02 am by wilber »
"Never trust a man without a single redeeming vice" WSC

Offline Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #190 on: February 18, 2020, 09:29:21 am »
Waugh... I started this thread drift by accident...

Back on track now...

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8856
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #191 on: February 18, 2020, 10:48:46 am »
Waugh... I started this thread drift by accident...

Back on track now...

yes you did (not by accident)... but it didn't start with you showcasing you're a NASCAR luvin' good ole' boy... it started earlier with your personalized vanity posts targeting moi! Of course, your thread derailing is sooooo hypocritical in the face of your own lapdogToChazWillyNillyThreadDerailers suspending act!  ;D

carry on - back on track now...

Offline Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #192 on: February 18, 2020, 01:00:28 pm »
yes you did (not by accident)... but it didn't start with you showcasing you're a NASCAR luvin' good ole' boy... it started earlier with your personalized vanity posts targeting moi! Of course, your thread derailing is sooooo hypocritical in the face of your own lapdogToChazWillyNillyThreadDerailers suspending act!  ;D

carry on - back on track now...

No, those were on topic... if experimental.  Kind of like when you take your dog for a walk (on topic) and you talk to him during that walk (off topic) to find out what he's thinking.

Mission accomplished...
Informative Informative x 1 View List

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8856
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #193 on: February 19, 2020, 01:01:29 am »
No, those were on topic... if experimental.  Kind of like when you take your dog for a walk (on topic) and you talk to him during that walk (off topic) to find out what he's thinking.

Mission accomplished...

 ;D I did naziThatComing! So... a "mission accomplished" thread derail is just fine if off-topic comments are simply searching for the thoughts of others! You've certainly come a long way from your days as a gestapoModeratingChazPuppet... at the other place!

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8856
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #194 on: February 19, 2020, 01:01:44 am »
waldo recap: today, weakAndy continued his pining for a violent end to the Mohawk/Wet'suet'en protests... continued to press for PM Trudeau to direct police intervention. Scheer extended beyond his earlier comments where he told Indigenous protesters/allies to “check their privilege”... now today, outright calling them, "radical activists aimed at the destruction of the Canadian energy industry". For good measure, mmmKay labeled them "thugs"! Just the required collective CPC measured tone needed!  ;D

why it seems PM Trudeau (and other oppoLeaders Singh, May & Blanchet) went so far as to 'eject a protestor' from today's related ad-hoc meeting of party leaders convened by PM Trudeau!

Quote from: Liberal Party leader - PM Trudeau
Mr. Scheer disqualified himself from constructive discussions with his unacceptable speech earlier today
Quote from: Green Party leader - Elizabeth May
Mr. Scheer was excluded because the speech he gave following the PM's statement was viewed as disqualifying him from participation in a discussion on how to find solutions.
Quote from: NDP Party leader - Jagmeet Singh
Scheer's speech on the blockades this morning was reprehensible. What he said was divisive. It was purposely designed to pit some groups against another - and to me it needs to be denounced. What he is suggesting is not a way forward

as a topper, self-labeled "True Blue" O'Toole was just livid that Scheer wasn't at the meeting... sending off this twitter zinger: