Author Topic: BC v Wet'suet'en  (Read 11593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Granny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #375 on: March 03, 2020, 04:21:56 pm »
I'm shocked that your, "seemed to be", is completely self-serving intended to fit with your agenda - shocked I tells ya! You can't support this madeUpShyte of yours... you can't quote/link to an OPP statement advising the Mohawk protestors were adhering to the terms of the injunction - you can't, right?

If you're interested in facts, you can google it as easily as I can. If you just want to do a smear job, you won't bother. 

This is certainly interesting: To extend the injunction, the only photo CN could provide with something blocking the tracks ... included OPP attending a learning session.  Lol  Otherwise, CN had nothing.

https://aptnnews.ca/2020/02/19/how-cn-rail-got-its-injunction-against-tyendinaga-mohawks/

Then CN provides the only photo in any of its court filings that clearly shows the Mohawks on the tracks.

“A photograph was taken showing protestors standing by a long table that has been placed in the middle of Wyman Road Crossing. Indigenous cultural items, including two wampum belts, were placed on the long table. A protestor is holding a Mohawk Warrior flag,” wrote Knorz in this second affidavit, sworn Feb. 12.

There’s also media on the tracks, as well as members of OPP who were meeting with the Mohawks. The 113-page affidavit doesn’t mention this. Only a brief description of the encounter is found in the daily log filed separately.


Quote
no - PM Trudeau/cabinet ministers most certainly, most assuredly, DID NOT direct the police to do anything. You've been called out on this and, per your norm, you resort to GishGallop! You have no credibility - none. I mean, c'mon, you're the braniac who has repeatedly run with a wildAss Facebook originated claim that CN put one of it's own vehicles on a track, took a picture of that vehicle, and then used it as the principal causal tie to secure the injunction! That was YOU!  ;D

No, I guess they decided not to use that one.  Lol

I don't think you're really interested in accurate information, waldo.
You have a political agenda that isn't swayed by facts.  Lol
I don't think you're helpful to your boy Trudeau either.
Disrespecting hereditary Wet'suet'en Chiefs while the feds have recognized them and are negotiating rights and titles issues with them?
Not helpful.

As for governments directing the operations of the police ... I'm just glad that they are now aware, and so is the public, that they can't legally do that. Police necessarily operate independently of government.

Otherwise we'd be a country where politicians in power would be jailing members of opposing political parties, and anyone else who criticizes or protests them.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2020, 06:29:09 pm by Granny »