and the example I offered... the 5 hereditary chiefs of the largest Wet'suet'en clan that were also Band Councillors during the 5+ years of negotiations (aka consult duty)? How selective and self-serving of you to continue to ignore that point I've stated, several times now.
again, you speak of "discussions": do you interpret it is the responsibility of the Crown/industry to reconcile differing views/opinions within the Wet'suet'en... to ascertain just who the participants should be within the Wet'suet'en... to determine just who the 'deciders' should be within the Wet'suet'en? Is there no responsibility of/onus on the Wet'suet'en to reach consensus within their own ranks?
Waldo, the Crown has a duty to consult with Aboriginal rights and title holders. That is clear.
Internal arrangements are their business.
I've seen no data indicating that a majority of Wet'suet'en Nation people voted for anything, but again, those are internal matters.
Your cherry-picking criticisms are irrelevant.
Your smear about "train derailing blockades" is just a racist smear. Nobody has taken such risks.
Home
Contact
Login
Register