Author Topic: BC v Wet'suet'en  (Read 1838 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline waldo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5047
Re: BC v Wet'suet'en
« Reply #45 on: February 12, 2020, 05:03:12 pm »
All are part of the discussions, all belong to the Wet'suet'en Nation, and the Chiefs and title holders  should have also been consulted by the Crown.

and the example I offered... the 5 hereditary chiefs of the largest Wet'suet'en clan that were also Band Councillors during the 5+ years of negotiations (aka consult duty)? How selective and self-serving of you to continue to ignore that point I've stated, several times now.

again, you speak of "discussions": do you interpret it is the responsibility of the Crown/industry to reconcile differing views/opinions within the Wet'suet'en... to ascertain just who the participants should be within the Wet'suet'en... to determine just who the 'deciders' should be within the Wet'suet'en? Is there no responsibility of/onus on the Wet'suet'en to reach consensus within their own ranks?