Author Topic: BC v Wet'suet'en  (Read 11595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8715
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #375 on: March 03, 2020, 12:55:59 pm »
in recent days, railway tracks owned by both CN Rail & CP Rail have had "protectors" attempt to set the tracks on fire with pallets and/or tires. Now some, certainly not the waldo, are drawing further conclusions:

Did you read where it is not connected to the Wet'suet'en issue, waldo?

By failing to clarify, you are being inflammatory, part of the racist propaganda machine.

as stated, some... are drawing further conclusions... but certainly not the waldo! Try reading, hey!

now, point in fact, yes, across all manner of social media and blogs and into comment sections of mainstream coverage, further conclusions have been drawn. The waldo suspects that fine outstanding work of the "protectors" trying to set fire to tracks, trying to derail trains... might have something to do with conclusions being drawn - yes? And by the by, I just checked: from the most recent RCMP statement, I read, "a motive has not yet been determined... but it is thought the fire has no affinity with/to the blockades" - it is thought! Why that sure doesn't line up with your most definitive statement, does it ever porkyTellingGranny - does it?