Canadian Politics Today
Federal Politics => Canadian Politics => Topic started by: waldo on February 28, 2022, 04:09:32 am
-
so Poilievre (aka skippy) announces his intent to run for... PM - yes, that's right, for Prime Minister; apparently, he's skipping that pesky CPC leadership thingee!
(https://i.imgur.com/Zm3TgZV.gif)
oh my! Of late, is there anything more cringeworthy than this announcement (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1490088463894339584/vid/1280x720/TfZoJbW8poMwS5Ch.mp4?tag=14) - that oddly is released in the 'dead of a Friday night'!
but really, c'mon which skippy will be running:
- the guy needing to secure {enough} caucus endorsements to ease the CPC leadership convention path; and/or
- the guy needing to play to the far-right CPC members just to win the CPC leadership, or
- the guy needing to balance the membership want against an eventual CPC national candidate... you know, one that can actually get elected while faking a shift to the moderate centre; a move that neither Scheer or O'Toole could manage!
-
Jean Charest - please save us from these people...
(https://i.imgur.com/RoJJ33M.gif)
notwithstanding Poilievre's self-coronation as PM, the as yet unconfirmed Charest is said to be 'contemplating' a run for the CPC leadership... speaking of, a recent open letter signed by Conservative/CPC MPs and senators calling on Jean Charest, the former premier of Quebec, to run for leadership of the Conservative party. Full text of the letter:
(https://i.imgur.com/NMB1WJ2.gif)
-
#pigeonPierre held the high profile assignment as the 'Finance Critic' for the CPC Opposition... in the HOC regularly going up against former Finance Minister Morneau, then moving on to Finance Minister Freeland. As Vice-Chair of the Finance Committee, Poilievre was always in the news... was regularly sought out by the media for comment on matters before the committee. Ever the snarky one, ever the one to throw barbs, to mock, to ridicule... Over time criticism of his "style" eventually caught up to him and Poilievre's time finally ran out as he lost this plum assignment... this key job/role.
even in the face of criticism from Poilievre, Prime Minister Trudeau showed his caring and expressed empathy for Poilievre losing his job in the throes of the pandemic! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1369837295629561859/pu/vid/1280x720/Gi3m6lheMUM3CakX.mp4?tag=12)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENgrHc-XkAAQn2y?format=jpg&name=small)
-
on again/off again Finance Shadow Minister #PigeonPierre has made repeated attempts to lay the blame for Canada's increased inflation rate on PM Trudeau and Liberal government policies/actions... with the ever repeating collective CPC nattering/use of the phrase & tag JustinFlation! Of course this nonsense was so easily dispatched by those experts from across the political spectrum, including prominent conservative pundits and the most profiled Canadian economists who stated the current inflation increase has almost nothing to do with the federal government’s policies. Notwithstanding current inflation is a global phenomenon Poilievre would have Canadians believe PM Trudeau's reach and influence is, apparently, global in impacting upon and acting to create the same increased inflation rates found in the U.S., in Germany, in the UK, etc.!
of course the real causes of the current increased inflation reflect upon and are being driven by, in the near term, the pandemic and its impact on everything from oil and gas prices to supply chains. And, of course, one of the more prolific longer term drivers of inflation is climate change - something CPC/Poilievre wants nothing to do with in terms of acknowledging the threat and economic impacts of! More pointedly, the CPC/Poilievre are wanting to emphasize one of their key perceived reasons for increased inflation as one tied to Liberal government deficit pandemic spending in support of Canadians... certainly something that, according to #PigeonPierre, would never happen if Conservatives were 'in charge'! Who can forget this spanking Minister Freeland gave Poilievre in that very regard, where he outright stated:
You may want to address COVID-19 with big fat government programs; we're conservatives, we don't believe in that!
Deputy Prime Minister Freeland reminds the CPC MP for Carleton, Pierre Poilievre, what he said when asked what support the government should offer to Canadians hurt by the pandemic: (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1309527370781523968/pu/vid/1272x720/7_AsH2XuTTuV4Z-Q.mp4?tag=10)
-
again, over & over, CPC MP Poilievre keeps presenting himself as not just the defacto leader of the CPC, but as 'running for Prime Minister'... that, apparently, he's expecting a coronation rather than an actual CPC leadership contest... and he's quite desperate in attempting to shift the narrative away from his most overt display of support for the 'Freedum Convoy'!
(https://i.imgur.com/dZo25t0.jpg)
-
so Poilievre (aka skippy) announces his intent to run for... PM - yes, that's right, for Prime Minister; apparently, he's skipping that pesky CPC leadership thingee!
(https://i.imgur.com/Zm3TgZV.gif)
oh my! Of late, is there anything more cringeworthy than this announcement (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1490088463894339584/vid/1280x720/TfZoJbW8poMwS5Ch.mp4?tag=14) - that oddly is released in the 'dead of a Friday night'!
but really, c'mon which skippy will be running:
- the guy needing to secure {enough} caucus endorsements to ease the CPC leadership convention path; and/or
- the guy needing to play to the far-right CPC members just to win the CPC leadership, or
- the guy needing to balance the membership want against an eventual CPC national candidate... you know, one that can actually get elected while faking a shift to the moderate centre; a move that neither Scheer or O'Toole could manage!
Is there anything more cringeworthy? Have you ever watched a Justin Trudeau press conference? Or question period? Or debate? Or speech?
-
Also, good idea on the uncensored thread. We may have to do that with other ones as well, to avoid the squidiot's ridiculous behavior.
-
We are at a time when we no longer have the luxury of having this culture-warrior types in leadership roles.
Trudeau doesn't even invoke wokeness very much anymore for obvious reasons: 1) He ain't woke and 2) He has had to deal with massive emergencies on a global scale
Then these pea-shooters like Poilievre show up and want to talk like it's 2016....
We don't need them.
I don't know what a Charest would bring to the Conservatives but it wouldn't be culture war... except possibly to appease the balcony seats...
-
We are at a time when we no longer have the luxury of having this culture-warrior types in leadership roles.
Trudeau doesn't even invoke wokeness very much anymore for obvious reasons: 1) He ain't woke and 2) He has had to deal with massive emergencies on a global scale
Then these pea-shooters like Poilievre show up and want to talk like it's 2016....
We don't need them.
I don't know what a Charest would bring to the Conservatives but it wouldn't be culture war... except possibly to appease the balcony seats...
I don't see Pollievre as a culture warrior, I see him as a bread and butter leader. Kitchen table issues are his forte. Inflation, housing, energy, etc. Now it is true that Trudeau, is his efforts to remain in power, has turned some of these, like energy into cultural issues. But they shouldn't be.
-
1. I don't see Pollievre as a culture warrior, I see him as a bread and butter leader. Kitchen table issues are his forte. Inflation, housing, energy, etc.
2. Now it is true that Trudeau, is his efforts to remain in power, has turned some of these, like energy into cultural issues. But they shouldn't be.
1. Well as a Centrist, I don't see any of that in his comms
2. Trudeau turned energy into a culture issue ? You mean when he bought the pipeline ? 🤔
-
so... no coronation after all! Skippy has announced 4 "principled & thoughtful" co-chairs for his CPC leader campaign. Once again John Baird, multi-portfolio Harper cabinet minister, surfaces - is someone sniffin' about for a Senate appointment - ya think, hey waldo?
(https://i.imgur.com/JfqAXjy.gif)
-
Also, good idea on the uncensored thread. We may have to do that with other ones as well, to avoid the squidiot's ridiculous behavior.
no worries member Shady - this thread covet's your active participation - freedom of expression rules above & beyond that censoring member squiggy!
-
We are at a time when we no longer have the luxury of having this culture-warrior types in leadership roles.
Trudeau doesn't even invoke wokeness very much anymore for obvious reasons: 1) He ain't woke and 2) He has had to deal with massive emergencies on a global scale
Then these pea-shooters like Poilievre show up and want to talk like it's 2016....
We don't need them.
I don't know what a Charest would bring to the Conservatives but it wouldn't be culture war... except possibly to appease the balcony seats...
Is Pierre a culture warrior, or just annoying? Which is also sorta his job in grilling the gov as member of the opposition.
I don't like Pierre. He reeks of used car salesman. But I don't really know much about his positions. He seems like a very prototypical conservative.
-
Is Pierre a culture warrior, or just annoying? Which is also sorta his job in grilling the gov as member of the opposition.
I don't like Pierre. He reeks of used car salesman. But I don't really know much about his positions. He seems like a very prototypical conservative.
Exactly. He gets under the skin of Trudeau and his supporters because he’s funny, witty and ruthless and also annoying in his questioning of the government. His policies are mostly monetary in nature. One of the benefits of him as conservative leader is he takes a big chunk of support from PPC, rendering Bernier as mostly irrelevant, and significantly eliminating the vote splitting.
-
Exactly. He gets under the skin of Trudeau and his supporters because he’s funny, witty and ruthless and also annoying in his questioning of the government. His policies are mostly monetary in nature. One of the benefits of him as conservative leader is he takes a big chunk of support from PPC, rendering Bernier as mostly irrelevant, and significantly eliminating the vote splitting.
He may get 3 out of PPC's 5% but he's gonna cost the CPC a lot of moderate votes. You guys are really bad at this.
You should've kept O'Toole but I guess he wasn't batshit crazy enough.
-
He talks like a culture warrior but it's hard to figure out what exactly he's about.
Optics: posting in a shiny new Canada Goose coat with smirking convoyers, strong critic of Liberals on China
Actual: never had a real job, he has a degree in economics
Not sure what to make of this, but not much to like so far...
-
He may get 3 out of PPC's 5% but he's gonna cost the CPC a lot of moderate votes. You guys are really bad at this.
You should've kept O'Toole but I guess he wasn't batshit crazy enough.
Complete nonsense.
-
He talks like a culture warrior but it's hard to figure out what exactly he's about.
Optics: posting in a shiny new Canada Goose coat with smirking convoyers, strong critic of Liberals on China
Actual: never had a real job, he has a degree in economics
Not sure what to make of this, but not much to like so far...
Trudeau talks like a cultural warrior. Every day.
-
What...about...Trudeau?
-
CPC announces rules for leadership campaign/election... with Sept 10th announcement date, opts not to accept "front runner" Poilievre's calls for a short period before his election!
(https://i.imgur.com/DdLm59y.gif)
-
CPC announces rules for leadership campaign/election... with Sept 10th announcement date, opts not to accept "front runner" Poilievre's calls for a short period before his election!
(https://i.imgur.com/DdLm59y.gif)
Kinda like Trudeau’s snap election! 😂
-
He talks like a culture warrior but it's hard to figure out what exactly he's about.
Optics: posting in a shiny new Canada Goose coat with smirking convoyers, strong critic of Liberals on China
Actual: never had a real job, he has a degree in economics
Not sure what to make of this, but not much to like so far...
Every single person who wears a Canada Goose jacket is an idiot or a d-bag. Thems cost over $1000. Also, geese and coyote are literally the most plentiful animals in Canada and cities want to cull them due to overpopulation, so wtf are you paying for?
Bourgie people are annoying.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/vxzgwZj.png)
Left frame: Michelle Rempel posts a column talking about how the World Economic Forum is a magnet for conspiracy-kooks and isn't influencing Canadian lawmakers.
Right frame: Pierre Poilievre in the HoC ranting about how the World Economic Forum is influencing Canadian lawmakers.
Rempel's column about how the WEF doesn't deserve the anxiety it apparently causes conspiracy-kooks:
https://theline.substack.com/p/michelle-rempel-garner-i-went-to?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=url&s=r
-k
-
wait, what? Back to skipping the CPC leadership step... video of Poilievre back to 'running for Prime Minister'! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1499526013964800031/pu/vid/720x720/XXENrOMLCSQxHHGb.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/bjo13l1.gif)
-
Rempel's column about how the WEF doesn't deserve the anxiety it apparently causes conspiracy-kooks:
https://theline.substack.com/p/michelle-rempel-garner-i-went-to?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=url&s=r
-k
Yeah, I thought I posted that here ?
A great column and we need centre-right people like her to explain this to the kookies because they don't listen to anyone who isn't conservative party...
-
Every single person who wears a Canada Goose jacket is an idiot or a d-bag. Thems cost over $1000. Also, geese and coyote are literally the most plentiful animals in Canada and cities want to cull them due to overpopulation, so wtf are you paying for?
Bourgie people are annoying.
They keep out the cold very well. They’re also trendy, but before that, they were still expensive and still worked well.
I don’t own one, but I sure wish I had one when I was in Yellowknife in -50…. My west coast garb sucked.
-
Yeah, I thought I posted that here ?
A great column and we need centre-right people like her to explain this to the kookies because they don't listen to anyone who isn't conservative party...
They won't listen to the Honourable Member from Oklahoma either.
-
They keep out the cold very well. They’re also trendy, but before that, they were still expensive and still worked well.
Also manufactured in Canada. And a good quality parka can last a lifetime.
-
wait, what? Back to skipping the CPC leadership step... video of Poilievre back to 'running for Prime Minister'! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1499526013964800031/pu/vid/720x720/XXENrOMLCSQxHHGb.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/bjo13l1.gif)
What a concept huh? It’s gonna be weird to have a PM that actually helps the middle class.
-
oh snap! Skippy has an endorsement from, "Great Canadian statesman", weakAndy!
(https://i.imgur.com/TfLPKcO.gif)
-
Our federal leaders are all weaksauce. I'm embarrassed for my country.
Being PM is the worst job in Canada. Half the country hates you. Your kids are harassed and bullied at school. Only a mentally ill person would apply for this job, so here we are...
-
Isn’t this kind of a big deal? He had to drop out of the race because of this.
[attachimg=1]
-
Our federal leaders are all weaksauce. I'm embarrassed for my country.
Being PM is the worst job in Canada. Half the country hates you. Your kids are harassed and bullied at school. Only a mentally ill person would apply for this job, so here we are...
That’s why I kind of liked Kevin O’Leary.
-
Isn’t this kind of a big deal? He had to drop out of the race because of this.
She misrepresented the facts and said she was just under 18 and it turned out, apparently, she was just over 18. You can't expect the media to conspiratorially keep it hush-hush and not report on what she said. That's not how it works
-
That’s why I kind of liked Kevin O’Leary.
He's a sleaze bag.
-
Press Progress/Mitchell Thompson - March 9,2022 --- re: CPC Conservative MP Dean Allison (Niagara West)
quite the record of anti-vaccine petitions:
- to ban COVID-19 vaccines for all Canadian adults of 'child-bearing age'
- calling for a ban on mRNA vaccines
- to make Ivermectin 'available to all Canadians'
(https://i.imgur.com/wp3ra62.gif)
-
Press Progress/Mitchell Thompson - March 9,2022 --- re: CPC Conservative MP Dean Allison (Niagara West)
quite the record of anti-vaccine petitions:
- to ban COVID-19 vaccines for all Canadian adults of 'child-bearing age'
- calling for a ban on mRNA vaccines
- to make Ivermectin 'available to all Canadians'
(https://i.imgur.com/wp3ra62.gif)
For pregnant women. Sounds like the right thing to do, especially after Pfizer’s recent document dump. Err on the side of caution. That’s not anti vaccine.
-
She misrepresented the facts and said she was just under 18 and it turned out, apparently, she was just over 18. You can't expect the media to conspiratorially keep it hush-hush and not report on what she said. That's not how it works
He was railroaded because he was taking the party to the centre. Something DoFo has had to do anyway.
I hope he wins leadership, but it'll be tough considering who's running the CPC nowadays.
He's good at growing the party. Currently he's the mayor of one of the Ontario 905 cities that they'll need to win a National Campaign.
-
For pregnant women. Sounds like the right thing to do, especially after Pfizer’s recent document dump. Err on the side of caution. That’s not anti vaccine.
And all adults of child-bearing age.
-
And all adults of child-bearing age.
I don’t see that in the picture posted. What does child bearing age have to do with men?
-
I don’t see that in the picture posted. What does child bearing age have to do with men?
From the petition (https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-3696):
We, the undersigned, Citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to suspend the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, children, youth, and adults of child-bearing age until the ongoing short- and long-term safety trials are fully completed and published in peer-reviewed journals.
-
From the petition (https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-3696):
Thanks. The image waldo posted didn’t have that in it. That’s still not anti vaccine. How is wanting a medicine to go through the normal approval process complete with peer review anti-vaxx? Answer. It’s not. It’s completely reasonable. I understand that it’s a position you people disagree with, but it’s not a ridiculous request, and doesn’t fit the definition of anti-vaxx.
-
Thanks. The image waldo posted didn’t have that in it. That’s still not anti vaccine. How is wanting a medicine to go through the normal approval process complete with peer review anti-vaxx? Answer. It’s not. It’s completely reasonable. I understand that it’s a position you people disagree with, but it’s not a ridiculous request, and doesn’t fit the definition of anti-vaxx.
Demanding a halt to a vaccine that has been peer reviewed and proven safe and effective based on spurious claims of its harms is an anti-vaxx position.
Of course this particular MPP has spread COVID disinformation in the past as well.
-
and then there were 5 in the CPC leadership race!
Patrick Brown - current mayor of Brampton since 2018; former leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario; Ontario's Leader of the Official Opposition from 2015 to 2018, joins the race already populated by:
- former federal Progressive Conservative leader Jean Charest; former Quebec Premier
- Ontario CPC MP Pierre Poilievre
- Ontario CPC MP Leslyn Lewis
- Ontario Independent MPP Roman Baber
and 'out of the chute' comes the Poilievre campaign advisor Jenni Byrne with an attack ad: 'Patrick Brown will say and do anything (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1503016634566516742/pu/vid/1280x720/-BvRSYIX6fhfZjh-.mp4?tag=12)'
-
(https://i.imgur.com/a5i8oCq.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/Du08ZUM.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/1heylex.gif)
-
I'm liking this. The centrists on the attack can only help the quality of Dialogue.
I noticed that Dr. Pepper has come out with a plan to 'fast track' immigration. I can't wait to hear the reaction.
-
I'm liking this. The centrists on the attack can only help the quality of Dialogue.
I noticed that Dr. Pepper has come out with a plan to 'fast track' immigration. I can't wait to hear the reaction.
I really hope Patrick Brown wins. And also Pray that he doesn't get railroaded by his own party again.
Dude is the mayor of one of the most multicultural cities in Canada, and an important 905 city to boot.
He has to be the most broadly electable Conservative I've seen since Harper.
-
I really hope Patrick Brown wins. And also Pray that he doesn't get railroaded by his own party again.
Dude is the mayor of one of the most multicultural cities in Canada, and an important 905 city to boot.
He has to be the most broadly electable Conservative I've seen since Harper.
Harper won his majority with only 3% more of the votes than the Cons got in the last election.
Funny, eh? The “broadly electable” Harper received barely any more votes than that failure O’Toole.
-
I really hope Patrick Brown wins. And also Pray that he doesn't get railroaded by his own party again.
Dude is the mayor of one of the most multicultural cities in Canada, and an important 905 city to boot.
He has to be the most broadly electable Conservative I've seen since Harper.
Any conservative has to throw bones to the ignoramuses and so I doubt I will vote for him either.
I need a Tory the colour of my boy's butt after a spanking...
(Kidding, I doubt that that exists and I don't spank Easy)
-
Harper won his majority with only 3% more of the votes than the Cons got in the last election.
Funny, eh? The “broadly electable” Harper received barely any more votes than that failure O’Toole.
Broadly electable does mean something. Who cares if more Westerners hate JT so much and juices the parties popular vote.
Harper was able to win in Quebec and Ontario. Scheer and O'Toole were not.
-
Broadly electable does mean something. Who cares if more Westerners hate JT so much and juices the parties popular vote.
Harper was able to win in Quebec and Ontario. Scheer and O'Toole were not.
You’re definition of “winning Quebec” is rather odd. The Cons (Harper) won 5 seats in Quebec when they last got a majority government.
You should take more of a dive into the numbers…. I love numbers…. They don’t lie. My takeaway is that the NDP did so well that they siphoned away Liberal seats allowing the Cons (Harper) to win a majority of seats due to the vote splitting.
I don’t think you can look at that election and come away with the conclusion that it was because Harper was “broadly electable”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Canadian_federal_election
-
Harper won his majority with only 3% more of the votes than the Cons got in the last election.
Funny, eh? The “broadly electable” Harper received barely any more votes than that failure O’Toole.
Its the nature of Canadian democracy... with at least 3 viable parties in every riding and the first-past-the-post selection method, even a small change in the popular vote can cause large swings in electability.
And Harper got ~40% of the popular vote when he won a majority. O'Toole got ~34%. A difference of 6% of the popular vote.
-
Its the nature of Canadian democracy... with at least 3 viable parties in every riding and the first-past-the-post selection method, even a small change in the popular vote can cause large swings in electability.
Yes, absolutely agreed. That’s why I think looking at Harper and saying he was “broadly electable” is looking at such small differences and drawing conclusions that are not really valid, in my opinion.
If Harper had Mulroney-like numbers, I would agree…. Broadly electable. But he was nowhere close and his majority was mainly due to a surge in NDP popularity.
And Harper got ~40% of the popular vote when he won a majority. O'Toole got ~34%. A difference of 6% of the popular vote.
Mea culpa. You’re right. 6%. Still a pretty small difference.
-
And Harper got ~40% of the popular vote when he won a majority. O'Toole got ~34%. A difference of 6% of the popular vote.
Mea culpa. You’re right. 6%. Still a pretty small difference.
Is it? Maybe if you look at percentage of popular vote, but you can also look at it as a percentage of the conservative vote... That 6% shift in popular vote represents an ~15% drop in conservative support.
-
I get the feeling that the base will not support Peter PepperLips if he starts out as pro-immigrant.
Thank you Patrick Brown.
-
You’re definition of “winning Quebec” is rather odd. The Cons (Harper) won 5 seats in Quebec when they last got a majority government.
You should take more of a dive into the numbers…. I love numbers…. They don’t lie. My takeaway is that the NDP did so well that they siphoned away Liberal seats allowing the Cons (Harper) to win a majority of seats due to the vote splitting.
I don’t think you can look at that election and come away with the conclusion that it was because Harper was “broadly electable”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Canadian_federal_election
Your claim is that Harper was only marginally more popular than this losing lot. I'm claiming that Harper was more electable in the areas that mattered.
Harper did well in Suburban Toronto. This is where I live, so I may think highly of my demographic, but the "905" is the ultimately bell weather region.
This gives Brown a distinct advantage in a National election being a politician who currently represents part of this region.
-
Yes, absolutely agreed. That’s why I think looking at Harper and saying he was “broadly electable” is looking at such small differences and drawing conclusions that are not really valid, in my opinion.
If Harper had Mulroney-like numbers, I would agree…. Broadly electable. But he was nowhere close and his majority was mainly due to a surge in NDP popularity.
Mea culpa. You’re right. 6%. Still a pretty small difference.
So then I ask, Is JT broadly electable? Considering he's actually lost two popular votes in a row.
-
So then I ask, Is JT broadly electable? Considering he's actually lost two popular votes in a row.
Good point. Broad support might mean support across the country to win seats, rather than popular vote.
Point taken.
-
I will speculate and say that if Brown or Charest win the party nomination, we will see another western “reform” party offshoot due to the whacky Albertans being pissed-off.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/BiwBDbz.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/jI6ITjB.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/jI6ITjB.jpg)
He might have a point if Justin was a serious person. But he’s not. He’s a clown.
-
He might have a point if Justin was a serious person. But he’s not. He’s a clown.
A clown who has won three straight national elections.
-
A clown who has won three straight national elections.
A clown that’s lost the popular vote twice in a row.
-
A clown that’s lost the popular vote twice in a row.
A win is a win.
-
A win is a win.
Yes, he wins by losing. It’s a great system we have.
-
Yes, he wins by losing. It’s a great system we have.
It's a bad system, but oddly the Tories don't seem interested in changing it, probably because they know they would never win a majority government again.
-
He might have a point if Justin was a serious person. But he’s not. He’s a clown.
so your retort to Andrew Coyne's analysis calling for a serious Conservative leader is to... whatabout PM #3peatTrudeau?
A clown that’s lost the popular vote twice in a row.
again, yours is a loses lament! Popular vote is for loses! It's a consolation "prize"... like a participation ribbon! Again, the CPC vote numbers were minimally greater than the Liberals: in 2019 ~220K votes greater; in 2021 ~186K votes greater. Those numbers are hardly HUUUUUGE and in relation to other parties and respective provincial outcomes are principally "skewed" by one province - Alberta!
consensus seems to be that Poilievre (if he wins) will similarly carry these, uhhh... disgruntled votes from Alberta. But as Andrew Coyne writes, it will take a serious Conservative leader to convince a 'nervous' electorate that he/she has the character & judgment to win. You know, from the linked image/article that you completely ignored!
Shoot, I forgot, you people only care about the popular vote when a Republican is involved. 😂 Is Justin 1 for 3 in popular vote?
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT!
again, popular vote means diddlySquat. That being said, as I showed with that 2021 election result graphic, you're pining over a measly ~186,000 votes! What you referred to as a significant amount! LOL!
again: #Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
(https://i.imgur.com/Qya8NPL.jpeg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/BiwBDbz.jpg)
Gary Mason must have read my post here before writing the article!
-
so your retort to Andrew Coyne's analysis calling for a serious Conservative leader is to... whatabout PM #3peatTrudeau?
again, yours is a loses lament! Popular vote is for loses! It's a consolation "prize"... like a participation ribbon! Again, the CPC vote numbers were minimally greater than the Liberals: in 2019 ~220K votes greater; in 2021 ~186K votes greater. Those numbers are hardly HUUUUUGE and in relation to other parties and respective provincial outcomes are principally "skewed" by one province - Alberta!
consensus seems to be that Poilievre (if he wins) will similarly carry these, uhhh... disgruntled votes from Alberta. But as Andrew Coyne writes, it will take a serious Conservative leader to convince a 'nervous' electorate that he/she has the character & judgment to win. You know, from the linked image/article that you completely ignored!
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT!
again, popular vote means diddlySquat. That being said, as I showed with that 2021 election result graphic, you're pining over a measly ~186,000 votes! What you referred to as a significant amount! LOL!
again: #Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
(https://i.imgur.com/Qya8NPL.jpeg)
I think Harper is 1 win 1 lose to Trudeau. At least Harper won the popular vote each election he won. Regardless, that doesn’t take away from Trudeau being a complete clown. He is. He’s not a serious person. So Coynes point is moot.
-
Regardless, that doesn’t take away from Trudeau being a complete clown. He is. He’s not a serious person. So Coynes point is moot.
Trudeau being a clown has literally nothing to do with Coyne's point.
-
She misrepresented the facts and said she was just under 18 and it turned out, apparently, she was just over 18. You can't expect the media to conspiratorially keep it hush-hush and not report on what she said. That's not how it works
Patrick Brown was thrown out as Ontario PC leader because the accusation that he'd sexually preyed on a high-school girl was so inflammatory that he was deemed completely radioactive to the party.
And then when the truth comes out, we find that the real story is that an unmarried 28 year old man met a 19 year old woman at a bar and they went back to his place. Deprived of the sensationalist "highschool girl" aspect, the story is such a non-story that one has to wonder why CTV was in such a rush to publish a story that they hadn't finished fact-checking.
Here's Gerald Butts, of all people, talking about the situation last week:
(https://i.imgur.com/KQtOWHG.png)
One of the strangest things about Brown's execution at the hands of his own caucus is that it was far-right kook and Nazi-adjacent scumbag Randy Hillier acting as the axe-man:
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/the-phone-call-that-ended-patrick-browns-leadership/
Gerald Butts hit a key point in his tweets: this "clusterfuzzle" ultimately just undermines the credibility of real victims of sexual harrassment. Ultimately, #MeToo was derailed and disgraced by people like this. They took something that was supposed to help women, and maliciously exploited it for cynical purposes, and played a part in tearing it down. It was disgusting and it still is. The people involved in this should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
This is CNN journalist Ashleigh Banfield, talking about salacious but insubstantial accusations made against Aziz Ansari. Just change the name "Aziz Ansari" to "Patrick Brown" and she could easily be talking about this accuser as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4bAULTwAJU
-k
-
Patrick Brown would have been a great Premiere. I hope he becomes PM.
DoFo has to play from his playbook when the pandemic hit.
-
.This is CNN journalist Ashleigh Banfield, talking about salacious but insubstantial accusations made against Aziz Ansari. Just change the name "Aziz Ansari" to "Patrick Brown" and she could easily be talking about this accuser as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4bAULTwAJU
-k
On a somewhat unrelated note, a friend of mine in high school briefly dated Ashleigh Banfield in Grade 11 and I met her many times. I have no interesting stories about her though. She seemed pretty normal, even though she hung with punk rockers.
-
and then there were 5 in the CPC leadership race!
Patrick Brown - current mayor of Brampton since 2018; former leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario; Ontario's Leader of the Official Opposition from 2015 to 2018, joins the race already populated by:
- former federal Progressive Conservative leader; former Quebec Premier, Jean Charest
- Ontario CPC MP, Pierre Poilievre
- Ontario CPC MP, Leslyn Lewis
- Ontario Independent MPP, Roman Baber
joining the CPC leadership race... now making it 7 candidates:
- Saskatchewan businessman & founder of 'Canadians for Truth', Joseph Bourgault
- former MP for Parry Sound—Muskoka Ontario; former mayor of Huntsville Ontario, Scott Aitchison
-
Too bad Tommy Chong said no.
Patrick Brown is the best hope for a non insane parliament.
-
certainly the waldo has been very critical of CPC MP Michelle Rempel (aka the member from Oklahoma, Buffalo Gal)... but more recently Rempel seems to be working to "refine" her positioning and perceived image - most notably of late actually skewering those Conservatives with conspiracy designs against the World Economic Forum, although she never directly mentions Poilievre by name. In any case, the waldo was not anticipating this move by CPC leadership candidate Patrick Brown in announcing Rempel as his campaign's co-chair:
(https://i.imgur.com/5y9XVRu.gif)
-
That's some good Western representation by PB. Great strategic move.
How can Westerners, in good conscience, vote for a guy name Pierre.
-
and now 8 running for the CPC leadership... BC CPC MP; former BC Liberal MLA, Marc Dalton joining:
- current mayor of Brampton; former leader of Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party, Patrick Brown
- former federal Progressive Conservative leader; former Quebec Premier, Jean Charest
- Ontario CPC MP, Pierre Poilievre
- Ontario CPC MP, Leslyn Lewis
- Ontario Independent MPP, Roman Baber
- Saskatchewan businessman & founder of 'Canadians for Truth', Joseph Bourgault
- former Ontario CPC MP for Parry Sound—Muskoka; former mayor of Huntsville Ontario, Scott Aitchison
-
Not the right color.
That’s what I was thinking too. They’re not the right colour and aren’t big fans of socialism/communism. So not Liberal voters.
guys, guys... lil' leadership campaign stop here; has Skippy found the/your right colour?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FOSiB-BXwAMfSfv?format=jpg&name=large)
-
guys, guys... lil' leadership campaign stop here; has Skippy found the/your right colour?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FOSiB-BXwAMfSfv?format=jpg&name=large)
Nice dodge!
-
certainly the waldo has been very critical of CPC MP Michelle Rempel (aka the member from Oklahoma, Buffalo Gal)... but more recently Rempel seems to be working to "refine" her positioning and perceived image - most notably of late actually skewering those Conservatives with conspiracy designs against the World Economic Forum, although she never directly mentions Poilievre by name. In any case, the waldo was not anticipating this move by CPC leadership candidate Patrick Brown in announcing Rempel as his campaign's co-chair:
(https://i.imgur.com/5y9XVRu.gif)
She was never the cartoon job you've done of her. She's one of the few in the party who've publicly challenged the Brad Trost, Derek Sloan wing of the party for their dinosaur politics. She's solidly in the "red Tory" mold, and it makes sense that she'd align against Pierre Poillievre.
Some people think that Jean Charest would be the choice of the "PC" wing of the CPC, but I just can't see it. His event in Vancouver didn't even draw as many people as my last Blonde Lives Matter teach-in, which was basically just me talking to my cat. Charest couldn't even get any cats to come to his event. Just a empty chairs and somebody who took pictures of empty chairs.
-k
-
She was never the cartoon job you've done of her.
it writes itself! Speaking of, here's candidate skippy at a recent rally leading the charge to, 'Defund The CBC' (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1508486682261299200/vid/720x720/D54DYTyIWyH6Gf91.mp4?tag=14) ... hitting all the notes!
-
it writes itself! Speaking of, here's candidate skippy at a recent rally leading the charge to, 'Defund The CBC' (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1508486682261299200/vid/720x720/D54DYTyIWyH6Gf91.mp4?tag=14) ... hitting all the notes!
The CBC should be 100% ideologically and politically neutral in content or abolished. Just the facts, yo. Those are the only 2 democratic options available (that I can think of). If you disagree with me you probably have a political motive. If you'll notice, most people who do disagree are on one side of the ideological spectrum.
I see no real reason to have a state broadcaster anyways, beyond propoganda of course. We no longer live in a world where the only news people in the middle of nowhere can get is cbc on their TV antenna.
-
1. The CBC should be 100% ideologically and politically neutral in content or abolished.
2. If you'll notice, most people who do disagree are on one side of the ideological spectrum.
3. I see no real reason to have a state broadcaster anyways, beyond propoganda of course.
4. We no longer live in a world where the only news people in the middle of nowhere can get is cbc on their TV antenna.
1. The complaints of bias are negligible at best.
2. 3. Those who want it abolished are at an extreme end of the other side. There are lots of centrists who want to keep it, mostly because PRETTY MUCH EVERY COUNTRY HAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING. And most countries are not culturally dominated by the world's last superpower. Would you not expect Taiwan or Ukraine to have public broadcasting to keep the narrative towards national concerns.
4. Many shared news stories originate in MSM. The fact that onshore propaganda is landing makes the CBC and domestic media ESSENTIAL
-
1. The complaints of bias are negligible at best.
2. 3. Those who want it abolished are at an extreme end of the other side. There are lots of centrists who want to keep it, mostly because PRETTY MUCH EVERY COUNTRY HAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING. And most countries are not culturally dominated by the world's last superpower. Would you not expect Taiwan or Ukraine to have public broadcasting to keep the narrative towards national concerns.
4. Many shared news stories originate in MSM. The fact that onshore propaganda is landing makes the CBC and domestic media ESSENTIAL
So I mistyped. I meant cbc news, not cbc in general. Cbc has a place in our culture. Cbc news is more problematic if editorial bias creeps in.
-
it writes itself! Speaking of, here's candidate skippy at a recent rally leading the charge to, 'Defund The CBC' (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1508486682261299200/vid/720x720/D54DYTyIWyH6Gf91.mp4?tag=14) ... hitting all the notes!
It’s funny listening to any Trudeau sycophant try to belittle any other politician while supporting the most vapid, empty, unserious and child-like prime minister we’ve ever had. Does he still wear his superman socks?! 😂🤣
-
and now 8 running for the CPC leadership... BC CPC MP; former BC Liberal MLA, Marc Dalton joining:
- current mayor of Brampton; former leader of Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party, Patrick Brown
- former federal Progressive Conservative leader; former Quebec Premier, Jean Charest
- Ontario CPC MP, Pierre Poilievre
- Ontario CPC MP, Leslyn Lewis
- Ontario Independent MPP, Roman Baber
- Saskatchewan businessman & founder of 'Canadians for Truth', Joseph Bourgault
- former Ontario CPC MP for Parry Sound—Muskoka; former mayor of Huntsville Ontario, Scott Aitchison
recent additions bringing the CPC leadership candidate count to 11:
- former Ontario CPC MP for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, Leona Alleslev
- Ontario lawyer, Joel Etienne
- Toronto businessman, Bobby Singh
-
geezaz skippy! Is Charest even campaigning?
(https://i.imgur.com/Yq0tk2v.gif)
-
skippy has had a many month's long run of repeatedly casting aspersion towards the 'Bank of Canada'... while at the same time playing up crypto-currency as the alternative. This, THIS from someone presuming to lead a G7 country; one as leading, "the path to personal liberty over the tyranny of government power over Canada's national financial system". It couldn't be more laughable if it wasn't actually a front by pigeonPierre to simply bring in another faction of "the base".
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FPfoEdvXIAAVZbe?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
Poilevre's recent weeks 'grassroots' rallies (so-called 'Freedom Rallies') have been punctuated with the catch-phrase, "Freedom is on the Move"... meanwhile one of the key measures of global freedom was released - the 2021 Human Freedom Index, where Canada ranks 6th (of 165 countries) having moved up 3 ranking positions since the last release of the index:
(https://i.imgur.com/ksris5r.jpg)
-
Poilevre's recent weeks 'grassroots' rallies (so-called 'Freedom Rallies') have been punctuated with the catch-phrase, "Freedom is on the Move"... meanwhile one of the key measures of global freedom was released - the 2021 Human Freedom Index, where Canada ranks 6th (of 165 countries) having moved up 3 ranking positions since the last release of the index:
(https://i.imgur.com/ksris5r.jpg)
Completely meaningless and subjective nonsense. How exactly is the United States ranked 15th but Canada 6th, when the United States, for better or for worse has much more freedom? These lists are based on the subjective criteria based on the opinions of people who compose the list.
-
Completely meaningless and subjective nonsense. How exactly is the United States ranked 15th but Canada 6th, when the United States, for better or for worse has much more freedom? These lists are based on the subjective criteria based on the opinions of people who compose the list.
That's your opinion based on your own subjective criteria lol.
It's also funny that you're arguing against the work of two arch conservative think tanks.
-
That's your opinion based on your own subjective criteria lol.
It's also funny that you're arguing against the work of two arch conservative think tanks.
And how is Canada listed higher than the United States, when for better or worse, they have much more freedom? Did the so-called arch conservative think tanks take into consideration Trudeau's new anti-protest, freezing bank accounts attitude? Because nothings screams of freedom than the government freezing your bank account without a court order! LOL! That doesn't even get into Trudeau's new internet censorship legislation. FREEEEEEEDOOOOOMMM!
-
And how is Canada listed higher than the United States, when for better or worse, they have much more freedom?
Did the so-called arch conservative think tanks take into consideration Trudeau's new anti-protest, freezing bank accounts attitude? Because nothings screams of freedom than the government freezing your bank account without a court order! LOL! That doesn't even get into Trudeau's new internet censorship legislation. FREEEEEEEDOOOOOMMM!
Again, that's all your opinion based on your own subjective criteria. If you want to know why Canada ranks higher than the States in the Cato/Fraser rankings you could simply seek out their report.
-
Again, that's all your opinion based on your own subjective criteria. If you want to know why Canada ranks higher than the States in the Cato/Fraser rankings you could simply seek out their report.
That's what I though, you have no answer, because there is none. Canada doesn't have any more personal freedom etc than the United States. It only has less. Next.
-
And how is Canada listed higher than the United States, when for better or worse, they have much more freedom? Did the so-called arch conservative think tanks take into consideration Trudeau's new anti-protest, freezing bank accounts attitude? Because nothings screams of freedom than the government freezing your bank account without a court order! LOL! That doesn't even get into Trudeau's new internet censorship legislation. FREEEEEEEDOOOOOMMM!
The study lists the objective criteria they use. Why don’t you read it and let us know what criteria you think they got wrong.
You know…. Have an informed opinion, rather than just talk out your ass.
-
The study lists the objective criteria they use. Why don’t you read it and let us know what criteria you think they got wrong.
You know…. Have an informed opinion, rather than just talk out your ass.
I don't see the study listed.
-
That's what I though, you have no answer, because there is none. Canada doesn't have any more personal freedom etc than the United States. It only has less. Next.
Again: that is your opinion based on your own subjective criteria. in my opinion, Canadians are far more free than Americans as they are far less likely to be imprisoned, less likely to be immiserated by forces beyond their control and less likely to die violently at the hands of fellow citizens or armed and unaccountable agents of the state to name a few things.
-
Again: that is your opinion based on your own subjective criteria. in my opinion, Canadians are far more free than Americans as they are far less likely to be imprisoned, less likely to be immiserated by forces beyond their control and less likely to die violently at the hands of fellow citizens or armed and unaccountable agents of the state to name a few things.
How are they less likely to be imprisioned? And wtf is immiserated by forces beyond their control? Is that a reference to the defund the police policies? Because, yes, I agree that that's probably one of the reasons why they could be listed lower. Democrat policy has unleased a pretty bad crime wave due to idiotic policies like defund the police and bail reform. Regardless, American's have a greater freedom of speech, second amendment freedoms, religious freedoms etc. Much more than Canada does.
-
How are they less likely to be imprisioned?
Canadian criminal laws are far less punitive and far less carcerally centric than the U.S.
And wtf is immiserated by forces beyond their control? Is that a reference to the defund the police policies?
lol, Christ you are dumb.
Because, yes, I agree that that's probably one of the reasons why they could be listed lower. Democrat policy has unleased a pretty bad crime wave due to idiotic policies like defund the police and bail reform.
LOL still lying about this, huh?
Regardless, American's have a greater freedom of speech, second amendment freedoms, religious freedoms etc. Much more than Canada does.
The only part of this is true is the second amendment thing, which is only because it doesn't exist in Canadian law and is not actually a measure of freedom.
-
Canadian criminal laws are far less punitive and far less carcerally centric than the U.S.
lol, Christ you are dumb.
LOL still lying about this, huh?
The only part of this is true is the second amendment thing, which is only because it doesn't exist in Canadian law and is not actually a measure of freedom.
No they're not. At least not anymore. For example, most drug laws pertaining to cannabis are tickets now instead of jail time. You're operating from an outdated mindset. And no, American's do enjoy much more freedom of speech. We have human rights tribunals that punish people for saying "the wrong thing." That's a fact. Another fact is the spike in crime, specifically linked to defund the police policies related to bail reform, letting violent criminals back on the street. I'm sorry that fact bothers you as well. You're living in a make believe fantasy land. You're a domestic chickenhawk, advocating for policies who's negative impact won't affect you.
-
No they're not. At least not anymore. For example, most drug laws pertaining to cannabis are tickets now instead of jail time. You're operating from an outdated mindset.
The United States has a greater share of people in prison than any other nation on the planet but that's ok because in some places just get a ticket for smoking weed. Moronic.
And no, American's do enjoy much more freedom of speech. We have human rights tribunals that punish people for saying "the wrong thing." That's a fact.
A hilarious simplification from a hilarious simpleton. What is the chilling effect of a human rights tribunal compared to the threat of losing your livelihood because of at-will employment laws or the kind of anti-speech laws you support?
Another fact is the spike in crime, specifically linked to defund the police policies related to bail reform, letting violent criminals back on the street. I'm sorry that fact bothers you as well.
I've lost count of how many times I've debunked this, but here you are spewing the same nonsense.
You're living in a make believe fantasy land. You're a domestic chickenhawk, advocating for policies who's negative impact won't affect you.
It's not just that you're aggressively stupid and constantly wrong, the fact you're so boring and unoriginal is what makes you so tedious.
-
It's also funny that you're arguing against the work of two arch conservative think tanks.
bingo! C'mon retro, if you can't trust right-wing/Conservative slanted stink-tanks, who you gonna trust, hey?
(https://i.imgur.com/gaPBk0U.gif)
-
wait now Retro, let the waldo give you some help - you're welcome!
the U.S. based non-governmental organization, Freedom House, publishes a yearly report, 'Freedom in the World'... measuring the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation. Canada ranks 4th in the most recent 2021 report... while the U.S. ranks @52. Again, you're welcome!
(https://i.imgur.com/6EZGxRp.gif)
-
wait now Retro, let the waldo give you some help - you're welcome!
the U.S. based non-governmental organization, Freedom House, publishes a yearly report, 'Freedom in the World'... measuring the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation. Canada ranks 4th in the most recent 2021 report... while the U.S. ranks @52. Again, you're welcome!
(https://i.imgur.com/6EZGxRp.gif)
Nobody really believes that.
-
After reading this thread, I have decided I will use The Economist's index moving forward:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#By_country
Still - it puts Canada 12th and the US at 26th - called "flawed democracy"
-
Nobody really believes that.
Retro, given your perpetual AmericanWannaBe posturing it's got to be perplexing for you to see just how flawed the U.S. shows in these analysis reviews, hey! And then member MH piles on - that's gotsToBurn!
After reading this thread, I have decided I will use The Economist's index moving forward: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#By_country
Still - it puts Canada 12th and the US at 26th - called "flawed democracy"
waldo pickinNits: it's actually put out by the EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit), the research division of the Economist Group... which just happens to also publish the Economist 'newspaper'; in any case, in 2021 Canada dropped 7 positions (from its prior 2020 ranking) principally because of imposed pandemic related restrictions & lockdowns - the waldo calls bullshyte on this EIU move! In any case, here's thinking of you Retro!
(https://i.imgur.com/0R44Viw.gif)
-
Retro, given your perpetual AmericanWannaBe posturing it's got to be perplexing for you to see just how flawed the U.S. shows in these analysis reviews, hey! And then member MH piles on - that's gotsToBurn!
waldo pickinNits: it's actually put out by the EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit), the research division of the Economist Group... which just happens to also publish the Economist 'newspaper'; in any case, in 2021 Canada dropped 7 positions (from its prior 2020 ranking) principally because of imposed pandemic related restrictions & lockdowns - the waldo calls bullshyte on this EIU move! In any case, here's thinking of you Retro!
(https://i.imgur.com/0R44Viw.gif)
Not really. These lists are made by adding things to them that aren’t actual freedoms, while discounting real ones. It’s an Orwellian exercise in which this list essentially tries to insist that 2 + 2 = 5.
Take Canada. Having much less freedom of speech does not give us more freedom than the United States. Not having the right to protect yourself via something like the 2bd amendment does not give us more freedom than the United States. Having some of the most lengthy covid restrictions in the world does not give us more freedom than the United States. Having the government freeze your bank accounts without due process does not give us more freedom than the United States. Paying much higher prices for goods and services does not give us more freedom than the United States. What’s funny is that some of you idiots spent the last couple of years denouncing the United States for their freedum, and now you’re pretending that it didn’t happen and that aCTuaLlY it’s Canada that is more free! Orwellian! 😂🤣
-
A secret board of Trudeau government advisors has terminated Rebel News’ licence renewal. Nothing says freedom more than the government in power deciding who can be a journalist and who can’t! 😂🤣
Freedom!!!!
-
A secret board of Trudeau government advisors has terminated Rebel News’ licence renewal. Nothing says freedom more than the government in power deciding who can be a journalist and who can’t! 😂🤣
Freedom!!!!
lol I posted about this in the media thread, but I'm entirely unsurprised you're just puking out the Rebel's version of events verbatim and of course it's totally wrong.
-
These lists are made by adding things to them that aren’t actual freedoms, while discounting real ones.
even this one from right-wing/Conservative CATO Institute & Fraser Institute? Why would they do what you're claiming - why?
(https://i.imgur.com/gaPBk0U.gif)
or these 2 from, respectively, Freedom House & the Economist Group - why would they do what you're claiming - why?
(https://i.imgur.com/6EZGxRp.gif) (https://i.imgur.com/0R44Viw.gif)
-
geezaz skippy! Is Charest even campaigning?
(https://i.imgur.com/Yq0tk2v.gif)
well looks like Charest is taking aim!
(https://i.imgur.com/XP37CPq.gif)
-
skippy has had a many month's long run of repeatedly casting aspersion towards the 'Bank of Canada'... while at the same time playing up crypto-currency as the alternative. This, THIS from someone presuming to lead a G7 country; one as leading, "the path to personal liberty over the tyranny of government power over Canada's national financial system". It couldn't be more laughable if it wasn't actually a front by pigeonPierre to simply bring in another faction of "the base".
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FPfoEdvXIAAVZbe?format=jpg&name=900x900)
even in the face of significant criticism coming his way, it seems Poilievre is doubling down on his crypto advocacy... even in recent days with a staged photo-op of him paying for lunch with bitcoin.
(https://news.coincu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Conservative-Party-Candidate-for-Prime-Minister-of-Canada-Pays-Lunch-With-Bitcoin-via-Lightning-Network.png) (https://i.imgur.com/UwviWGm.gif) (https://i.imgur.com/VF82iOj.gif)
and Charest went after Poilievre’s position on cryptocurrency; one which includes suggesting Canada could become the “crypto capital of the world,” and condemned him for “attacking the Bank of Canada.”:
You {Pierre Poilievre} want to be prime minister of Canada, and you're telling Canadians that cryptocurrency is going to wipe out inflation? Does anyone credible believe that? Is there any economic person in the country who actually said that he was right? I mean, this is it's not just wrong. It's bizarre.
-
I was much relieved to visit some Conservative friends of ours on the weekend, to find that:
- Although they are not pleased with Trudeau's personality
- The handling of the pandemic by our governments was satisfactory in their opinion
- The Convoy was the stupidest thing ever
- They are becoming disgusting with the yahoos of their party.
These are also not centrists, but rural, gun-owning, freedom loving etc. etc.
I firmly believe we just need reasonable people to get a bit louder as every single loud wingnut that I have to moderate (Facebook) is ignorant and stupid. For that matter, they would probably vote for Trudeau too if he just fit the jingoist cut-out.
It will indeed be amusing to see well-suited Peter Pepperlips try to play the part of cowboy with his economics degree and soft hands...
-
even in the face of significant criticism coming his way, it seems Poilievre is doubling down on his crypto advocacy... even in recent days with a staged photo-op of him paying for lunch with bitcoin.
(https://news.coincu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Conservative-Party-Candidate-for-Prime-Minister-of-Canada-Pays-Lunch-With-Bitcoin-via-Lightning-Network.png) (https://i.imgur.com/UwviWGm.gif) (https://i.imgur.com/VF82iOj.gif)
and Charest went after Poilievre’s position on cryptocurrency; one which includes suggesting Canada could become the “crypto capital of the world,” and condemned him for “attacking the Bank of Canada.”:
You {Pierre Poilievre} want to be prime minister of Canada, and you're telling Canadians that cryptocurrency is going to wipe out inflation? Does anyone credible believe that? Is there any economic person in the country who actually said that he was right? I mean, this is it's not just wrong. It's bizarre.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQRhgtiXIAMQ99F?format=jpg&name=large)
-
Steven Guilbeault, Minister of the Environment, responds to skippy's disinformation:
(https://i.imgur.com/IL3rHDp.gif)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQgK-8_VcAQU8eE?format=jpg&name=small)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQgK-8_VcAQU8eE?format=jpg&name=small)
Can’t be any worse than this dipshit.
[attachimg=1]
-
CPC leadership candidate Jean Charest keeps hammering away at skippy's support for the 'Trucker Freedom Convoy'... drawing attention to what 2020's Poilievre said against blockades:
(https://i.imgur.com/yCJqhBT.jpg)
-
CPC leadership candidate Jean Charest keeps hammering away at skippy's support for the 'Trucker Freedom Convoy'... drawing attention to what 2020's Poilievre said against blockades:
(https://i.imgur.com/yCJqhBT.jpg)
Charest dismisses fundamental rights and civil liberties for perceived political expediency. Regardless, how much money did lockdowns cost Canadians? Just wondering. Oh right, hundreds of billions.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/x8h21dE.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/x8h21dE.png)
Oh look, fake outrage over the cost of a peaceful protest and civil disobedience.
-
Oh look, fake outrage over the cost of a peaceful protest and civil disobedience.
Blocking the supply chain is a terrorist act. You support terrorists now.
-
both CPC leadership candidates Jean Charest & Patrick Brown have stated Poilievre's support for the 'Trucker Freedom Convoy' should disqualify Poilievre from running:
(https://i.imgur.com/MD76h77.jpg)
-
Blocking the supply chain is a terrorist act. You support terrorists now.
WHATABOUT WHATABOUT
BLM broke a window and nobody cared... etc
-
WHATABOUT WHATABOUT
BLM broke a window and nobody cared... etc
Can we agree that rioters and native blockaders, despite perhaps having reasonable grievances, should also have been arrested?
I think that’s where most reasonable people would fall.
Shady thinks that because his strawman libtard that he made up to argue with would be against arresting rioters and native blockaders, that he is somehow justified supporting his pet cause doing the same.
-
Whabbaboubism
-
"Whataboutism is the first symptom of cognitive chronic hypocrisy." - Shady, on the other forum, shortly before he called everyone on this forum ****. The projection is getting disturbing.
-
CPC leadership candidate Jean Charest keeps hammering away at skippy's support for the 'Trucker Freedom Convoy'... drawing attention to what 2020's Poilievre said against blockades:
Charest: "Poilievre supported the trucker convoy!"
Poilievre: "Poilievre supported the trucker convoy!"
-
Charest: "Poilievre supported the trucker convoy!"
Poilievre: "Poilievre supported the trucker convoy!"
What kind of Canada does the Conservatives want…. One where attempted secession and harassing citizens by holding a city hostage is acceptable behaviour if you agree with their politics, or one that applies the rule of law equally?
This is what Cons are fighting over.
-
What kind of Canada does the Conservatives want…. One where attempted secession and harassing citizens by holding a city hostage is acceptable behaviour if you agree with their politics, or one that applies the rule of law equally?
This is what Cons are fighting over.
PP is sitting at like 43% support among Cons, seems like the fight is over before it started.
-
PP is sitting at like 43% support among Cons, seems like the fight is over before it started.
I really hope you're wrong.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/waMcBF9.gif)
-
as Poilievre continues to undermine Canada's Central Bank:
(https://i.imgur.com/1LsZUaN.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/pkOzRsy.gif)
-
Why was Pierre not in favour of Freedumb when he voted against legalizing cannabis? Makes you think he's just lying to the gullible idiots because they're low-hanging fruit. Again.
-
I moderate Facebook pages for community involvement and my sense is that more normies are calling out the Freedummies and bravely so.
-
I moderate Facebook pages for community involvement and my sense is that more normies are calling out the Freedummies and bravely so.
IMO brave speech is when you say something where you would reasonably be expected to likely incur some kind of significant punishments for saying it, but you say it anyways.
-
IMO brave speech is when you say something where you would reasonably be expected to likely incur some kind of significant punishments for saying it, but you say it anyways.
Yes
-
and now 8 running for the CPC leadership... BC CPC MP; former BC Liberal MLA, Marc Dalton joining:
- current mayor of Brampton; former leader of Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party, Patrick Brown
- former federal Progressive Conservative leader; former Quebec Premier, Jean Charest
- Ontario CPC MP, Pierre Poilievre
- Ontario CPC MP, Leslyn Lewis
- Ontario Independent MPP, Roman Baber
- Saskatchewan businessman & founder of 'Canadians for Truth', Joseph Bourgault
- former Ontario CPC MP for Parry Sound—Muskoka; former mayor of Huntsville Ontario, Scott Aitchison
recent additions bringing the CPC leadership candidate count to 11:
- former Ontario CPC MP for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, Leona Alleslev
- Ontario lawyer, Joel Etienne
- Toronto businessman, Bobby Singh
official list of verified candidates... those meeting monetary and sponsoring membership signature requirements; from 11 candidate 'running' announcements down to 6 verified by the Conservative Party of Canada:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FRwaVKFWQAIHC2F?format=jpg&name=small)
-
We’re never getting rid of Trudeau are we?
-
We’re never getting rid of Trudeau are we?
Every politician and party has a shelf life.
-
Every politician and party has a shelf life.
If Brown or Charest manage to win, they would likely oust Trudeau.
Any of the other nutbars, and Trudeau wins.
-
If Brown or Charest manage to win, they would likely oust Trudeau.
Any of the other nutbars, and Trudeau wins.
I don’t know much about Brown but agreed on Charest. I trust your judgment on Brown too, I’ll have to learn more about him.
-
If Brown or Charest manage to win, they would likely oust Trudeau.
Any of the other nutbars, and Trudeau wins.
Maybe, maybe not.
In Canada's political system (with first-past-the-post, and urban-vs-rural voting patterns) I can certainly envision a scenario where someone like Poilievre manages to win (even if its just a minority government). It would probably require Liberal support completely collapsing in the west (certainly not unheard of... remember the days of Trudeau Sr., where at the end he had no seats west of Manitoba) and non-urban areas of Ontario going conservative.
Not that I'm saying I WANT Poilievre to win. I would certainly never vote for him (and I have regularly voted conservative in the past).
Overall, not a great collection of candidates. A group who are either covidiots (Poilievre, Baber), anti-abortion religious nutjobs (Lewis), have troubling scandals in his past (Brown), have questionable plans to address climate change (Aitchsison), or are warmed-over Liberals (Charest). I don't expect perfection, but what happened to the idea of having a decent, principled conservative leader who wasn't a wingnut?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/l4cdvnl.gif)
-
per the CPC's leadership election rules:
the Leadership Candidate Nomination Committee (LCNC), the group of party stalwarts reviewing applications from would-be candidates, can also rely on "any other information they see fit to ascertain the suitability of an applicant." The LCNC can, in turn, recommend to a 21-member group, the Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) that a particular candidate be barred from running.
the anti-abortion group, Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) had initially been quite buoyed in interpreting 4 of its 'endorsed candidates' would be accepted as candidates running for the CPC leadership. However, the CLC is now raising concerns that 3 of its preferred candidates were not verified... were not accepted by the LEOC even though 3 of the 4 had met the $300,000 buy-in fee and also obtained the required number of party member sponsoring signatures. The only CLC endorsed person receiving the verified candidate status from the LEOC/CPC is Leslyn Lewis - who coincidentally tweeted the following:
(https://i.imgur.com/32s4AcG.gif)
One of the pillars of the CPC, and of the broader “small-c” conservative movement, is democracy – letting the people, not the elites, decide who should represent them. Therefore, this sort of Cancel Culture has no business in the Conservative Party.
In the end, if Bourgault and Abraham are unsuccessful in their appeals, Campaign Life Coalition will do its best to ensure that Leslyn Lewis is victorious as the only green-lit, pro-lifer of the six “verified” candidates.
-
One of the pillars of the CPC, and of the broader “small-c” conservative movement, is democracy – letting the people, not the elites, decide who should represent them. Therefore, this sort of Cancel Culture has no business in the Conservative Party.
In the end, if Bourgault and Abraham are unsuccessful in their appeals, Campaign Life Coalition will do its best to ensure that Leslyn Lewis is victorious as the only green-lit, pro-lifer of the six “verified” candidates.
beyond the anticipated appeals for these 2 'SoCons' (Bourgault & Abraham), Toronto lawyer Joel Etienne also demands an appeal to his disqualification from the Conservative leadership race... a disqualification made by the CPC/LEOC even though Etienne states he raised more than the required $300K 'buy-in fee' and also secured more than the required number of sponsoring party member signatures.
Joel Etienne demands appeal to disqualification from Conservative leadership (https://globalnews.ca/news/8806624/joel-etienne-demands-appeal-to-disqualification-from-conservative-leadership/)
-
first CPC leadership candidates debate: bulldog skippy takes a question on the "Freedumb Convoy" (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522335594919178240/vid/1280x720/Wyi6gwCyeoFad3oJ.mp4?tag=14)
-
debate #1: Charest asked if he's a Conservative (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522338929273360384/vid/1280x720/qoern6hlRanIaui8.mp4?tag=14)... well duh!
-
debate #1: Lewis asked about her anti-abortion stance... pivots to attack skippy for staying silent on the subject! (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522343897967603712/vid/1280x720/JRNtsWJri3-89PKi.mp4?tag=14)
-
debate #1: Charest asked if he's a Conservative (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522338929273360384/vid/1280x720/qoern6hlRanIaui8.mp4?tag=14)... well duh!
Charest got booed for calling the protests illegal proving once again that conservatives are their own worst enemy.
He’s my preferred choice and I think he could bring it home for the CPC but like Peter McKay he’s just not nutty enough.
-
first CPC leadership candidates debate: bulldog skippy takes a question on the "Freedumb Convoy" (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522335594919178240/vid/1280x720/Wyi6gwCyeoFad3oJ.mp4?tag=14)
Ok, thanks for posting this. I think that I get him now.
It's red meat for those conservatives who love the name calling and puff chest posing.
I also get what the left hates about him.
Is there anything in the way of ideas from him?
He had a good chance of being PM, what is the grand vision?
-
debate #1: Charest asked if he's a Conservative (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1522338929273360384/vid/1280x720/qoern6hlRanIaui8.mp4?tag=14)... well duh!
Well, given the fact that he was elected premier of Quebec as a Liberal, I think it is natural to question whether he is interested in supporting "conservative" ideas, or whether he is just picking a "convenient" path to power.
I do think he handled the question quite well... pointing out his economic record as Quebec premier (including tax cuts, improved provincial credit rating, etc.)
As another poster pointed out, it was a bit... disconcerting when people started booing when he pointed out that the "freedom convoy" was illegal.
-
Ok, thanks for posting this. I think that I get him now.
It's red meat for those conservatives who love the name calling and puff chest posing.
I also get what the left hates about him.
Is there anything in the way of ideas from him?
He had a good chance of being PM, what is the grand vision?
It's a toned-down version of Donald Trump's "those other guys are out to f*ck you and i'm the only one who can stop them" spiel, with "those guys" being whatever out-group you want it to be (immigrants, work leftists, wealthy elites).
-
It's a toned-down version of Donald Trump's "those other guys are out to f*ck you and i'm the only one who can stop them" spiel, with "those guys" being whatever out-group you want it to be (immigrants, work leftists, wealthy elites).
Well he's not as stupid as Trump but every bit as cynical.
We knew Trump was in it to make money for himself and attempt his gigantically dumb ideas.
But what... WHAT.... WHAT... does PP want to achieve, or ... is he even proposing ?
Calling Charest a liberal won't be a great action item once he is PM.
-
But what... WHAT.... WHAT... does PP want to achieve, or ... is he even proposing ?
just what does skippy want to achieve (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1522407219169402880/pu/vid/720x720/0k5CttaIx5LHaxgP.mp4?tag=12)... as he "runs for Prime Minister"? Why, of course, to "take back control of your life"! Of course!
-
Well he's not as stupid as Trump but every bit as cynical.
We knew Trump was in it to make money for himself and attempt his gigantically dumb ideas.
I'm not saying he's anything like trump, just that the message is the same. It's the populist playbook.
But what... WHAT.... WHAT... does PP want to achieve, or ... is he even proposing ?
He wants to be PM and make his friends richer, what else is there?
(To be clear: this is not a generic "all politicians are corrupt" thing, but specific to PP. I can't imagine a weird little freak who went into politics in his 20s has any great principles or convictions beyond the attainment of power. Jee also: Kenney, Jason)
-
just what does skippy want to achieve (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1522407219169402880/pu/vid/720x720/0k5CttaIx5LHaxgP.mp4?tag=12)... as he "runs for Prime Minister"? Why, of course, to "take back control of your life"! Of course!
Well that's retarded.
I am not willing to predict how well/poorly such stupidity will play.
He's campaigning against the pandemic ? By the time of the next election will mask mandates be much more than an unpleasant piece of nostalgia ?
He's like the nerd who actually turned out to be bad at math and everything.
-
1. It's the populist playbook.
2. I can't imagine a weird little freak who went into politics in his 20s has any great principles or convictions beyond the attainment of power. Jee also: Kenney, Jason)
1. The new one. The old one from the 20th century was 'Blame the Rich'. It resulted in the society that neocons now celebrate: pro-worker, progressive, collaborative, community-focused and guided by science. Of course they just remember something about no black people or lesbians being around.
2. Yeah, me neither. What kind of sex does someone like him have ? Let's see... google google... well his wife looks normal. Wow she cited THIS on her linkedIn
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-nike-a-boys-club-culture-and-flawed-hr-1522509975
Calling a corporate company a 'boys club' culture is pretty CANCEL CULTURE. Maybe this is a hint that they are closet liberals.
Anyway, he will go down at some point. Hopefully in the next 6 months, not in 2 years or - ugh - 10 years
-
1. The new one. The old one from the 20th century was 'Blame the Rich'. It resulted in the society that neocons now celebrate: pro-worker, progressive, collaborative, community-focused and guided by science. Of course they just remember something about no black people or lesbians being around.
I guess the better way to describe it is "new right populism" because populism itself ain't. abad thing. I'd consider Bernie to be a populist, for example.
2. Yeah, me neither. What kind of sex does someone like him have ? Let's see... google google... well his wife looks normal. Wow she cited THIS on her linkedIn
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-nike-a-boys-club-culture-and-flawed-hr-1522509975
Calling a corporate company a 'boys club' culture is pretty CANCEL CULTURE. Maybe this is a hint that they are closet liberals.
Woke virtue signalling from the CPC frontrunner, man you hate to see it.
-
1. The new one. The old one from the 20th century was 'Blame the Rich'. It resulted in the society that neocons now celebrate: pro-worker, progressive, collaborative, community-focused and guided by science. Of course they just remember something about no black people or lesbians being around.
2. Yeah, me neither. What kind of sex does someone like him have ? Let's see... google google... well his wife looks normal. Wow she cited THIS on her linkedIn
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-nike-a-boys-club-culture-and-flawed-hr-1522509975
Calling a corporate company a 'boys club' culture is pretty CANCEL CULTURE. Maybe this is a hint that they are closet liberals.
Anyway, he will go down at some point. Hopefully in the next 6 months, not in 2 years or - ugh - 10 years
Thinking that his wife is the same as him and doesn’t have her own opinions is wrong-headed. Maybe even a tad sexist.
-
Well, given the fact that he was elected premier of Quebec as a Liberal, I think it is natural to question whether he is interested in supporting "conservative" ideas, or whether he is just picking a "convenient" path to power.
I do think he handled the question quite well... pointing out his economic record as Quebec premier (including tax cuts, improved provincial credit rating, etc.)
As another poster pointed out, it was a bit... disconcerting when people started booing when he pointed out that the "freedom convoy" was illegal.
Must be the convenience. I like him, I supported him when he ran for premier (I was living in Montreal at the time). If for some reason he wins the nomination I would probably vote CPC for the first time in my life.
-
Thinking that his wife is the same as him and doesn’t have her own opinions is wrong-headed. Maybe even a tad sexist.
I said they.
-
Thinking that his wife is the same as him and doesn’t have her own opinions is wrong-headed. Maybe even a tad sexist.
I said they. They seem to tweet and post and lock stuff with regards to their political views
-
;)
Must be the convenience. I like him, I supported him when he ran for premier (I was living in Montreal at the time). If for some reason he wins the nomination I would probably vote CPC for the first time in my life.
I feel like this could happen, but the CPC would have to undermine Peter Pepper
-
Well that's retarded.
I am not willing to predict how well/poorly such stupidity will play.
He's campaigning against the pandemic ? By the time of the next election will mask mandates be much more than an unpleasant piece of nostalgia ?
He's like the nerd who actually turned out to be bad at math and everything.
I think that one reason Poillievre has appealed to a lot of people is that he has been hammering away at prices for 2 years. He was talking about rising costs when Justin and friends were trying to convince us that the inflation rate was just an aberration that resulted from low gas prices early in the pandemic.
The other thing is that many people just don't feel heard. And like other self-styled populists, Poillievre has somehow conned regular people into thinking he hears them.
Our politicians (and our journalists as well) aren't exactly a group representative of Canadian society as a whole. They're well-to-do college educated urbanites. They live in big cities. Their friends live in big cities. They and their friends are all prosperous white-collar people. They got to work remotely from spacious homes (or their recreation properties!) during the lockdowns. They treat large areas of this country as "fly-over" territory. They don't actually know anybody who works at a factory or in trades or at a restaurant or a farm or a jobsite. They're aware that these people exist, in an academic sense, and they might even have met some of them at photo-ops and that sort of thing, but they don't really actually have any connection to anybody who isn't part of the same privileged, urbanite culture as they are. And it's very easy for people to feel disconnected from all of these politicians. It's very easy to be cynical of them, especially when they profess to be "fighting for working Canadians!" or similar slogans. It's all very fake, very patronizing.
Poillievre is part of that same elite urbanite culture as the rest of them, but he has been talking about groceries being too expensive for two years, and that's something that us "regular people" can relate to.
I saw a Poillievre sign in the back window of a pickup last month, and the race had barely even started. Can you recall seeing that in Canada before? I can't. During an election, sure. But for a candidate in a leadership race? I think people might be underestimating the amount of enthusiasm there is behind Poillievre.
One of the people I follow on Twitter said a while back something along the lines of "if Poillievre wins, Liberals will finally be able to relate to how annoying 35% of Canadians find Trudeau."
-k
-
even in the face of significant criticism coming his way, it seems Poilievre is doubling down on his crypto advocacy... even in recent days with a staged photo-op of him paying for lunch with bitcoin.
(https://news.coincu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Conservative-Party-Candidate-for-Prime-Minister-of-Canada-Pays-Lunch-With-Bitcoin-via-Lightning-Network.png) (https://i.imgur.com/UwviWGm.gif) (https://i.imgur.com/VF82iOj.gif)
and Charest went after Poilievre’s position on cryptocurrency; one which includes suggesting Canada could become the “crypto capital of the world,” and condemned him for “attacking the Bank of Canada.”:
You {Pierre Poilievre} want to be prime minister of Canada, and you're telling Canadians that cryptocurrency is going to wipe out inflation? Does anyone credible believe that? Is there any economic person in the country who actually said that he was right? I mean, this is it's not just wrong. It's bizarre.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSMbGZKUcAAI7a8?format=png&name=900x900)
-
I guess people never learn.
They seem to think that people will save us not policies.
-
Not only that, does no one remember the arc of disappointment from the initial height to the end of their popularity? This goes for every politician
-
Charest could possibly appeal to Quebecers. As a CPC member why would you not vote for him if you actually want to win an election? If your wants of a leader is someone who is anti-abortion, pro-comvoy, and pro-Trump well you're going to be a appeal to the fringe and lose the election.
-
Charest could possibly appeal to Quebecers. As a CPC member why would you not vote for him if you actually want to win an election? If your wants of a leader is someone who is anti-abortion, pro-comvoy, and pro-Trump well you're going to be a appeal to the fringe and lose the election.
I think Poilievre could win by default
-
Charest could possibly appeal to Quebecers.
Yes he could. The problem is, the Liberals and the Bloc Quebecois also appeals to Quebecers. The question is, would Charest's appeal to quebecers actually result in a significant gain of seats in Quebec (at least to counteract possible losses elsewhere) would it simply increase the votes but leave other parties still leading.
As a CPC member why would you not vote for him if you actually want to win an election?
Voters don't often think rationally. (Look at all the left-leaning American voters who decided to sit out the 2016 election because they mistakenly thought "my vote doesn't matter", and ended up with 4 years of Stubby McBonespurs in charge, instead of Clinton.)
Personally, I usually lean conservative, and would probably prefer Charest to Trudeau (assuming he can keep the nut cases in the party in check), but I can certainly imagine some conservative voters thinking "Former Liberal premier vs. Liberal Prime Minister... there isn't enough difference to matter".
-
The Liberal Party was the right-wing federalist party in Quebec in opposition to the left-wing PQ. He didn't change parties from Conservative to Liberal; he remained in the federalist fold to go fight for Canadian unity...and succeeded.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/gVHIrVC.gif)
skippy says to 'give control of money to the people'... which means what? Anyone, anyone, anyone......
Former Bank of Canada governor slams Poilievre's assertion central bank is 'financially illiterate' (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/former-bank-of-canada-governor-slams-poilievre-s-assertion-central-bank-is-financially-illiterate-1.5892299)
On another Poilievre stance -- that cryptocurrency allows people to “opt out” of inflation -- Dodge said “he has no idea what he’s talking about.”
“He’s just wrong because the issue of rising prices…that you have to cope with out of your income is fundamentally at the moment a structural one,” he said. “We have limitations on supply, in part because of a war, in part because of COVID, in part because of ongoing features of the economy – we’re all getting older – the labour force is not growing as fast.”
-
skippy says to 'give control of money to the people'... which means what? Anyone, anyone, anyone......
The best we can hope for is that this is bullshit.
The worst is that this nerd has some brilliant idea that will collapse our banking system.
-
The Liberal Party was the right-wing federalist party in Quebec in opposition to the left-wing PQ. He didn't change parties from Conservative to Liberal; he remained in the federalist fold to go fight for Canadian unity...and succeeded.
First of all, it is true that the Liberal party in Quebec is further to the right than the PQ. But that doesn't necessarily mean it would be considered "right wing" or "conservative" when compared to the federal conservatives or conservatives in other provinces.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Liberal_Party
In the context of federal Canadian politics, it is a more centrist party when compared to Conservative and Liberal parties in other provinces, such as the British Columbia Liberal Party. It believes in a strong role for government in the economy and supports social-liberal policies
Secondly, even if the Quebec Liberal Party is "right wing", do you really think most voters in other provinces are going to understand the difference? Most people aren't that familiar with the political landscape of other provinces... they will just here "Charest was a Quebec Liberal" and base their opinions on him based on that.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSMbGZKUcAAI7a8?format=png&name=900x900)
(https://i.imgur.com/BcSsoPS.gif)
-
like the kind of harassment PM Trudeau regularly deals with... NDP leader Singh was met with disturbing verbal assaults and physical intimidation (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1524582656821719041/pu/vid/1280x720/ZifMkcfHOZd3iFrF.mp4?tag=14) while campaigning for an Ontario provincial NDP candidate.
CPC leader candidate Aitchison commented on the Singh abuse following a similar theme to what he presented during tonight's CPC leadership debate: that the politics of division and corrosive vitriol are further stoking societal polarization:
(https://i.imgur.com/F1o314c.gif)
NDP leader Singh has followed up with a statement on the incident:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FShNMriXwAAJJxX?format=jpg&name=small)
-
perhaps it was the format of tonight's CPC leadership debate that tempered the prescient lead-up G&M columnist Coyne was offering; one based on the initial debate from last week, with Coyne suggesting the only issue is which candidate can take the most unhinged positions on the fringiest topics!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSfPGK8XEAET-xL?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
(https://news.coincu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Conservative-Party-Candidate-for-Prime-Minister-of-Canada-Pays-Lunch-With-Bitcoin-via-Lightning-Network.png)
during tonight's CPC leadership debate Poilievre took significant attacks over his crypto advocacy... with a flummoxed skippy finally reduced to simply suggesting his position has been mischaracterized - something Patrick Brown rebutted with: "No one in this room, and no one in Canada will believe that you didn't say you can opt out of inflation through cryptocurrency. … It is bad advice to be giving to Canadians, that is so risky, and you should know that as a former finance critic, that's not the advice you should be giving to the country."
-
like the kind of harassment PM Trudeau regularly deals with... NDP leader Singh was met with disturbing verbal assaults and physical intimidation (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1524582656821719041/pu/vid/1280x720/ZifMkcfHOZd3iFrF.mp4?tag=14) while campaigning for an Ontario provincial NDP candidate.
These goons always look exactly how you expect them to look.
-
These goons always look exactly how you expect them to look.
the organizing 'brainTrust'... Roy Aseltine & Nicole Comber (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1524475442555674630/pu/vid/384x848/jY6zo1d5ooQIlpOh.mp4?tag=12): "show them the hold-fast {white authority} pride"
-
a Charest zinger!
(https://i.imgur.com/5mhSEp4.gif)
-
recent days Poilievre-Peterson interview posted to Youtube (1.5 hours long)... extracts are beginning to appear such as this lil' ditty with skippy being asked by Peterson what makes him credible in terms of, "who he is and what he's offering"! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1526607226655236096/pu/vid/1280x720/lh3ddVAKlPN7uD8T.mp4?tag=12) Skippy responds: "I'm a believer in using, simple Anglo Saxon words that strike right at the meaning I'm trying to convey".
simple Anglo Saxon words??? Anyone... anyone... anyone?
-
recent days Poilievre-Peterson interview posted to Youtube (1.5 hours long)... extracts are beginning to appear such as this lil' ditty with skippy being asked by Peterson what makes him credible in terms of, "who he is and what he's offering"! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1526607226655236096/pu/vid/1280x720/lh3ddVAKlPN7uD8T.mp4?tag=12) Skippy responds: "I'm a believer in using, simple Anglo Saxon words that strike right at the meaning I'm trying to convey".
simple Anglo Saxon words??? Anyone... anyone... anyone?
So now Peterson is schilling for Pierre? Lol. Pete needs career advice.
-
:-* 1.5 hours?
What else is in there?
-
recent days Poilievre-Peterson interview posted to Youtube (1.5 hours long)... extracts are beginning to appear such as this lil' ditty with skippy being asked by Peterson what makes him credible in terms of, "who he is and what he's offering"! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1526607226655236096/pu/vid/1280x720/lh3ddVAKlPN7uD8T.mp4?tag=12) Skippy responds: "I'm a believer in using, simple Anglo Saxon words that strike right at the meaning I'm trying to convey".
simple Anglo Saxon words??? Anyone... anyone... anyone?
Me meeting Pierre Pollivere at a campaign event: Hello.
PP: Mé lícaþ þé tó métanne.
-
Means 'pleased to meet you'
https://omniglot.com/language/phrases/oldenglish.htm
-
There hasn’t been much in the media about Poilievre using that phrase. They should be hounding him to provide an explanation.
Like, WTF??? “Anglo Saxon words”. On the face of it, it’s meaningless…. However, it can certainly be taken as “I don’t speak jive, like the coloured folks do…. I speak proper white words”.
-
There hasn’t been much in the media about Poilievre using that phrase. They should be hounding him to provide an explanation.
Like, WTF??? “Anglo Saxon words”. On the face of it, it’s meaningless…. However, it can certainly be taken as “I don’t speak jive, like the coloured folks do…. I speak proper white words”.
Maybe they're saving the racism accusation for the bit gaffe that is surely coming.
What will it be ?
-Slapping hands with an older woman of colour
-Asking someone if they're an Injun
-Bitcoining
-
Maybe they're saving the racism accusation for the bit gaffe that is surely coming.
What will it be ?
-Slapping hands with an older woman of colour
-Asking someone if they're an Injun
-Bitcoining
Proposing a federal "no fat chicks" policy (JP's idea).
-
Proposing a federal "no fat chicks" policy (JP's idea).
That would cause me to move to Bavaria pretty quick.
-
That would cause me to move to Bavaria pretty quick.
I could see you taking that straight to the Supreme Court!!
It would be made into one of those movies where the protagonist is so passionate that they go back to school and get a law degree when no one else would take the case…
“The story of one man’s love of the big-boned and his struggle to bring them justice”.
-
skippy keeps nattering on about the BoC, "acting like an ATM for PM Trudeau"... on about the BoC, "printing money for PM Trudeau". Of course these are outright lies Poilievre is throwing at his ignorant and misinformed support base! The waldo had an earlier say on this "printing money nonsense":
#printMoMoney - oh wait, the waldo recently showcased that the BoC doesn't print money... it's all about balance sheet tallies, hey!
waldo factoid: its called quantitative easing (QE) in aid of influencing longer-term interest rates that matter to Canadians - simply a tool within the Bank of Canada's monetary policy tool chest that involves buying large amounts of bonds that the Government of Canada has issued and sold to financial institutions, such as commercial banks.
=> perpetuating a major misconception about QE: the BoC is not printing bank notes to buy government bonds; rather, to pay for the bonds the BoC issues a liability settlement balance to match the bonds value... expanding upon the bank's balance sheet but NOT the amount of circulating money.
and... such power PM Trudeau wields to impact upon global inflation!
(https://i.imgur.com/VDYtUFi.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/2X1ekwe.jpg)
resistance..... is futile!
-
We could be on the verge of something pretty good.
-
Andrew Coyne flat-out calls candidate Lewis a nutbar!
(https://i.imgur.com/1NTR6af.gif)
-
In the debate I found Lewis just spoke vague cookie cutter talking points and didn't really say much at all.
-
We could be on the verge of something pretty good.
What would that be?
-
geezaz! When skippyForFreedumb loses the likes of Urback...
(https://i.imgur.com/VjfK5RA.gif)
-
Majority Liberals government in the headlights...
-
Majority Liberals government in the headlights...
Maybe Charest will win the nomination?
-
There is no party in Canada that isn't a giant piece of crap. They are literally all embarrassingly bad. Our politicians are insane ideologues with little common sense to go around. My theory is you have to be at least partially insane to run for public office in the first place. I fear for this country.
-
more WEF nonsense from Poilievre... with references to past Harper Conservatives attending the 2010 & 2015 conferences! What a maroon, what a rube!
(https://i.imgur.com/LQGFo1Y.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTcdZRdWIAEX_7A?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
clearly skippy thinks he has a winner with his attacking the WEF!
(https://i.imgur.com/jRKgEf2.gif)
meanwhile John Baird, attendee at multiple past WEF conferences and one of Poilievre's national campaign co-chairs, still hasn't commented - go figure!
(https://i.imgur.com/5XP8nVp.jpg)
-
What a **** show...
-
LOL imagine spending so much time talking about something only a tiny fringe of lead-poisoned Facebook addicts cares about, what a goof.
-
LOL imagine spending so much time talking about something only a tiny fringe of lead-poisoned Facebook addicts cares about, what a goof.
Many left of centre people are sick of defending old schools Libs and Tories to these idiots now too
-
I want to know how Poilievre is going to build back better.
-
I want to know how Poilievre is going to build back better.
1. Bitcoin
2. Pull out of the UN and WHO
3. Freedom
4. Not Trudeau
5. ...
6. Resign
7. Top rated podcaster
-
1. Bitcoin
2. Pull out of the UN and WHO
3. Freedom
4. Not Trudeau
5. ...
6. Resign
7. Top rated podcaster
You forgot the World Economic Forum conspiracy idiocy.
-
You forgot the World Economic Forum conspiracy idiocy.
No these are steps to build back better
-
Many left of centre people are sick of defending old schools Libs and Tories to these idiots now too
I don't even think it's worth engaging the nuts, they don't live in the same reality as the rets of us.
-
I don't even think it's worth engaging the nuts, they don't live in the same reality as the rets of us.
They seem to be walling themselves off into sealed rooms of their own which should do wonders for their dwindling influence.
-
They seem to be walling themselves off into sealed rooms of their own which should do wonders for their dwindling influence.
Dwindling influence?
They’re about to have the leader of the Official Opposition and potential PM of Canada. Their influence sounds like it’s on the rise to me…
-
1. Bitcoin
2. Pull out of the UN and WHO
3. Freedom
4. Not Trudeau
5. ...
6. Resign
7. Top rated podcaster
Might as well elect shady. At least we could brag to people that we know him.
-
Bergen just bounced my MP as finance critic for criticizing Pollievre's position on firing the head of the BoC.
"I'm deeply troubled by the suggestions by one of our leadership candidates, that that candidate would be prepared to interfere already at this stage in the independence of our central bank. We lose some of our credibility when we do this". Looks like he is supporting Charest.
I'm increasingly getting stuck between an MP I respect (but don't always agree with) and a party that I am starting to detest. Hopefully they can redeem themselves by selecting someone sane.
-
Bergen just bounced my MP as finance critic for criticizing Pollievre's position on firing the head of the BoC.
the full related statement from {now former} CPC shadow minister for finance, Ed Fast:
I'm deeply troubled by suggestions by one of our leadership candidates, that that candidate would be prepared to interfere already at this stage in the independence of our central bank.
We lose some credibility when we do this. ... It is fair to ask questions, to demand solutions to the skyrocketing cost of living. But we also have to respect the institutions that have been granted independence to ensure that they function apart from political interference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2rIh5stNVs
-
(https://i.imgur.com/ZH4e1Qs.gif)
yeah Polio! You go Smallpox - you go! Don't let us down rubella, meningitis, measles.....
-
Polio Pete... let's hope that sticks...
-
It should show who the true crackpots in the Conservative Party are. This is going to create another wedge within conservatives, as everyone else is basically on the same page with vaccines.
-
Polio Pete... let's hope that sticks...
I was a kid during the polio epidemic. Parents were ecstatic when a vaccine became available and we lined up to get it. The idea of not being vaccinated would have been looney tunes back then. Polio and smallpox vaccination clinics were standard in schools.
-
I was a kid during the polio epidemic. Parents were ecstatic when a vaccine became available and we lined up to get it. The idea of not being vaccinated would have been looney tunes back then. Polio and smallpox vaccination clinics were standard in schools.
They gave a megaphone to the stupids...
-
I was a kid during the polio epidemic. Parents were ecstatic when a vaccine became available and we lined up to get it. The idea of not being vaccinated would have been looney tunes back then. Polio and smallpox vaccination clinics were standard in schools.
Vaccines are good. We should highly encourage them without a doubt. The question is whether the state should force kids to have medicine injected into them, such is exactly what we're talking any here.
Personally I would still feel safe if a few kids in my kid's class didn't have vaccinations as long as my kid did. Denying a kid their right to an education because their parents don't consent to their child undergoing a medical procedure the state wants them to have is a very serious thing.
The parents who don't vax their kids are stupid, but people have a right to be stupid and to consent to medical procedures.
-
Vaccines are good. We should highly encourage them without a doubt. The question is whether the state should force kids to have medicine injected into them, such is exactly what we're talking any here.
Of course, you seem to be ignoring the fact that the state never actually forces children to take vaccines. You always have the option of (for example) homeschooling. Yeah, that's a lot more inconvenient than sending them off to school. But that's the price of stupidity.
Personally I would still feel safe if a few kids in my kid's class didn't have vaccinations as long as my kid did.
"Safe" is not always a simple binary 'yes/no' issue. Your kids will be safer with the vaccine than without. But having unvaccinated kids around decreases the amount of safety .
Denying a kid their right to an education because their parents don't consent to their child undergoing a medical procedure the state wants them to have is a very serious thing.
Children have a right to an education. But children (and teachers) also have a right to be safe.
Vaccines work very well, but they are not 100%... some people (for whatever reason) do not develop the proper immune response, and they can be infected. The potential of loss of education in the unvaccinated child must be weighed against the potential health risks to a child that has been fully vaccinated by still has the potential to be infected. So who's rights take precidence?
Plus, even if you assume "vaccinated kids are safe enough", if you drop the vaccine mandate you have to consider the possibility that overall vaccination rates will fall, thus adding to even more risk.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/27oe2PO.gif)
-
geezaz Candi! Is this all you've got... to solve 'justinflation'? That's it?
(https://i.imgur.com/UIfYfpc.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/AbAkEmI.gif)
It’s time for Pierre Poilievre to get serious and stop giving oxygen to Conservatives’ furious fringe (https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2022/06/08/its-time-for-pierre-poilievre-to-get-serious-and-stop-giving-oxygen-to-conservatives-furious-fringe.html?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=OpinionStaff&utm_content=stareditorial&utm_source=twitter&source=torontostar&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=&utm_campaign_id=&utm_content=)
In his quest for the national Conservative leadership it seems there are no limits on what Poilievre is prepared to say to curry favour with the angry anti-vax constituency in his party, the same people prone to disappear down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories about globalist plots to run the world.
.
How much of what he’s saying now is based on sincere belief, and how much is just a cynical bid for votes among the Conservatives’ furious fringe?
.
But at the moment he is riding a tiger. It looks like it’s carrying him to the Conservative leadership, but he’s feeding forces that he may not be able to control down the road.
It’s time for Poilievre to get serious and make clear where he stands on all this. Becoming leader of one of the country’s national parties carries with it great responsibility. Fuelling fringe theories and casting doubt on whether he would fight a future pandemic fails that test spectacularly.
-
I'd prefer a forensic inquiry into money laundering and real estate but a public inquiry would be better than nothing.
-
I'd prefer a forensic inquiry into money laundering and real estate but a public inquiry would be better than nothing.
I'd prefer scrapping the whole system and going direct democracy. A lot harder to buy off tens of millions of Canadians than a bunch of well-connected politicians.
-
The most inclusive form of government is inclusive tribal governance. We have the technical tools to try to scale this.
-
I'd prefer scrapping the whole system and going direct democracy. A lot harder to buy off tens of millions of Canadians than a bunch of well-connected politicians.
The last federal election cost over $600 million, are you going to spend that every time there is a bill to vote on?
-
The last federal election cost over $600 million, are you going to spend that every time there is a bill to vote on?
Do it online. I submit my taxes online every year and do banking almost exclusively online.
How much good vs bad do our "democratic representatives" do for this country? I trust Canadians to act in the best interests of the country and everyday citizens than I do these idiots. They suck, many of them are crooks, at least the ones with any power, so take away their power as much as possible.
We can see corruption destroying Canada and the US right before our eyes. Remove the middle-man.
-
Charges of corruption without specifics strike me as extremely basic and unthoughtful.
-
Charges of corruption without specifics strike me as extremely basic and unthoughtful.
K
-
I don't have to do your homework for you when I say the sky is blue and you want proof.
If you need specifics that the Canadian and US political systems are corrupt then it's not I who is failing to think.
-
Charges of corruption without specifics strike me as extremely basic and unthoughtful.
MH, way to call member Nipples out! Given his response, clearly there's no there there... just Nipples being Nipples!
-
MH, way to call member Nipples out! Given his response, clearly there's no there there... just Nipples being Nipples!
the waldo, featuring 5800+ posts all consisting of...
(https://c.tenor.com/sHY2qL3VfMIAAAAC/wizrd-of-oz-pay-no-attention.gif)
-
Charges of corruption without specifics strike me as extremely basic and unthoughtful.
If you need specifics that the Canadian and US political systems are corrupt then it's not I who is failing to think.
c'mon Nipples - it's a simple request that you're scrambling to ignore/avoid!
-
c'mon Nipples - it's a simple request that you're scrambling to ignore/avoid!
You want me to post decades worth of news articles? Like I said, i'm not doing your own homework for you.
-
Sponsorship Scandal, Adscam. Didn't even have to look that up.
-
no! Nipples spoke of the system... stated that the Canadian political system is corrupt... as in systemic corruption distinct from examples of corruption within particular programs; as in the Sponsorship example given. That particular program example involved administrative misuse & misdirection of public funds - one program of hundreds... thousands of programs!
it shouldn't be so difficult for member Nipples to grasp - systemic political corruption versus program specific corruption
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVJP11MWAAIck0Q?format=jpg&name=small)
-
no! Nipples spoke of the system... stated that the Canadian political system is corrupt... as in systemic corruption distinct from examples of corruption within particular programs; as in the Sponsorship example given. That particular program example involved administrative misuse & misdirection of public funds - one program of hundreds... thousands of programs!
it shouldn't be so difficult for member Nipples to grasp - systemic political corruption versus program specific corruption
I wouldn’t accuse individual members of being on the take but parties definitely look after their friends when in power.
-
Do it online. I submit my taxes online every year and do banking almost exclusively online.
How much good vs bad do our "democratic representatives" do for this country? I trust Canadians to act in the best interests of the country and everyday citizens than I do these idiots. They suck, many of them are crooks, at least the ones with any power, so take away their power as much as possible.
We can see corruption destroying Canada and the US right before our eyes. Remove the middle-man.
Have you actually met many Canadians?
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/3oz8xTl6sGKbuRPDDW/giphy.gif)
Jokes aside, I don't know why individual Canadians would be any less self-interested than politicians.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/9PoGxGc.gif)
the waldo converts to bitcoin!
(https://i.imgur.com/PFItHih.gif)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVKG1kbWUAACo6z?format=jpg&name=small)
-
Have you actually met many Canadians?
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/3oz8xTl6sGKbuRPDDW/giphy.gif)
Jokes aside, I don't know why individual Canadians would be any less self-interested than politicians.
They are but it's their country. It's also harder to pay off tens of millions.
The whole point of democracy is rule by will of the people. Self-determination. If politicians aren't acting in the interests of voters the system doesn't work.
-
Always trust Sir Mackenzie Bowell
https://twitter.com/PMBowell/status/1537080259463372800
(https://i.imgur.com/jeSR5M6.png)
-
no! Nipples spoke of the system... stated that the Canadian political system is corrupt... as in systemic corruption distinct from examples of corruption within particular programs; as in the Sponsorship example given. That particular program example involved administrative misuse & misdirection of public funds - one program of hundreds... thousands of programs!
it shouldn't be so difficult for member Nipples to grasp - systemic political corruption versus program specific corruption
still waiting Nipples... still waiting! The waldo is shocked you haven't... can't... support your claim of systemic political corruption - that the Canadian political system, the system, is corrupt! What a moron you are, hey Nipples!
-
oh my! Prominent... er, leading Conservative journalist Andrew Coyne on today's Conservative, today's Conservatism!
(https://i.imgur.com/6Lmadom.gif)
-
Poilievre revisionism extraordinaire!
(https://i.imgur.com/XyFjQM2.gif)
if only PM Trudeau had "listened to the people" says skippy! As in listen to their MOU demands to overturn the 2021 election results in favour of a ruling "committee" of far-right extremists, the Senate and the Governor General... which eventually shifted into a proposal where a core group of "Freedumb Convoy" organizers and their supporters would govern, “with the Conservatives, and the NDP, and the Bloc as a coalition.” This... this is the rabble, the nonsense that the CPC/Poilievre supported. Imagine PM Trudeau ignoring them in favour of invoking the Emergencies Act - imagine!
wait waldo, there's more: Freedom Convoy protesters set to return to Ottawa for Canada Day, stay through summer (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/freedom-convoy-protesters-return-canada-day-1.6492504)
freeeeeeeeeeeedom!
-
such unadulterated bullshyte from Poilievre! (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1538194080475258881/vid/1280x720/lIafy7LOJ6zIbV-m.mp4?tag=14)... apparently, Canada's nationality is freedom - who knew, who knew!
this grifter says,
So many of our freedoms are under attack as big bossy government takes your money and tells you what to do... imposing vaccine mandates and attacking your dollar value. You no longer have the freedom to spend your wages because it is being inflated away by a deliberate inflationist policy imposed by the federal government and executed by an incompetent central bank. All of these attacks on our freedom have taken away from the great heritage that Laurier advanced when he was Prime Minister, at a time when he advanced freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise, freedom of trade.
.
I'm running for Prime Minister to put you back in control of your life by making Canada the freest nation on earth.
of course all those organizations that follow/review/rank the freedom of global nations consistently rank Canada's freedom comparatively high... geezaz skippy, even the Fraser Institute stink tank ranks Canada 6 out of 152 countries!
-
wound licking appears over as O'Toole finally resurfaces!
=> Erin O'Toole wants his party to find a 'balance' between conservatism and populism. (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/otoole-populism-the-house-wherry-analysis-1.6492946) --- Former leader says Conservatives need to 'come up with positive change, not add to the anger'
Whoever the next leader is … they will have to get the balance right between conservative, traditional policies and populism.
And I believe as leaders we have to channel people's frustrations into positive change, not add fuel to the fire.
Citing the influence of American culture and the effects of Western alienation, rural issues and pandemic fatigue, O'Toole said Conservatives need to "come up with positive change, not add to the anger."
Anyone that wins will have to strike that right balance for the well-being of the country. That's what I was always trying to say to my caucus.
He said he hopes the next Conservative leader will "realize that the country is in a fractious state but provide a plan to heal those divisions."
-
(https://i.imgur.com/WjfjuSB.jpg)
-
by the by, of course in Canada... it's 'freedom of expression', not 'freedom of speech'
(https://i.imgur.com/Wrq8DWZ.gif)
(https://i.imgur.com/V5UFpup.gif)
-
recent Mainstreet survey of Carleton Ottawa riding... Poilievre's riding:
(https://i.imgur.com/BXOWqAn.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/uubjeW3.jpg)
-
PM Trudeau & NDP leader Singh have both offered comment on the U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down 'Roe vs. Wade'... so have CPC leadership candidates Charest, Brown and Lewis. Surprisingly freedomMan Poilievre has nothing to say! Who says skippy revels in ambiguity... in inexactness!
(https://i.imgur.com/Ahpso2P.gif)
-
hey now Conservative Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC)... whatchaGonnaDo when candidate for CPC leader Patrick Brown gets tooooo close to the 'annointedOne' Poilievre? Why, no worries, you simply disqualify the guy! Clearly Brown's relentless attacks against the presumed frontrunner in the race, Pierre Poilievre, has consequence! Patrick Brown disqualified from Conservative leadership race (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/patrick-brown-disqualified-1.6511407)
statement from Patrick Brown campaign:
(https://i.imgur.com/ejnluT0.jpg)
-
geezaz! When the CPC loses lilleyPad... and Kinsella!
(https://i.imgur.com/2nJJ3Kk.gif)
Disqualifying Brown an indictment of Conservative Party itself (https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-disqualifying-brown-an-indictment-of-conservative-party-itself) --- The party establishment appear to have rigged the race to favour Pierre Poilievre.
After answering questions on a variety of issues, though, Brown said he was booted from the race over an anonymous allegation that an organizer was being paid by a private company to campaign for him. He said his campaign asked for details on who the organizer was, or which company was allegedly paying organizers, but said the party refused to say.
“You can’t fight a phantom,” Brown said.
Without details, he said his team wasn’t able to look into the matter or provide evidence either supporting or refuting the allegation.
He called the process to remove him unfair, damaging to the party, and ultimately done to try and ensure a Pierre Poilievre victory.
-
counsel to Patrick Brown - enter prominent criminal defence lawyer, 'Marie Henein':
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXBu0RiWAAE5yt1?format=jpg) - (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXBu0RmXkAM8Zfb?format=jpg)
-
Looks like he won't be going quietly...
Over at the Conspiracy Board the people who cried conspiracy when the far-right candidates were tossed are strangely silent.
Personally I don't care. I would support a good Conservative candidate if the party ever for some reason elected one, but not Poilievre who is a populist pull-doll with all the preprogrammed talky talks. Pull the string ... "Freedom" and then pull it again "Freedom"
-
Global News' Rachel Gilmore: asking Poilievre/campaign (apparently inconvenient) questions about his associations with some of the 'far-right' Trucker Convoy characters - instead of receiving a response with answers to the questions, Gilmore is instead called unprofessional while Poilievre plays the, 'victim under attack' ploy!
(https://i.imgur.com/MiCja5K.gif)
-
(^) Global News' Rachel Gilmore's related column: How close is too close to the far-right? Why some experts are worried about Canada’s MPs (https://globalnews.ca/news/8967781/how-close-is-too-close-to-the-far-right-why-some-experts-are-worried-about-canadas-mps/)
On June 30, Conservative leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre made a choice.
Wearing a crisp blue shirt and a politician’s smile, he walked up to a group of anti-vaccine mandate protesters and led the pack as it walked down Ottawa’s streets.
Beside him marched a man named James Topp, an anti-vaccine figure now set to face a court martial, who had been walking across the country to draw attention to his opposition to vaccine mandates. Topp, however, had recently joined a podcast run by far-right figurehead Jeremy Mackenzie for over an hour, saying that the podcast and others like it “kept (him) hanging on.” Mackenzie said in January that the “Freedom Convoy,” which gathered in Ottawa in February, could “bring down the government.”
“I want to be there. I want to see this s–-t happen,” Mackenzie said in a YouTube broadcast at the time.
It’s unclear why Poilievre “felt that he needed to” meet with Topp, said Stephanie Carvin, a former CSIS analyst who now teaches at Carleton University.
“But it definitely was a choice with consequences,” she said — including, potentially, emboldening and legitimizing the more extreme views among the convoy’s supporters.
-
the anonymous
person 'whistleblower' behind the Patrick Brown accusations is no longer anonymous... and none other than the Sun's Warren Kinsella writes an 'open letter' to her: Open letter to 'whistleblower' behind Patrick Brown accusations (https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-open-letter-to-whistleblower-behind-patrick-brown-accusations)
Dear Debbie Jodoin:
.
It’s simply an open letter written to you, the person identified as the “whistleblower” who prompted the expulsion of Patrick Brown from the Conservative leadership race.
One complaint from one person: that’s all it took, Debbie. Apparently what you had to say was so powerful, so incontrovertible, so damning, you alone could force the expulsion of one of the frontrunners in your party’s leadership contest. Even after the ballots have been printed up with his name on them. Wow.
What did you say that would have such a dramatic result? That’s the question everyone is asking, because the Conservative Party brass are refusing to say anything meaningful.
.
Now, Debbie, I sent you a number of questions prior to writing this opinion column. You did not respond to any of them.
Here they are:
1. Have you received employment or compensation, or offer of same, by the Poilievre campaign or the Conservative Party?
2. You have posted multiple statements on social media applauding Poilievre and his campaign staff. Were you in contact with them, or their representatives, when you were ostensibly supporting Patrick Brown?
3. We have received statements and suggestions that you were placed — or offered yourself to do so — in the Brown campaign by the Poilievre campaign to damage the former. Is this true?
4. Have you received any compensation or consideration from any individual associated with the Poilievre campaign, or supportive of same?
Anyway. No response.
...
-
I bet the CPC could get a strong majority with Charest. I think, however, they're overall far too stupid for that and will lose official opposition status and be a third or fourth party under Polievre.
-
I bet the CPC could get a strong majority with Charest. I think, however, they're overall far too stupid for that and will lose official opposition status and be a third or fourth party under Polievre.
It says a lot about the party when Pierre is a leading voice within the party. How embarrassing.
-
This kind of retarded pablum may work...
https://youtu.be/h3Mmd3llxP8
-
It's like the CPC doesn't want to govern again.
-
This kind of retarded pablum may work...
https://youtu.be/h3Mmd3llxP8
Not even a dog whistle anymore.
(https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/2d8be8b/2147483647/legacy_thumbnail/1200x900%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F20%2Fa4%2Fb01d914445f0bf0aa5e08b15093a%2Fpatriot-front-arrests-43586.jpg)
-
This kind of retarded pablum may work...
https://youtu.be/h3Mmd3llxP8
Meh, I could have been spared the wood analogy but I mostly agree with him, to a point.
"Freedom" has now become a dirty word and a "conservative meme" to the left. Let's think about that for a second. Only in a statist society repressing civil liberties could this occur.
Statists, please downvote this post and reveal yourselves. Show me your distain for freedom.
-
Meh, I could have been spared the wood analogy but I mostly agree with him, to a point.
"Freedom" has now become a dirty word and a "conservative meme" to the left. Let's think about that for a second. Only in a statist society repressing civil liberties could this occur.
Statists, please downvote this post and reveal yourselves. Show me your distain for freedom.
A buzzword has no real meaning to me.
If you want to discuss an actual issue where you think Canadians are losing freedoms, then it can be analyzed.
But the freedom you’re talking about is a campaign slogan. Meaningless.
-
^
THIS.
If you drill down as far as possible, "freedom" means:
- I don't want to wear a mask
- I think Political Correctness is threatening us
Neither of these positions are worthy of serious consideration.
Our three biggest problems:
- Unity (and the attendant shittyness of means and substance of discussion to bring us together)
- Environment (pollution, climate change waste etc.)
- Economy (runaway capitalist speculation, lack of fair wages, etc)
Imagine a leader who would step up and actually say that in public.... that person would get my vote.
Not a high school debate club president who never worked a job telling me he's going to protect my freedom.
-
Meh, I could have been spared the wood analogy but I mostly agree with him, to a point.
"Freedom" has now become a dirty word and a "conservative meme" to the left. Let's think about that for a second. Only in a statist society repressing civil liberties could this occur.
Statists, please downvote this post and reveal yourselves. Show me your distain for freedom.
lmao what a mark.
-
Graham is all about the buzzwords, slogans and truthiness without the thought given to the actual reality.
“A sense of Justice that traverses space and time” is a prime example of this. It’s a completely meaningless statement. But, from what I can tell, he believes it. What “it” is remains ambiguous and unexplained.
-
^
THIS.
If you drill down as far as possible, "freedom" means:
- I don't want to wear a mask
- I think Political Correctness is threatening us
Neither of these positions are worthy of serious consideration.
That's your opinion, and an exaggeration. Masks are fine, but people were fined for walking outdoors in a park. Let's think about that for a second.
In a healthy, free society it is a good thing to question authority instead of simply submitting to them. If we don't stand up for our civil liberties we will lose them. Brushing it away with "Well, it was an emergency and for the common good" is not good enough.
You are my friend, but I will be frank and try to be respectful. You have a long track record of statist positions and your support for some if not many basic civil liberties is at many times weak, for lack of a better word (remember our discussions on privacy). If you're ok with being controlled by government and put a high priority on order that's fine, but expect that many others may not share this. Some feel that being chained in movement, or speech, etc is not fun. Even if sometimes necessary. Even thread drift on the other board...I say just let people talk, who cares really. Is order so important all the time, to that extent? But the big C insists on micro-managing ... which people typically resent.
A key difference of opinion that keeps popping up. On the Political Compass I lean about -4 or -5 on the authoritarian/libertarian scale, I suspect your score is higher.
I dislike Pierre as a person, he's slimy, but that doesn't mean I disagree with him on all issues. But he is now a meme.
-
but people were fined for walking outdoors in a park.
Cite
-
1. Masks are fine, but people were fined for walking outdoors in a park. Let's think about that for a second.
2. You are my friend, but I will be frank and try to be respectful. You have a long track record of statist positions and your support for some if not many basic civil liberties is at many times weak, for lack of a better word (remember our discussions on privacy). If you're ok with being controlled by government and put a high priority on order that's fine, but expect that many others may not share this. Some feel that being chained in movement, or speech, etc is not fun. Even if sometimes necessary. Even thread drift on the other board...I say just let people talk, who cares really. Is order so important all the time, to that extent? But the big C insists on micro-managing ... which people typically resent.
3. A key difference of opinion that keeps popping up. On the Political Compass I lean about -4 or -5 on the authoritarian/libertarian scale, I suspect your score is higher. I dislike Pierre as a person, he's slimy, but that doesn't mean I disagree with him on all issues. But he is now a meme.
1. I can disagree with that AND think that the Convoy protests were unnecessary and misguided
2. This is fair. I don't expect you (or the convoy) to agree with me and in fact I can think that the Convoy protests were unnecessary and misguided AND sympathize. IN fact, I believe a majority of Canadians are with me on this from a poll I saw.
3. Again, fair.
-
Cite
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/britannia-man-fined-880-while-walking-dog-through-britannia-park/wcm/2b73b63f-8622-495d-b428-8880842ab5dd/amp/ my
-
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/britannia-man-fined-880-while-walking-dog-through-britannia-park/wcm/2b73b63f-8622-495d-b428-8880842ab5dd/amp/ my
This is the problem with your examples…. you’re full of sh!t. This has nothing to do with masks. He was fined for being in the park when it was closed. Parks were closed for a time to avoid crowds because they didn’t know how virulent the disease was. Once we learned, parks were open again.
This is the problem with your sloganeering…. Individual cases don’t stand up to scrutiny. Not to mention you see conspiracies to take away your freedoms where none exist.
-
This is the problem with your examples…. you’re full of sh!t. This has nothing to do with masks.
Masking was a government imposed emergency legal requirement during COVID times. Not walking through parks was a government imposed emergency legal requirement during COVID times. Think harder buddy.
This is the problem with your sloganeering…. Individual cases don’t stand up to scrutiny. Not to mention you see conspiracies to take away your freedoms where none exist.
You asked for a cite about people getting fined for walking in a park. I gave one. If you agreed with them ok whatever. Nothing I've said is false or misleading. Banning group gatherings made some sense at the time. But he was alone outside walking his dog through a park you f**king idiot.
"Sloganeering"? Bugger off with this nonsense. And I have no idea what you're talking about re: conspiracies lol. I don't remember saying there's a secret plot to take away our freedoms. You keep trying to pin memes on me because your arguments suck. Use your brain instead of constant, never-ending insults like a tantrum- throwing toddler. Like aren't you embarrassed? Seriously, try disagreeing with someone like an adult for once. It's call "debate" you stupid whiny f*ck.
BTW if someone starts insulting me I have every right to verbally annihilate them because f*ck you. But you're still going to call me a hypocrite. STFU.
-
But he was alone outside walking his dog through a park
Any idea how a municipality can close a park to groups of three, but not to individuals?
I don’t think they can…. The park is either open, or it’s closed. It’s nuance that your brain seems to have a hard time grasping.
But, you go on to saying masking was required…. And other measures were required. So you can’t even really articulate what the freedoms that you claim were taken away even are. You just deal in vague slogans and conspiracies.
But you're still going to call me a hypocrite
I’m not convinced you even know what the term means.
-
1. I can disagree with that AND think that the Convoy protests were unnecessary and misguided
2. This is fair. I don't expect you (or the convoy) to agree with me and in fact I can think that the Convoy protests were unnecessary and misguided AND sympathize. IN fact, I believe a majority of Canadians are with me on this from a poll I saw.
3. Again, fair.
Well at least if you can sympathize and not immediately write off all protesters as "dumb" that's at least more than some people.
-
Any idea how a municipality can close a park to groups of three, but not to individuals?
I don’t think they can…. The park is either open, or it’s closed. It’s nuance that your brain seems to have a hard time grasping.
When did I say they closed the park to groups but not individuals? Your reading comprehension sucks. You can't even read dude. Go work for the city of Ottawa your numb-nuts brain would fit right in.
But, you go on to saying masking was required…. And other measures were required. So you can’t even really articulate what the freedoms that you claim were taken away even are. You just deal in vague slogans and conspiracies.
You can't even articulate a point properly and therefore nobody has any idea what you even just wrote, but it was probably something smug. You can't read or write LOL.
-
This kind of retarded pablum may work...
https://youtu.be/h3Mmd3llxP8
skippy's got wood!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8MZCpsqaFE (https://i.imgur.com/txNDpCV.jpg)
-
Laugh away Waldo but it's not too dumb to win the election.
-
That's your opinion, and an exaggeration. Masks are fine, but people were fined for walking outdoors in a park. Let's think about that for a second.
In a healthy, free society it is a good thing to question authority instead of simply submitting to them. If we don't stand up for our civil liberties we will lose them. Brushing it away with "Well, it was an emergency and for the common good" is not good enough.
LMAO this you?
Do what (the cops) say, follow their lawful orders, you're very unlikely to get shot.
-
LMAO this you?
Uhm you challenge their authority in court with a lawyer present or in the laws themselves via politicians. If you want to physically challenge a cop when he's in front of you trying to arrest you and barking orders with a gun on his hip and a license to shoot you if you resist have fun getting shot. Apparently you're cool with people getting into street fights with cops LOL, great advice!
I was also careful to say "lawful orders". You're also free to verbally challenge a cop's authority if he's giving you unlawful orders (or lawful ones, though that will do nothing). I've watched about a billion Youtube videos of "police audits". A cop is extremely unlikely to shoot you or even arrest you if you're just running your mouth and calling them on their BS, especially with a camera rolling. But if you're going to actually DO something stupid, like run, or reach for your waist, or otherwise resist arrest well congrats you're effed.
-
Uhm you challenge their authority in court with a lawyer present or in the laws themselves via politicians. If you want to physically challenge a cop when he's in front of you trying to arrest you and barking orders with a gun on his hip and a license to shoot you if you resist have fun getting shot. Apparently you're cool with people getting into street fights with cops LOL, great advice!
(https://i.imgflip.com/6ms0qi.jpg)
I was also careful to say "lawful orders". You're also free to verbally challenge a cop's authority if he's giving you unlawful orders (or lawful ones, though that will do nothing). I've watched about a billion Youtube videos of "police audits". A cop is extremely unlikely to shoot you or even arrest you if you're just running your mouth and calling them on their BS, especially with a camera rolling. But if you're going to actually DO something stupid, like run, or reach for your waist, or otherwise resist arrest well congrats you're effed.
Lawful orders like not walking through a closed park?
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/6ms0qi.jpg)
What's your point?
Lawful orders like not walking through a closed park?
Right. I'm complaining about it online, I'm not getting into physical fights with bylaw officers.
If it were me I'd probably tell the officer to go eff themselves and not give them my ID which they'd request. They'd probably call the real cops and detain or arrest me which I wouldn't resist because I'm not suicidal. Then they'd ID me, give me the ticket, then release me. Then I'd fight the ticket in court without a lawyer, which I'd lose, but I would be able to tell the government to suck my big giant black d!ck and be very satisfied that this statement is added to the public record. I would request the transcript and email it to the mayor and every city councilor who approved the measure, and also frame the transcript to hang in my living room next to an artist's rendering of my giant black member.
-
Cite?
-
What's your point?
You talk a big game but when the rubber hits the road you're yes sir no sir right away sir.
Right. I'm complaining about it online, I'm not getting into physical fights with bylaw officers.
If it were me I'd probably tell the officer to go eff themselves and not give them my ID which they'd request. They'd probably call the real cops and detain or arrest me which I wouldn't resist because I'm not suicidal. Then they'd ID me, give me the ticket, then release me. Then I'd fight the ticket in court without a lawyer, which I'd lose, but I would be able to tell the government to suck my big giant black d!ck and be very satisfied that this statement is added to the public record. I would request the transcript and email it to the mayor and every city councilor who approved the measure, and also frame the transcript to hang in my living room next to an artist's rendering of my giant black member.
I love that you couldn't do this tough guy act without being a giant racist.
-
I love that you couldn't do this tough guy act without being a giant racist.
Oh wow crying racism like a little b*tch. Grow some balls.
-
Oh wow crying racism like a little b*tch. Grow some balls.
Here, class, we have an example of a mediocre micropenised middle aged white guy cosplaying as a black man and indulging in hoary racial stereotypes as a way of compensating for their own deep inadequacies.
-
Here, class, we have an example of a mediocre micropenised middle aged white guy cosplaying as a black man and indulging in hoary racial stereotypes as a way of compensating for their own deep inadequacies.
Nah I just thought it was amusing.
-
Here, class, we have an example of a mediocre micropenised middle aged white guy cosplaying as a black man and indulging in hoary racial stereotypes as a way of compensating for their own deep inadequacies.
He’s closer to 12, living in his mom’s basement. He’s nowhere near middle aged.
-
He’s closer to 12, living in his mom’s basement. He’s nowhere near middle aged.
I'm 5 and I live in your mom's ying-yang. I'm also black you racist.
-
Press Progress - Luke LeBrun, July 13, 2022: Only 1-in-10 Canadians Believe ‘Free Speech’ is in Crisis, Despite What Right-Wing Voices Claim (https://pressprogress.ca/only-1-in-10-canadians-believe-free-speech-is-in-crisis-despite-what-right-wing-voices-claim/)
(https://pressprogress.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/image-2022-07-01.png)
New research suggests a lopsided majority of Canadians do not believe “free speech” is on the verge of disappearing in Canada, findings that pour a tall glass of cold water on claims promoted by Pierre Poilievre and right-wing media sources.
According to a new survey released by the University of Saskatchewan’s Canadian Hub for Applied and Social Research, the belief that “freedom of speech” is in crisis appears to be a top-of-mind concern for a very small – but very loud – minority of Canadians.
Only 12.4% of respondents said they believe Canadians have little to no “freedom of speech” – by contrast, more than eight-in-ten Canadians take a less catastrophic view.
“The majority of respondents (85.9%) believe Canadians fully or somewhat have freedom of speech,” the USask survey states.
-
at what point do these children of the corn turn on skippy?
(https://i.imgur.com/o919Txh.jpg)
-
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/britannia-man-fined-880-while-walking-dog-through-britannia-park/wcm/2b73b63f-8622-495d-b428-8880842ab5dd/amp/ my
He was fined for walking through a closed park, not for lack of masking.
-
He was fined for walking through a closed park, not for lack of masking.
Correct. I didn't say otherwise.
-
CPC leadership committee (LEOC) opts for a 3rd campaign debate... but skippy exercises his freeedom to refuse to attend!
(https://i.imgur.com/dzMMGC6.gif)
Poilievre campaign spokesperson Jenni Byrne provides statement... Charest campaign responds:
(https://i.imgur.com/Od3fpQl.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYOx47JUcAAuCis?format=png&name=small)
-
yabut c'mon, Poilievre is a uniter... not a divider!
Will Red Tories create a new political party if Poilievre wins the CPC leadership? (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-will-red-tories-create-a-new-political-party-if-poilievre-wins-the-cpc/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter)
... with populist pretender Pierre Poilievre poised since the outset to capture the poisoned chalice of Canadian politics that is the Conservative Party leadership.
The party looks set to embrace the grievance politics of U.S. Republicans and the European far right, just as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his fellow Liberals always hoped it would. They know that, faced with a Conservative Party leader who gives succour to misguided anti-vaxxers, angry truckers and right-wing conspiracy theorists, mainstream Canadian voters will opt for the comparatively safe Liberals, no matter how irritatingly woke the party’s leadership becomes.
Some supporters of Poilievre rival Jean Charest have concluded as much and are already musing about the creation of a new centre-right political party that would look, well, a lot like the old Progressive Conservative Party Mr. Charest led between 1993 and 1998.
.
“Who speaks for the majority of mainstream Canadians, who describe themselves as fiscal conservatives with progressive views on social issues?” the group’s founder, former Tory leadership candidate Rick Peterson, writes on Centre Ice’s website. “Who speaks for those of us focused on pragmatic solutions and policies? Who speaks for those of us who dismay at the loud, single-issue and predictably slanted views that often dominate Party politics and leadership races?”
.
Even if a new centre-right political party were to emerge in the wake of a Poilievre victory on Sept. 10, it is not clear if Mr. Charest, at 64, would be the obvious person to lead it. Mr. Macron was not yet 40 when he founded La République en Marche. And Mr. Charest’s current leadership campaign, while solid and principled, has not exactly caught on with the broader Canadian electorate.
Still, if only to restore some sanity to federal politics, no one should discourage Mr. Charest from trying.
-
https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/canadians-more-favourable-towards-charest-cpc-voters-prefer-poilievre
-
yabut c'mon, Poilievre is a uniter... not a divider!
Will Red Tories create a new political party if Poilievre wins the CPC leadership? (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-will-red-tories-create-a-new-political-party-if-poilievre-wins-the-cpc/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter)
Betteridge's law of headlines
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines)
"This story is a great demonstration of my maxim that any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "no." The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bullshit, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it."
-
"This story is a great demonstration of my maxim that any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "no." The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bullshit, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it."
oh really! The linked-to G&M article is a mix of openly stated speculation peppered with supporting references to the Charest campaign's co-chairperson and former CPC leadership candidate Rick Peterson... founder of the group, also as referenced in the article, 'Centre Ice Conservatives (https://www.centreiceconservatives.ca/)'!
but hey now, another article (in The Hill Times) with some of the same players referenced... note the article headline doesn't end in a question mark! /snarc
=> If Conservatives fail to win next federal election, party would split, say some Conservatives (https://www.hilltimes.com/2022/07/25/if-conservatives-fail-to-win-next-federal-election-party-would-split-say-some-conservatives/373632)
Self-described “progressive liberal” and freelance columnist Andrew Perez: “Blue Tories are becoming an endangered species,” and that if something isn’t done to combat the party’s increased embrace of populism, 2022 will be the year they finally go extinct.
While Perez said in an interview with The Hill Times that he believes the Red Tories may have “died” in 2003 after the creation of the CPC, there still remained a strong contingent of Blues alongside other social conservatives and libertarians.
However, since the defeat of Harper in 2015, the party has been “submerged by a brigade of ‘freedom-loving,’ anti-science, anti-establishment ‘activists’ that are intent on installing Pierre Poilievre as leader–whatever the cost to their party and movement.”
Perez argued that Poilievre, in particular, has “glommed on to grievance-based populism,” possibly due to learning the wrong lessons from the defeat of the party’s last two leaders, Scheer and O’Toole.
“I think there’s a sense within the party that the last two leaders were not effective and that the party needs to tack to the far right,” Perez said. “To really champion an approach that is diametrically opposed to Trudeau.”
-
the "legend" of Stephen Harper holds that his governing prowess managed to keep the fringe elements of the CPC in line... that's its only in Opposition that the populist driving caucus members have been given a free path to embrace the fringe minorities (aka, 'the base') with populist drivel!
but hey now, is this an actual endorsement from Harper - and if so, does it even carry any weight?
=> Stephen Harper says Pierre Poilievre has the best chance to win the next federal election (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/harper-poilievre-endorsement-1.6531995)
Former prime minister Stephen Harper says Pierre Poilievre is the Conservative leadership candidate with the best shot at leading the party to victory in the next federal election.
Harper's declaration came in a Monday evening video posted to Facebook and Twitter, in which he described Poilievre's ability to galvanize support from new members as a critical ingredient for success.
"That's how we win the next federal election, and in my opinion, Pierre has made by far the strongest case," Harper said.
-
oh really! The linked-to G&M article is a mix of openly stated speculation peppered with supporting references to the Charest campaign's co-chairperson and former CPC leadership candidate Rick Peterson... founder of the group, also as referenced in the article, 'Centre Ice Conservatives (https://www.centreiceconservatives.ca/)'!
but hey now, another article (in The Hill Times) with some of the same players referenced... note the article headline doesn't end in a question mark! /snarc
=> If Conservatives fail to win next federal election, party would split, say some Conservatives (https://www.hilltimes.com/2022/07/25/if-conservatives-fail-to-win-next-federal-election-party-would-split-say-some-conservatives/373632)
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SkeletalCompleteCaecilian-max-1mb.gif)
-
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SkeletalCompleteCaecilian-max-1mb.gif)
(https://i.imgur.com/8FfNFcj.jpg)
says you, the guy who cared enough to 'Betteridge' the G&M article
Betteridge's law of headlines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines)
-
but hey now, is this an actual endorsement from Harper - and if so, does it even carry any weight?
=> Stephen Harper says Pierre Poilievre has the best chance to win the next federal election (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/harper-poilievre-endorsement-1.6531995)
yes! Yes Harper is endorsing Freedom Clownvoy skippy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1551723231135944704/pu/vid/1280x720/PWPejARBMo_mBhXP.mp4?tag=12)
-
CPC leadership committee (LEOC) opts for a 3rd campaign debate... but skippy exercises his freeedom to refuse to attend!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYl7Bu1XwAA-1CR?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYnjDNYXkAEGf0u?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
yes! Yes Harper is endorsing Freedom Clownvoy skippy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1551723231135944704/pu/vid/1280x720/PWPejARBMo_mBhXP.mp4?tag=12)
geezaz waldo! Yet another zinger from G&M's Andrew Coyne! Winner of one majority in five tries says Poilievre has what it takes (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-winner-of-one-majority-in-five-tries-says-poilievre-has-what-it-takes/)
So Stephen Harper thinks Pierre Poilievre is the best choice to lead the federal Conservatives, on the grounds that he is the candidate most likely to win the next election.
This is big news. After all, who knows more about winning elections than Stephen Harper: the leader who took a certain Conservative victory in 2004 – the year of the sponsorship scandal – and turned it into a Liberal minority; who in 2006 turned a certain Conservative majority into a Conservative minority; who eked out another minority in 2008 against the historically inept Stéphane Dion; and who, after finally winning a potentially realigning majority in 2011 threw it away over the next four years.
At the end of which – after nearly 10 years in power – he departed with next to nothing in the way of a policy footprint: at least, of a conservative policy footprint. The Harper Conservatives jettisoned every principle that he or they had ever stood for, from democratic accountability to a strong defence to balanced budgets to free markets. And they still won but a single majority in five attempts. They sold their souls, and got nothing in return; swung for the lowest common denominator, and missed. All that remains of Mr. Harper’s legacy, the sole basis for his reputation as an unbending conservative, is his scowl: a petulant Cheshire cat.
So Mr. Harper’s endorsement of Mr. Poilievre is a big deal, especially among those who think Mr. Harper’s example is to be emulated or his judgment is to be trusted. Still, the supposition, apparently widespread, that the most unpopular minister in a deeply unpopular government has now become an unstoppable political phenomenon, based solely on his ability to turn out the anti-vaccine vote, seems to have emerged from the same strange universe in which Mr. Harper is a master strategist and principled conservative.
-
CPC leadership committee (LEOC) opts for a 3rd campaign debate... but skippy exercises his freeedom to refuse to attend!
(https://i.imgur.com/r9KinmB.gif)
let Poilievre debate... freeeedom! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1552677246560788482/pu/vid/1280x720/Pgu3nZTfpKjk7CJX.mp4?tag=12)
-
Well, Trudeau is only 1 for 3 when it comes to majorities and it has only been Conservative ineptitude that has kept him in power at all.
-
Well, Trudeau is only 1 for 3 when it comes to majorities and it has only been Conservative ineptitude that has kept him in power at all.
oh my! Conservative ineptitude™, hey! So... with Poilievre being widely touted as the next CPC leader, have they finally resolved that ineptitude concern you speak of?
(https://i.imgur.com/CvwyfqH.jpg)
but hey now, surely you haven't forgot about 'power broker' Singh (as in the coalition... err, Confidence & Supply agreement... to 2025, doncha know!)
(https://saltwire.imgix.net/2022/3/22/ndp-liberal-2-0322-20220322jpg)
-
but hey now, surely you haven't forgot about 'power broker' Singh (as in the coalition... err, Confidence & Supply agreement... to 2025, doncha know!)
That's not a majority. Trudy has to lick the NDP's balls to get any legislation passed.
-
That's not a majority. Trudeau has to lick the NDP's balls to get any legislation passed.
it's obvious you don't understand a/this Liberal/NDP 'Confidence & Supply Agreement'!
waldo splainer: in exchange for expedited progress on shared priorities (sans ball-lickin'), the NDP has agreed to uphold the government on budgetary matters of confidence and supply (typically formal confidence motions and votes on budgets and spending plans.) ... shared priorities like pharmacare, dentalcare, and childcare - key issues which the Liberal government campaigned on and was elected to enact.
-
it's obvious you don't understand a/this Liberal/NDP 'Confidence & Supply Agreement'!
waldo splainer: in exchange for expedited progress on shared priorities (sans ball-lickin'), the NDP has agreed to uphold the government on budgetary matters of confidence and supply (typically formal confidence motions and votes on budgets and spending plans.) ... shared priorities like pharmacare, dentalcare, and childcare - key issues which the Liberal government campaigned on and was elected to enact.
Thanks for the waldoganda.
I'll add your note next to the naked statue of Justin that I worship and sodomize on a daily basis.
-
I'll add your note next to the naked statue of Justin that I worship and sodomize on a daily basis.
the waldo is always here for you... particularly to help with your lack of understanding and to counter some of the plethora of misinformation that you spew! Carry on!
-
the waldo is always here for you... particularly to help with your lack of understanding and to counter some of the plethora of misinformation that you spew! Carry on!
Would you like a handkerchief, you've got some slobber hanging from your chin?
-
oh my! Conservative ineptitude™, hey! So... with Poilievre being widely touted as the next CPC leader, have they finally resolved that ineptitude concern you speak of?
(https://i.imgur.com/CvwyfqH.jpg)
but hey now, surely you haven't forgot about 'power broker' Singh (as in the coalition... err, Confidence & Supply agreement... to 2025, doncha know!)
(https://saltwire.imgix.net/2022/3/22/ndp-liberal-2-0322-20220322jpg)
Is ineptitude winning the popular vote in the last 2 elections? 😂
That used to be a pretty big deal to you people. 🤣
Regardless, Harper is 1 win and 1 lose versus wonder boy. So I’m not sure why you include him in your list. He would trounce wonder boy if he decided to buck tradition and run again. People like him, Martin, Chrétien are serious people. Trudeau is not. People really want somebody who is an adult back in office. Trudeau is a man child, who’s only in this position because his daddy used to be PM. That’s assuming of course that he’s not actually Fidel Castro’s actual son.
-
You should hear the actually actual stories I heard about your mother.
-
You should hear the actually actual stories I heard about your mother.
I’m embarrassed for you. Yikes.
-
Only because you're ashamed of yourself The Castro bit is stupid even by your standards.
...no, I take that back. It suits your standards perfectly.
-
Only because you're ashamed of yourself The Castro bit is stupid even by your standards.
...no, I take that back. It suits your standards perfectly.
Aww, poor baby.
-
Aww, poor baby.
That"s what your mom says?
-
That"s what your mom says?
I’m honestly embarrassed for you.
-
And yet not embarrassed to call Trudeau's mom a wh0re. The projection is strong in this one.
-
And yet not embarrassed to call Trudeau's mom a wh0re. The projection is strong in this one.
Yes, you’re the very definition of projection. You’ve attacked politicians’ family members on a regular basis. But now you get a case of the vapours as you clutch your hypocritical pearls? GFY. Regardless, I didn’t call her that. Get professional help already. Your brain is completely broken.
-
I don't have the vapours. I'm just laughing that you would call Trudeau's mom a wh0re, given your own situation. But any "family members" you speak of are people who have taken public roles in government, like, for example, Trump's daughter whom he wants to bang.
-
Times up for Trudumb
The Liberals also lost the popular vote in the last two elections, and won with the smallest amount of the popular vote in Canadian history in 2020, defeating a record set by the Liberals in the election prior..
-
How much of the popular vote does the "coalition government" have?
-
The Liberals also lost the popular vote in the last two elections, and won with the smallest amount of the popular vote in Canadian history in 2020, defeating a record set by the Liberals in the election prior..
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT! Again, popular vote means diddlySquat. Again, yours is a losers lament! Popular vote is for losers! It's a consolation "prize"... like a participation ribbon! Again, the CPC vote numbers were minimally greater than the Liberals: in 2019 ~220K votes greater; in 2021 ~186K votes greater. Those numbers are hardly HUUUUUGE and in relation to other parties and respective provincial outcomes are principally "skewed" by one province - Alberta!
again: #Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
(https://i.imgur.com/Qya8NPL.jpeg)
-
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT! Again, popular vote means diddlySquat. Again, yours is a losers lament! Popular vote is for losers! It's a consolation "prize"... like a participation ribbon! Again, the CPC vote numbers were minimally greater than the Liberals: in 2019 ~220K votes greater; in 2021 ~186K votes greater. Those numbers are hardly HUUUUUGE and in relation to other parties and respective provincial outcomes are principally "skewed" by one province - Alberta!
again: #Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
(https://i.imgur.com/Qya8NPL.jpeg)
Trudeau is also a loser. Just checked his record. Regardless, I’m glad you guys don’t care so much about popular vote anymore, since you can no longer win it. The Ford election should show you what’s coming for wonder boy.
-
Trudeau is also a loser. Just checked his record. Regardless, I’m glad you guys don’t care so much about popular vote anymore, since you can no longer win it.
That's not true. The "coalition government" got over 50%.
-
Trudeau is also a loser. Just checked his record. Regardless, I’m glad you guys don’t care so much about popular vote anymore, since you can no longer win it. The Ford election should show you what’s coming for wonder boy.
Ford, for all his many faults, isn't a unlikeable, charisma-free whackjob pandering to the dumbest people alive like Pollivere, so I have no idea how you can map the Ontario results onto the federal one. Just kidding, I do: you're an idiot.
-
yes! Yes Harper is endorsing Freedom Clownvoy skippy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1551723231135944704/pu/vid/1280x720/PWPejARBMo_mBhXP.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/R0f5s7f.jpg)
-
I’m glad you guys don’t care so much about popular vote anymore, since you can no longer win it.
again, only losers lamenting reach for popular vote! In your particular case the reach is quite comical, particularly given the minuscule numbers you presume to attempt to leverage; again, the popular vote numbers difference you're embarrassing yourself over:
=> in 2019 ~18 million votes were cast... the popular vote difference was ~220K votes greater;
=> in 2021 ~17 million votes were cast... the popular vote difference was ~186K votes greater
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT!
#Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
-
again, only losers lamenting reach for popular vote! In your particular case the reach is quite comical, particularly given the minuscule numbers you presume to attempt to leverage; again, the popular vote numbers difference you're embarrassing yourself over:
=> in 2019 ~18 million votes were cast... the popular vote difference was ~220K votes greater;
=> in 2021 ~17 million votes were cast... the popular vote difference was ~186K votes greater
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT!
#Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
Yes, he won by losing! 😂😂😂
Thankfully for him, his buddy Jagoff came to the rescue! 🤣
-
Ford, for all his many faults, isn't a unlikeable, charisma-free whackjob pandering to the dumbest people alive like Pollivere, so I have no idea how you can map the Ontario results onto the federal one. Just kidding, I do: you're an idiot.
You vote like a teenage girl. I couldn’t give a **** about personality and charisma. I care about policies.
-
You vote like a teenage girl. I couldn’t give a **** about personality and charisma. I care about policies.
First, no you don't (how many memes have you posted about JT's hair/clothes?), and second, Pollivere's "policies" (that is: repeating the words "freedom" and "gatekeepers" over and over again) are dogshit too.
-
First, no you don't (how many memes have you posted about JT's hair/clothes?), and second, Pollivere's "policies" (that is: repeating the words "freedom" and "gatekeepers" over and over again) are dogshit too.
Nope. Taxes, budgets, vaccine mandates, immigration, housing, etc. Keep your head up Trudeau's to shelter you from the truth.
-
Nope. Taxes, budgets, vaccine mandates, immigration, housing, etc. Keep your head up Trudeau's to shelter you from the truth.
The truth is Pollivre is an empty husk who has somehow managed to make Trudeau look like an intellectual and policy heavyweight.
-
The truth is Pollivre is an empty husk who has somehow managed to make Trudeau look like an intellectual and policy heavyweight.
BWAAAHAAAAAHAAA, a Trudeau supporter calling somebody else an empty husk! Really? It doesn't seem that way in question period. Pollivere turns Trudeau into a babbling monkey.
-
BWAAAHAAAAAHAAA, a Trudeau supporter calling somebody else an empty husk! Really? It doesn't seem that way in question period. Pollivere turns Trudeau into a babbling monkey.
You think QP, a performance where politicians read scripted questions prepared by staffers, is indicative of intellectual prowess? Good lord you’re an easy mark.
-
You think QP, a performance where politicians read scripted questions prepared by staffers, is indicative of intellectual prowess? Good lord you’re an easy mark.
Because after the initial questions, it's not scripted. Once again though, a Trudeau supporter calling somebody else out for scripted questions is hilarious.
-
I don't see any "Trudeau supporters" other than Waldo I just see people criticizing him for what he actually does and other people criticizing him for imaginary things they read in Facebook memes.
-
I don't see any "Trudeau supporters" other than Waldo
(https://minimalistquotes.com/posterimages/you-go-to-war-with-the-army-you-have-not-the-army-.jpg)
-
Because after the initial questions, it's not scripted.
LOL yes it is.
Once again though, a Trudeau supporter calling somebody else out for scripted questions is hilarious.
Your reading comprehension is, as always, below toddler level. I'm not calling out anyone for scripted questions, I'm laughing at you for being so credulous as to think PP's QP performances are in any way indicative of his intellect.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZpPf-yXEAEKsPl?format=jpg)
-
Former B.C. premier Christy Clark endorses Jean Charest in Tory race --- Clark says federal Tories need to stick closer to the political centre (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/christy-clark-jean-charest-conservatives-federal-1.6549112)
Former British Columbia premier Christy Clark endorsed Jean Charest on Wednesday to be the next leader of the federal Conservatives, at a time when she says the party is racing to the extremes.
.
Clark's comment followed an impassioned speech she delivered in Edmonton to a room of conservatives gathered to discuss the need for the federal party to stick closer to the political centre.
-
Andrew Coyne G&M Aug 12: Where would Poilievre take the Conservatives? Not to the far right, but the far out (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-where-would-poilievre-take-the-conservatives-not-to-the-far-right-but/)
Mr. Poilievre is not properly understood as an ideological phenomenon. There is no such thing as Poilievrism. Nothing in his long career in politics, or in this campaign, suggests anything in the way of a coherent philosophy of government. Neither is that the basis of his appeal.
He made his name, after all, as Stephen Harper’s most eager attack dog, the backbencher willing to say and do whatever his master ordered, no matter how nasty. His most notable achievement, in his brief time as a junior cabinet minister, was the sinisterly misnamed Fair Elections Act. Guided by no apparent principle but a desire to tilt the electoral odds in the Tories’ favour, it caused a massive political firestorm and had to be substantially redrafted.
His campaign for leader has been singularly lacking in concrete policy proposals, beyond a vague promise to “give you back control of your life” – which turns out to mean abolishing COVID-19 vaccine mandates and little else – and hostility to various unnamed “gatekeepers.” Oh, and he’d “fire” the Bank of Canada governor, though that is not actually something a prime minister has the power to do.
What has Mr. Poilievre spent the current campaign talking about? The benefits of crypto currencies as a way of “opting out” of inflation; the heroism of the convoyards who took over downtown Ottawa earlier this year; accusations that the government is “spying on you everywhere” (a consultant’s report used anonymized cellphone data to track population movements); the evils of the World Economic Forum.
What, specifically, has he promised to do in government? He’d make federal infrastructure grants to cities conditional on approving new housing development. He’d withhold a part of federal research grants from universities that did not do enough to protect free speech on campus. He’d repeal Bill C-11, Liberal legislation that would regulate online streaming services like broadcasters. He’d invoke the notwithstanding clause to restore consecutive sentences for mass murderers. That’s about it.
Whether or not Mr. Poilievre is personally an extremist, his campaign is aimed squarely at attracting support from extremists. His followers do not support him because of what he is for, or what he would do in government. They only know what, and who, he is against, and – perhaps even more important – who is against him.
It would not matter to them if, on taking power, he pursued policies that were diametrically opposed to those few he has proposed as a candidate – any more than they were upset by Mr. Harper’s policy reversals. It isn’t about policy, for them or for him. It’s about attitude. It’s about taking the fight to the enemy.
Could he pivot, then, after the leadership race? In a sense, yes, and in a sense, no. I can imagine him adopting virtually any policy as leader if he thought it expedient. But that’s not really a pivot: That would require some initial position to pivot from. On the other hand, it’s harder to pivot from the sorts of associations he has made along the way. How do you “pivot” from hanging out with hostage-takers and amping conspiracy theorists?
Poor judgment, moral recklessness, bottomless opportunism: These aren’t policy positions, something you can moderate or explain away or wriggle out of. They’re attributes. They stick. That is increasingly the dividing line in American politics – not left versus right, but character and judgment versus their opposites. The party that is about to elect Mr. Poilievre – the party that, with the help of hundreds of thousands of new recruits, he has done much to create – looks likely to entrench the same cleavage in Canada.
This may be, in the end, where he would take the Conservative Party: not far right, but far out.
-
Andrew Coyne G&M Aug 12: Where would Poilievre take the Conservatives? Not to the far right, but the far out (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-where-would-poilievre-take-the-conservatives-not-to-the-far-right-but/)
David Moscrop WAPO Aug 8: It’s Poilievre’s Conservative Party. That’s bad news for Canada. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/08/pierre-poilievre-conservative-party-bad-news-canada/)
For months, Pierre Poilievre has led the pack, a clear front-runner in a contest that will shape the future of the party. Right now, that future looks to be a toxic, right-wing populist libertarian turn — a nasty turn we’ve seen before around the world.
In late July, former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper endorsed Poilievre. The nod wasn’t unexpected. It has long been assumed that Harper supported his former cabinet minister, just as it has long been known that Harper wasn’t the biggest fan of Poilievre’s principal rival, Jean Charest. The endorsement was a rubber stamp on top of a foregone conclusion. It made Poilievre the unity candidate — which is to say, it called for the ideological diversity of the party to be subsumed under Poilievre’s libertarian conservatism served with a dollop of populist pastiche. It’s Poilievre’s party now. That’s bad news for conservatives and the country.
The front-runner is also fond of torqued attacks against the Bank of Canada, journalists, the World Economic Forum and anyone who might plausibly be defined as a “gatekeeper.” His anti-elite, anti-establishment bit belies the fact he’s a career politician and former cabinet minister. He’s establishment all the way down. He’s a phony loudmouth who has been walking the halls of Parliament since 2004, when he was in his 20s.
With all those years in Parliament, you’d think he’d know what he’s talking about, but he doesn’t. He has made the federal budget a crusade: shrinking the deficit and debt, railing against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Bank of Canada’s “money printing” and inflation, and supporting a batty policy to force his ministers to cut a dollar of spending for each new dollar they wish to spend, as if government finance and personal finance are the same thing. It turns out, contrary to Poilievre’s lazy, rehashed-Thatcherist fever dream, that Canada is in healthy and sustainable fiscal shape. Inflation is a problem, a serious one, but it’s not caused by what Poilievre thinks it is, and it won’t be solved by his unserious, debate-club ideas.
While it’s too late to prevent Poilievre’s ascendancy to leader of the Conservative Party, it isn’t too late to resist him becoming prime minister. The Liberals, New Democrats and Greens ought to make it a priority to ensure he never forms a government. So should sensible Conservatives. Of course, the people of Canada must do the same. The problems Canada and the world face are far too great to leave to a right-wing, doctrinaire, stuffed-shirt politician of such little distinction, capacity or imagination.
-
Andrew Coyne G&M Aug 12: Where would Poilievre take the Conservatives? Not to the far right, but the far out (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-where-would-poilievre-take-the-conservatives-not-to-the-far-right-but/)
David Moscrop WAPO Aug 8: It’s Poilievre’s Conservative Party. That’s bad news for Canada. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/08/pierre-poilievre-conservative-party-bad-news-canada/)
Michael Harris The Tyee Aug 12: Pierre Poilievre Is a Symptom of the Conservatives’ Sickness (https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2022/08/12/Pierre-Poilievre-Symptom-Conservatives-Sickness/?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email) - The party remains under the Harperites’ spell — or curse.
Since Harper’s forced retreat from public life to ride the gravy train of right-wing political consulting, the party has gotten it emphatically wrong.
Despite three straight electoral losses, one under Harper, and two under the leadership of Harper mini-clones from his cabinet, the Conservatives are poised to select Pierre Poilievre on Sept. 10 as their next leader. Stay tuned for the fourth bellyflop in a row at the national polls.
The Conservatives are still the party of “Make Harperism Great Again.” Instead of taking the rejections of 2015, 2019 and 2021 as signs of the urgent need to reconstruct a party that had grown authoritarian, undemocratic and out of touch, they have doubled down on the policies that have turned them into the perpetual opposition, including fossil fuel worship, environmental myopia, anti-democratic practices and dismissiveness towards Indigenous Peoples in Canada.
Poilievre is more of a Harper protégé than Andrew Scheer or Erin O’Toole ever were.
But once Poilievre has to speak to a national audience, his messages — Trudeau-bashing, threatening to fire the governor of the Bank of Canada, and hailing cryptocurrency as the answer to inflation — will draw more laughs than votes.
Some people have said that once the Conservative leadership race wobbles to its anti-climactic end, Poilievre will merely “pivot” to a more centrist position to appeal to a wider audience. O’Toole tried that, after running on the right to win the top job, and no one believed him when he changed his spots.
And Poilievre is a Harper Conservative through and through. So rather than pivot, it is much more likely he will double down on the stuff that brings smiles to the faces of people who think vaccine mandates are a bad idea.
-
skippy states "it's time to stand up for fundamental Canadian values"! Yet somehow Poilievre has yet to actually stand up and describe his personal understanding of just what 'Canadian values'... are fundamental and how they're presently being undercut/compromised/threatened! Anyone, anyone, anyone...
(https://i.imgur.com/T3yAQuF.jpg)
-
skippy states "it's time to stand up for fundamental Canadian values"! Yet somehow Poilievre has yet to actually stand up and describe his personal understanding of just what 'Canadian values'... are fundamental and how they're presently being undercut/compromised/threatened! Anyone, anyone, anyone...
(https://i.imgur.com/T3yAQuF.jpg)
Arrivecan app for one. Who the f**k is the PM to tell me whether or not I can leave the country.
-
Keep away from the memes. They're feeding you incorrect information and you haven't the literacy to know better.
-
Keep away from the memes. They're feeding you incorrect information and you haven't the literacy to know better.
You're a mouthpiece for the powerful.
Ottawa is making plans to expand the capabilities of its ArriveCAN app even as criticism continues to mount over the mandatory online data-entry system for travellers entering the country.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ottawa-arrivecan-criticisms-airports-wait-times-1.6548504
-
You still haven't realized it says nothing about you not being allowed to leave the country? How could your reading comprehension be that bad?
-
You still haven't realized it says nothing about you not being allowed to leave the country? How could your reading comprehension be that bad?
Right, just coming back. Like that's any better. You're a tool for the government, that intrudes on people's rights. Congratulations, Putin would be proud.
-
Poor baby had to quarantine? Awww!
-
You still haven't realized it says nothing about you not being allowed to leave the country? How could your reading comprehension be that bad?
IT'S LITERALLY CALLED ARRIVECAN LOL!
-
IT'S LITERALLY CALLED ARRIVECAN LOL!
And? It literally infringes on people’s rights. So f**king what you tool for government.
-
And?
Arrivecan app for one. Who the f**k is the PM to tell me whether or not I can leave the country.
-
Poor baby had to quarantine? Awww!
So needing it to enter the country as a Canadian citizen is somehow better. You’re the biggest f**king tool I’ve ever seen in my life. Anything to infringe in people’s rights huh.
-
So needing it to enter the country as a Canadian citizen is somehow better. You’re the biggest f**king tool I’ve ever seen in my life. Anything to infringe in people’s rights huh.
It's funny that you can't tell the difference between people defending the app and people making fun of you for thinking something called ArriveCAN somehow prevents you from leaving the country when you've never even left your Cheeto and jizz-stained mattress in your basement.
-
It's funny that you can't tell the difference between people defending the app and people making fun of you for thinking something called ArriveCAN somehow prevents you from leaving the country when you've never even left your Cheeto and jizz-stained mattress in your basement.
Hey now, your mom loves my mattress! That's a low blow.
-
Hey now, your mom loves my mattress! That's a low blow.
Aren't you like 50 years old at this point?
-
Shady's using the LeaveCan app leave him alone.
-
Can't they just suspend the requirement of ArriveCan from like June through August every year? Or not track Canadians at all unless there's a variant of concern going around?
I get maybe tracking foreign travelers coming into Canada but wtf is tracking Canadians going to do? What are they going to do with these stats? Studying stats is always interesting, but is having interesting stats protecting Canadians in a significant way? Is there enough protection happening due to this app to be worth violating the Charter rights of Canadians for? Canadians have a Charter right to enter or leave Canada, pre-COVID they have never been required to answer questions at the border coming into Canada beyond showing ID to prove your citizenship and questions regarding any property they are transporting into the country. We don't live in a police state. This government calls itself Liberal and doesn't understand liberalism.
Oh yeah that's right, they're not that kind of liberal.
-
We don't live in a police state.
c'mon bro! The app is evolving:
While ArriveCan was created for COVID-19, it has technological capacity beyond that to really shrink the amount of time that is required when you're getting screened at the border.
for example, {optionally, today}, at select air border crossings (Toronto's Pearson airport, Vancouver and Montreal), one can use the app to fill out a customs declaration form before arrival.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/Tp5bxwv.gif)
c'mon skippy! Name the names of those corporate oligarch's you'll target and what exactly will you do? Name the names of the companies/CEO's, hey!
-
c'mon bro! The app is evolving:
for example, {optionally, today}, at select air border crossings (Toronto's Pearson airport, Vancouver and Montreal), one can use the app to fill out a customs declaration form before arrival.
Suck on dem Trudeau balls.
-
strong is the salt with Nipples Graham! Don't be Nipples Graham...
-
strong is the salt with Nipples Graham! Don't be Nipples Graham...
Wait you're saying Justin's balls are salty?
-
Peepee Poopoo.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/AD6cgM3.png)
c'mon skippy... pivot! LOL!
Pierre Poilievre’s dangerous dance with a Diagolon extremist (https://www.nationalobserver.com/2022/08/23/opinion/pierre-poilievre-dangerous-dance-diagolon-extremist)
The name Diagolon refers to the imaginary nation MacKenzie and his followers have created, one that runs from Alaska to Florida. As the Canadian Anti-Hate Network’s Peter Smith and Mathew Kriner noted in a piece on the movement, this imaginary nation is “unencumbered by the sinister burdens of communism, moral degeneracy, and the World Economic Forum.” But that’s more than just a bad joke. As they write, the online community of pro-Diagolon livestreamers and their audience “have grown into an anti-government movement with militant accelerationist overtones.”
But the photo with MacKenzie wasn’t Poilievre’s first exposure to the Diagolon movement. On Canada Day, the Conservative leadership hopeful marched with James Topp, another Canadian Forces veteran who has appeared numerous times on MacKenzie’s podcast. That wasn’t an accident, and Poilievre and his staff must have done their due diligence on Topp before deciding to march with him. That they chose to do so in spite of his affiliation with someone like MacKenzie speaks volumes — and raises some uncomfortable questions about the Conservative movement’s persistent proximity to far-right groups.
Jean Charest tweeted over the weekend: “Hate and intolerance have no place in Canada or in the Conservative Party … it’s long past time for @PierrePoilievre to loudly and clearly tell MacKenzie, Diagolon and their supporters they are not welcome. Some votes should not be courted.”
Pierre Poilievre Ignores Calls to Disavow Far-Right Extremist Identified as a National Security Threat (https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-ignores-calls-to-disavow-far-right-extremist-identified-as-a-national-security-threat/)
Pierre Poilievre is ignoring calls to clearly disavow a man identified by a federal counterterrorism organization as a national security threat after Poilievre shook hands with the far-right extremist at a meet-and-greet in Nova Scotia.
During a campaign event in Dartmouth on Saturday, the Conservative leadership candidate was photographed alongside Jeremy Mackenzie, a far-right influencer previously arrested for harassing Nova Scotia’s chief medical officer of health.
Mackenzie broadcasted the photo to his followers on one of his social media accounts, alleging Poilievre personally assured him during the meeting that he would be “pulling the plug” on media subsidies if he becomes prime minister.
-
c'mon Shady - as you stumble and flail in your (other thread) attempts to articulate your liberal use of "woke/wokies", perhaps take a 'freedom' cue from your boy skippy:
(https://i.imgur.com/JmdIEac.gif)
Poilievre says sumthin, sumthin bout the, "totalitarian and authoritarian agenda of the woke movement" is against freedom... is against the youth want for adventure, risk taking and enjoying life - wants to take away the youthful spirit of adventure! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1509335529606762497/pu/vid/720x720/Z6QeVqueFDMrGVYI.mp4?tag=12)
-
c'mon Shady - as you stumble and flail in your (other thread) attempts to articulate your liberal use of "woke/wokies", perhaps take a 'freedom' cue from your boy skippy:
(https://i.imgur.com/JmdIEac.gif)
Poilievre says sumthin, sumthin bout the, "totalitarian and authoritarian agenda of the woke movement" is against freedom... is against the youth want for adventure, risk taking and enjoying life - wants to take away the youthful spirit of adventure! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1509335529606762497/pu/vid/720x720/Z6QeVqueFDMrGVYI.mp4?tag=12)
I’ve already outlined what the woke/alt-left entails. Controlling language, tearing down statues, cancelling former Prime Ministers, defunding police, censorship, reverse discrimination, telling you what you can drive, what energy you can use, how much water you can have in your toilet, artificially raising the cost of gasoline, insisting that men can get pregnant, puberty blockers and surgery to young children, shutting down schools and businesses in the name of public health, forcing people to inject chemicals into their body against their will, forcing everyone to wear masks, the list goes on and on. I hope that helps you buddy. And I hope that explains why I can never support your empty suit of a Prime Minister, Wonder boy, as he continues to turn Canada into sh*t.
-
... the list goes on and on.
even as a summary statement... that's yuuuuge! In your measure of wokeness, of being a wokie, does one need to be for all/most of your listed items? But hey now, if one were for just half your listed items, would that make one a halfazzed wokie?
-
Meanwhile politicians across Canada (of all party stripes) are coming forward to denounce this bullying intimidation {and verbal assault} of Ms. Freeland. Noticeably absent in that mix is Poilievre!
still no words from Poilievre; still waiting on skippy to denounce the physical intimidation and verbal assault Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland was subjected to in Grande Prairie Alberta - still waiting Poilievre!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZPGZn3X0AUHTdE?format=jpg)
-
I’ve already outlined what the woke/alt-left entails. Controlling language, tearing down statues, cancelling former Prime Ministers, defunding police, censorship, reverse discrimination, telling you what you can drive, what energy you can use, how much water you can have in your toilet, artificially raising the cost of gasoline, insisting that men can get pregnant, puberty blockers and surgery to young children, shutting down schools and businesses in the name of public health, forcing people to inject chemicals into their body against their will, forcing everyone to wear masks, the list goes on and on. I hope that helps you buddy. And I hope that explains why I can never support your empty suit of a Prime Minister, Wonder boy, as he continues to turn Canada into sh*t.
Here we have the perfect summary of Shiddy’s political beliefs: “waaaaaahhhhhh you can’t tell me what to do!” Basically, he’s a toddler, though I’ve me toddlers who are less whiny.
-
Here we have the perfect summary of Shiddy’s political beliefs: “waaaaaahhhhhh you can’t tell me what to do!” Basically, he’s a toddler, though I’ve me toddlers who are less whiny.
Another substanceless post.
-
still no words from Poilievre; still waiting on skippy to denounce the physical intimidation and verbal assault Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland was subjected to in Grande Prairie Alberta - still waiting Poilievre!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZPGZn3X0AUHTdE?format=jpg)
I’m still waiting for Wonder boy to apologize for labelling Canadians that were against vaccine mandates as nazis, racists, fascists and white supremacists. It really was pretty disgusting politics.
-
Another substanceless post.
Oh damn maybe I should have posted something profound like an editorial cartoon or a meme. You crybaby chucklefuck.
-
Oh damn maybe I should have posted something profound like an editorial cartoon or a meme. You crybaby chucklefuck.
Get professional help.
-
Get professional help.
I talked to my therapist and showed them your post crying about low flush toilets and wearing a mask and they’ve diagnosed you with a chronic case of being a dumb baby b!tch.
-
I talked to my therapist and showed them your post crying about low flush toilets and wearing a mask and they’ve diagnosed you with a chronic case of being a dumb baby b!tch.
Seriously, get some professional help, you’re not well.
-
still no words from Poilievre; still waiting on skippy to denounce the physical intimidation and verbal assault Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland was subjected to in Grande Prairie Alberta - still waiting Poilievre!
I’m still waiting for {PM Trudeau} to apologize for labelling Canadians that were against vaccine mandates as nazis, racists, fascists and white supremacists. It really was pretty disgusting politics.
you're a whataboutwonder! Can ya refresh the waldo recall on your statement/claim - sure you can!
-
Seriously, get some professional help, you’re not well.
Idk man I’m not the one struggling with low flush toilets, sounds like you need to eat more fibre you slob.
-
Idk man I’m not the one struggling with low flush toilets, sounds like you need to eat more fibre you slob.
I’m all good, your mom cleans my toilets.
-
you're a whataboutwonder! Can ya refresh the waldo recall on your statement/claim - sure you can!
Regardless, comrade Freeland got what she deserved. That’s what happens when you sh*t on western Canada for 8+ years. Actions have consequences.
-
I’m all good, your mom cleans my toilets.
Mom is dead and you’re crying about your rock hard dumps clogging your rooming house crapper, she’s better off than you.
-
Regardless, comrade Freeland got what she deserved. That’s what happens when you sh*t on western Canada for 8+ years. Actions have consequences.
Yes, no one is surprised you consider that appropriate. People raised poorly would.
-
Regardless, comrade Freeland got what she deserved. That’s what happens when you sh*t on western Canada for 8+ years. Actions have consequences.
Hang on: some slobbering pig was able to walk right up and threaten the deputy PM and waddle back to his oversized pickup without anything happening to him? But I thought we were living in a commie police state, how could that happen? How is he not in a gulag? Or is it that Trudeau’s secret police decided that living in Grande Prairie was punishment enough for that divorced strip club bouncer-loooking ass dink.
-
Regardless, comrade Freeland got what she deserved. That’s what happens when you sh*t on western Canada for 8+ years. Actions have consequences.
comrade Freeland? C'mon Shady, this is a troll-free zone! And you're fine with having a derangedBubba physically intimidate and verbally assault a much smaller bigger/better brain woman... cause you claim "she deserved it"?
-
Mom is dead and you’re crying about your rock hard dumps clogging your rooming house crapper, she’s better off than you.
Nope. It’s your mom, boomer.
-
comrade Freeland? C'mon Shady, this is a troll-free zone! And you're fine with having a derangedBubba physically intimidate and verbally assault a much smaller bigger/better brain woman... cause you claim "she deserved it"?
I don’t know what you mean by verbally “assault”. Words are not violence. Regardless, it’s rich coming from you folks, especially after the Harper years. I guess you guys have done a 180 on that kinda stuff now huh? Oh and after the Bush years, and currently with Trump and anyone associated with his administration. Two sets of standards with you people huh? Fack off with your pearl clutching all of a sudden.
-
Yes, no one is surprised you consider that appropriate. People raised poorly would.
Why’s that? You and your ilk consider everything appropriate when it comes to Trump, etc. Fack off with your pearl clutching and crocodile tears.
-
I don’t know what you mean by verbally “assault”. Words are not violence. Regardless, it’s rich coming from you folks, especially after the Harper years. I guess you guys have done a 180 on that kinda stuff now huh? Oh and after the Bush years, and currently with Trump and anyone associated with his administration. Two sets of standards with you people huh? Fack off with your pearl clutching all of a sudden.
Now you're pretending you're against that kind of behaviour? Make up your mind.
-
Nope. It’s your mom, boomer.
That is incoherent, what are you blathering about dipshit.
-
Why’s that? You and your ilk consider everything appropriate when it comes to Trump, etc. Fack off with your pearl clutching and crocodile tears.
All you do is cry cry cry. Goddamn you’re a whiny little cumstain. That’s why you’ll always be a loser.
-
All you do is cry cry cry. Goddamn you’re a whiny little cumstain. That’s why you’ll always be a loser.
Reeeeeeeeeeee!
You’re such a bitter angry person. I hope you get the help you need. It’s not good to go through life like that, and you’re the only one in this forum that seems to be having these problems. 🙏🙏🙏
-
Reeeeeeeeeeee!
You’re such a bitter angry person. I hope you get the help you need. It’s not good to go through life like that, and you’re the only one in this forum that seems to be having these problems. 🙏🙏🙏
You’ve been carrying around a sad about how people were mean to George W Bush for like 15 years lmao real loser stuff.
-
You’ve been carrying around a sad about how people were mean to George W Bush for like 15 years lmao real loser stuff.
🙏
-
🙏
lol Boomer-brain doesn't know what that emoji means. Sad.
-
lol Boomer-brain doesn't know what that emoji means. Sad.
🙏
-
🙏
You're welcome I guess?
-
Yep.
[attachimg=1]
-
We don't know how to behave in public...but whatabout public health measures during a pandemic?
-
Yep.
(Attachment Link)
LOL that guy would absolutely call the cops if some stinky redneck in a wife beater got in his face AND if someone was honking horns outside his house day and night for two weeks.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FbfZ_7cXoAI-rgs?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FbfZ_7cXoAI-rgs?format=jpg&name=900x900)
Like Trudeau pushing his Russian disinformation theories, right? 😂
-
Like Trudeau pushing his Russian disinformation theories, right? 😂
citation request - sure you can!
-
finally getting to the 'good stuff'; the meaningful stuff that Canadians have been clamouring for!
(https://i.imgur.com/NHsp3Sj.gif)
I guess this aligns with Poilievre's earlier statement, (from the Jordan Peterson podcast), that his popularity is as a result of him using simple Anglo-Saxon words... "plain language", hey!
-
finally getting to the 'good stuff'; the meaningful stuff that Canadians have been clamouring for!
(https://i.imgur.com/NHsp3Sj.gif)
I guess this aligns with Poilievre's earlier statement, (from the Jordan Peterson podcast), that his popularity is as a result of him using simple Anglo-Saxon words... "plain language", hey!
This is a dumb idea. Totally superficial change.
-
Peepee is friggin retarded if he thinks Canadians care about his fake populist jargon law.
Now where's that woke pu$$y retard cybercoma to tell me it's offensive to call retarded people retarded.
-
This is a dumb idea. Totally superficial change.
If his aim is to make bureaucracy more efficient, I’m all for it.
-
This is a dumb idea. Totally superficial change.
Why the f*ck would we need an act of Parliament for this?
-
Why the f*ck would we need an act of Parliament for this?
Because PooPoo is a man of the people see. Saving us from the Ottawa elites, see.
-
Because PooPoo is a man of the people see. Saving us from the Ottawa elites, see.
Setting around the kitchen table with Paw Paw where talk of the harvest has been replaced by the incomprehensibility of internal government policy documents.
-
Why the f*ck would we need an act of Parliament for this?
There are already government guidelines for public servants to use plain language.
I want to know what PP thinks the penalty should be for a civil servant who uses the wrong words. A fine? Jail?
-
There are already government guidelines for public servants to use plain language.
Yup. I literally wrote one of those in one of my former gigs. Every government or quasi government job I've worked has mandated plain language for public-facing documents and products.
I want to know what PP thinks the penalty should be for a civil servant who uses the wrong words. A fine? Jail?
You kinda get the feeling he's telling on himself here. "I'm too dumb to understand the material I'm given."
-
healthy crop, hey skippy?
(https://i.imgur.com/QmGX2p8.jpg)
-
(https://i.cbc.ca/1.6528394.1659448995!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/pc-leadership-candidates-composite.jpg)
election results (first & probably only ballot) today @19:30 Eastern (Patrick Brown's name is still on the ballot... cause the CPC Party shenanigans in 'disqualifying' Brown, apparently, didn't allow enough time for reprinting ballots).
given the expected skippy win, the predictable move to show party unity just ain't gonna happen... how can it? How can moderates Charest/Aitchison back a Poilievre led CPC party?
supposed membership numbers: 678,702 members deemed eligible to vote; 437,854 ballots received by the Tuesday deadline => 65% turnout... where the only engagement effort required was to mail back a ballot!
-
Looks like a Trudeau is sticking around.
-
Good news for all Canadians that want to see Canada lifted out from under the boot of a woke authoritarian corrupt plutocrat.
-
Looks like a Trudeau is sticking around.
Sad but I think so. The good news is we probably won't see a majority government anytime soon.
-
Good news for all Canadians that want to see Canada lifted out from under the boot of a woke authoritarian corrupt plutocrat.
Was Trudeau your teacher because you are a real drama queen.
-
Geez, PeePee really stomped Charest, 68% for PP and only 16% for Charest.
-
Good news for all Canadians that want to see Canada lifted out from under the boot of a woke authoritarian corrupt plutocrat.
"plutocrat"? Geezaz Shady, the waldo reads that PM Trudeau & wannabePM Poilievre have roughly the same net worth - go figure, hey! As for authoritarian, are you ignoring most of what skippy promised to do just to get himself elected as CPC leader... surely you're not saying Poilievre didn't mean what he said and that he'll just pivot towards the centre like every CPC leader does after he's finished with the gullible rubes in the CPC base? Surely not, hey Shady?
-
Journalist Justin Ling has an opinion:
https://twitter.com/Justin_Ling/status/1568765916065955842
"Trudeau, by the way, is going to go scorched earth against Poilievre. It will not be a campaign to govern, but a campaign to stop Poilievre from doing so.
This next election is going to be miserable. Brutal, democracy-harming, miserable."
He seems to think Poilievre is going to go full rightwing, full Trump and try to win with the crazies who would love him. I don't know if that's a great idea, as it depends on people being sick of the "They're Hitler" strategy.
-
Journalist Justin Ling has an opinion:
https://twitter.com/Justin_Ling/status/1568765916065955842
"Trudeau, by the way, is going to go scorched earth against Poilievre. It will not be a campaign to govern, but a campaign to stop Poilievre from doing so.
This next election is going to be miserable. Brutal, democracy-harming, miserable."
He seems to think Poilievre is going to go full rightwing, full Trump and try to win with the crazies who would love him. I don't know if that's a great idea, as it depends on people being sick of the "They're Hitler" strategy.
lmao:
Pierre Poilievre is not a white supremacist. He's not an anti-vaxxer. He's not an extremist.
But, up to a point, he's willing to use them to win in a brutal election. (I think he genuinely believes that giving them an outlet is a constructive thing. Which is a debatable point.)
-
Not much to laugh at IMO... 🤔
-
If O'Toole couldn't beat Trudeau, PP isn't going to, unless Trudeau does something very scandalous. It's as simple as that.
-
so... the waldo has had a cursory look through a transcript of Poilievre's 'victory' speech and didn't find any mention of crypto/bitcoin, of firing the BoC Governor, of the trucker convoy, of the World Economic Forum... I guess there must have been a strict time limit allotted to the speech and all that stuff just didn't make the cut! Go figure, hey!
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZyIjPFOFis/maxresdefault.jpg)
-
waldo perspective... er... reality: media is losing it's fricken collective mind fawning over skippy's huuuuge internal party win! Those CPC members who voted for Poilievre represent about 5% of Conservative voters... represent about 1% of eligible voters. Yeesh!
-
we like Poilievre cause he's a straight-shooter! Oh really!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FcaYs97XkAYxjXm?format=jpg)
-
Wowee...
When did he say THAT?!?
Yesterday I hope.
-
If O'Toole couldn't beat Trudeau, PP isn't going to, unless Trudeau does something very scandalous. It's as simple as that.
What like show up in Black Face multiple times? Trudeau is not that popular anymore. Many Canadians want a reasonable alternative to him.
I think the Liberals need to quit trying to tar and feather him as a racist. He's not racist. He's in an interracial marriage.
He's not my cup of tea, but let's see what he's go to say. We all know you have to move to the far right to win leadership, I suspect he'll move to the centre. He'll have to.
-
1. I think the Liberals need to quit trying to tar and feather him as a racist. He's not racist. He's in an interracial marriage.
2, I suspect he'll move to the centre. He'll have to.
1. I don't think they are using that angle. There's plenty of other things to talk about. Maybe the First Nations comment though...
2. We'll be watching to see. Speech was pallid...
-
Wowee...
When did he say THAT?!?
Yesterday I hope.
He said that back in 2008 right before Harper was to apologize for the residential schools, so you can tell his sense of timing is impeccable.
-
What like show up in Black Face multiple times? Trudeau is not that popular anymore. Many Canadians want a reasonable alternative to him.
I think the Liberals need to quit trying to tar and feather him as a racist. He's not racist. He's in an interracial marriage.
People can harbour broadly racist sentiments while carving out exceptions in their personal lives, happens all the time.
He's not my cup of tea, but let's see what he's go to say. We all know you have to move to the far right to win leadership, I suspect he'll move to the centre. He'll have to.
We saw what happened to O'Toole when he tried to pull that trick.
-
We saw what happened to O'Toole when he tried to pull that trick.
JT did not win that election by much.
He was lucky that Vaccines and COVID were a potent wedge issue. I doubt that will track for the next election.
I wouldn't put it past JT to give PP the Stockwell Day treatment and try to call a snap election. The NDP may not be down, they're in defacto government right now.
-
JT did not win that election by much.
He was lucky that Vaccines and COVID was a potent wedge issue. I doubt that will track for the next election.
I wouldn't put it past JT to give PP the Stockwell Day treatment and try to call a snap election. The NDP may not be down, they're in defacto government right now.
Yeah the margins are tight, that's the issue. JT won the election in part because O'Toole was seen as going squishy by the hard right elements in the party. If PP tries to moderate his stances, he runs the same risk of alienating the people who carried him to power. I guess it's a question of whether or not PP is high on his own supply and actually thinks the electorate is as extreme as his base.
-
Yeah the margins are tight, that's the issue. JT won the election in part because O'Toole was seen as going squishy by the hard right elements in the party. If PP tries to moderate his stances, he runs the same risk of alienating the people who carried him to power. I guess it's a question of whether or not PP is high on his own supply and actually thinks the electorate is as extreme as his base.
You can tell by his early sentiments that he'll lean into the Populist stuff. Worked for Trump and has worked for DoFo in areas where he'll need.
We'll see.
With all the baggage JT has overcome, I doubt dwelling on BitCoin and the Bank of Canada will make much hay in the long run.
-
You can tell by his early sentiments that he'll lean into the Populist stuff. Worked for Trump and has worked for DoFo in areas where he'll need.
We'll see.
With all the baggage JT has overcome, I doubt dwelling on BitCoin and the Bank of Canada will make much hay in the long run.
What's funny is for such a supposed populist, very little of his platform is actually aimed at helping the middle/working classes. A Plain Language Law? Stopping private companies from importing miniscule amounts of foreign oil? Jets at Billy Bishop? Regulating speech in colleges/universities? Folderol about the World Economic Forum? Who on earth gives a sh!t about any of that stuff? Doug Ford would never.
-
Statement from Mark Hancock, National President of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), on Pierre Poilievre winning the Conservative Party leadership:
(https://cupe.ca/sites/default/files/styles/cupe_embedded_image__fb_dimensions_/public/scheer-poilievre.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/Ebs0v0m.gif)
-
Statement from Mark Hancock, National President of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), on Pierre Poilievre winning the Conservative Party leadership:
(https://cupe.ca/sites/default/files/styles/cupe_embedded_image__fb_dimensions_/public/scheer-poilievre.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/Ebs0v0m.gif)
Another reason why CUPE has no credibility.
-
Sounds like something a far-right extremist conspiracy theorist would say.
-
Sounds like something a far-right extremist conspiracy theorist would say.
Hit dogs holler.
-
Sounds like something a far-right extremist conspiracy theorist would say.
Not really. I’m just looking at the facts. CUPE thinks he’s by bad for “working families”. But they’re silent on extreme inflation. Do they think that’s good for working people? They’re silent on carbon taxes and phony environmental policies that make energy much more expensive. Do they think that’s good for working people? They’re silent on mass unlimited immigration, which makes everything more expensive, particularly rent and housing. Do they think that’s good for working people? Nah. They just don’t like not having a Prime Minister that spends his time shovelling troughs full of money to public sector unions. All at the expense of working people through higher fees and higher taxes. I can’t wait to get a responsible adult in Ottawa again, who’s not trying to be Santa Claus.
-
Not really. I’m just looking at the facts. CUPE thinks he’s by bad for “working families”. But they’re silent on extreme inflation. Do they think that’s good for working people? They’re silent on carbon taxes and phony environmental policies that make energy much more expensive. Do they think that’s good for working people? They’re silent on mass unlimited immigration, which makes everything more expensive, particularly rent and housing. Do they think that’s good for working people? Nah. They just don’t like not having a Prime Minister that spends his time shovelling troughs full of money to public sector unions. All at the expense of working people through higher fees and higher taxes. I can’t wait to get a responsible adult in Ottawa again, who’s not trying to be Santa Claus.
Important to note here that when Shiddy says "CUPE is silent on X" he means "CUPE doesn't agree with me on X" which is not the same thing. CUPE has positions on all these issues, they just don't conform to those of the dumbest man on the internet, which is probably a stroke in their favour. That being said, there's no doubt their opposition to PeePee Poo Poo is self-serving, but that doesn't mean they are wrong; we know PP's objective is, like all conservatives, to facilitate the upward transfer of wealth and the destruction of public services.
-
Does anyone give a crap about covid anymore?
anymore... or ever? C'mon Shady, do you follow your boy Poilievre's position that Conservatives wouldn't have provided COVID benefits to individuals, to businesses... cause, "we're Conservatives, we don't believe in that (in big fat government programs) (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1508420475235541001/pu/vid/720x730/FBt1cedG4LcKNDie.mp4?tag=12)". So Shady, alternatively, just what would you have wanted done to help Canadians & Canadian businesses work through... and in some cases quite literally survive/keep afloat through the pandemic?
-
Another reason why CUPE has no credibility.
you want more? More? No problemo!
Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers. (https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-claims-hes-a-friend-of-the-working-class-hes-spent-years-attacking-canadian-workers/)
Newly elected Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s recent rhetoric pandering to workers contradicts his long track record of attacking unions and dividing workers, experts say.
Poilievre has spent much of his leadership campaign paying lip service to Canadian workers and claiming, without evidence, that workers support him.
.
Poilievre aggressively fought card-check legislation that would make it easier for workers to unionize in favour of a two-step process that gives employers more time to interfere in the union drive.
.
Under Stephen Harper’s government, Poilievre was one of the loudest supporters of the anti-union Bill C-377, a likely unconstitutional piece of legislation that tried to force Canadian labour unions to disclose all of their internal finances while big corporations would not have been subjected to the same rules.
Poilievre is also a major proponent of bringing US Right-to-Work laws to Canada. Right-to-Work laws weaken the labour movement by making it more difficult for unions to collect membership dues which pay for the collective bargaining process. Wages and benefits are lower on average in states with Right-to-Work laws.
.
Poilievre also used xenophobic rhetoric arguing that “foreign” migrant workers were taking Canadian workers’ jobs and driving down wages.
Poilievre was Stephen Harper’s Employment Minister while thousands of migrant workers had their work permits expire in 2015 which forced them to leave the country or remain as undocumented workers.
“That’s why they’re called temporary foreign workers,” Poilievre said about the looming deportations in 2015.
.
Poilievre defended his management of the temporary foreign worker program and the deportations: “Broadly speaking, we made the right decision with the program, and we’re going to continue.”
(https://i.imgur.com/ELpwy8f.jpg)
-
Choose people for key positions based in whole or in part on their membership in a marginalized community.
the marginalized community of those who choose to wear their hair dressed in a pompadour - the waldo asks the simple question: "who did/does it better"?
(https://i.imgur.com/cOb24j7.jpeg)
hey Shady, you have repeat posts extolling the party prominence of Lantsman - has she ever sponsored/co-sponsored a bill... any bill? Oh wait, that's why Poilievre chose her as "coDeputy Leader"... cause she matches his dismal lack of bill sponsorship - birds of a feather, hey!
-
whaaa! Such a weak bench to choose from... and we now see the outcome of all that azzkissing by Scheer! Hey now waldo, does that House Leader position for Scheer come with a mini-van and paid school tuition for his brood?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fci5FVPaUAIxO9q?format=jpg)
-
all through the leadership campaign Poilievre refused to be interviewed by anyone from the so-called mainstream media... but somehow managed to find time to be a part of a Jordon Peterson podcast!
so today skippy held a presser that was initially intended as a 'no questions' statement from Poilievre... somewhere in the mix that shifted to where Poilievre's handlers relented to allow 2... and only 2 questions.
but the ever lurking drama had Global's David Akin taking heat from Poilievre who chose to label him a "Liberal heckler"... and more broadly referred to the gathered journalists as the, "Liberal heckling gathering" - all on display in the short video as follows. Of course Akin actually has a long history of Conservative bias.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6n0lh5fTZk
clearly too much pressure for skippy... and it becomes clearer as to why Poilievre was kept away from the media during the leadership campaign - not that there was ever any doubt why the thin-skinned, brash and obnoxious Poilievre was so isolated from the media! But wait now - never let a victim-hood fundraising opportunity slide on by; as follows, the fundraising email that went out soon after!
(https://i.imgur.com/BCOwNT4.jpg)
-
the marginalized community of those who choose to wear their hair dressed in a pompadour - the waldo asks the simple question: "who did/does it better"?
Cons get the stand-up hair vote...
Somebody tell Harper the "dry look" is dead.
-
[attachimg=1]
-
all through the leadership campaign Poilievre refused to be interviewed by anyone from the so-called mainstream media... but somehow managed to find time to be a part of a Jordon Peterson podcast!
so today skippy held a presser that was initially intended as a 'no questions' statement from Poilievre... somewhere in the mix that shifted to where Poilievre's handlers relented to allow 2... and only 2 questions.
and watch Poilievre after he takes those 2 questions - runAway, runAway from tough questions (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1569776523284201472/pu/vid/1274x720/4QJR4wg3Pa1T9cOp.mp4?tag=12)! Meanwhile contrast that with PM Trudeau at the recent days 'Liberal caucus retreat' at St. Andrews, NB... where PM Trudeau took and answered 11 questions from journalists over an ~30 minute period!
-
Charest was favoured amongst all Canadians while Poilievre was favoured amongst conservatives. It’s unfathomable to me why the party chose him.
I mean I get that he represents their ideals but when he doesn’t resonate with the rest of the country why not try to get the fascist dictator <eye roll> out of office?
-
He's planning to delete benefits and institutions that help Canadians, after a fluffy campaign talking about freedom and non specific feel-good slang...
Seems like it anyway.
-
Charest was favoured amongst all Canadians while Poilievre was favoured amongst conservatives. It’s unfathomable to me why the party chose him.
I mean I get that he represents their ideals but when he doesn’t resonate with the rest of the country why not try to get the fascist dictator <eye roll> out of office?
Charest is as about as charismatic as a rock, as exciting as a re-run of That 70’s Show, and is desperately in need of retiring. The only reason he was “favoured” by Canadians is because of name recognition as he’s been in politics for some 50 years. He’s Canada’s version of Joe Biden.
-
He's planning to delete benefits and institutions that help Canadians, after a fluffy campaign talking about freedom and non specific feel-good slang...
Seems like it anyway.
Complete nonsense.
-
Complete nonsense.
Really ? If I come up with one example will you concur ?
-
Charest was favoured amongst all Canadians while Poilievre was favoured amongst conservatives. It’s unfathomable to me why the party chose him.
I mean I get that he represents their ideals but when he doesn’t resonate with the rest of the country why not try to get the fascist dictator <eye roll> out of office?
They don't care about the rest of the country or having a big tent, no matter how many woke leadership appointments PP makes. The purpose of the modern conservative movement is to gin up outrage among a fringe of lunatics and take their money.
-
He's planning to delete benefits and institutions that help Canadians, after a fluffy campaign talking about freedom and non specific feel-good slang...
Seems like it anyway.
Oh you mean Harper's hidden agenda that never happened.
-
They don't care about the rest of the country or having a big tent, no matter how many woke leadership appointments PP makes. The purpose of the modern conservative movement is to gin up outrage among a fringe of lunatics and take their money.
The point of the conservative movement is to dig a giant hole in the ground in order to find Noah's Ark and then start sh!tting in order to fill the hole they dug for themselves so they can get out of it.
The point of the progressive movement is for white yuppies to kill themselves because of their guilt and self-hatred and to help non-white people assist them (who are more than willing because they hate white people).
-
Oh you mean Harper's hidden agenda that never happened.
Harper absolutely slashed spending on healthcare, social and cultural programs and handed tax cuts to the wealthiest Canadians, where were you living?
-
Harper absolutely slashed spending on healthcare, social and cultural programs and handed tax cuts to the wealthiest Canadians, where were you living?
More nonsense and drivel.
-
Oh you mean Harper's hidden agenda that never happened.
No, it's open.
Firing the governor of the Bank of Canada ... isn't that something that raises your eyebrows at least ?
How about defunding the CBC ?
Did Harper say he was going to do that on his way up ?
-
Really ? If I come up with one example will you concur ?
Which programs and institutions does he want to “delete”. Is there a delete button for that? Regardless, just because a government program exists, doesn’t mean it has eternal life, and can never be reformed or even ended. And the notion that if anyone is helped by something it can never be touched is childish. We have limited resources, with a debt that has now ballooned thanks to the current PM. Now that interest rates are rising, the cost of financing that debt is going to get very expensive, cutting into resources that could’ve been used for other things. But thanks to our woke progressive short sighted PM, we’ve dug ourselves quite a hole, and difficult decisions will have to be made. Similar to Chrétien and Martin in the late 1990s.
-
No, it's open.
Firing the governor of the Bank of Canada ... isn't that something that raises your eyebrows at least ?
How about defunding the CBC ?
Did Harper say he was going to do that on his way up ?
The CBC provides a service that’s already provided by multiple companies in the private sector. It serves no purpose other than to exist.
-
The CBC provides a service that’s already provided by multiple companies in the private sector. It serves no purpose other than to exist.
Ok... well then this means you retract your objection to my point ? Since you agree with one example and didn't address the second ?
-
Harper absolutely slashed spending on healthcare, social and cultural programs and handed tax cuts to the wealthiest Canadians, where were you living?
Oh you mean when he cut the GST by 2%?
-
No, it's open.
Firing the governor of the Bank of Canada ... isn't that something that raises your eyebrows at least ?
How about defunding the CBC ?
Did Harper say he was going to do that on his way up ?
Yes PP is an idiot for saying he's going to fire the BoC head. Not sure how that is deleting institutions or benefits.
CBC news should be reformed to be politically neutral, it should be as dry as the Canadian Press. The other CBC stuff is more or less fine and Cancon is good for the country.
So what benefits is he going to eliminate?
-
Yes PP is an idiot for saying he's going to fire the BoC head. Not sure how that is deleting institutions or benefits.
CBC news should be reformed to be politically neutral, it should be as dry as the Canadian Press. The other CBC stuff is more or less fine and Cancon is good for the country.
So what benefits is he going to eliminate?
I think removing the BoC head fundamentally changes it as an institution. And yes 'defunding the CBC' is deleting it.
End of point.
Whether or not CBC should be reformed (or even defunded) is beside the point. Poilievre is campaigning as a wrecking ball.
As for benefits, in terms of EI, transfer payments etc., I concur that he hasn't said.
-
Oh you mean when he cut the GST by 2%?
No I mean when he slashed spending on healthcare, social and cultural programs and handed tax cuts to the wealthiest Canadians.
-
Charest is as about as charismatic as a rock, as exciting as a re-run of That 70’s Show, and is desperately in need of retiring. The only reason he was “favoured” by Canadians is because of name recognition as he’s been in politics for some 50 years. He’s Canada’s version of Joe Biden.
Joe Biden won, kinda proves my point.
-
Minister of Inflation! 😂😂😂
https://youtu.be/sjB4h2k36po
-
Joe Biden won, kinda proves my point.
Not really. Poilievre isn’t Trump.
-
Not really. Poilievre isn’t Trump.
Oh yes he is.
-
Oh yes he is.
You lose all credibility if you compare him or anyone else in Canada to Trump. Sorry, he’s a smart, educated, well spoken, traditional conservative/libertarian. I know you don’t like him, and you don’t have to. But to say he’s Trump is completely disingenuous, and intellectually dishonest.
-
Oh yes he is.
He's not Trump in that he doesn't have the celebrity, the chutzpah or any actual charisma, but he is singing from the same hymnbook.
-
He's not Trump in that he doesn't have the celebrity, the chutzpah or any actual charisma, but he is singing from the same hymnbook.
I heard he drinks coffee too, just like Trump!
-
whaaa! Down memory lane with Pierre Poutine... good start, hey PeePee!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FcuRiD_XEAQnN3a?format=jpg)
Quebec MP who left Conservatives says his office is being swamped by harassing callers (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/alain-rayes-harassment-conservative-party-of-canada-1.6583056)
-
He's not Trump in that he doesn't have the celebrity, the chutzpah or any actual charisma, but he is singing from the same hymnbook.
(https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2022/09/08/PoilievreTrumpCartoon.jpg)
-
whaaa! Down memory lane with Pierre Poutine... good start, hey PeePee!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FcuRiD_XEAQnN3a?format=jpg)
Quebec MP who left Conservatives says his office is being swamped by harassing callers (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/alain-rayes-harassment-conservative-party-of-canada-1.6583056)
Robo calls from 11 years ago, with no resolution! 😂
You know there’s been a few elections since then, right?
-
(https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2022/09/08/PoilievreTrumpCartoon.jpg)
Oh well, if a cartoon says so, without any actual substance behind it, well, I guess you got me! 😂
I know Trump was very concerned with inflation. Not. I know Trump was very concerned with government spending. Not.
-
You guys are making the same mistake the opposition in Ontario made. Trying to paint Doug Ford as Donald Trump. That worked so well with voters that he’s won back to back majority governments! Keep up the good work! 🤣
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRLHSPCsZ2v_sWE0wczTtrcXcUSpzHVqCNI58JLVCNa742fjJ1_I2m3PosaQV_1JELGojw&usqp=CAU)
-
hey Shady, why is skippy so hangry?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FcqtmYragAI24uZ?format=jpg)
-
If he’s Trump, than I think we need to explore the possibility of wonder boy being Castro! 😂
[attachimg=1]
-
when Poilievre tells you who he is... believe him!
(https://i.imgur.com/6hFfgOI.gif)
-
when Poilievre tells you who he is... believe him!
If the Minister of Veterans Affairs (ass. Min. of Defence), Lawrence MacAulay, can change his mind and be a Liberal cabinet member, can’t PP change his mind too?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_38th_Canadian_Parliament_and_same-sex_marriage
-
Here let me help you waldo.
Pierre Poioilievrevrere once voted to holocaust all Jews and enslave black Canadians.
-
Here let me help you waldo.
Pierre Poioilievrevrere once voted to holocaust all Jews and enslave black Canadians.
This sounds like you think PP voting against same-sex marriage never happened. I think it’s fair to say that many politicians’ minds have changed since then. Liberal and Conservative. If there’s some sort of purity test Walduh wants to apply, then he should probably cheerlead for the NDP.
-
If the Minister of Veterans Affairs (ass. Min. of Defence), Lawrence MacAulay, can change his mind and be a Liberal cabinet member, can’t PP change his mind too?
sure, sure squigidiot! Try again, try harder!
MacAulay was accepting to civil unions; given his age/generation and deep religious conviction, actual marriage was a step too far. Your mind-changing claim about Poilievre is a freakin' joke man - skippy made a big to-do about reversing his positions on ssm and pro-life... both done coincidentally at the same (in French) presser. But hey, the same way that doubts exist on the sincerity of Poilievre's shifted position of convenience on ssm, thinking persons also have doubts about Poilievre's "shift of political expediency" in regards abortion... like say the 'Abortion Rights Coalition' that continues to list Poilievre as anti-choice!
try again, try harder, hey squigidiot
-
oh my! Poilievre can't run from his past!
(https://i.imgur.com/Cpwd8SZ.gif)
-
a Tombe/Chen pre-print... puts a real damper on Poilievre's nauseating prattle about "JustinFlation"!
(https://i.imgur.com/whG3YjU.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/esScBbU.jpg)
c'mon Shady - support your boy PP and highlight all his legislative accomplishments... sure you can! And simply being Harper's attackDoggy isn't an actual accomplishment, yes?
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FckZ4tdagAAKXmq?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
all through the leadership campaign Poilievre refused to be interviewed by anyone from the so-called mainstream media... but somehow managed to find time to be a part of a Jordon Peterson podcast!
so today skippy held a presser that was initially intended as a 'no questions' statement from Poilievre... somewhere in the mix that shifted to where Poilievre's handlers relented to allow 2... and only 2 questions.
but the ever lurking drama had Global's David Akin taking heat from Poilievre who chose to label him a "Liberal heckler"... and more broadly referred to the gathered journalists as the, "Liberal heckling gathering" - all on display in the short video as follows. Of course Akin actually has a long history of Conservative bias.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6n0lh5fTZk
Who the hell calls a press conference, then tells reporters they can’t ask questions?
Who the hell calls a press conference, then tells reporters they can’t ask questions?
It’s right in the words: P-R-E-S-S conference.
Dear politicians, if you want to reach the public without the media, you’re free to open a Facebook page or post more of your spicy attack ads to YouTube. Maybe suck up a few million taxpayers' dollars to fund a PR “war room” like Jason Kenney and if your voters keep coming back, more power to you. You can even launch your own news site like Doug Ford did.
However, there are still citizens in this democracy who invest their time and money to support a free press. They want journalists to represent them, to seek truth and demand accountability.
That’s right, if you want access to media platforms, public accountability is the price of entry.
You don’t get to cheat citizens in a democracy by holding a “press conference” where you muzzle the press and expect us to play along.
Mr. Poilievre, welcome to the first day of leadership class.
Here is lesson 101: You are not the free press’ gatekeeper.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxzmJ2qLMg8&t=287s
h/t Martin Lukacs - The Breach
Pierre Poilievre bills himself a man of the people, who’s taking on the powerful, standing up for the working class, with a penchant for speaking like a popular rebellion leader… from 14th century England.
Poilievre is tapping into anger at inequality and the soaring cost of living while pointing his finger at the ruling class that is responsible.
There’s just one hitch: Pierre Poilievre has spent his entire political career serving the very elites he vilifies.
So what explains his approach? It’s called fake populism: when politicians ride ordinary people’s outrage against the establishment into office, then hand the keys to the one percent.
.
Elected at 24 years old, he emerged within Stephen Harper’s government as the leading enemy of workers’ basic rights.
He helped push legislation to make it more difficult for workers to unionize, to collectively negotiate, and to go on strike—the best tool they have against elites and employers.
When migrant workers brought in by the government to work on Canada’s farms and in seniors homes faced deportation, Poilievre’s response exhibited his special brand of concern for the common toiler: “That’s why they’re called temporary foreign workers.”
Poilievre has such a distaste for Canada’s universal social programs that he has suggested adopting economist Milton Friedman’s proposal to replace “the entire welfare state” with “a tiny survival stipend for all low-income people.” This would involve “eliminating all other programs, including housing, drug plans, child care and the bureaucrats who administer it all.”
Massive tax cuts for the rich, suppressing workers rights, and gutting social programs that ordinary Canadians depend on — it’s not exactly the platform of a people’s champion.
-
Poilievre has such a distaste for Canada’s universal social programs that he has suggested adopting economist Milton Friedman’s proposal to replace “the entire welfare state” with “a tiny survival stipend for all low-income people.” This would involve “eliminating all other programs, including housing, drug plans, child care and the bureaucrats who administer it all.”
Wait... isn't that UIB ?
-
Poilievre has such a distaste for Canada’s universal social programs that he has suggested adopting economist Milton Friedman’s proposal to replace “the entire welfare state” with “a tiny survival stipend for all low-income people.” This would involve “eliminating all other programs, including housing, drug plans, child care and the bureaucrats who administer it all.”
Wait... isn't that UIB ?
No, closer to UBI.
-
Waldo you ever post arguments anymore, or just repost twitter memes and youtube videos?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/WcgdnTh.gif)(https://i.imgur.com/GRa2siK.gif)
skippy has shown a knack for fomenting anger but not for proposing sensible economic solutions
TorStar - Pierre Poilievre cruised to victory as federal Conservative leader. His campaign was powered by a core of party members who are mad as hell, about pretty much everything, from COVID rules to climate policies to the mass media.
While that negative energy handily won him the leadership, Poilievre now faces the same quandary as his unsuccessful predecessors: the narratives that make you popular with party members don’t usually resonate with the broader electorate.
His economic platform will decisively shape his future fortunes. Poilievre portrays himself as a fighter for “freedom,” promising to liberate Canadians from regulations and taxes. But his economic program is not consistent with that overarching narrative. In fact, it’s hard to pin down his economics anywhere on the conventional political spectrum. Some of his proposals are libertarian: smaller government, lower taxes. But others are highly interventionist — imposing new leaders at the Bank of Canada, banning imports from certain countries, intruding into the governance of cities and universities.
.
This hodgepodge of policies is neither right-wing nor left-wing. Poilievre promises to ban so many things — imports of Middle East oil, attendance at world economic conferences, university policies, and more — he sounds authoritarian as often as libertarian. The only consistent thread in his economic platform is a desire to foment anger over any convenient issue … and direct it at federal institutions.
That’s an effective way to get yourself elected Conservative leader. But it’s a very dangerous way to run an economy.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdBJkcEXoAA3eYM?format=jpg)
-
oh my - Canada @29% positive impression of skippy! Is that a lot... that's not a lot, right? Right Shady?
(https://i.imgur.com/cV88372.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdBJkcEXoAA3eYM?format=jpg)
Not sure I get the point of the cartoon. Is the puppy supposed to represent David Akin or Canadian media in general?
oh my - Canada @29% positive impression of skippy! Is that a lot... that's not a lot, right? Right Shady?
(https://i.imgur.com/cV88372.jpg)
Genuine question: how are the rest of the leaders polling these days? It has been a while since I saw polling about the party leaders, but my recollection is that only Singh does well in "net favorable" numbers in these sorts of thing.
-k
-
I believe a Liberal minority is projected...>
https://338canada.com/sim.htm
-
oh c'mon! Poilievre's 'working man' schtick is just so lame, just so phony, just so disingenuous...
(https://i.imgur.com/6iUWU6F.gif)
Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers. (https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-claims-hes-a-friend-of-the-working-class-hes-spent-years-attacking-canadian-workers/)
Newly elected Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s recent rhetoric pandering to workers contradicts his long track record of attacking unions and dividing workers, experts say.
Poilievre has spent much of his leadership campaign paying lip service to Canadian workers and claiming, without evidence, that workers support him.
.
Poilievre aggressively fought card-check legislation that would make it easier for workers to unionize in favour of a two-step process that gives employers more time to interfere in the union drive.
.
Under Stephen Harper’s government, Poilievre was one of the loudest supporters of the anti-union Bill C-377, a likely unconstitutional piece of legislation that tried to force Canadian labour unions to disclose all of their internal finances while big corporations would not have been subjected to the same rules.
Poilievre is also a major proponent of bringing US Right-to-Work laws to Canada. Right-to-Work laws weaken the labour movement by making it more difficult for unions to collect membership dues which pay for the collective bargaining process. Wages and benefits are lower on average in states with Right-to-Work laws.
.
Poilievre also used xenophobic rhetoric arguing that “foreign” migrant workers were taking Canadian workers’ jobs and driving down wages.
Poilievre was Stephen Harper’s Employment Minister while thousands of migrant workers had their work permits expire in 2015 which forced them to leave the country or remain as undocumented workers.
“That’s why they’re called temporary foreign workers,” Poilievre said about the looming deportations in 2015.
.
Poilievre defended his management of the temporary foreign worker program and the deportations: “Broadly speaking, we made the right decision with the program, and we’re going to continue.”
-
Theory: Harper was a robot.
PP is also, but a new model. T-1000.
-
Skippy power!
[attachimg=1]
-
oh c'mon! Poilievre's 'working man' schtick is just so lame, just so phony, just so disingenuous...
(https://i.imgur.com/6iUWU6F.gif)
Pierre Poilievre Claims He’s a Friend of the ‘Working Class’. He’s Spent Years Attacking Canadian Workers. (https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-claims-hes-a-friend-of-the-working-class-hes-spent-years-attacking-canadian-workers/)
A pension he worked for, unlike your trust fund baby.
-
Skippy power!
you doofus! National polls are meaningless... carry on!
-
Skippy power!
(Attachment Link)
Whoa geez.
-
A pension he worked for, unlike your trust fund baby.
you keep nattering on about a PM Trudeau 'trust fund'... care to describe/detail it - sure you can!
-
Whoa geez.
Nipples is a troll; don't be Nipples!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/qctjEnV.gif)
-
Poilievre is so obviously avoiding any mention of... any association to... crypto/bitcoin! Go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdQZdM9XkAEz95x?format=jpg)
while making his HOC grand entrance as the new CPC leader, Deputy PM Freeland gave a gentle reminder to skippy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1572801173949763586/pu/vid/640x368/x57LTFK__nHAnI1f.mp4?tag=12)
-
Poilievre is so obviously avoiding any mention of... any association to... crypto/bitcoin! Go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdQZdM9XkAEz95x?format=jpg)
while making his HOC grand entrance as the new CPC leader, Deputy PM Freeland gave a gentle reminder to skippy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1572801173949763586/pu/vid/640x368/x57LTFK__nHAnI1f.mp4?tag=12)
You people are idiots. You find a downturn in the market and then pretend any investment in crypto is bad no matter what. It’s like somebody in 2008 saying that anyone that told you to invest in real estate is bad. If you invest for the long term it’s not a bad investment. Anyone who knows anything about crypto and blockchain technology know that it’s not going away any more than the internet was going to go away in 2000 during the dot com boom and bust.
-
Oh snap! Skippy power!
[attachimg=1]
-
If you invest for the long term it’s not a bad investment.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR7yfSSpIYLmj3UHu4nPMKl3eP3vOC-HSe6jA&usqp=CAU)
-
Oh snap! Skippy power!
so when are the CPC calling an election, hey! LOL!
by the by, again, federal polls are meaningless
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdS9FFnWIAUUPKO?format=jpg)
-
You people are idiots. You find a downturn in the market and then pretend any investment in crypto is bad no matter what. It’s like somebody in 2008 saying that anyone that told you to invest in real estate is bad. If you invest for the long term it’s not a bad investment. Anyone who knows anything about crypto and blockchain technology know that it’s not going away any more than the internet was going to go away in 2000 during the dot com boom and bust.
Real estate is at least a real thing. But if you want to invest your life savings in crypto by all means do so.
-
Real estate is at least a real thing. But if you want to invest your life savings in crypto by all means do so.
The real estate industry can never collapse longterm. People need to live in homes. It can only correct. Homes have been around for many, many centuries and aren't going anywhere.
Crypto only exists in digital form, has no inherent value, you can't even melt it down and sell the scraps, and it has only existed mainstream for, what, several years? It is highly, highly speculative and the riskiest investment humanly possible. It's a terrible longterm investment and Skippy is an idiot.
-
If you invest for the long term it’s not a bad investment.
(https://i.imgur.com/1p1Ik3G.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fdd00G1XoAE4ugV?format=jpg)
-
in its 'early days' misinforming rush {supposedly} targeting inflation, the CPC has set its sights on carbon pollution pricing. Shockingly (as in not), they position the estimated 2030 price @$170 per tonne of CO2 in relation to today's 'high inflation' rate - more pointedly ignoring that it's a gradual rise of $15 per tonne per year to the year 2030... most pointedly ignoring that the related rebates to consumers will also triple in amount over that same period. In the HOC, misinforming Deputy CPC leader Melissa Lantsman:
(https://i.imgur.com/rAtH6mq.gif)
-
You people are idiots. You find a downturn in the market and then pretend any investment in crypto is bad no matter what. It’s like somebody in 2008 saying that anyone that told you to invest in real estate is bad. If you invest for the long term it’s not a bad investment. Anyone who knows anything about crypto and blockchain technology know that it’s not going away any more than the internet was going to go away in 2000 during the dot com boom and bust.
Better analogy - somebody in the 90s telling you to invest in Sim City properties...
-
Also - nice going waldo, the Scotiabank CEO stepped aside after your post :(
-
Pierre was fine with the far-right wackos threatening Trudeau and his family, and even met and shook hands with the people who did it But now that they've turned on him and his wife, suddenly that sort of rhetoric is unacceptable?
-
Pierre was fine with the far-right wackos threatening Trudeau and his family, and even met and shook hands with the people who did it But now that they've turned on him and his wife, suddenly that sort of rhetoric is unacceptable?
PeePee says he never heard of these guys despite marching with one of them in Ottawa on Canada Day (https://globalnews.ca/news/8959365/canada-day-convoy-james-topp-far-right-pierre-poilievre/).
The day before Canada Day, Conservative leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre strutted down an Ottawa street with a crowd of red and white adorned supporters trailing behind him.
Alongside him, helping to lead the crowd of protesters who were pushing for a permanent end to vaccine mandates, was a man in a bright vest named James Topp.
Poilievre and Topp can be heard chit-chatting about the veteran’s morning routine, referencing Topp’s recent march across Canada in protest of COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
A topic they didn’t appear to talk about, based on circulating clips, was Topp’s appearance on far-right figurehead Jeremy Mackenzie’s podcast for well over an hour one month ago.
-
[attachimg=1]
-
If it's Liberal inflation, how do you explain the much-worse situation in far-right governments like in Brazil and the U.K.? Could it be that borrowing to pay off the rich and emboldening Putin were both bad economic strategies that you guys are completely responsible for?
-
Could it be that borrowing to pay off the rich and emboldening Putin were both bad economic strategies that you guys are completely responsible for?
That just gives us more assets to nationalize.
-
PeePee says he never heard of these guys despite marching with one of them in Ottawa on Canada Day (https://globalnews.ca/news/8959365/canada-day-convoy-james-topp-far-right-pierre-poilievre/).
PeePee PooPoo you're talking about?
-
Skippy power!
[attachimg=1]
-
How come you didn't mention Trudeau was the solid first choice for PM in the same poll?
-
How come you didn't mention Trudeau was the solid first choice for PM in the same poll?
Voters don’t vote for a PM, they vote for a party that selects the PM. It’s basic civics.
-
Voters don’t vote for a PM, they vote for a party that selects the PM. It’s basic civics.
Actually they vote for someone running as an MP. Their reasons will vary. Like the individual. Like the party. Like the leader. Who knows.
-
Voters don’t vote for a PM, they vote for a party that selects the PM. It’s basic civics.
They vote with the prospective PM in mind. If that weren't the case, you wouldn't see so many TrudeauMustGo memes, would you?
Duh.
-
They vote with the prospective PM in mind. If that weren't the case, you wouldn't see so many TrudeauMustGo memes, would you?
Duh.
It’s weird that the Liberals would be 7 points behind them. #TrudeauMustGo #TrudeauResign
-
PP is half-retarded and the CPC is still polling ahead of the Libs in terms of seat-projection on 338. Uh-oh spaghetios!
-
PP is half-retarded and the CPC is still polling ahead of the Libs in terms of seat-projection on 338. Uh-oh spaghetios!
Polls at this point in time are completely meaningless. We might be two years from an election. And we may be seeing something of a post-leadership bounce for Peter Polyester, as is often the case for new leaders.
However, this might dissuade Justin and his backroom advisors from calling a snap election.
-k
-
Pierre was fine with the far-right wackos threatening Trudeau and his family, and even met and shook hands with the people who did it But now that they've turned on him and his wife, suddenly that sort of rhetoric is unacceptable?
(https://i.imgur.com/pqqGmrs.gif)
such a hypocrite is Poilievre - don't be skippy! Claiming he didn't know about Diagolon (until about a month ago) is a g-damn lie... it was prominently mentioned several times back in February during the debate over deployment of the Emergencies Act! Pee Pee, the leader of the Convoy Party of Canada! LOL!
-
Charest was favoured amongst all Canadians while Poilievre was favoured amongst conservatives. It’s unfathomable to me why the party chose him.
I mean I get that he represents their ideals but when he doesn’t resonate with the rest of the country why not try to get the fascist dictator <eye roll> out of office?
Probably 40+% of Canadians would not vote CPC regardless of who they chose as leader. There's little doubt that committed LPC and NDP voters would have preferred Charest to Poilievre, but so what? Choosing a leader that's popular with people who wouldn't vote for you anyway isn't a recipe for success.
There's two kinds of votes who are actually in play.
1) undecided centrist voters who might be persuaded to vote CPC
2) right wing voters who might vote PPC if the party moved to the center.
With regard to group (2) I think clearly Poilievre keeps more CPC voters from migrating to the PPC, and probably brings some PPC voters back to the CPC. I don't know how many votes we're actually talking about there. With PPC typically polling around 5%, clearly not a lot. I do think there is some small number of ridings where vote splitting between PPC and CPC could be a factor, but it's probably not a big difference maker.
With regard to group (1), I think there is obviously a much larger number of voters available there, but I'm skeptical as to whether Charest would make a difference there. I honestly just don't think Charest matters in 2022. I just don't think anybody gives a **** about Charest anymore. Ultimately I think that the election doesn't ride on Trudeau or Poilievre as much as it rides on the economy. If the economy recovers and people are not feeling as squeezed financially by the time we vote next, I think the Liberals will win. If people are still feeling financially squeezed when we vote next, I think the CPC wins. I think that's what it really comes down to.
-k
-
1. Probably 40+% of Canadians would not vote CPC regardless of who they chose as leader.
1. Where do you get THAT number ?
Harper was considered a big meanie by many and he got about 40% ten years ago or so.
https://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/1867-present.html
-
1. Where do you get THAT number ?
Harper was considered a big meanie by many and he got about 40% ten years ago or so.
https://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/1867-present.html
Which means 60% didn't vote for him, which is Kimmy's point that the number of swing votersis relatively small.
-
Holy crap. That's embarrassing. 😂
-
Holy crap. That's embarrassing. 😂
Math errors are embarrassing ?
Ok... I guess I'm glad I don't have your ego...
-
I didn't see a math error. I saw a complete lack of understanding of how numbers work.
-
I didn't see a math error. I saw a complete lack of understanding of how numbers work.
What was said about conservatives applies to any party. No party usually gets much more than 40%, no matter who wins.
-
You still don't understand the original point. But I guess you're used to that by now.
-
c'mon Shady, why would your boy PeePee and CPC MPs vote against providing dental care to the children of low(er) income families?
Canada Dental Benefit - the Liberal federal government plan states that:
=> as the first stage, coverage for those people who are uninsured, and earning less than $90,000, will start with kids under 12 years old this year;
=> coverage will be expanded to those under 18, seniors and people with disabilities by the end of next year;
=> full implementation is promised by 2025.
NDP calls out Poilievre and Conservatives for opposing kids dental benefit while MPs enjoy comprehensive coverage (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ndp-calls-out-poilievre-and-conservatives-for-opposing-kids-dental-benefit-while-mps-enjoy-comprehensive-coverage-1.6088673)
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says it’s “ridiculous” that Conservative MPs will vote against a proposed dental benefit for children in low-income families when they enjoy far more comprehensive dental care coverage for their own families.
“Conservative MPs are planning to vote against giving kids dental care when their leader has had publicly-paid dental care for nearly two decades," Singh said Wednesday, referring to Pierre Poilievre, who has been an MP since 2004.
The Conservatives have signalled they will oppose Bill C-31, which would provide a benefit of up to $650 per child under age 12 in families with incomes lower than $90,000. Last week, the party tried to pass a motion in the House of Commons gutting the legislation.
-
c'mon Shady, why would your boy PeePee and CPC MPs vote against providing dental care to the children of low(er) income families?
Canada Dental Benefit - the Liberal federal government plan states that:
=> as the first stage, coverage for those people who are uninsured, and earning less than $90,000, will start with kids under 12 years old this year;
=> coverage will be expanded to those under 18, seniors and people with disabilities by the end of next year;
=> full implementation is promised by 2025.
NDP calls out Poilievre and Conservatives for opposing kids dental benefit while MPs enjoy comprehensive coverage (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ndp-calls-out-poilievre-and-conservatives-for-opposing-kids-dental-benefit-while-mps-enjoy-comprehensive-coverage-1.6088673)
I don't oppose it, however it should be paid for in the budget.
Waldo, how is the Liberal/ndp fake coalition going to pay for it? Raising taxes or cutting spending elsewhere? Nah they're just going to add it to the debt just like everything else.
And don't mention the recent quarterly surplus, that's just quarterly, we know it's not going to last longterm with this government.
-
I don't oppose it, however it should be paid for in the budget.
Waldo, how is the Liberal/ndp fake coalition going to pay for it? Raising taxes or cutting spending elsewhere? Nah they're just going to add it to the debt just like everything else.
And don't mention the recent quarterly surplus, that's just quarterly, we know it's not going to last longterm with this government.
And the surplus comes from record high inflation. The government is getting extra tax revenue from huge price increases in virtually everything. Once inflation comes down, so does that extra revenue. But I wouldn’t doubt that the Liberal-NDP Party plans to raise taxes some more, especially the carbon tax.
-
whoa Shady, you're being very selective in what you're responding to - here, let's try this again, hey! C'mon Shady, think of the kids, think of the kids!
c'mon Shady, why would your boy PeePee and CPC MPs vote against providing dental care to the children of low(er) income families?
NDP calls out Poilievre and Conservatives for opposing kids dental benefit while MPs enjoy comprehensive coverage (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ndp-calls-out-poilievre-and-conservatives-for-opposing-kids-dental-benefit-while-mps-enjoy-comprehensive-coverage-1.6088673)
-
...Liberal/ndp fake coalition
wait now! Are you claiming a coalition exists, but its fake... or a postured/posed/presumptive... fake... coalition doesn't exist? Please elaborate, hey Nipples!
-
Alex Jones endorses PierreP as a kindred spirit and part of the far-right movement that includes governments of Brazil and Italy. I'm glad they are at least honest and upfront about their allegiances.
-
Man’o the people. 😂
[attachimg=1]
-
You think we must live in poverty before we can ask for higher taxes on the rich? How stupid are you?
-
Man’o the people. 😂
(Attachment Link)
You claim Trump is a man of the people, his Rolexes are solid gold.
-
Alex Jones endorses PierreP as a kindred spirit and part of the far-right movement that includes governments of Brazil and Italy. I'm glad they are at least honest and upfront about their allegiances.
FFS! The video extract, only 18 secs in, where degenerate wing-nut Alex Jones touts Poilievre! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1576681761261633538/pu/vid/1280x720/szfVPBQZkGRyJRUK.mp4?tag=12) Oh my!
-
You claim Trump is a man of the people, his Rolexes are solid gold.
I've never said that Trump is a man of the people.
-
FFS! The video extract, only 18 secs in, where degenerate wing-nut Alex Jones touts Poilievre! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1576681761261633538/pu/vid/1280x720/szfVPBQZkGRyJRUK.mp4?tag=12) Oh my!
Do you want to go into detail of the backgrounds of some of Justin Blackface's supporters? Probably not.
-
But...whatabout the Putin stooges that support Justin? They might exist. Shady can't name anyone, but...they might exist. Whatabout them! 😆
-
But...whatabout the Putin stooges that support Justin? They might exist. Shady can't name anyone, but...they might exist. Whatabout them! 😆
I never said anything about a Putin stooge. He has plenty of Xi stooge support though, and even worse, some former **** criminals.
-
How about Putin-backed conspiracy theorists who, like you, are working to destroy western democracy? Whatabout that? Got anything...at all?
-
Man’o the people. 😂
(Attachment Link)
He looks good, let's see your fit.
-
He looks good, let's see your fit.
He's the classic champagne socialist/limousine liberal.
-
How about Putin-backed conspiracy theorists who, like you, are working to destroy western democracy? Whatabout that? Got anything...at all?
I love the hyperbole! It's entertaining.
-
I think the cops that died after the Jan. 6 riot you cheered on would disagree that your slurping of Putinballs is hyperbole.
-
I think the cops that died after the Jan. 6 riot you cheered on would disagree that your slurping of Putinballs is hyperbole.
You mean the cops that died for reasons other than the riot? Who cares? What about the cops that died during BLM riots? Why don’t you care about them? What about the cops that have been targeted and killed due to you and your ilk’s irresponsible rhetoric defaming police in 2020? Stare me your crocodile tears, you have no credibility.
-
Yes, I know you don't care about the people you guys are responsible for killing. But I like how you make up BS just to distract from what a sh1tstain your mother shat. lol
-
Yes, I know you don't care about the people you guys are responsible for killing. But I like how you make up BS just to distract from what a sh1tstain your mother shat. lol
Yes of course, just like you don't care about the people you're responsible for killing.
-
I never cheered on riots while they were happening. And there were no police deaths from BLM riots. All you got is a black guy committed a robbery once and shot a police officer. You decided to make that about BLM because you're from London and you guys throw bananas at black hockey players there.
-
I never cheered on riots while they were happening. And there were no police deaths from BLM riots. All you got is a black guy committed a robbery once and shot a police officer. You decided to make that about BLM because you're from London and you guys throw bananas at black hockey players there.
More than 700 officers were injured during the riots you supported, and you've said nothing. You have no credibility. Spare me your pathetic crocodile tears.
Officers injured: The New York Post reported on June 8, citing the U.S. Justice Department, that more than 700 law enforcement officers were injured on the job during nationwide protests over Floyd’s death.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/10/fact-checking-claim-about-deaths-damage-from-black-lives-matter-protests/113878088/
-
He's the classic champagne socialist/limousine liberal.
Post fit.
-
You mean the cops that died for reasons other than the riot? Who cares?
Filing this one away for posterity lol
-
Filing this one away for posterity lol
I forgot that you love the police, as long as they're going after your political enemies. Just like a good little authoritarian.
-
I forgot that you love the police, as long as they're going after your political enemies. Just like a good little authoritarian.
Wait who are my political enemies in this scenario where you don't care about cops getting maimed/killed?
-
Wait who are my political enemies in this scenario where you don't care about cops getting maimed/killed?
Nobody was maimed/killed. You’re living in a fantasy world.
-
Nobody was maimed/killed. You’re living in a fantasy world.
You live in a world where no cops were killed or injured on Jan. 6 and kids identify as cats: you're so detached from reality you should be committed to psychiatric care and possibly lobotomized (if there was anything there to work with in the first place).
-
You live in a world where no cops were killed or injured on Jan. 6 and kids identify as cats: you're so detached from reality you should be committed to psychiatric care and possibly lobotomized (if there was anything there to work with in the first place).
Because there were none. Now do the BLM riots you supported, where over 700 hundred were injured.
-
Because there were none.
Facts (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-union-says-140-officers-injured-in-capitol-riot/2021/01/27/60743642-60e2-11eb-9430-e7c77b5b0297_story.html) don't care about the strange alternate reality in which you reside.
Now do the BLM riots you supported, where over 700 hundred were injured.
Who cares?
-
More than 700 officers were injured during the riots you supported, and you've said nothing. You have no credibility. Spare me your pathetic crocodile tears.
Officers injured: The New York Post reported on June 8, citing the U.S. Justice Department, that more than 700 law enforcement officers were injured on the job during nationwide protests over Floyd’s death.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/10/fact-checking-claim-about-deaths-damage-from-black-lives-matter-protests/113878088/
nice own goal you stooge! Clearly showing you prefer headline munching rather than reading your own links. Cause if you actually did read you'd note, more pointedly, that the U.S. Justice Department (being cited) doesn't have the numbers you're bold-highlighting:
the U.S. Justice Department told us it does not have figures on officer injuries or property damage resulting from civil disturbances, and the FBI said it had no comment.
and most pointedly, you'd note your linked article first appeared in Politifact where it received a 'FALSE' rating; again, nice OWN GOAL!
(https://i.imgur.com/0NhxvRk.gif)
-
c'mon waldo, get this thread back on track! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1577251917620822022/pu/vid/1280x720/BTZ6lPCyB810zC0d.mp4?tag=12)
-
nice own goal you stooge! Clearly showing you prefer headline munching rather than reading your own links. Cause if you actually did read you'd note, more pointedly, that the U.S. Justice Department (being cited) doesn't have the numbers you're bold-highlighting:
and most pointedly, you'd note your linked article first appeared in Politifact where it received a 'FALSE' rating; again, nice OWN GOAL!
(https://i.imgur.com/0NhxvRk.gif)
I quoted the numbers indicated by the fact check, not the initial claim. Try harder.
-
Facts (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-union-says-140-officers-injured-in-capitol-riot/2021/01/27/60743642-60e2-11eb-9430-e7c77b5b0297_story.html) don't care about the strange alternate reality in which you reside.
LOL, the Union says huh? LOL. There aren't that many police officers on duty at the capital to begin with, that was one of the problems, as there were barely any law enforcement there.
-
I quoted the numbers indicated by the fact check, not the initial claim. Try harder.
bullshyte you did! LOL!... it's the fact check that's busting your claim/statement!
(https://i.imgur.com/4ZIxNo9.gif)
-
LOL, the Union says huh? LOL. There aren't that many police officers on duty at the capital to begin with, that was one of the problems, as there were barely any law enforcement there.
That figure includes boyh Capitol and Metro cops but you've never been great with numbers concerning this event (https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/american-politics/the-donald-trump-thread/msg92680/#msg92680).
-
That figure includes boyh Capitol and Metro cops but you've never been great with numbers concerning this event (https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/american-politics/the-donald-trump-thread/msg92680/#msg92680).
So why don't you care about the police injured during your BLM riots?
-
So why don't you care about the police injured during your BLM riots?
I don't. The point is your selective outrage and complete denial of the reality of what happened on Jan. 6.
-
I don't. The point is your selective outrage and complete denial of the reality of what happened on Jan. 6.
It's you who has the selective outrage. I've always acknowledged the BLM-like riot that took place on January 6th. But it's odd that you've never spoken up about injured officers, etc until then. When the riots you supported in 2020 producted 10 times as many injured, etc. That's why you, just like Blubber Slimy, have absolutely no credibility. Spare me your crocodile tears, you f**king fraud.
-
It's you who has the selective outrage. I've always acknowledged the BLM-like riot that took place on January 6th.
You have done nothing but downplay the extent of the violence on Jan 6 (describing the mob as "a handful of people, who were unarmed, became violent" and dead Q-Tard Ashlii Babbit as "an unarmed woman walking around the capital") and its intent while pretending whole cities were burned down during the riots during the BLM protests.
But it's odd that you've never spoken up about injured officers, etc until then. When the riots you supported in 2020 producted 10 times as many injured, etc.
Yeah I think protesting police brutality is good and trying to overthrow the democratically elected government is bad, go figure.
Now go back to crying about made up litterboxes in classrooms you dumb twat.
-
You have done nothing but downplay the extent of the violence on Jan 6 (describing the mob as "a handful of people, who were unarmed, became violent" and dead Q-Tard Ashlii Babbit as "an unarmed woman walking around the capital") and its intent while pretending whole cities were burned down during the riots during the BLM protests.
Yeah I think protesting police brutality is good and trying to overthrow the democratically elected government is bad, go figure.
Now go back to crying about made up litterboxes in classrooms you dumb twat.
I said it was several hundred people, not a handful you pathological liar. They were unarmed. I'm sorry that fact offends you so much. Not whole cities, but whole neighbourhoods, as oppose to nothing being burned on January 6th. You've downplayed the BLM riots you supported for the last 2 years.
Once again, the fantasy world you live in bubbles to the surface. Overthrow of an election? You need professional help. A group of unarmed people CANNOT overthrow a government by walking around in a building. You're certifiable.
-
I said it was several hundred people, not a handful you pathological liar.
Not only did you say it was "a handful of people," you doubled down on it when we laughed at you:
So you finally admit that the election couldn’t have been overturned. See how easy that was? So this whole insurrection stuff is complete and utter bullsh*t. It was a protest that turned into a riot. And a handful of people, who were unarmed, became violent. I fully support them being charged for trespassing and assault. The rest of this theatre is complete insanity.
Yes, a handful of people. Check the number of people charged with assault. You don’t even ha e to take my word for it.
Suck on that one.
They were unarmed. I'm sorry that fact offends you so much.
Why would I be offended by something that isn't true?
Not whole cities, but whole neighbourhoods, as oppose to nothing being burned on January 6th.
"It's ok for an armed mob to attempt to overthow the government if nothing gets set on fire"-Shid-for-brains.
You've downplayed the BLM riots you supported for the last 2 years.
My point has always been that the overwhelming number of protests were peaceful and that's a fact, pindick.
Once again, the fantasy world you live in bubbles to the surface. Overthrow of an election? You need professional help. A group of unarmed people CANNOT overthrow a government by walking around in a building. You're certifiable.
But that's what they were trying to do, you gibbering shitgibbon.
-
Not only did you say it was "a handful of people," you doubled down on it when we laughed at you:
Suck on that one.
Why would I be offended by something that isn't true?
"It's ok for an armed mob to attempt to overthow the government if nothing gets set on fire"-Shid-for-brains.
My point has always been that the overwhelming number of protests were peaceful and that's a fact, pindick.
But that's what they were trying to do, you gibbering shitgibbon.
I'll say this one more time, so that you're pea brain can hopefully comprehend it. A GOVERNMENT CANNOT BE OVERTHROW BY TRESSPASSING. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT, YOU NEED PROFESSIONAL HELP, AND HAVE BEEN SO PROPAGANDIZED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT YOU'RE BEYOND REPAIR.
99% of rioters that have been charged, were charged with trespassing. Trespassing cannot overthrow governments. Even hitting a police officer cannot overthrow a government.
I'm done talking about this with you, or anyone that's as bat s**t crazy as you. You're an effing lunatic.
-
I'll say this one more time, so that you're pea brain can hopefully comprehend it. A GOVERNMENT CANNOT BE OVERTHROW BY TRESSPASSING. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT, YOU NEED PROFESSIONAL HELP, AND HAVE BEEN SO PROPAGANDIZED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT YOU'RE BEYOND REPAIR.
99% of rioters that have been charged, were charged with trespassing. Trespassing cannot overthrow governments. Even hitting a police officer cannot overthrow a government.
I'm done talking about this with you, or anyone that's as bat s**t crazy as you. You're an effing lunatic.
I'm well aware they were unlikely to succeed in overthrowing the government. The point is the "handful of people" (as you called them) who invaded the capitol thought they could. It's why they were there in the first place, you mush-brained donkeyfucker. Do you think they just busted in to take a look around, you stupid c*nt? Jesus christ, your parents should have drowned you in a sack the day you cursed the earth with your presence.
-
I'm well aware they were unlikely to succeed in overthrowing the government. The point is the "handful of people" (as you called them) who invaded the capitol thought they could. It's why they were there in the first place, you mush-brained donkeyfucker. Do you think they just busted in to take a look around, you stupid c*nt? Jesus christ, your parents should have drowned you in a sack.
No, not unlikely, try not possible. Just like squeezing a piece of coal really hard with your hand will turn it into a diamond. I feel sad for people like you, that accept media propaganda as if it were fact. I hope you eventually get the help you need.
-
99% of rioters that have been charged, were charged with trespassing. Trespassing cannot overthrow governments. Even hitting a police officer cannot overthrow a government.
.
Your fellow Oathkeepers have been charged with seditious conspiracy.
-
No, not unlikely, try not possible. Just like squeezing a piece of coal really hard with your hand will turn it into a diamond. I feel sad for people like you, that accept media propaganda as if it were fact. I hope you eventually get the help you need.
You should put down your bowl of Frosted Lead Paint Chips and answer the question of what you suppose the people who were there on Jan. 6 were trying to accomplish.
-
Your fellow Oathkeepers have been charged with seditious conspiracy.
Shady's the kind of retard who would call in a bomb threat to a public library and get mad when he gets arrested because there wasn't really a bomb.
-
Shady's the kind of retard who would call in a bomb threat to a public library and get mad when he gets arrested because there wasn't really a bomb.
Black Dog is the kind of retard that would charge somebody with attempted murder because they thought they could kill somebody by looking at them with a really mean stare.
Btw, what would I be arrested for? Not attempted murder, retard. Nice self-own. Thanks for proving my point.
-
Black Dog is the kind of retard that would charge somebody with attempted murder because they thought they could kill somebody by looking at them with a really mean stare.
What a godawfully poor copycat attempt. You should lock yourself in a running car in a closed garage until you think of a better one.
Btw, what would I be arrested for? Not attempted murder, retard. Nice self-own. Thanks for proving my point.
You'd be arrested for a different crime, but that would not change what your intent was in making the threat you imbecile. Christ how do you even get dressed?
-
What a godawfully poor copycat attempt. You should lock yourself in a running car in a closed garage until you think of a better one.
You'd be arrested for a different crime, but that would not change what your intent was in making the threat you imbecile. Christ how do you even get dressed?
Yes, I’d be arrested for a different crime. Thank you again for making my point. You’re such a rube! That might have been the best self-own in the history of self-owns! 😂
-
Yes, I’d be arrested for a different crime. Thank you again for making my point. You’re such a rube! That might have been the best self-own in the history of self-owns! 😂
It's comical to see you lose the thread of your own argument and reach the "flip the chessboard over and declare yourself winner" stage. I'd love to see you even attempt to summarize your argument at this point.
-
It's comical to see you lose the thread of your own argument and reach the "flip the chessboard over and declare yourself winner" stage. I'd love to see you even attempt to summarize your argument at this point.
[attachimg=1]
-
Your fellow Oathkeepers have been charged with seditious conspiracy.
as have a number of Shady's Proud Boys!
seditious conspiracy: in U.S. Federal law, the crime of sedition, which generally means the organized encouragement of rebellion or civil disorder against the authority of the state. An act where two or more people conspire to overthrow the U.S. government or to forcibly oppose its authority, interfere with the execution of any law, or seize any property of the U.S..
-
as have a number of Shady's Proud Boys!
seditious conspiracy: in U.S. Federal law, the crime of sedition, which generally means the organized encouragement of rebellion or civil disorder against the authority of the state. An act where two or more people conspire to overthrow the U.S. government or to forcibly oppose its authority, interfere with the execution of any law, or seize any property of the U.S..
Hmmm, sounds like BLM and Antifa!
-
(Attachment Link)
Yeah memes is all you got, you fuckin loser.
-
as have a number of Shady's Proud Boys!
seditious conspiracy: in U.S. Federal law, the crime of sedition, which generally means the organized encouragement of rebellion or civil disorder against the authority of the state. An act where two or more people conspire to overthrow the U.S. government or to forcibly oppose its authority, interfere with the execution of any law, or seize any property of the U.S..
So that's 16 total Oaf Keepers and **** Boys charged with seditious conspiracy. The question is: is that a handful?
-
Yeah memes is all you got, you fuckin loser.
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! 🤣
-
Hmmm, sounds like BLM and Antifa!
You can provide a cute of them being charged with seditious conspiracy, or you can silently admit you lose again.
-
You can provide a cute of them being charged with seditious conspiracy, or you can silently admit you lose again.
Being charged doesn’t mean guilty. I mean, I know ol’Police State Bubber abandoned innocent until proven guilty a king time ago. Regardless, politicizing the justice department generally means that justice in unevenly applied. Hence, some people are charged with things others are not, despite similar actions.
-
Being charged doesn’t mean guilty. I mean, I know ol’Police State Bubber abandoned innocent until proven guilty a king time ago. Regardless, politicizing the justice department generally means that justice in unevenly applied. Hence, some people are charged with things others are not, despite similar actions.
"Burning down an autobody shop is the same as plotting to violently prevent the transfer of presidential power." - Shiddy
-
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! 🤣
You don't have to sign your posts, we already know you're retarded.
-
Being charged doesn’t mean guilty. I mean, I know ol’Police State Bubber abandoned innocent until proven guilty a king time ago. Regardless, politicizing the justice department generally means that justice in unevenly applied. Hence, some people are charged with things others are not, despite similar actions.
But charges are derived from evidence. So you have no evidence of what you're talking about? Why do you bother then? It's not like you have the credibility that someone would take your word for it
-
apparently... there's a new Conservative leader! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1577776284977037312/pu/vid/1280x720/qudrBAhNqYkYNJw_.mp4?tag=12)Who knew!
-
oh my! Poilievre's YouTube channel included a hidden misogynistic tag to promote videos... the tag, #mgtow, is an acronym for “Men Going Their Own Way” — a mostly-online movement comprised of anti-feminists who attempt to cut women completely out of their lives. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the movement overlaps with more aggressive forms of “male supremacy.”
(https://i.imgur.com/fQte0hs.gif)
Within hours of Global News sending a detailed list of questions to Poilievre’s office, the tag disappeared.
Poilievre’s office said the Conservative leader was unaware the embedded tags existed “and therefore was unaware they were used for uploads on his YouTube channel over the last” four and a half years.
-
You'd think he would have disavowed Alex Jones' endorsement by now. Rather telling that he hasn't.
-
oh my! Poilievre's YouTube channel included a hidden misogynistic tag to promote videos... the tag, #mgtow, is an acronym for “Men Going Their Own Way” — a mostly-online movement comprised of anti-feminists who attempt to cut women completely out of their lives. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the movement overlaps with more aggressive forms of “male supremacy.”
What’s most shocking is a lack of racist or homophobic tags!
-
What’s most shocking is a lack of racist or homophobic tags!
You’ve got a lot of nerve posting in a thread waldo had to create because you kept deleting his posts. Get the f**k out of here you f**king fascist. Nobody wants you here.
-
But charges are derived from evidence. So you have no evidence of what you're talking about? Why do you bother then? It's not like you have the credibility that someone would take your word for it
But I thought it! 😂
-
Nobody wants you here.
Since when did that bother you?
-
not that the waldo is counting, but... apparently it's coming up on 75 days since Poilievre accepted an interview/questions from the cadre of Parliamentary Press Gallery (PPG)journalists - what's PeePee afraid of, anyway? Even more pointedly, Poilievre distanced himself from the recent days (yearly) PPG dinner which, by tradition, sees both the Prime Minister and the leader of the Official Opposition roast each other in "friendly criticism/banter" - clearly too much for the thin-skinned PeePee. By the by waldo, it seems Poilievre has no problem with taking soft-ball tailored questions from the likes of so-called "journalists" from True North, Rebel News, Western Standard, etc..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2wkXXOBbFI
-
skippy approved!
(https://i.imgur.com/YuaGAep.jpg)
-
The populist strategy to troll the press is unacceptable but their supporters won't call them on it.
-
and so the Poilievre revisionism begins! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1586748378427576322/pu/vid/1024x576/DGJLCWkrfVN-eBAL.mp4?tag=12) Oh my! Poilievre taking them timmies, saying he supports the truckers, doing selfies with the truckers, marching with the leaders of the Convoy, etc..
If this government gives into all the demands of the lawbreakers, It will get more lawbreaking. How will we ever restore lawfulness and development in this country?
-
Waldo, how do you taste food with Justin's feces rammed so far up your nose from all the brown-nosing and your lips permanently stitched to the man's bum cheeks?
-
Waldo, how do you taste food with Justin's feces rammed so far up your nose from all the brown-nosing and your lips permanently stitched to the man's bum cheeks?
I assume he gets paid by direct deposit by the Liberal Party of Canada.
-
Funny how you never hear these stories in the Canadian media:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63393955
-
Funny how you never hear these stories in the Canadian media:
waldo googly says what? Bloc leader condemns 'racist' and 'humiliating' monarchy while calling for Canada to cut ties with Charles (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bloc-racist-humiliating-monarchy-1.6628934)
-
newly appointed Communications Director for the ConvoyPartyOfCanada - Sarah Fischer => a long-time party staffer and failed 2019 Conservative candidate under Andrew Scheer:
here she is pacing the CPC leader during his run to be the Prime Minister of Canada!
(https://i.imgur.com/bTq5PNF.gif)
better yet, she has a litany of videos she personally took during the Occupation of Ottawa; a few examples of:
- like this gem which accompanies her, "music to my ears", tweet (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1487217189761519616/pu/vid/720x1280/0bITd6VztynAJjZu.mp4?tag=12):
(https://i.imgur.com/P17CnnX.gif)
- or this one where she's hands-on! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1487924846617145345/pu/vid/720x1280/-oza6Lhi9ZKC9AoB.mp4?tag=12[/url)
-
PeePee really under the gun today for continuing to boycott taking questions from the Parliamentary Press on Parliament Hill... clearly not willing to answer to/for, among many issues, the #mgtow tag in his youtube videos!
(https://i.imgur.com/k3hMWzW.jpg)
-
PeePee really under the gun today for continuing to boycott taking questions from the Parliamentary Press on Parliament Hill... clearly not willing to answer to/for, among many issues, the #mgtow tag in his youtube videos!
(https://i.imgur.com/k3hMWzW.jpg)
LOL @ YouTube videos! 😂
Meanwhile we have a PM that’s been found guilty a record number of times for ethics violations.
-
LOL @ YouTube videos! 😂
Nobody expected you to be offended that they were tagging videos to target you.
-
PeePee really under the gun today for continuing to boycott taking questions from the Parliamentary Press on Parliament Hill...
so PeePee had a most carefully scripted/staged "presser" in Kitts and was quite taken aback when some wag asked why he refused to take questions from the 'Press Gallery' on Parliament Hill... Poilievre whining waddamean, "I'm taking questions right now"! Apparently, the PeePee boycott is now at 80 days - but who's counting! Geezaz Shady, what's Poilievre so afraid of, hey?
-
yet another example of why Poilievre's "handlers" need to get him out there answering media questions!
PeePee has the answer to crime - to woke bail reform conditions! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1601710330371088385/pu/vid/1280x720/ggbh5MIQnM6_iKQH.mp4?tag=12) Poilievre claims that the SAME 40 Criminals have been arrested in Vancouver 6000 times in one year - that "they" just need to make bail conditions more difficult to keep those 40 in jail. So basic, so simple!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FjuFruIWYAITzWC?format=jpg)
-
Conservative governments in Canada are failing so miserably at managing the addiction epidemic that I'm surprised they would bring it up at all. Their position on safe consumption sites is cruel and unreasonable and leading to countless deaths and community destruction.
-
Conservative governments in Canada are failing so miserably at managing the addiction epidemic that I'm surprised they would bring it up at all. Their position on safe consumption sites is cruel and unreasonable and leading to countless deaths and community destruction.
😂😂😂
Yes, provinces are left to try and cope with a problem the federal government has completely botched. FYI, fentanyl comes into Canada from other countries. Trudeau’s regime allows it to.
-
I'm talking about meth.
-
Conservative governments in Canada are failing so miserably at managing the addiction epidemic that I'm surprised they would bring it up at all. Their position on safe consumption sites is cruel and unreasonable and leading to countless deaths and community destruction.
ignore the Shady attempt to deflect towards street-drugs/fentanyl while completely missing the actual Poilievre position and target - safe injection sites and safe supply!
Poilievre's most selective, most self-serving location choice for his much criticized video... Vancouver - only because it allows him to avoid identifying that the same situation/circumstances exist in Conservative led provinces. That is to say, for example, Alberta has 5 'safe consumption sites'... for the same reason B.C. and other Canadian jurisdictions do; because they save lives.
NP-Chris Selley - Poilievre's anti-drug pitch is a failure of imagination (https://nationalpost.com/opinion/chris-selley-poilievres-anti-drug-pitch-is-a-failure-of-imagination) - Drug treatment is bloody hard to make stick — and impossible with cadavers
Poilievre’s position: “There is no safe supply of these drugs. They are deadly, they are lethal, and they are relentlessly addictive.”
Treatment is Poilievre’s preferred approach. Treatment is pretty much everyone’s preferred approach. But it has been proven entirely ineffective with cadavers.
.
Methadone and buprenorphine are drugs that help addicts quit by reducing cravings and withdrawal symptoms; they don’t help those who aren’t ready to quit get high safely. At this point in our evolving understanding of addiction, it’s simply a failure of curiosity not to understand the difference — and not to understand how difficult it is to get addicts into therapy, and to make it stick. It’s unforgivably simplistic to say “let’s focus on treatment over safe supply.” You do both, for God’s sake. Both. Hundreds of lives are waiting to be saved. There are more than enough barriers in the way of that without Poilievre erecting more, especially on false pretences.
G&M-Gary Mason - Pierre Poilievre couldn’t be more wrong on drug policy (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-pierre-poilievre-drug-policy-everything-broken-video/)
With a tent city in Vancouver as his backdrop, Mr. Poilievre said offering addicts access to a safe supply of illicit drugs was a “failed experiment” brought in by “woke Liberal and NDP governments.” He said if he became prime minister, he would end this policy (although he didn’t say how) and instead put federal dollars toward recovery and treatment.
.
I want to say here that Mr. Poilievre doesn’t know what he’s talking about. But his harping on about the perils of giving people “taxpayer-funded” drugs is a trope guaranteed to get his conservatively inclined base fired up and might even persuade the odd centrist or two to question the policy as well. They ignore the fact that “safe supply” isn’t really a radical departure from conventional addiction treatments with drugs such as methadone or Suboxone.
-
ignore the Shady attempt to deflect towards street-drugs/fentanyl while completely missing the actual Poilievre position and target - safe injection sites and safe supply!
Poilievre's most selective, most self-serving location choice for his much criticized video... Vancouver - only because it allows him to avoid identifying that the same situation/circumstances exist in Conservative led provinces. That is to say, for example, Alberta has 5 'safe consumption sites'... for the same reason B.C. and other Canadian jurisdictions do; because they save lives.
NP-Chris Selley - Poilievre's anti-drug pitch is a failure of imagination (https://nationalpost.com/opinion/chris-selley-poilievres-anti-drug-pitch-is-a-failure-of-imagination) - Drug treatment is bloody hard to make stick — and impossible with cadavers
G&M-Gary Mason - Pierre Poilievre couldn’t be more wrong on drug policy (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-pierre-poilievre-drug-policy-everything-broken-video/)
LOL, treatment and recovery is now considered dangerous. 😂😂😂
-
LOL, treatment and recovery is now considered dangerous. 😂😂😂
yours is a 3-emoji strawman! Point-in-fact: multi-faceted approaches are needed. PeePee's failed position is one solely presuming upon treatment/recovery... while being against safe-supply/safe injection sites.
-
yours is a 3-emoji strawman! Point-in-fact: multi-faceted approaches are needed. PeePee's failed position is one solely presuming upon treatment/recovery... while being against safe-supply/safe injection sites.
There's nothing dangerous about wanting to emphasize treatment and recovery. And for this piece of crap journalist to suggest that is disgusting. He's just trying to silence debate. That's all you types do now.
-
Point-in-fact: multi-faceted approaches are needed. PeePee's failed position is one solely presuming upon treatment/recovery... while being against safe-supply/safe injection sites.
There's nothing dangerous about wanting to emphasize treatment and recovery. And for this piece of crap journalist to suggest that is disgusting. He's just trying to silence debate. That's all you types do now.
the waldo provided links to 2 related articles criticizing Poilievre's stoopid/misguided position... from those articles provide a quote to support your claim that a journalist stated, "it's dangerous to emphasize treatment & recovery".
emphasis implies multiple approaches with degrees of importance and weight applied to those multiple approaches. The PeePee position is one of exclusion - excluding safe supply/injection sites while ONLY targeting treatment/recovery options.
Offering addicts access to a safe supply of illicit drugs is a failed experiment brought in by woke Liberal and NDP governments. When I become Prime Minister, I will end this policy and instead put federal dollars toward recovery and treatment.
(https://i.imgur.com/VhxL6vd.jpg)
-
(https://www.saltwire.com/media/photologue/photos/2022/12/14/Bruce_12_15_2022_RGB.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/w2yIGNN.gif)
One-in-three (33%) view Poilievre favourably, while more than half (54%) hold a negative view. These levels of unfavourable sentiment are much higher than those of previous leaders Andrew Scheer, Erin O’Toole, and Stephen Harper at the beginning of their own leadership ventures.
.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, meanwhile, enjoys a five-point boost in his approval compared to summer levels. He’s viewed positively by more than two-in-five (43%).
.
An emerging gender divide is unmistakable: Poilievre’s favourability is nearly twice as high among men (44%) as women (23%), while the inverse, though not as pronounced, is true of Trudeau (35% among men, 50% among women).
-
Speaking of peepee's polls, I was interested in the Angus Reid breakdowns provincially, showing he only has positive favourability in Saskatchewan and Alberta and -20% overall. It appears he only appeals to libertarian conservatives, which I believe are disproportionately represented a great deal among conservatives in those two provinces, but those two provinces only.
Pierre Poilievre Net Approvals:
Canada: -20%
Region:
SK: +19%
AB: +16%
MB: -17%
ON: -17%
ATL: -22%
BC: -26%
QC: -43%
Gender:
Men: -6%
Women: -34%
Age:
18-34: -20%
35-54: -13%
55+: -28%
https://twitter.com/CanadianPolling/status/1604717187448594432?s=20&t=sJ6epReCyPekyDR469UCwA
-
of course NDP Singh knows that the provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the management, organization and delivery of health care services for their residents... he knows this! Yet he's back to peddling this nonsense again! (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1604885488380567552/vid/1080x1080/zA1EpWI1MWWMfj2I.mp4?tag=16)
(https://i.imgur.com/lxExIIH.gif)
-
😂
[attachimg=1]
-
of course NDP Singh knows that the provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the management, organization and delivery of health care services for their residents... he knows this!
So, you think the Feds don’t fund healthcare and couldn’t do anything to increase the resources available to alleviate the issues?
-
of course NDP Singh knows that the provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the management, organization and delivery of health care services for their residents... he knows this!
And you must know that federal funding has a lot to do with the delivery of health care services. You must know this!
-
And you must know that federal funding has a lot to do with the delivery of health care services. You must know this!
thanks Captain Obvious! As a key reference point, while undercutting public healthcare, Conservative Premiers are targeting healthcare privatization in their respective provinces. Not only are some of those provincial governments running large surpluses, some of those same provincial governments are improperly using federally provided funding for healthcare... as in not using it for healthcare at all!
so now we have Premiers demanding an increase in healthcare funding from the federal government, but they're quite miffed that the federal government wants to attach accountability to healthcare funding to ensure it's properly used... for healthcare! What a concept!
-
NB Conservative Premier Higgs says what about health care and the provinces big surplus?
(https://i.imgur.com/LaVJcUL.gif)
-
NB Conservative Premier Higgs says what about health care and the provinces big surplus?
So NB can spend money to make a difference, but Trudeau says the Feds can’t. Interesting…. Who has more tax/spend powers…. The Feds or NB?
-
So NB can spend money to make a difference, but Trudeau says the Feds can’t.
squiggy says PM Trudeau says what? Cite your strawman, hey squiggy!
-
thanks Captain Obvious! As a key reference point, while undercutting public healthcare, Conservative Premiers are targeting healthcare privatization in their respective provinces. Not only are some of those provincial governments running large surpluses, some of those same provincial governments are improperly using federally provided funding for healthcare... as in not using it for healthcare at all!
so now we have Premiers demanding an increase in healthcare funding from the federal government, but they're quite miffed that the federal government wants to attach accountability to healthcare funding to ensure it's properly used... for healthcare! What a concept!
Premiers are bound by the Canada Health Act. There's already accountability attached to funding. So what if some Premiers want some privatization? Germany's health care system is a public/private hybrid. You really should be more progressive and stop being stuck in old outdated policy. It's clearly not working. But what are you saying? That Trudeau is purposely holding back health care funding because he doesn't like how some Premier's are running their governments? Governments elected by Canadians? That's pretty f**king evil don't you think? Properly used? Properly used is subjective. Many don't think Trudeau's properly using Federal funding. Where's his accountability? The voters right? The same voters that elected these Premiers. He's not a dictator, even though he thinks he is, and you wish he was. Regardless, people across the country are waiting longer for care, because Trudeau doesn't like how Premiers are running their provinces. Thanks for clearing it up, I kind of figured as much.
-
nice BlatheringShadyScreed! LOL!
Regardless, people across the country are waiting longer for care, because Trudeau doesn't like how Premiers are running their provinces. Thanks for clearing it up, I kind of figured as much.
notwithstanding there's a fundamental disagreement between the federal government and the provinces as to how to calculate the current rate of federal funding...
Canada's premiers say the federal government is only paying 22 per cent of the cost of providing health care. They want that amount boosted to 35 per cent — an increase of $28 billion to the $45.2 billion Canada Health Transfer (CHT) starting this year.
.
At the heart of the disagreement is how the federal contribution to the provinces is calculated.
In 1977, direct federal funding for hospital and physician services was reduced. The federal government cut some taxes it collects and gave those tax points to the provinces, allowing income and corporate taxes collected at the provincial level to fund health services directly.
.
The federal government said that when the CHT and those tax points are combined with the money Ottawa spends on bilateral deals for long-term care, home care, mental health and some other services, the portion of health care spending covered by the federal government in 2021-22 came closer to 38.5 per cent.
The premiers have not included the tax points in their calculation, saying the CHT — the largest federal transfer to the provinces — covers only about 22 per cent of the cost.
c'mon Shady - yours is a very narrow and/or skewed and/or misinformed understanding of the Canada Health Act - go figure, hey!
points in fact: over the last year the federal Health Minister & the respective provincial health ministers have agreed on required fundamental improvements to health care... such as, for example, the recruitment and retention of health care workers & data sharing initiatives to streamline care. Setting dedicated federal funding allotments to support these types of agreed upon improvements is the kind of accountability being described.
-
nice BlatheringShadyScreed! LOL!
notwithstanding there's a fundamental disagreement between the federal government and the provinces as to how to calculate the current rate of federal funding...
c'mon Shady - yours is a very narrow and/or skewed and/or misinformed understanding of the Canada Health Act - go figure, hey!
points in fact: over the last year the federal Health Minister & the respective provincial health ministers have agreed on required fundamental improvements to health care... such as, for example, the recruitment and retention of health care workers & data sharing initiatives to streamline care. Setting dedicated federal funding allotments to support these types of agreed upon improvements is the kind of accountability being described.
It's called federalism.
Trudeau's reckless and irresponsible immigration policy has degraded the health care system. He's purposely adding 500,000 new Canadians every year, with no regard to doctor/patient rations, and nurse/patient ratios already stretched thin. He doesn't care that millions of Canadians cant' find family doctors, he doesn't care that emergency rooms are overcrowded with excess waiting times. He just blames it on Premiers. I've said it before and I'll say it again. He's a complete a**hole.
-
Trudeau's reckless and irresponsible immigration policy
I've said it before and I'll say it again. He's a complete a**hole.
geezaz Shady! Your boy PeePee rage farms over, "unprecedented labour shortages"... but somehow doesn't have any solutions to help deal with labour shortages - go figure, hey! Wait now! Can you say increased immigration numbers/rates, particularly focusing on the 'economic class' - well can ya!
(https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/images/infographics/levels-infographie-design-2022-e.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FklYyZUagAAVkPd?format=jpg)
-
I see the CPC are leading in national polls and Ontario and everyone still greatly dislikes Justin.
The welfare provinces like Atlantic Canada and Quebec still prefer the Libs though. I wonder why.
-
I see the CPC are leading in national polls and Ontario and everyone still greatly dislikes Justin.
"everyone" ... oh noooos! The walls are closing in!™
Angus Reid polling says what?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkV6_j-XkAMwjRE?format=png)
The welfare provinces like Atlantic Canada and Quebec...
Nipples is ignorant! Don't be Nipples...
-
"everyone" ... oh noooos! The walls are closing in!™
Angus Reid polling says what?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkV6_j-XkAMwjRE?format=png)
Nipples is ignorant! Don't be Nipples...
People don't vote for leaders.
-
...and everyone still greatly dislikes Justin.
People don't vote for leaders.
-
PeePee has jumped on the ethics violations bandwagon... by the by waldo, Poilievre is the only sitting MP who has a Compliance Agreement with the Elections Canada Commissioner for Canada Elections Act violations: Commissioner of Canada Elections Enters into Compliance Agreement with Pierre Poilievre (https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/commissioner-of-canada-elections-enters-into-compliance-agreement-with-pierre-poilievre-635621743.html)
The Commissioner of Canada Elections has entered into a compliance agreement with Mr. Pierre Poilievre for having circumvented the prohibitions on contributions to a registered party by ineligible contributors.
(https://i.cbc.ca/1.5171619.1560293331!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/commons-20190201.jpg)
-
PeePee has jumped on the ethics violations bandwagon... by the by waldo, Poilievre is the only sitting MP who has a Compliance Agreement with the Elections Canada Commissioner for Canada Elections Act violations: Commissioner of Canada Elections Enters into Compliance Agreement with Pierre Poilievre (https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/commissioner-of-canada-elections-enters-into-compliance-agreement-with-pierre-poilievre-635621743.html)
(https://i.cbc.ca/1.5171619.1560293331!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/commons-20190201.jpg)
The news is now that the Liberals are looking for him to be their new leader! 😂🤣
-
Hey wally, party polls > leader polls
-
Hey wally, party polls > leader polls
The 2 parties are in a statistical tie, and the Libs are favoured to win the most seats.
https://338canada.com/
-
Poilievre's Media Disengagement Strategy: a few weeks back now, PeePee's boycott of mainstream media... in particular his boycott of a Parliamentary Press Gallery 'scrum'... hit 80+ days. Significant profiled criticism of his media "strategy" finally caused Poilievre to relent and enter into a Press Gallery media scrum!
For the most part, {within the press gallery}, there is a definite bias in favour of just defending the government and regurgitating its talking points, and I don’t need to validate that.
-
The 2 parties are in a statistical tie, and the Libs are favoured to win the most seats.
https://338canada.com/
PeePee PooPoo's party has been leading in the polls since PeePee was elected party leader.
Yes polls favour the Liberals for seats apparently despite the popular vote. CPC also won the popular vote the last 2 elections. Democrat party supporters call this "undemocratic".
The Liberals won the popular vote and seats last election in Ontario. The CPC is now leading popular vote polls in Ontario, will be an interesting election.
-
PeePee PooPoo's party has been leading in the polls since PeePee was elected party leader.
Yes polls favour the Liberals for seats apparently despite the popular vote. CPC also won the popular vote the last 2 elections. Democrat party supporters call this "undemocratic".
Running up the score in Alberta or Saskatchewan doesn't really mean s**t though.
-
PeePee PooPoo's party has been leading in the polls since PeePee was elected party leader.
Yes polls favour the Liberals for seats apparently despite the popular vote. CPC also won the popular vote the last 2 elections. Democrat party supporters call this "undemocratic".
The Liberals won the popular vote and seats last election in Ontario. The CPC is now leading popular vote polls in Ontario, will be an interesting election.
They only seem to complain about popular votes when Republicans lose it, but win the electoral college. When Liberals constantly lose the popular vote in Canada, but end up with more seats, it’s a non issue for them. They’re quit a principled lot! 😂
-
Running up the score in Alberta or Saskatchewan doesn't really mean s**t though.
Why? Their votes don't count?
-
Why? Their votes don't count?
Apparently not. It’s ok to run up the vote in other provinces, but not Alberta.
-
Yes polls favour the Liberals for seats apparently despite the popular vote. CPC also won the popular vote the last 2 elections. Democrat party supporters call this "undemocratic".
Didn’t he lose the popular vote in 2 of the 3? 😂
The last election was by a significant amount.
The CPC got the most votes in the last 2 elections. The CPC has been more popular than the Liberals among Canadians the last 2 elections, but the Liberals got 41 more seats last election.
winners WIN... losers LAMENT!
hey now waldo, do you have the numbers? Why yes... yes I do:
=> in the 2021 election, the popular vote difference was, wait for it, wait for it... ~186,000 votes! The amount member Plugs refers to as, "a significant amount"!
=> that's in an election where Elections Canada states 17,209,000 ballots were cast.
=> key to that popular vote difference were the results from the provinces of Alberta & Saskatchewan.
(https://i.imgur.com/nTXK99x.gif)
again, WINNERS WIN, LOSERS LAMENT!
again, popular vote means diddlySquat. That being said, as I showed with that 2021 election result graphic, you're pining over a measly ~186,000 votes! What you referred to as a significant amount! LOL!
again: #Trudeau3Peat ... apparently... it's a part of the Brand!
(https://i.imgur.com/Qya8NPL.jpeg)
-
greeting from Hans Gruber! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1606435876409679873/pu/vid/720x720/BPLDsLZNO97Tgk4K.mp4?tag=12)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/JXFI420.jpg)
waldo by-the-by: of that collective $116 billion lost, note the Winklevi twins are included!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FlA2Q5PaEAADKEa?format=jpg)
-
Peepee broke Canada.
-
Peepee broke Canada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pd2xQij9gs
-
Dec 21: G&M editorial --- PeePee has to show that he can fix the things he says are broken
Mr. Poilievre loves to say Canada “feels broken,” which no doubt resonates with many voters who aren’t Conservatives. They won’t vote for his party, though, unless and until he shows that he can actually fix what isn’t working. The Conservative Leader has not done so – yet.
as playing out across media outlets in recent weeks, the waldo offers up references to PeePee's "Canada is broken" theme: a Dec 21st G&M editorial... a Dec 28th TorStar Moudakis cartoon... a couple of weeks old CTV News youtube posting of a PM Trudeau response... yet starved for attention member squiggy tags the references as "old"! The squiggy is a dBag - don't be squiggy!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FlLrCkraAAA7W73?format=jpg)
-
pressure related to Poilievre's boycotting mainstream media finally gets to him... so he relents and calls a year-end presser - his responses to media questions are just beginning to surface:
the waldo is somewhat partial to the following where we get a 2-fer: he reinforces his position on personal body autonomy and personal choice as what to do with a vaccine... but goes off the deep-end when asked what he would do as government leader should another pandemic arise! (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1608940002809122818/vid/1556x720/V2DYNpk6g-_e7fjp.mp4?tag=16) Obviously PeePee can't think on his feet and he blubbers on saying he can't comment on "something he hasn't seen"... and he doesn't have a laboratory preventing him from commenting on a hypothetical! LOL! Geezaz... that's right... people's expectation is that their Prime Minister creates a 'silver-bullet' vaccine him/her self! What a maroon, what a rube!
-
the blathering Poilievre & his misinforming #justinflation... still going strong!
(https://i.imgur.com/IuPkNd0.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FlA2Q5PaEAADKEa?format=jpg)
Yeah, that's it, the guy who has been opposition leader for 6 months broke the country.
Not the guy who's been presiding over it for 7 years.
What a moronic cartoon and moronic post.
-k
-
Yeah, that's it, the guy who has been opposition leader for 6 months broke the country.
Not the guy who's been presiding over it for 7 years.
What a moronic cartoon and moronic post.
c'mon kimmy! For weeks on end, Poilievre has been beaking off about 'Canada being broken'... given your moronic comment here, you apparently agree with him. Since PeePee has no solutions to his presumptuous premise, perhaps you can fill-in for the guy - yes?
ya ya, kimmy - what's broken & how you gonna fix it, hey?
-
c'mon kimmy! For weeks on end, Poilievre has been beaking off about 'Canada being broken'... given your moronic comment here, you apparently agree with him. Since PeePee has no solutions to his presumptuous premise, perhaps you can fill-in for the guy - yes?
ya ya, kimmy - what's broken & how you gonna fix it, hey?
Your cartoon argues that Canada is broken and PP is the one who broke it.
But now you want to change the argument and say PP is wrong to say Canada is broken.
I hope your boy thinks that's a winning message. I hope JT and the Sunshine Gang decide to fight the next election on the platform that everything is going great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cQgQIMlwWw
-k
-
Your cartoon argues that Canada is broken and PP is the one who broke it.
But now you want to change the argument and say PP is wrong to say Canada is broken.
I hope your boy thinks that's a winning message. I hope JT and the Sunshine Gang decide to fight the next election on the platform that everything is going great.
-k
Problem is, PP would be worse. Hopefully, the Libs get scared they can’t win and change their leader…. Not sure his ego would allow that to happen though.
-
Your cartoon argues that Canada is broken and PP is the one who broke it.
that cartoon... not "my cartoon" as you say; rather a linked cartoon reference is most apropos! The things Poilievre claims are broken are only broken in his agenda-driven misinformation! Hence the cartoon implying broken by PeePee's misinformation.
but again, you skipped on over the challenge. Again, since you're apparently aligning with the "Canada broken" CPC misinformation campaign... that offers no solutions to its presumptuous claim: ya ya, kimmy - what's broken & how you gonna fix it, hey?
-
that cartoon... not "my cartoon" as you say; rather a linked cartoon reference is most apropos! The things Poilievre claims are broken are only broken in his agenda-driven misinformation! Hence the cartoon implying broken by PeePee's misinformation.
Hospitals? Affordability? Crime? This stuff isn't broken? That's all misinformation?
but again, you skipped on over the challenge. Again, since you're apparently aligning with the "Canada broken" CPC misinformation campaign... that offers no solutions to its presumptuous claim: ya ya, kimmy - what's broken & how you gonna fix it, hey?
I don't think Peter Polyester is a particularly smart man. I don't think he actually has answers to anything. But it has become apparent that your boy doesn't either. Which is why instead of an election about how to fix what's broken, your boy is going to run on a platform of "if the Conservatives win there will be assault rifles in the streets and anti-vaxxers will run amok!"
-k
-
Hospitals? Affordability? Crime? This stuff isn't broken? That's all misinformation?
nice drive-by! By the by, you seem challenged as to federal versus provincial 'principal' responsibility & accountability!
-
nice drive-by! By the by, you seem challenged as to federal versus provincial 'principal' responsibility & accountability!
If it were just one or two provinces who had hilariously inept premiers, then you might have a point. But did all 10 provinces somehow elect incompetent governments?
When all the provinces are mysteriously facing the same issues, maybe it indicates that there is some sort of common thread. And is "*shrug* that's provincial jurisdiction" the sort of transformative leadership you've been bragging about?
-k
-
Hospitals? Affordability? Crime? This stuff isn't broken? That's all misinformation?
nice drive-by! By the by, you seem challenged as to federal versus provincial 'principal' responsibility & accountability!
If it were just one or two provinces who had hilariously inept premiers, then you might have a point. But did all 10 provinces somehow elect incompetent governments? When all the provinces are mysteriously facing the same issues, maybe it indicates that there is some sort of common thread. And is "*shrug* that's provincial jurisdiction" the sort of transformative leadership you've been bragging about?
"bragging about transformative leadership"? Huh? Say what? Geezaz kimmy! The waldo drops a pigs fly one-liner referencing die-hard Conservative journo G&M's Ibbitson touting the transformative governance of PM Trudeau... that was his word; transformative!
but again, you drive-by and drop 3 words with no attachment/context; your, "Hospitals? Affordability? Crime?" reference. Yours is the typical no-nothing blathering of someone who doesn't recognize the provincial versus federal jurisdiction aspect. You stoopidly threw down a dare... let the waldo, once again, see and raise you a double dog dare! Take those 3 drive-by words and expand upon them... offer some context, hey! What a concept! LOL!
-
we last heard from Poilievre about "Mustafa from Calgary" when PeePee needed an anecdotal story about the difficulty in securing a mortgage... and now in the latest Poilievre reveal, "Mustafa from Calgary caught up to him in the Ottawa airport in regards his claimed difficulty in renewing his passport"... cause, you know, "Trudeau's passport offices are broken!":
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FllTBQHaUAAS8YS?format=png)
-
geezaz NDP Jagmeet... not a good look in choosing to remove the Canadian flag when you target Quebec en français!
(https://i.imgur.com/AkLQeMN.jpg)
-
geezaz NDP Jagmeet... not a good look in choosing to remove the Canadian flag when you target Quebec en français!
(https://i.imgur.com/AkLQeMN.jpg)
WOW
If you don't like the Canadian flag you can go eff yourself
-
we last heard from Poilievre about "Mustafa from Calgary" when PeePee needed an anecdotal story about the difficulty in securing a mortgage... and now in the latest Poilievre reveal, "Mustafa from Calgary caught up to him in the Ottawa airport in regards his claimed difficulty in renewing his passport"... cause, you know, "Trudeau's passport offices are broken!":
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FllTBQHaUAAS8YS?format=png)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FlxBzLAXoAM5NyL?format=jpg)
-
oh my! Results from... count em'... 4 recognized polling firms. PeePee you gots a lot of splainin' to do!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmDMPNCWYA8Hiqo?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
the charlatanFromCarleton, Poilievre, delivers a speech to a group criticized for residential school 'denialism' --- The Frontier Centre ran ads claiming to debunk 'myths' about residential schools, holds positions against vaccine mandates, promoting climate denialism, etc..
when confronted over his appearing at the Frontier Centre event, Poilievre says he spoke with the Frontier Society because all groups need to be heard, and he's a defender of free speech!
boggles the mind as to why the CPC/Poilievre "brain trust" saw this as an appropriate venue/event for Poilievre to appear at; related article from the Winnipeg Free Press:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fmb4kqhacAEjVQP?format=jpg)
-
calling the Parliamentary Press Gallery, the "Liberal Parliamentary Press Gallery", PeePee says he refuses to speak to the Press Gallery cause, uhhh... they're Liberal Gatekeepers who carry the water for PM Trudeau! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1614283306853453824/pu/vid/1280x720/ew9LSr6Dby_33a-_.mp4?tag=12)
-
Sucking up to far-right institutions and discrediting mainstream ones. What could go wrong?
-
calling the Parliamentary Press Gallery, the "Liberal Parliamentary Press Gallery", PeePee says he refuses to speak to the Press Gallery cause, uhhh... they're Liberal Gatekeepers who carry the water for PM Trudeau! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1614283306853453824/pu/vid/1280x720/ew9LSr6Dby_33a-_.mp4?tag=12)
Maybe you can interview PeePee during the next election campaign during that period when you mysteriously disappear for a couple weeks and then return after election day.
-
oh my! Results from... count em'... 4 recognized polling firms. PeePee you gots a lot of splainin' to do!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmDMPNCWYA8Hiqo?format=jpg&name=900x900)
This means little, unless a source is provided. It reminds me of one of those FOX / Elon Musk charts.
-
the charlatanFromCarleton, Poilievre, delivers a speech to a group criticized for residential school 'denialism' --- The Frontier Centre ran ads claiming to debunk 'myths' about residential schools, holds positions against vaccine mandates, promoting climate denialism, etc..
when confronted over his appearing at the Frontier Centre event, Poilievre says he spoke with the Frontier Society because all groups need to be heard, and he's a defender of free speech!
boggles the mind as to why the CPC/Poilievre "brain trust" saw this as an appropriate venue/event for Poilievre to appear at; related article from the Winnipeg Free Press:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fmb4kqhacAEjVQP?format=jpg)
Not suprising at the least.
I reside in Alberta where Danielle Smith is Premier, and wants to remove Alberta from the Canadian Constitution. She is literally batshit crazy, and has made it clear that she will not honor the treaties with the Indigenous population.
It should be noted that Smith had the audacity to claim she was "Part Indigenous." This was proven false.
-
oh my! Results from... count em'... 4 recognized polling firms. PeePee you gots a lot of splainin' to do!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmDMPNCWYA8Hiqo?format=jpg)
This means little, unless a source is provided. It reminds me of one of those FOX / Elon Musk charts.
such an odd understanding... interpretation. The highlighted results from the 4 respective polling firms speak for themselves... the polling firms are the, as you say, sources! If you have trouble with the graphic, that's just presentation... of those sourced polling firm results.
-
oh PeePee - #justinflation this, hey!
(https://i.imgur.com/wwFMAYh.gif)
of course, Poilievre will never acknowledge that rising inflation was/is a global concern caused by, for example, the Russian invasion of Ukraine that drove up the prices of commodities—particularly energy and agricultural goods—and created new disruptions to already impaired global supply chains (re: pandemic related). Notwithstanding, of course, Canada positioned significantly better than most like nations.
-
we last heard from Poilievre about "Mustafa from Calgary" when PeePee needed an anecdotal story about the difficulty in securing a mortgage... and now in the latest Poilievre reveal, "Mustafa from Calgary caught up to him in the Ottawa airport in regards his claimed difficulty in renewing his passport"... cause, you know, "Trudeau's passport offices are broken!":
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FllTBQHaUAAS8YS?format=png)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FlxBzLAXoAM5NyL?format=jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmzZ8_OXkAAhTmX?format=png)
-
But what about...Biden? Didn't he plagiarize something once? 😂
https://twitter.com/IqwinderSGaheer/status/1620530789447516160?t=3jdUktNnEfvSrwAvmrWzhQ&s=19
-
But what about...Biden? Didn't he plagiarize something once? 😂
https://twitter.com/IqwinderSGaheer/status/1620530789447516160?t=3jdUktNnEfvSrwAvmrWzhQ&s=19
Once??? 😂😂😂
-
Didn't it cause him to step down from his campaign for president? Because that's what honourable politicians do in such cases of outright theft?
-
the 'from-the-past' CPC MP Michael Chong was always held-up as the 'ethical Conservative moderate'! To fit within a PeePee led CPC, Chong has undergone a transference to just another non-thinking, purposely misinforming ConservativeSmuck. Recent days case-in-point: apparently, Chong isn't aware of NORAD... isn't aware of the workings of NORAD!
(https://i.imgur.com/elpsRLV.gif)
waldo factoid: NORAD dispatched both Canadian & U.S. jets... the U.S. jets were closer and took out the "object" over the Yukon.
-
Waldo in campaign mode pretty hard.
-
the 'from-the-past' CPC MP Michael Chong was always held-up as the 'ethical Conservative moderate'! To fit within a PeePee led CPC, Chong has undergone a transference to just another non-thinking, purposely misinforming ConservativeSmuck. Recent days case-in-point: apparently, Chong isn't aware of NORAD... isn't aware of the workings of NORAD!
(https://i.imgur.com/elpsRLV.gif)
waldo factoid: NORAD dispatched both Canadian & U.S. jets... the U.S. jets were closer and took out the "object" over the Yukon.
it's as if CPC MP Chong coordinated his nonsense with this subsequent CPC bullshyte - go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fo3VuwFXgAAUxHw?format=jpg)
ya ya waldo - waddbout that NORAD thingee! North American Aerospace Defense Command - About NORAD (https://www.norad.mil/About-NORAD/)
-
CPC bullshyte
The Libs canceled the F35 purchase only to implement the exact same purchase 8 years later.
Sounds like mismanagement to me. What do you think about an 8 year delay just to do the exact same thing the Previous government was implementing?
-
The Libs canceled the F35 purchase only to implement the exact same purchase 8 years later.
Sounds like mismanagement to me. What do you think about an 8 year delay just to do the exact same thing the Previous government was implementing?
the federal government maintained its participation in the 'F-35 program'... as the waldo understands the cumulative cost to do so was in the order of some US$600 million - while also allowing companies in Canada to secure US$2 billion in contracts during that same period.
clearly when you stooopidly state, "just to do the exact same thing", you have no grasp on the early year problems "early adopters" of the F-35 had to deal with (as in, for example, iterative cost overruns and suspect performance). More pointedly your simplistic reference to a "delay" showcases you're not a serious player on this file... in line with your typical engagement in most everything, hey! Most pointedly you highlight your ignorance to the impact of ongoing trade disputes, in particular the Boeing action against Bombardier & the accompanying Trump admin 300% tariff against Bombardier sales... all of which helped to ultimately "kibosh/counter" the federal government plan to buy 18 new Super Hornet fighter jets from the U.S. government and Boeing.
c'mon squiggy, try again - try harder!
per waldo's 'muscle memory': photo op with Conservative Minister MacKay and the fake F-35 supplied by Lockheed Martin:
(https://i.imgur.com/4Z0DBrx.jpg)
-
Walduh thinks cancelling something isn’t actually cancelling something if you do the exact thing you canceled 8 years later!
In its place, the Liberals said they would launch an "open and transparent competition" to buy more affordable planes to replace Canada's aging CF-18 jets. Trudeau said the money saved by scrapping the F-35 procurement would go primarily to increasing spending on the Royal Canadian Navy.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-trudeau-scrap-f35-halifax-1.3235791
Hey Justin! We want our cheap fighter jets!!
-
...cancelling something isn’t actually cancelling something if you do the exact thing you canceled 8 years later!
the "exact thing", hey! Like the waldo said in his prior post: you're not a serious player on this file!
-
Peepee has decided meeting with Nazis isn't as electable as they'd hoped?
https://twitter.com/brianlilley/status/1629135065513959432?t=roK86IN7O1CAy6pFc9hIPw&s=19
-
Peepee has decided meeting with Nazis isn't as electable as they'd hoped?
https://twitter.com/brianlilley/status/1629135065513959432?t=roK86IN7O1CAy6pFc9hIPw&s=19
same energy:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoSJwT2XUAgU1VZ.jpg:small)
-
Hitler particle emissions from this lady hitting levels never thought possible. Really just missing the lil' moustache.
(https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/cover_images/U7GfhPOJGirJ/GGbX9gMjRuqC_640x360.jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpvXuQ7XEAguzwe?format=jpg&name=small)
-
Peepee has decided meeting with Nazis isn't as electable as they'd hoped?
https://twitter.com/brianlilley/status/1629135065513959432?t=roK86IN7O1CAy6pFc9hIPw&s=19
“Everyone that disagrees with me is a nazi”! 🤣
Meanwhile, fund actual nazis in Ukraine.
-
“Everyone that disagrees with me is a nazi”! 🤣
Meanwhile, fund actual nazis in Ukraine.
She's an actual Nazi. Just ask peepee. But are you calling Zelensky a Nazi because your Russian talking points told you to? Classy.
-
She's an actual Nazi. Just ask peepee. But are you calling Zelensky a Nazi because your Russian talking points told you to? Classy.
She’s an actual nazi? Just like the ones you’re supporting in Ukraine? Does she have the official membership card as well?
-
She’s an actual nazi? Just like the ones you’re supporting in Ukraine? Does she have the official membership card as well?
TFW you work yourself into a pretzel and can't remember if you think nazis are bad or not.
-
She’s an actual nazi? Just like the ones you’re supporting in Ukraine? Does she have the official membership card as well?
So you admit you're on Russia's side in the war. Good to see. You've been scared to do that up to now while still repeating the same talking points, word for word, as your Facebook brethren (and Tucker) who are more willing to openly admit it
-
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6759453
What is PP going to do with the extremist sympathizers in his party? Ignore it?
-
ya ya, Conservative MPs 'do lunch' with someone they've never heard of - with a subsequent "we were not aware" official statement released by the Conservative Party itself! Again, an official statement which is more than what's being attributed to PeePee himself!
of course MEP Christine Anderson has been making the 'freedom & democracy' rounds this past week meeting with the likes of "FreedomConvoy" organizer Tamara Lich... with 'Canadians For Truth' morons Theo Fleury & Jamie Sale...
(https://i.imgur.com/zA1FSfQ.jpg)
-
supposedly... CPC leader Poilievre issued a 'condemnation statement'... but not via any "official Poilievre/CPC outlet"; rather, a claimed statement release put forward by the Sun's resident Conservative Party hack, lilleypad!
(https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
-
What are her views? Is this the “she supports medical privacy and body autonomy so he’s a nazi” things again? Regardless, this guilt by association is beyond absurd. Especially when we see all the vile people Turdeau has met, talked to, and taken pictures with.
But I guess it’s easier to talk about this then the disastrous condition of Canada, that Turdeau is responsible for.
-
What are her views? Is this the “she supports medical privacy and body autonomy so he’s a nazi” things again?
geezaz Shady... are you not accepting to lilleypad's claim of the, "Poilievre condemnation statement"? You know, the one that supposedly states Ms. Anderson's views are, per PeePee, vile? Vile Shady, vile!
and nuthin sweeter than to read all the criticism of Brian Lilley for being the water-carrying Poilievre conduit... uhhh, supposedly! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/GWcAhcr.gif)
-
geezaz Shady... are you not accepting to lilleypad's claim of the, "Poilievre condemnation statement"? You know, the one that supposedly states Ms. Anderson's views are, per PeePee, vile? Vile Shady, vile!
and nuthin sweeter than to read all the criticism of Brian Lilley for being the water-carrying Poilievre conduit... uhhh, supposedly! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/GWcAhcr.gif)
I’ll ask again. What are her views? This must be much better than having to talk about the terrible condition of Canada huh?
-
I'm sure her views are very similar to yours.
-
I’ll ask again. What are her views?
waldo clue: the chair of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and 2 Canadian Jewish organizations expressed concern about the 3 CPC MPs meeting with Christine Anderson after photos were shared online.
c'mon Shady, fire up your googly, hey!
-
waldo clue: the chair of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and 2 Canadian Jewish organizations expressed concern about the 3 CPC MPs meeting with Christine Anderson after photos were shared online.
c'mon Shady, fire up your googly, hey!
Concern over which views?
-
Concern over which views?
notwithstanding your sillyBuggar act, those views termed VILE by Poilievre... those ones - uhhh, presuming lilleypad's fronting a so-called 'condemnation' statement for PeePee is legit!
-
whaaa! From Rebel News, no less: MEP Christine Anderson pushes back at "supposed condemnation" statement from Poilievre (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1629247854781820931/vid/1080x612/FvSyoyWYYYNbxN2i.mp4?tag=16)... "he has no business being the leader of the Opposition because he is actually doing Trudeau's bidding".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKdJ6DnPhzk
-
Concern over which views?
No surprise the man with a baby brain needs to be spoon fed.
-
No surprise the man with a baby brain needs to be spoon fed.
Translation: I have no idea.
-
whaaa! From Rebel News, no less: MEP Christine Anderson pushes back at "supposed condemnation" statement from Poilievre (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1629247854781820931/vid/1080x612/FvSyoyWYYYNbxN2i.mp4?tag=16)... "he has no business being the leader of the Opposition because he is actually doing Trudeau's bidding".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKdJ6DnPhzk
Condemnation of what? Why are you being so obtuse?
-
Go to wikipedia ad look up her party, AfG. You can then read about them and see how you totally agree with everything they stand for.
-
Translation: I have no idea.
I do because I know how to use google. Maybe you and Shitbag could ask a caregiver to show you how.
-
Go to wikipedia ad look up her party, AfG. You can then read about them and see how you totally agree with everything they stand for.
Or you could just post it? Like is suppose to be done. You guys are clowns. 🤡
-
Or you could just post it? Like is suppose to be done. You guys are clowns. 🤡
All you do is post unlinked memes and screenshots, shut da hell up.
-
at the Ukraine-Russia war one-year anniversary event Ukraine-Russia war - a rally to show support for Ukraine, PM Trudeau was heckled by the guy below for, as he stated, "taking away Canadians freedom"
Sir, I think Ukrainians can tell you a little about freedom and liberty, so why don’t you settle down? This is a night for them, not for you. If you want to stand and cheer for Ukraine, do that. If you want to wave the Ukrainian flag, please do. But let people celebrate that Ukraine is still standing and Canada stands with it.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp3OywxWcAANpkf?format=png&name=small)
oh ya, in the above image, the protester at the event is the guy on the right!
-
at the Ukraine-Russia war one-year anniversary event Ukraine-Russia war - a rally to show support for Ukraine, PM Trudeau was heckled by the guy below for, as he stated, "taking away Canadians freedom"
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp3OywxWcAANpkf?format=png&name=small)
oh ya, in the above image, the protester at the event is the guy on the right!
Hey buddy, you gonna post the questionable views yet? Regardless, your buddy Turdeau trampled all over Canadians rights and freedoms. Stop hiding behind the Ukrainian flag. It’s reprehensible.
-
Hey buddy, you gonna post the questionable views yet?
hey shitbird - your own boy Poilievre has, according to Conservative lapdog "journalist" Brian Lilley, condemned Ms. Christine Anderson's views as VILE - vile Shady, vile! Why would your boy PeePee make such a statement, hey?
-
hey shitbird - your own boy Poilievre has, according to Conservative lapdog "journalist" Brian Lilley, condemned Ms. Christine Anderson's views as VILE - vile Shady, vile! Why would your boy PeePee make such a statement, hey?
And what are the views that were condemned? Yours is a circular argument. Step up to the plate already, and let us now of these reprehensible views! Why the stonewalling?
-
Yours is a circular argument.
says the guy, YOU, who dismisses his own boy Poilievre's statement that the/her views are VILE! You've been mocked here for wanting to be spoon-fed... for showcasing you refuse to google. **** off, shitbird!
-
says the guy, YOU, who dismisses his own boy Poilievre's statement that the/her views are VILE! You've been mocked here for wanting to be spoon-fed... for showcasing you refuse to google. **** off, shitbird!
If it’s so easy to Google, then post a link! Sh*t or get off the pot. What are these reprehensible views? Stop filibustering. Post the links or get the f**k out. You’re done here.
-
If it’s so easy to Google, then post a link! Sh*t or get off the pot. What are these reprehensible views? Stop filibustering. Post the links or get the f**k out. You’re done here.
hey now azzhole! The waldo tried to help ya out:
waldo clue: the chair of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and 2 Canadian Jewish organizations expressed concern about the 3 CPC MPs meeting with Christine Anderson after photos were shared online.
c'mon Shady, fire up your googly, hey!
-
c'mon Shady! Again, your own boy Poilievre states her views are VILE! Again:
supposedly... CPC leader Poilievre issued a 'condemnation statement'... but not via any "official Poilievre/CPC outlet"; rather, a claimed statement release put forward by the Sun's resident Conservative Party hack, lilleypad!
(https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
-
c'mon Shady! Again, your own boy Poilievre states her views are VILE! Again:
What are her vile views?
-
additional image added to initial post:
at the Ukraine-Russia war one-year anniversary event Ukraine-Russia war - a rally to show support for Ukraine, PM Trudeau was heckled by the guy below for, as he stated, "taking away Canadians freedom"
Sir, I think Ukrainians can tell you a little about freedom and liberty, so why don’t you settle down? This is a night for them, not for you. If you want to stand and cheer for Ukraine, do that. If you want to wave the Ukrainian flag, please do. But let people celebrate that Ukraine is still standing and Canada stands with it.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp3OywxWcAANpkf?format=png&name=small) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp2iwBTaQAEze-L?format=png&name=small)
oh ya, in the above leftmost image, the protester at the event is the guy on the right!
-
additional image added to initial post:
at the Ukraine-Russia war one-year anniversary event Ukraine-Russia war - a rally to show support for Ukraine, PM Trudeau was heckled by the guy below for, as he stated, "taking away Canadians freedom"
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp3OywxWcAANpkf?format=png&name=small) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fp2iwBTaQAEze-L?format=png&name=small)
oh ya, in the above leftmost image, the protester at the event is the guy on the right!
Enough filibustering. Post the vile views that were condemned. Otherwise you’re just a sh*tbag propagandist.
-
Okay. For starters, her party wants to make circumcision illegal. This is not based on medical evidence so much as it is an attempt to make Jews feel unwelcome.
-
Well, that was easy. 😆
-
Okay. For starters, her party wants to make circumcision illegal. This is not based on medical evidence so much as it is an attempt to make Jews feel unwelcome.
Did they say that’s why they want that, or is that what their opposition asserts? Still no links?
-
You need a link to the party's Wikipedia page? It lists all the far-right ideals you completely agree with but that peepee calls "vile."
-
You need a link to the party's Wikipedia page? It lists all the far-right ideals you completely agree with but that peepee calls "vile."
Wikipedia! 😂😂😂
-
I can't believe the guy who posts nothing but memes and screenshots is out here asking others for links. Truly a deranged character that is best ignored and pitied.
-
Wikipedia! 😂😂😂
It's their party platform. Are you saying that's not their platform? If you have a problem with a fact on Wikipedia, say what it is. Is there anything in that cited platform you disagree with? Which views do you think peepee find to be "vile"?
I expect you to continue to deflect. Those are questions you are far too cowardly to answer. 😆
-
It's their party platform. Are you saying that's not their platform? If you have a problem with a fact on Wikipedia, say what it is. Is there anything in that cited platform you disagree with? Which views do you think peepee find to be "vile"?
I expect you to continue to deflect. Those are questions you are far too cowardly to answer. 😆
Link?
-
Link?
Here's a link for you (https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/medical-assistance-dying.html).
-
Okay. For starters, her party wants to make circumcision illegal. This is not based on medical evidence so much as it is an attempt to make Jews feel unwelcome.
This is possible. But a lot of Christians also circumcise their babies. Do you have evidence for you claim?
Either way, seems like a weird policy given a lot of people of various backgrounds do this. Maybe German Christians generally don't?
-
This is possible. But a lot of Christians also circumcise their babies. Do you have evidence for you claim?
Either way, seems like a weird policy given a lot of people of various backgrounds do this. Maybe German Christians generally don't?
It definitely seems like a weird policy, it's a big overstep of government. But better to focus on this, than the sh*tty job Turdeau has done over the last several years. Better to try to distract Canadians with this than the sh*tty state of the country.
-
so... other than this claimed PeePee statement from the Sun's resident Conservative lapdog "journalist", 'lilleypad', still nuthin from an actual Poilievre and/or CPC outlet - go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqAngpzWcAEME0R?format=jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
-
so... other than this claimed PeePee statement from the Sun's resident Conservative lapdog "journalist", 'lilleypad', still nuthin from an actual Poilievre and/or CPC outlet - go figure, hey!
Lies.
“Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here,” said Sebastian Skamski, director of media relations for the Official Opposition Leader's office, in a written statement.
-
so... other than this claimed PeePee statement from the Sun's resident Conservative lapdog "journalist", 'lilleypad', still nuthin from an actual Poilievre and/or CPC outlet - go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqAngpzWcAEME0R?format=jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
I’m still waiting to hear about these vile views of hers. Try harder.
-
Lies.
and just where can one... anyone... everyone... find said written statement? Canya point the waldo to it - to where it can be found? Linkee please - LOL!
-
I’m still waiting to hear about these vile views of hers. Try harder.
again, ask YOUR boy Poilievre... ask him why he supposedly has termed Ms. Anderson's views as vile... as having no place in Canada's politics. Ask him, hey!
(https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
-
and just where can one... anyone... everyone... find said written statement? Canya point the waldo to it - to where it can be found? Linkee please - LOL!
Ask the Globe and Mail:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievre-denies-speaking-with-anti-immigration-german-politician/
-
and just where can one... anyone... everyone... find said written statement? Canya point the waldo to it - to where it can be found? Linkee please - LOL!
Good question, because you still haven’t posted a single thing she’s said! 😂😂😂
This is f**king Groundhog Day! 🤣
I’ll ask for the thousandth time. What vile views has she espoused? Come’on lil’buddy, I know you can do it!
-
Ask the Globe and Mail:
linkee to said written statement please! LOL! How is it PeePee can tweet a couple of dozen or so times in the interim period but can't manage to tweet said... claimed... "written statement"?
(https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
-
linkee to said written statement please! LOL! How is it PeePee can tweet a couple of dozen or so times in the interim period but can't manage to tweet said... claimed... "written statement"?
(https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
I’ve seen your meaningless pic. I get it, her views are vile and don’t belong in Canadian politics. What are they? You can do it! I know you can! 🤣
-
I’ve seen your meaningless pic. I get it, her views are vile and don’t belong in Canadian politics.
wait, what? You're saying the image of the claimed Poilievre written statement calling Ms. Anderson's views vile is... meaningless? Oh my!
-
wait, what? You're saying the image of the claimed Poilievre written statement calling Ms. Anderson's views vile is... meaningless? Oh my!
What are the views being called vile? Come on buddy, you can do it! I have faith in you! 👍
-
Are you saying peepee is full of crap and is being woke for political gain. I have a party with more pees for you
-
PeePee could **** babies on live TV and he'd still be better than Chairman Mao oops I mean Trudeau.
-
wait, what? You're saying the image of the claimed Poilievre written statement calling Ms. Anderson's views vile is... meaningless? Oh my!
Which views are being referred to as vile? Come on buddy, I know you can do it. I have faith in you! 😂
-
Are you saying peepee is full of crap and is being woke for political gain. I have a party with more pees for you
You gonna finally post something detailing her supposed vile policies? It really shouldn’t be this difficult.
-
As I said, their platform is all things you totally agree with: anti-immigrant, anti-vax, anti-diversity, pro-tax cuts for the rich, etc. And peepee agrees you people are vile.
-
As I said, their platform is all things you totally agree with: anti-immigrant, anti-vax, anti-diversity, pro-tax cuts for the rich, etc. And peepee agrees you people are vile.
One can disagree with those things, but that’s hardly vile policies. There’s gotta be Mira you can provide. Something she’s written or said? A speech maybe? An interview? Something?
-
I think you are clearly a Maxime guy. Don't vote for someone who calls you vile.
-
so... other than this claimed PeePee statement from the Sun's resident Conservative lapdog "journalist", 'lilleypad', still nuthin from an actual Poilievre and/or CPC outlet - go figure, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqAngpzWcAEME0R?format=jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/8OyEs0T.gif)
Poilievre/CPC thought the manufactured performative media-driven foreign election interference story would have buried this CPC MPs meeting event with a far-right German extremist, Christine Anderson... that if they just continued to ignore it, it would just go away! But alas, some media wags continue to try to ask Poilievre related questions about Anderson and why 3 of his caucus MPs (including a prominent shadow minister) met with her. The latest in recent days had PeePee delivering yet another 'Canada is broken' prepared message only to have another journalist attempt to ask inconvenient questions... which caused Poilievre to bolt (runaway, runaway)!
(https://i.imgur.com/oGVgzpz.gif)
-
PoiLIEvre is a g-damn liar! So PeePee just finished a prepared presser targeting Canada's current Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) law... specifically misinforming/lying about mental illness eligibility.
(https://i.imgur.com/ayKuV7b.gif)
Reality: On February 2, 2023, the Government of Canada introduced legislation to extend the temporary exclusion of eligibility in circumstances where a person's sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness for a period of one-year, until March 17, 2024.
There is no doubt that medical assistance in dying is a very complex and deeply personal issue. We strongly believe that the proposed one-year extension, until March 17, 2024, of the temporary exclusion of eligibility for persons whose sole medical condition is a mental illness will provide sufficient time to ensure our health care system protects those who may be vulnerable and support autonomy and freedom of choice.
As MAID is a very personal and complex issue, the temporary extension would allow more time for regulators, clinicians, and others to better understand and implement guidelines and practices. This extension would play a crucial role in protecting the most vulnerable while supporting their autonomy, and ensuring assessors and providers are prepared and comfortable to support MAID for persons living with a mental illness, when it becomes available.
The safety and security of Canadians, including the most vulnerable, remains at the centre of our actions, alongside supporting individual autonomy. Canadians can rest assured we’re taking a careful and considered approach on the implementation of MAID for persons living with a mental illness.
-
PoiLIEvre is a g-damn liar! So PeePee just finished a prepared presser targeting Canada's current Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) law... specifically misinforming/lying about mental illness eligibility.
(https://i.imgur.com/ayKuV7b.gif)
Reality: On February 2, 2023, the Government of Canada introduced legislation to extend the temporary exclusion of eligibility in circumstances where a person's sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness for a period of one-year, until March 17, 2024.
PeePee continuing with his lie:
(https://i.imgur.com/cfqCOS6.gif)
-
oh my! Misogynist publicly calls his wife "hot"! LOL
(https://i.imgur.com/GVkowh7.gif)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqsylnbWwAcQAfG?format=jpg&name=small)
-
oh my! Misogynist publicly calls his wife "hot"! LOL
(https://i.imgur.com/GVkowh7.gif)
Bicep totally photoshopped.
-
Bicep totally photoshopped.
Popilievre: I yam what I yam!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqjfuBBaYAAHHbZ?format=jpg&name=small)
-
so-called "journalists" taking a run @ Jagmeet
(https://i.imgur.com/y5oLVQy.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/JCFuzwT.gif)
Pierre Poilievre’s know-nothing populism is a dangerous delusion (https://www.nationalobserver.com/2023/03/07/opinion/pierre-poilievre-experts) - National Observer | Max Fawcett | March 7th 2023
There’s a lesson here that Canadian conservatives like Poilievre could stand to learn. No, experts aren’t infallible, and nobody is actually suggesting they should be listened to uncritically. But the world we live in is underwritten by expertise and experts, now more than ever before. From the people who design and deliver our internet services to the medical innovations that have both extended our lifespans and increased their quality, we depend (and are dependent) on expertise in ways even our recent ancestors couldn’t have imagined.
To pretend otherwise, as Poilievre and his fellow populists seem determined to do, isn’t just foolish or naive. It’s corrosive to the shared project we call society. But, then, maybe that’s part of his plan. Conservatives have never been big on the idea of a society, much less one that’s defined by things like common purpose and shared ideals rather than freedom and liberty. And experts, with their stubborn belief in things like evidence and data, are a natural antagonist to anyone trading in populist sloganeering. It’s no wonder Poilievre seems to find them so threatening — and so dangerous.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/JCFuzwT.gif)
*PULP intensifies*
(https://78.media.tumblr.com/596f5696583325c3f9ee72ae9a31158e/tumblr_p3mr6sCeLs1wjx9bzo4_250.gif)
-
the criticism of 'LilleyPad' was unrelenting... so the so-called "journalist" does the right thing and deletes the offending tweet - but does it in such a bigly weaselly way!
(https://i.imgur.com/DjxpKul.gif)
-
the criticism of 'LilleyPad' was unrelenting... so the so-called "journalist" does the right thing and deletes the offending tweet - but does it in such a bigly weaselly way!
(https://i.imgur.com/DjxpKul.gif)
Keep holding to account, checks notes, people with no actual power. Keep butt sniffing those who actually do. Deflect, deflect, deflect!
-
Keep holding to account, checks notes, people with no actual power. Keep butt sniffing those who actually do. Deflect, deflect, deflect!
c'mon Shady! Are you that starved for anonymous attention that you need to shyte upon multiple threads with your same tired screed?
-
Poilievre has lately taken to the most bizarre "in your face" messaging approach... and when someone like 'Brittlestar' takes note, well.... (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1634579716937072646/vid/720x1280/StPKdvoWDBGOtTyg.mp4?tag=16).
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fq8SIlxXgAEI8qq?format=jpg)
-
Poilievre has lately taken to the most bizarre "in your face" messaging approach... and when someone like 'Brittlestar' takes note, well.... (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1634579716937072646/vid/720x1280/StPKdvoWDBGOtTyg.mp4?tag=16).
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fq8SIlxXgAEI8qq?format=jpg)
Deflect, deflect, deflect! 😂😂😂
-
and further, for some weeks now, PeePee has somewhat regularly ended his "messaging" with a supposed catch-phrase, "Let's Bring it Home"... or slight variants of:
the waldo attributes such a juvenile ploy to the brainiacs associated with conservative operative/activist Jeff Ballingall (he of Canada/Ontario Proud infamy); those in the Ballingall media-group/meme-machine that Poilievre hired last year!
-
Deflect, deflect, deflect! 😂😂😂
Shady is a phackingSimpleton... don't be like Shady!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrO-K6nakAMIakP?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FbfZ_7cXoAI-rgs?format=jpg)
-
alrightee then!
Poilievre clarifies that it's ok for him to speak of, to release, state secrets... cause he's refused to take related security briefings so as to allow him to speak on them - to ensure he is not silenced! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1636444339537625118/pu/vid/672x480/ThsyNesYdQkpJzLA.mp4?tag=12) Oh my!
PeePeeSmartsOnTheShadyScale => offTheCharts
(https://www.ctvnews.ca/polopoly_fs/1.4780816.1579814887!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_960/image.jpg)
-
PP's latest thing is he wants to ban illegal drugs.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrO-K6nakAMIakP?format=jpg)
You mean like what you do in every post in this thread retard?
MAGA waldo even has Trump nicknames for everyone, including Skippy!
-
You mean like what you do in every post in this thread retard?
MAGA waldo even has Trump nicknames for everyone, including Skippy!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
-
You mean like what you do in every post in this thread retard?
MAGA waldo even has Trump nicknames for everyone, including Skippy!
hey now Nipples - sorry to have triggered you so!
-
PeePee makes a conscious decision to use an improper... and uncalled for... crest image for the Edmonton Police Service. The actual crest, most certainly, does not include the highly controversial "Thin Blue Line". Poilievre couldn't help himself and just had to politicize this - he just couldn't help himself!
(https://i.imgur.com/ud7j9WB.gif)
-
PeePee makes a conscious decision to use an improper... and uncalled for... crest image for the Edmonton Police Service. The actual crest, most certainly, does not include the highly controversial "Thin Blue Line". Poilievre couldn't help himself and just had to politicize this - he just couldn't help himself!
Super glad you didn't politicize it. You're a goof.
-
Super glad you didn't politicize it.
so, uhhh... to you, Poilievre doing it isn't politicizing it - but, the waldo highlighting PeePee did it... is! Alrightee then!
-
so, uhhh... to you, Poilievre doing it isn't politicizing it - but, the waldo highlighting PeePee did it... is! Alrightee then!
Never said PooPoo didn't. I'm just saying you're the pot calling the kettle black.
-
Never said PooPoo didn't. I'm just saying you're the pot calling the kettle black.
no - you said I politicized by highlighting that Poilievre politicized - LOL! You're such a clown!
-
no - you said I politicized by highlighting that Poilievre politicized - LOL! You're such a clown!
Why did you highlight it? To score political points. Just admit i'm right.
-
Why did you highlight it? To score political points. Just admit i'm right.
LOL! So it's important for you to be right... important that the waldo validates you, hey!
Nipples you've not said wordOne about Poilievre purposely/consciously/improperly including the most controversial and politicized "Thin Blue Line" as a part of the Edmonton Police Service crest. Is there a problem for you? Clearly PeePee must have known that action would be challenged - as it most certainly has been! Why would Poilievre want to take away from the most solemn, sober and devastating aspects of the fallen police officers? Why Nipples, why?
-
Maybe some dumb staffer posted it and didn't know about the thin blue line controversy. I dunno.
-
CPC minority projected.
https://mobile.twitter.com/CanadianPolling/status/1637487102123294720
-
LOL! So it's important for you to be right... important that the waldo validates you, hey!
Nipples you've not said wordOne about Poilievre purposely/consciously/improperly including the most controversial and politicized "Thin Blue Line" as a part of the Edmonton Police Service crest. Is there a problem for you? Clearly PeePee must have known that action would be challenged - as it most certainly has been! Why would Poilievre want to take away from the most solemn, sober and devastating aspects of the fallen police officers? Why Nipples, why?
Maybe some dumb staffer posted it and didn't know about the thin blue line controversy. I dunno.
yabut, the offending Poilievre tweet remains, as is - no change! There's been no update tweet/commentary on it to clarify why PeePee is, clearly, quite content with it...
-
hey now Nipples, with that polling you're hyping, are you predicting an election... before the Liberal/NDP supply-and-confidence agreement expires in 2025?
(https://i.imgur.com/iQEgpYb.png) (https://i.imgur.com/fPBJKkV.gif)
-
so yesterday, Poilievre was at his most nauseating best... with the guy dropping the emetic "Bring It Home catch phrase" over and over and over again!
apparently, PeePee has the solution to meet the challenge of dealing with the shortage of doctors/nurses... clearly unaware of what the federal Liberal government has been working on in 2022 - that culminated in a formal Dec 2022 release announcing the 'Foreign Credential Recognition Program (FCRP)'.
of course the ever sad, weak and lacking media fawned all over Poilievre's announcement... apparently being equally unaware of the FCRProgram!
(https://i.imgur.com/dXtH8sG.gif)
-
speaking of the federal Liberal government's Foreign Credential Recognition Program:
(https://i.imgur.com/f3GCo2d.gif)
-
Poilievre calls for changes to allow doctors, nurses to work across Canada
Similar proposal is backed by the Canadian Medical Association
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-national-licensing-healthcare-1.6783976
Real leadership tries to make Canadian health care better, not washing their hands of it and blaming it on provinces. Turdeau could learn something.
-
so yesterday, Poilievre was at his most nauseating best... with the guy dropping the emetic "Bring It Home catch phrase" over and over and over again!
apparently, PeePee has the solution to meet the challenge of dealing with the shortage of doctors/nurses... clearly unaware of what the federal Liberal government has been working on in 2022 - that culminated in a formal Dec 2022 release announcing the 'Foreign Credential Recognition Program (FCRP)'.
of course the ever sad, weak and lacking media fawned all over Poilievre's announcement... apparently being equally unaware of the FCRProgram!
(https://i.imgur.com/dXtH8sG.gif)
-
speaking of the federal Liberal government's Foreign Credential Recognition Program:
(https://i.imgur.com/f3GCo2d.gif)
-
Karina Gould - Minister of Families, Children and Social Development of Canada... bringing the heat schooling & sizing up Poilievre! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1638959872493645824/pu/vid/720x720/IadzsSxMpxWIY6qR.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.cbc.ca/1.4256339.1572213246!/cpImage/httpImage/question-period-20170210.jpg)
-
video of slow-clapping AzzholeyInsuranceBroker! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1639392301788332034/pu/vid/720x1160/c_-894otZXyWr-mr.mp4?tag=12)
-
oh my! Video of U.S. President Biden calling out Conservative MPs for not recognizing cabinet gender parity (in both the Trudeau & Biden admins)
"even if you don't agree guys, I'd stand up"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8A_fZ4DAE
-
oh my! Video of U.S. President Biden calling out Conservative MPs for not recognizing cabinet gender parity (in both the Trudeau & Biden admins)
"even if you don't agree guys, I'd stand up"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8A_fZ4DAE
Does Biden even know where he is? Regardless, I would say the following to a Democrat or Republican president visiting Canada and demanding Liberals or conservatives stand for up some reason. Kindly go f**k yourself. You’re not our dictator.
-
Does Biden even know where he is? Regardless, I would say the following to a Democrat or Republican president visiting Canada and demanding Liberals or conservatives stand for up some reason. Kindly go f**k yourself. You’re not our dictator.
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
-
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
Because recognizing somebody based on their genitalia is absurd. Btw, if these two old white dudes are so concerned about gender parity, why haven’t either of them stepped aside to allow a woman the opportunity? Why didn’t Biden withdraw from the primaries and allow Harris, etc the opportunity? More liberal hypocrisy on display. I was also impressed with Biden’s 70 car motorcade on his way to talk to Justin about climate change! 😂
Btw, do you think either of them could answer the question, what is a woman!? 🤣
-
c'mon Shady! Quit your shyte-posting! LOL!
speaking of shyte-posting, CPC & supporters are feverishly whining about PeePee not getting an invite to the dinner... but as it turns out, the ineptness of Poilievre and his support staff shines through. A copy of the email inviting Poilievre is making the rounds showcasing just how incompetent they are! LOL!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsENGhXWcAAd7If?format=jpg)
-
oh my! Video of U.S. President Biden calling out Conservative MPs for not recognizing cabinet gender parity (in both the Trudeau & Biden admins)
"even if you don't agree guys, I'd stand up"
He has no place telling our MP's what to do. Some of the weak-spines did stand up.
-
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
Because they believe giving cabinet positions based on the best person for the job regardless of gender (equality) and not on wokeness based on your genitalia (equity).
-
oh my! Video of U.S. President Biden calling out Conservative MPs for not recognizing cabinet gender parity (in both the Trudeau & Biden admins)
"even if you don't agree guys, I'd stand up"
He has no place telling our MP's what to do. Some of the weak-spines did stand up.
but not, as below (left image), 'strong-spine' Michael Cooper, MP from Alberta... not him! He held fast! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/gSsQXHm.jpg)
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
Because they believe giving cabinet positions based on the best person for the job regardless of gender (equality) and not on wokeness based on your genitalia (equity).
so... all those male cabinet members, or PeePee shadow cabinet members are merit based, hey! Case in point is the above highlighted MP Cooper - the CPC Shadow Minister for Democratic Reforms. You know, Cooper, the guy who attacked a Muslim witness in committee and read into Hansard, part of the manifesto of the terrorist and mass shooter who attacked and killed 50+ Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand. Merit based, hey Nipples!
-
but not, as below (left image), 'strong-spine' Michael Cooper, MP from Alberta... not him! He held fast! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/gSsQXHm.jpg)
so... all those male cabinet members, or PeePee shadow cabinet members are merit based, hey! Case in point is the above highlighted MP Cooper - the CPC Shadow Minister for Democratic Reforms. You know, Cooper, the guy who attacked a Muslim witness in committee and read into Hansard, part of the manifesto of the terrorist and mass shooter who attacked and killed 50+ Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand. Merit based, hey Nipples!
Cooper is a weirdo. I never said CPC cabinet is merit-based, i have no idea their criteria. But Cabinet members chosen based on genitals is odd, not to mention discriminatory.
-
oh my! As Biden announced on Feb 1, the mandate is to be lifted as of May 11th! You go PeePee, you go! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/x4wQreQ.gif)
-
oh my! As Biden announced on Feb 1, the mandate is to be lifted as of May 11th! You go PeePee, you go! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/x4wQreQ.gif)
Lol, May 11th??? Is that supported by science? 😂😂😂
Just a meaningless arbitrary date pulled out of Biden’s a$$. tRuSt ThE sCiEnCe!!!
-
Lol, May 11th??? Is that supported by science? 😂😂😂
Just a meaningless arbitrary date pulled out of Biden’s a$$. tRuSt ThE sCiEnCe!!!
hey simpleton - how did you miss the point that your boy PeePee wasn't aware the mandate was scheduled to end... just how did you miss that, hey! LOL!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/ejPkP9U.jpg)
c'mon waldo... that's just low hangin' fruit! Rise above it, hey! LOL!
-
speaking of shyte-posting, CPC & supporters are feverishly whining about PeePee not getting an invite to the dinner... but as it turns out, the ineptness of Poilievre and his support staff shines through. A copy of the email inviting Poilievre is making the rounds showcasing just how incompetent they are! LOL!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsENGhXWcAAd7If?format=jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsKYVrMXgAEVLMB?format=jpg)
-
hey simpleton - how did you miss the point that your boy PeePee wasn't aware the mandate was scheduled to end... just how did you miss that, hey! LOL!
Hey stooge, you should learn the difference between wanting something ended immediately, vs 6 weeks from now! Gotta tRuSt ThE sCiEnCe though right! 😂
It’s too dangerous to lift the mandates now, gotta wait until May 11th! Not May 10th or May 9th, it’s gotta be May 11th! 🤣
Imagine being so f**king dumb and thinking mandates are still important. You’re a good little Branch Covidian there waldo.
-
Turdeau doesn’t have the intellectual capacity to compete with PP.
https://youtu.be/eUrAEZb_LNg
-
Hey stooge, you should learn the difference between wanting something ended immediately, vs 6 weeks from now! Gotta tRuSt ThE sCiEnCe though right! 😂
It’s too dangerous to lift the mandates now, gotta wait until May 11th! Not May 10th or May 9th, it’s gotta be May 11th! 🤣
Imagine being so f**king dumb and thinking mandates are still important. You’re a good little Branch Covidian there waldo.
uhhh... that's the U.S.' mandate... the date the U.S. has decided to rescind their mandate. Imagine being so f**king dumb that YOU don't realize this!
-
uhhh... that's the U.S.' mandate... the date the U.S. has decided to rescind their mandate. Imagine being so f**king dumb that YOU don't realize this!
Yes, I know it’s the U.S. mandate. Hence why Pierre asked that Biden end the mandates NOW. But we gotta tRuSt ThE sCiEnCe right? 😂
It’s too risky to remove mandates now! Gotta wait until May 11th! 🤣
-
speaking of shyte-posting, CPC & supporters are feverishly whining about PeePee not getting an invite to the dinner... but as it turns out, the ineptness of Poilievre and his support staff shines through. A copy of the email inviting Poilievre is making the rounds showcasing just how incompetent they are! LOL!
PeePee's EMAILS!!! C'mon Shady, if Poilievre isn't using his official government email account, just what private account is he using? Are its server(s) secure? #BringItHome! LOL!
-
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
geezaz waldo! That's Sarah Fischer... the Director of Communications for the Conservative Party of Canada! Why would she delete her tweet... anyone, anyone... Shady? Oh my!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsKUcIhWIAANK2j?format=jpg)
-
geezaz waldo! That's Sarah Fischer... the Director of Communications for the Conservative Party of Canada! Why would she delete her tweet... anyone, anyone... Shady? Oh my!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsKUcIhWIAANK2j?format=jpg)
Hey waldo, what is a woman? 😂
-
PeePee's EMAILS!!! C'mon Shady, if Poilievre isn't using his official government email account, just what private account is he using? Are its server(s) secure? #BringItHome! LOL!
Deflect, deflect, deflect. Poillievre illustrates the absurdity of these mandates perfectly, and that they should’ve been abolished immediately. Hey buddy waldo, what science is being relied on to justify mandates until May 11th? 😂
-
Hey waldo, what is a woman? 😂
you were asked why Sarah Fischer (Director of Communications for the Conservative Party of Canada) would have deleted her tweet? Since you have NO ANSWER, you deflect, deflect, deflect!
-
Hey buddy waldo, what science is being relied on to justify mandates until May 11th? 😂
again, that's a U.S. mandate... perhaps you should address your fake outrage (and deflections) in that direction - yes?
-
again, that's a U.S. mandate... perhaps you should address your fake outrage (and deflections) in that direction - yes?
I am. Why would waiting until May 11th? Why Mr. Waldo, please explain why? Is it based on science?
-
you were asked why Sarah Fischer (Director of Communications for the Conservative Party of Canada) would have deleted her tweet? Since you have NO ANSWER, you deflect, deflect, deflect!
I don’t know why it was deleted. It’s a great point. Especially when it comes to the Trudeau regime. Before he took office, he specifically stated that having a v****a is the main qualification to being named part of his cabinet.
-
Are you saying that male-dominated Conservative cabinets did not have an advantage because of their gender and only succeeded because men are naturally superior?
-
oh my! Video of U.S. President Biden calling out Conservative MPs for not recognizing cabinet gender parity (in both the Trudeau & Biden admins)
"even if you don't agree guys, I'd stand up"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN8A_fZ4DAE
and why would PeePee/Conservative MPs refuse to recognize and show respect for gender parity?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsPnYJZWIAAYPc2?format=jpg)
-
geezaz waldo! That's Sarah Fischer... the Director of Communications for the Conservative Party of Canada! Why would she delete her tweet... anyone, anyone... Shady? Oh my!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsKUcIhWIAANK2j?format=jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsVrDo2WAAEHQ4b?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsVrDo2WAAEHQ4b?format=jpg)
Clearly being a Rhodes scholar doesn't mean much. She might be the dumbest person in politics, next to Kamala Harris. Who's also an affirmative action hire. Freeland is probably as responsible for running this country into the ground. Her background is probably in gender studies or something.
-
Clearly being a Rhodes scholar doesn't mean much. She might be the dumbest person in politics, next to Kamala Harris. Who's also an affirmative action hire. Freeland is probably as responsible for running this country into the ground. Her background is probably in gender studies or something.
now do cryptoKingPoilievre - state his qualifications! LOL!
as an aside, in terms of the background studies point you attempt to slag Freeland over: she has a bachelor's degree from Harvard University, studying Russian history and literature before earning a master's degree in Slavonic studies from Oxford University.
-
geezaz waldo! PeePeePopulism Rules!
Former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole quitting federal politics --- O’Toole, pushed out as leader by his own MPs last year, said he will resign his seat as MP for Durham at the end of the spring session of Parliament.
(https://media.socastsrm.com/wordpress/wp-content/blogs.dir/1977/files/2021/08/erin-otoole.jpg)
=> Prime Minister Trudeau was my political opponent, not my enemy.
=> These anti-Trudeau flags and the hyper-aggressive rhetoric that often accompanies them are slowly normalizing rage, damaging our democracy and are the very antithesis of what it means to be conservative.
=> The principle of ordered liberty holds that individual freedom should still respect the need for order in society, and steer clear of rash action or disorderly conduct.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fsv2ibTWAAMgTPE?format=jpg&name=small)
-
secular government?... separation of church & state?
hey waldo, is "God-given right" a PeePee/CPC euphemism for constitution?
(https://i.imgur.com/n26kYi8.gif)
-
courtesy of Poiievre's "media machine maestro", Jeff Ballingall (he of the racist Canada/Ontario Proud brand)... the king of Conservative (anti-Liberal) shyte-posting!
per Dean Blundell-Crier Media: PeePee's Paid Troll Farm Game Is Still Strong
We’ve tracked over 400 fake accounts that drive roughly 90% of CPC online hate. Of those 400 accounts, at least 75% were created in the last 12-24 months, with an average follower count of less than 200. Roughly 90% of accounts that follow those fake accounts are fake, and almost all of them are followed by Canadian Disinformation darling Andy Lee – a known vector for Russian/Chinese disinformation. They observe and tag each other when the game starts and lasts for 12-36 hours, depending on the scope of the op.
.
Every Tweet #PeePee puts out is meant to incite fake outrage in the victim community, which he then hides behind for a few dollars a tweet. If you peruse the timelines of his “supporters,” it’s a **** FIREHOSE of anti-Canada, pro-Russia, Anti-choice, Anti-Trudeau sentiment.
That kind of content means it’s the only job the account owner has – to RT and comment on bullshit to make you think their perception operation is your reality. It’s not. It’s a few moronic victims who stand on the shoulders of a few losers in a basement in St Petersburgh or Nigeria.
.
There are two “Troll Streams.”
One is paid (some of these accounts get paid through Upwork-type organizations) with a roster of THOUSANDS of paid trolls who are paid to downvote or negatively interact on #PeePee’s behalf through his Digital Strategist Jeff Ballingall. Along the way, those trolls empower actual supporters of #PeePee’s “I Have A White Christian Dream” rage farming where paid “events” really take off. The other belongs to real people who have the IQ of a hammer and can’t help themselves.
Jeff’s team sends out the day marks to his “troll Farm(s)” with hashtags and messaging, then they sit back and watch a fake movement/narrative become a reality with a bit of help from his friends in Russia, India, China, and the US fringe movement.
clearly the/a reason Poilievre/CPC were so steadfastly opposed to including Russia in the proposed public inquiry into foreign interference - clearly!
-
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg&name=medium)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/E49HFD9.jpg)
BringItHome PeePee, BringItHome!
-
government funded ✓
cryptocurrency influencer ✓
BringItHome PeePee, BringItHome
(https://i.imgur.com/JXwyhhn.jpg)
-
Winnipeg Free Press - columnist Tom Brodbeck
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuFLSvzWAAAufJy?format=jpg)
-
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
c'mon Shady - nuthinToSay, hey?
-
oh PeePee - #justinflation this, hey! Prior post graphic updated to include Jan-Mar 2023 inflation rates... March 2023 @4.3%
(https://i.imgur.com/J4xZgdK.gif)
of course, Poilievre will never acknowledge that rising inflation was/is a global concern caused by, for example, the Russian invasion of Ukraine that drove up the prices of commodities—particularly energy and agricultural goods—and created new disruptions to already impaired global supply chains (re: pandemic related). Notwithstanding, of course, Canada positioned significantly better than most like nations.
-
Almost a whole page of waldo. He sure has a lot of time on his hands.
-
Prior post graphic updated to include Jan-Mar 2023 inflation rates...
You’re saying a 4.3% inflation rate for the month is good? Prices are still going up a lot, just not as badly as before.
-
Almost a whole page of waldo. He sure has a lot of time on his hands.
He cares deeply about politicians with absolutely no legislative or policy power. However, those that do, get a free ride with him. Don’t try and make any sense of it, it’s impossible. Regardless, I love that he’s citing bloggers like Dean Blundell, while at the same time calling the Globe & Mail trash! 🤣
Oh the irony! 😂😂😂
-
c'mon Shady! Still nothing to say about your boy Poilievre refusing a security background check? Still nothing to say, hey!
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg)
c'mon Shady - nuthinToSay, hey?
-
so Poilievre goes running to Elon Musk demanding he have CBC twitter accounts tagged with a "government funded label". Shockingly, Musk obliges and, of course, the pigeon gloatingly crows! There's an even better PeePee tweet that has him showcasing his ignorance in not understanding the distinctions between public funding, government funding and state media... with Poilievre actually referring to CBC as "state media".
but, oh my, just days later now, without offering any explanation, Twitter has dropped tagging accounts as being government funded... accounts like NPR, PBS, BBC and yes, CBC. Now what PeePee, now what? LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/1Mjx7rH.gif)
-
So it was Harper propaganda before it was Trudeau propaganda? Or does he think his supporters are too stupid to remember?
And why can't PP get security clearance? That seems like a big deal.
-
And why can't PP get security clearance? That seems like a big deal.
a big deal that no one from ConMedia will touch... not G&M's Fife, not Global's Cooper, not NP's Ivison/Murphy/Kay/et al. Bloody hell, not even Coyne has anything to say about it!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg)
-
Government House Leader Marc Holland on Poilievre & government funding..... ziiiiiing! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1649207176131403781/pu/vid/1280x720/aAE4PMvIernn8BSd.mp4?tag=12)
Poilievre's Stornoway residence - government funded!
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxSf3lV3sQYdh40q2uSEJ6-R80auhy1SPnew&usqp=CAU)
-
Pierre Poilievre is exploiting public safety fears to troll for law-and-order votes --- His claim that a crime wave is caused by 'woke' politicians is utter nonsense (https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/opinion/pierre-poilievre-is-exploiting-public-safety-fears-to-troll-for-law-and-order-votes/375350)
After eight years of Justin Trudeau and the costly Coalition with the NDP, Trudeau and the NDP have caused a crime wave with policies that allow the same repeat violent offenders loose on our streets. The worst disorder, drug abuse, crime, and chaos are in places run by woke NDP, Liberal mayors and premiers whose policies have unleashed a wicked crime spree across this country.
Poilievre dropped the word “woke” not because it has anything to do with crime but as a dog whistle to his supporters. It is a word devoid of meaning except as a cover for his lack of understanding of justice policy.
Because the reality is that outside of the Territories, the Conservative heartland of Manitoba, Alberta, and Saskatchewan have the highest crime and violent crime rates in Canada. British Columbia, singled out by Poilievre as a woke dystopia, saw the second-biggest drop in violent crime in Canada from 2020 to 2021.
Violent crime also decreased in Vancouver in 2021 under “NDP mayor” Kennedy Stewart, but that wouldn’t fit Poilievre’s narrative. Crime rates in Toronto and Ottawa increased in 2021 – I suppose we can blame the notoriously woke John Tory and Jim Watson for that.
In 2021, the rate of violent offences, including assault, murder, attempted murder, and other violent interactions (excluding sexual assault), was lower last year than in some years under the Harper Conservative government.
But looking at the numbers gives Poilievre and his surrogates too much credit. None of this is about data or a genuine concern for the safety of our communities. Instead, it is part of a political confidence trick using public safety concerns to sow fear and troll for votes.
-
ya waldo, so just what has Poilievre done? LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/YeFHyKg.jpg)
-
ya waldo, so just what has Poilievre done? LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/YeFHyKg.jpg)
Outright lies. I’ve seen him talk to the media. If he’s so bad, why do you feel it necessary to lie so much about him?
-
Outright lies. I’ve seen him talk to the media. If he’s so bad, why do you feel it necessary to lie so much about him?
c'mon Shady, have you seen your boy talk to the Parliamentary Press Gallery? Well have ya? To Poilievre, "mainstream media" starts and ends with the likes of Rebel News, Post Millennial, True North et al! LOL!
-
c'mon Shady, have you seen your boy talk to the Parliamentary Press Gallery? Well have ya? To Poilievre, "mainstream media" starts and ends with the likes of Rebel News, Post Millennial, True North et al! LOL!
Yes I have.
-
You’re a straight up liar. Just like Turdeau.
https://youtu.be/RLw7JU7h63U
-
You’re a straight up liar. Just like Trudeau.
settle down lil' fellow! Your linked vid relates to the first time 'newly minted leader' PeePee "faced" the Parliamentary Press Gallery... where he/his handlers gave notice that NO QUESTIONS would be allowed. Given the ensuing brouhaha, Poilievre has boycotted them ever since - go figure, hey!
To Poilievre, "mainstream media" starts and ends with the likes of Rebel News, Post Millennial, True North et al! LOL!
geezaz waldo, how did you miss including the Western Standard in that list of "news media outlets" Poilievre will actually talk to!
-
re: the signed agreements between the Liberal federal Government of Canada and provinces & territories to make meaningful progress towards a Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care system; one that works for families.
video: when asked pointedly if the Poilievre/CPC proposal to cancel supplementary spending includes cancelling those agreements, Poilievre states that the CPC will cancel any tax increases and cancel any new deficit spending. (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1649735269824774148/pu/vid/1270x720/UHoFnLcb6RGG-0cd.mp4?tag=12)
-
Conservatives hatred of journalism is damaging their brand (https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2023/04/25/conservatives-hatred-of-journalism-is-damaging-their-brand.html)
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre appears to be genuine in his contempt for many Canadian journalists. This hatred is, of course, dangerous for democracy, but it is also damaging the Canadian Conservatives’ brand.
.
The old nostrum for trainee politicians was to never make an enemy of the press because they have endless barrels of ink to punish you for it. Perhaps the contemporary version might be, “Don’t rely on your captive conservative social media to get you elected, the mainstream media still shape the campaign agenda — and often anoint the loser.”
-
Waldo you seem obsessed with Pierre Poilievre, given you post anti-Pierre posts every day in this thread and have him as your avatar. That is odd.
-
Waldo you seem obsessed with Pierre Poilievre, given you post anti-Pierre posts every day in this thread
hey Nipples! You lookin' for some attention... are you after some waldo luv'n? You're obsessed with how/what the waldo posts... you've been repeatedly triggered over waldo posts - geezaz, how many times have you said poor lil' waldo is on the party payroll, hey?
by-the-by, the waldo hasn't posted in this thread for 5 days... but who's counting... incorrectly - other than you? Carry on, hey!
gratuitous PeePee toon:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuvxKlGWcBIg4fh?format=jpg)
-
hey Nipples! You're welcome...
(https://i.imgur.com/BKZWMI5.jpg)
-
whiny lil' beeatch says what?
Waldo is a Liberal Party schill and doesn't actually care about policy other than how his masters voted.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FviQ1LxXoAAEjZj?format=jpg)
whaaa! WorkingManPeePee rarin' to go... with clenched fists, ill-fitting hardhat and improperly fastened safety vest! LOL!
-
Those don't appear to be steel-toed wingtips. Bad cosplay!
-
Those don't appear to be steel-toed wingtips. Bad cosplay!
Why is PP’s hardhat floating magically over his noggin? I’m thinking this might be a Walduh photoshop job.
-
Those don't appear to be steel-toed wingtips. Bad cosplay!
Those are steel toe loafers.
-
Chinese ambassador sent home from harassment attempts against Michael Chong's family. Again, this only comes out after media leaks and Trudeau gov has to be reactive to save face after doing nothing for 2 years about it.
-
Chinese ambassador sent home from harassment attempts against Michael Chong's family. Again, this only comes out after media leaks and Trudeau gov has to be reactive to save face after doing nothing for 2 years about it.
quit making shyte up, hey Nipples! LOL!
Chong has had, effectively, 3 differing statements as his weaselly attempts to impugn the government have blown up on him!
points in fact:
=> in 2021 CSIS advised Chong that it had intelligence about threats concerning Chong’s family in Hong Kong. China publicly said it would sanction Chong for criticizing Beijing’s treatment of Uyghur Muslims in China’s Xinjiang province... CSIS never provided that information to the federal government/political level.
=> specifics: in February 2021, Chong voted in favour of a motion condemning China’s treatment of its Uyghur minority as a genocide. In March 2021, China sanctioned Chong, barring him from entering the county and prohibiting Chinese citizens from conducting business with him.
=> Chong has admitted to being briefed by CSIS in 2021
=> Chong has admitted that he was advised that CSIS DID NOT INFORM PM Trudeau/his Chief of Staff
When it comes to the safety and security of MPs or their families, intelligence agencies should always make that information known. If anyone ever puts a threat against an MP or a family, we need to know about it and we’re going to make sure that CSIS elevates that, even if it’s not a credible threat or doesn’t hit the threshold that they would decide is necessary. When it comes to MPs and their families, I think we have to have a lower threshold.
-
video: Michael Chong CLARIFIES his remarks: now says PM Justin Trudeau DID NOT receive the information, nor did his chief of staff (Kate Telford) (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1654484917340758017/pu/vid/1280x720/K5Vc0VqGpVhu7Lr8.mp4?tag=12)
-
video: Michael Chong CLARIFIES his remarks: now says PM Justin Trudeau DID NOT receive the information, nor did his chief of staff (Kate Telford) (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1654484917340758017/pu/vid/1280x720/K5Vc0VqGpVhu7Lr8.mp4?tag=12)
The Liberal government had the info. Nothing was done.
On Thursday, Chong told the House of Commons that the intelligence report on the matter was shared with relevant departments — including the prime minister's national security and intelligence adviser in the Privy Council Office. The Wellington-Halton Hills MP said the current national security adviser, Jody Thomas, told him so.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6833343
-
The Liberal government had the info.
hey Nipples! Clearly you don't grasp the distinction between the political government and the public civil service! LOL!
-
in the recent weeks asshat Poilievre has repeatedly challenged PM Trudeau to stand up and be accountable... problem is, by design, PeePee is speaking to an empty chair as PM Trudeau has not been present in the House on those occasions! So Poilievre gets the photo-op he's after while not having to face a countering response. Green Party Elizabeth May takes note:
(https://i.imgur.com/wnMMZYf.gif)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fvo-gvYXsAIl-TN?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
hey Nipples! Clearly you don't grasp the distinction between the political government and the public civil service! LOL!
If the PMO isn't getting relevant and important national security info from CSIS or his national security advisor the buck stops with him. He's 8 years into his run, there's no excuses bud.
The very fact that the foreign affairs minister said they have to be careful about expelling the Chinese diplomat because of possible retaliation from China is weakness on their part. Why would you publicly admit to China that they have that kind of power over you and you're scared of them??
-
If the PMO isn't getting relevant and important national security info from CSIS or his national security advisor the buck stops with him.
Nipples feverishly backpedalling! CSIS determined the importance of said info... it {CSIS} decided the info was only relevant to MP Chong and did not advise further within government.
note to Nipples: there's government... then there's the civil service supporting the government of the day. Carry on, hey Nipples! LOL!
-
Nipples feverishly backpedalling! CSIS determined the importance of said info... it {CSIS} decided the info was only relevant to MP Chong and did not advise further within government.
note to Nipples: there's government... then there's the civil service supporting the government of the day. Carry on, hey Nipples! LOL!
When did CSIS inform Chong?
CSIS advised the national security advisor and "relevant departments". The Liberal government runs the public service. The Liberal ministers in cabinet run each department.
If the departments and high ranking members within them aren't doing their jobs the buck stops with the Liberal government in charge who don't seem to have proper protocols in place. Why isn't the PMO insisting such info is passed up to them... until it's leaked into the news? Why does CSIS have to leak serious national security info just to get the gov to act on them? The Trudeau gov is weak on national security and everyone including China knows it.
Maybe, just maybe, the Liberal gov just doesn't give that much of a sh*t if a conservative MP is being targeted by China. They don't even give a crap if their own MPs are on the China dole until it leaks in the media!
-
points in fact:
=> in 2021 CSIS advised Chong that it had intelligence about threats concerning Chong’s family in Hong Kong. China publicly said it would sanction Chong for criticizing Beijing’s treatment of Uyghur Muslims in China’s Xinjiang province... CSIS never provided that information to the federal government/political level.
=> specifics: in February 2021, Chong voted in favour of a motion condemning China’s treatment of its Uyghur minority as a genocide. In March 2021, China sanctioned Chong, barring him from entering the county and prohibiting Chinese citizens from conducting business with him.
=> Chong has admitted to being briefed by CSIS in 2021
=> Chong has admitted that he was advised that CSIS DID NOT INFORM PM Trudeau/his Chief of Staff
March 2021: China announces sanctions on Canadians, including MP Michael Chong --- 'I'll wear it as a badge of honour,' Chong says in response to sanctions
Michael Chong states CSIS did give him a "defensive briefing" in 2021... terms it "general in nature" - whatever the Poilievre/CPC rage-farming hell that means!
-
March 2021: China announces sanctions on Canadians, including MP Michael Chong --- 'I'll wear it as a badge of honour,' Chong says in response to sanctions
Michael Chong states CSIS did give him a "defensive briefing" in 2021... terms it "general in nature" - whatever the Poilievre/CPC rage-farming hell that means!
They didn't brief him about this issue about his family.
-
hey Nipples! What fam... Chong says he has no fam in Hong Kong... or at least family that he's in contact with! LOL!
I made the decision years ago to cut off contact with family in Hong Kong out of an abundance of caution for their safety - I am unaware of what threats or harassment they may have faced.
how convenient, hey Nipples?
-
I did that with my family too. But I like his "abundance of caution" excuse. I might use that.
-
c'mon Shady! Still nothing to say about your boy Poilievre refusing a security background check? Still nothing to say, hey!
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg)
c'mon Shady - nuthinToSay, hey?
still waiting Shady... still waiting! By the by, since you're so tapped-in, any insight into why Poilievre went by the name "Jeff" in high-school? LOL!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fv4smikXsAIlR9s?format=jpg&name=small)
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
(https://i.imgur.com/UZqngBS.jpg)
-
Maybe Alberta's hate French people?
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
(https://i.imgur.com/rldHwCh.jpg)
-
Woot!
FREDERICTON — Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is seen as more competent and having better judgment than Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/poilievre-perceived-to-be-more-competent-than-trudeau-national-poll-shows/ar-AA1bdwZN?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=3d3a4747aefd42679533b61058263f88&ei=11
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
If we see each other at the food bank come say hi.
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
(https://i.imgur.com/yiuNBdk.jpg)
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
(https://i.imgur.com/yiuNBdk.jpg)
You're right, the credit rating, which is due to the difficult decisions made by previous governments, most notably the Chretien liberals, is good.
-
...the credit rating, which is due to the difficult decisions made by previous governments, most notably the Chretien liberals, is good.
the waldo encourages you to cite reference analysis of the methodologies used by respective issuer companies that assign sovereign credit ratings... analysis that, according to you, ignores any influence from the current federal government in how credit ratings have been determined over the past decade; choosing instead, according to you, to attribute credit rating assignments to "difficult decisions made by Chretien Liberals"... some 2-3 decades ago! Citation request:
-
everything PeePee? Everything?
(https://i.imgur.com/49BDD1z.jpg)
-
the waldo encourages you to cite reference analysis of the methodologies used by respective issuer companies that assign sovereign credit ratings... analysis that, according to you, ignores any influence from the current federal government in how credit ratings have been determined over the past decade; choosing instead, according to you, to attribute credit rating assignments to "difficult decisions made by Chretien Liberals"... some 2-3 decades ago! Citation request:
You’ve never heard of what Chrétien and Martin accomplished from the mid 90s to the early 2000s? It’s what allowed wonder boy to add so much debt without it affecting the credit rating.
-
...the credit rating, which is due to the difficult decisions made by previous governments, most notably the Chretien liberals, is good.
the waldo encourages you to cite reference analysis of the methodologies used by respective issuer companies that assign sovereign credit ratings... analysis that, according to you, ignores any influence from the current federal government in how credit ratings have been determined over the past decade; choosing instead, according to you, to attribute credit rating assignments to "difficult decisions made by Chretien Liberals"... some 2-3 decades ago! Citation request:
You’ve never heard of what Chrétien and Martin accomplished from the mid 90s to the early 2000s? It’s what allowed wonder boy to add so much debt without it affecting the credit rating.
again: citation request
-
the waldo encourages you to cite reference analysis of the methodologies used by respective issuer companies that assign sovereign credit ratings... analysis that, according to you, ignores any influence from the current federal government in how credit ratings have been determined over the past decade; choosing instead, according to you, to attribute credit rating assignments to "difficult decisions made by Chretien Liberals"... some 2-3 decades ago! Citation request:
again: citation request
Do you need a citation that they were both PMs too? 😂😂😂
Does your knowledge of Canadian politics only start in 2014?
-
deflectin & distractin - the ShadyWay!
-
deflectin & distractin - the ShadyWay!
You’ve never heard of the 1995 Redbook? 🙄
-
From Liberal 1995 Redbook:
“A Liberal government will reduce the deficit. We will implement new programs only if they can be funded within existing expenditures. We will exercise unwavering discipline in controlling federal spending .… Expenditure reductions will be achieved by cancelling unnecessary programs, streamlining processes and eliminating duplication.”
Which is all foreign to Trudeau.
-
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwW_N3uaYAAna1Q?format=jpg)
-
When the debt-to-GDP ratio hit a whopping 66.6 per cent in 1995, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and Finance Minister Paul Martin went to work
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-view-will-these-liberals-be-willing-to-do-what-chretien-and-martin-did/wcm/1538b4fc-83b3-46d5-9bbf-3ca1f403da69/amp/
-
Which is all foreign to Trudeau.
again, the companies that issue sovereign credit ratings follow formal methodologies in how they determine the assignment of respective country credit ratings... you've been repeatedly asked to cite reference associated analysis from these companies that, according to you, ignores any influence from the current federal government in how credit ratings have been determined over the past decade. You refuse and instead offer up nothing but deflection & distraction!
-
"Yes, I was a high school teacher before getting into politics, but I’m having trouble remembering what the leader of the opposition did before getting into politics." - Prmie Minister Justin Trudeau
-
"Yes, I was a high school teacher before getting into politics, but I’m having trouble remembering what the leader of the opposition did before getting into politics." - Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
video link: (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1663989254328811522/pu/vid/888x486/h5l9m353_EicmlJA.mp4?tag=12)
-
video link: (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1663989254328811522/pu/vid/888x486/h5l9m353_EicmlJA.mp4?tag=12)
He wasn’t a stupid f**king drama teacher, that’s for sure. Also didn’t run the country into the ground.
-
Shady, calm down you petulant whiny lil' beeatch! By the by, what job(s) did career politician PeePee have before getting into politics, hey?
-
Shady, calm down you petulant whiny lil' beeatch! By the by, what job(s) did career politician PeePee have before getting into politics, hey?
None of them wore black face either.
-
c'mon... is that all ya got? LOL!
-
c'mon... is that all ya got? LOL!
That and the fact literally everything in Canada is worse since he’s been in office.
-
Do people actually believe that peepee would be silenced from criticizing the government if he were to get security clearance? I still don't get it. Surely the whole party isn't that stupid.
-
...the fact literally everything in Canada is worse since he’s been in office.
"literally"... the most misused word! Geezaz lil' buddy, your parroting PeePee's "everything is broken" is such hyperbole - literally! Bring it home Shady; bring it home!
The latest in recent days had PeePee delivering yet another 'Canada is broken' prepared message only to have another journalist attempt to ask inconvenient questions... which caused Poilievre to bolt (runaway, runaway)!
(https://i.imgur.com/oGVgzpz.gif)
-
Do people actually believe that peepee would be silenced from criticizing the government if he were to get security clearance? I still don't get it. Surely the whole party isn't that stupid.
so Poilievre was again asked about his refusal to get a security clearance. A new wrinkle has him stating he doesn't need to... cause there are 2 Conservative MPs that have the required clearance to review classified info/data - this would be as members of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP); the/a committee that is actively reviewing foreign interference. Now speaking of stupid, is PeePee just that stupid to not realize that NSICOP members are bound by the Security of Information Act. Oh my, surely Poilievre isn't being updated with classified information by those Conservative members?
-
I wonder if the reason for his refusal to undergo the scrutiny of a security clearance is the same reason Biden laughed at him when he said he was the Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition, questioning his use of the word "loyal."
https://twitter.com/CountFloyd2020/status/1666476132080979969?s=20
-
geezaz! PeePee lookin' a lil' rough & greasy! And nice jacket, hey!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyQgSnmWIAA9w_e?format=jpg)
-
video: with an agreement to show a moment of silence and (bowed head) respect for the RCAF members killed in the helicopter crash near Petawawa... everyone except that azzhole Poilievre! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1671615847608057856/pu/vid/960x720/sAMLzq-OFeGaJqM2.mp4?tag=12) Seriously PeePee has a screwLoooooose!
-
geezaz! How the hey does one "bring Canada home"? Is there a translator in the house? Anyone, anyone, anyone...
(https://i.imgur.com/42mRzA6.gif)
Pierre "Bring It Home" Poilievre! LOL!
-
geezaz! How the hey does one "bring Canada home"? Is there a translator in the house? Anyone, anyone, anyone...
...
Pierre "Bring It Home" Poilievre! LOL!
He's got AI writing campaign slogans now. "Bring home the work for the people at home who work at home hard."
-
over the last couple of weeks: the launching of Poilievre 2.0! Tone & appearance: image softening, less oil-slick hair, no glasses... and the tone, mygawd the tone is sooooo 'calming'! LOL!
style over substance, hey PeePee!
(https://i.imgur.com/KkwBkVV.gif)
-
can a PeePee make-over help deal with - 9 Things:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FzVoQtyagAAztq-?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fz0KJ5PWcBANh3_?format=jpg&name=small)
(https://i.redd.it/g1l7t7wda3h61.jpg)
-
did someone say, 'pile on'?
(https://i.imgur.com/Xa64UZW.jpg)
-
lipstick-on-a-pig... it's still a pig!
(https://i.imgur.com/GgUDMOr.jpg)
-
'no prisoners'!
(https://i.imgur.com/YV4raLl.jpg)
-
nothing a physical makeover can't remedy!
(https://i.imgur.com/zgHQUdp.jpg) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsQhSF3t_E8
-
oh c'mon! Talk about the heights of hypocrisy...
(https://i.imgur.com/IjbKkFJ.gif)
for months upon months, Poilievre et al claimed 'Canada is broken'... 'everything is broken'! And now we get a video: where PeePee2.0 wants everyone to just fuhgeddaboudit! - where he now states Canada is the greatest nation on earth, while acknowledging... leveraging, no less, that's why half a million immigrants come here every year (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1675107364460978176/pu/vid/1280x720/aWC6OzNrKryDoXNP.mp4?tag=12)
oh my Shady, your boy is talking up immigration and it's current yearly rate of immigrants! What say you now, hey Shady? What say you now?
-
purrfect!
(https://i.imgur.com/4r0uPXc.jpg)
-
geezaz waldo - back to "everything is broken"! Either it was a bitchin' weekend for PeePee... or internal polling is in on the failed make-over attempt!
(https://i.imgur.com/ddsf761.gif)
-
geezaz stoogeShady! Your misinforming video reflects upon the federal carbon pricing replacing New Brunswick's provincial carbon tax... Premier Higgs' Conservative government ended the provincial policy/plan. The federal carbon pricing on a litre of gasoline rose to 14.3 cents, up from 11 cents under New Brunswick’s provincial carbon tax. By the by, is there a particular reason you're purposely not mentioning carbon pricing rebates? Of course, this has nothing to do with Canada's introduction of new Clean Fuel regulations.
for weeks on end you've been nattering on (parroting Poilievre/CPC) about, "2 carbon taxes" - purposely misinforming how the Clean Fuel Regulation works and purposely misrepresenting the regulation as a tax attached to consumer pump consumption. Why don't you step up and explain just how the Clean Fuel Regulation applied to, for example, refineries and other fuel suppliers works in relation to some of those companies unable to comply with the ongoing iterative regulations... those forced to turn to the carbon credit market. Make sure you properly provide the associated timeline as in, for example, 2025 on through to 2030 - sure you can!
weakAndy lying about a 'second carbon tax'! It's what Conservatives do - lie & misinform!
(https://i.imgur.com/iC64S1C.gif)
-
weakAndy lying about a 'second carbon tax'! It's what Conservatives do - lie & misinform!
(https://i.imgur.com/iC64S1C.gif)
The new fuel tax is a new carbon tax. Is there anything you guys won’t tax? Is there anything that you don’t think Canadians are paying enough for? And with all this new tax revenue, and the extra revenue from inflated prices on everything, you haven’t one balanced the budget. In fact, you e added more debt than all previous governments combined. You’re an epic failure.
-
The new fuel tax is a new carbon tax.
you continue to purposely lie; to purposely misinform... to purposely misrepresent and falsely claim the new Clean Fuel Regulation associates to 'consumer consumption at the pump'.
how surprising that you ignore the challenge; here, again... I doubleDogDare ya:"Why don't you step up and explain just how the Clean Fuel Regulation applied to, for example, refineries and other fuel suppliers works in relation to some of those companies unable to comply with the ongoing iterative regulations... those forced to turn to the carbon credit market. Make sure you properly provide the associated timeline as in, for example, 2025 on through to 2030 - sure you can!"
-
over the last couple of weeks: the launching of Poilievre 2.0! Tone & appearance: image softening, less oil-slick hair, no glasses... and the tone, mygawd the tone is sooooo 'calming'! LOL!
style over substance, hey PeePee!
(https://i.imgur.com/KkwBkVV.gif)
oh my! Surely this can't be PM Trudeau mocking PeePee's failed make-over!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0euZuZXoAAb_LW?format=jpg)
-
whaaaa! Google Street says what about Stornoway? Oh my!
(https://i.imgur.com/gUw13M1.gif)
-
another facet of the PeePee2.0 makeover has the "brain trust" wanting to project a more "buffed" body image! LOL!
geezaz waldo, they tried that with the 'athletic running' O'Toole; the most comical photoshop of his oversized bulging calf muscles led the way! Now we get Poilievre wearing some kinda 'girdle' under his undersized tee! Too bad, so sad!
(https://i.imgur.com/JXDZKWG.jpg)
-
another facet of the PeePee2.0 makeover has the "brain trust" wanting to project a more "buffed" body image! LOL!
geezaz waldo, they tried that with the 'athletic running' O'Toole; the most comical photoshop of his oversized bulging calf muscles led the way! Now we get Poilievre wearing some kinda 'girdle' under his undersized tee! Too bad, so sad!
(https://i.imgur.com/JXDZKWG.jpg)
Bulletproof or stabbyproof vest?
-
? the impetus behind the Poilievre makeover
July 10, 2023 - The Hill Times: After Conservatives underperform in byelections, some party stalwarts, pundits question if Poilievre’s leadership is ‘all hat and no cattle’ (https://www.hilltimes.com/story/2023/07/10/after-underperforming-in-five-byelections-some-former-senior-conservatives-and-pundits-question-if-poilievres-leadership-all-hat-and-no-cattle/392155/)
“Opposition parties are supposed to be adding to the vote total, not subtracting,” said Fred DeLorey, former Conservative national campaign director in the 2021 federal election.
“We’re trending in the wrong direction. Right now, everything we’re seeing nationally and what we should be feeling is a surge to the Conservatives. Our leader has been everywhere. He’s doing a great job getting out and the party, national polls, how it’s doing well. But sadly, when people get into the voter box, they’re not voting for us.”
.
“We’re potentially missing the target on who we’re trying to get out to vote for us, our leader’s negatives are very high, and he needs to find a way to tackle that,” said DeLorey, who served as the Conservative Party’s director of communications and director of political operations between 2009-2015.
.
For the parliamentary strategy, Beardsley said Poilievre should emulate the Harper model where he left the “attack dog role” to other MPs, and should appear more prime ministerial when he speaks both inside and outside the House.
“When Harper was on TV, he was playing the role of a prime minister-to-be, and that’s what people want. They want to know that, if they’re going to give you the government, that you can get the job done, you’re not just someone who throws out social media stuff or comes up with a fast line,” said Beardsley.
-
another facet of the PeePee2.0 makeover has the "brain trust" wanting to project a more "buffed" body image! LOL!
geezaz waldo, they tried that with the 'athletic running' O'Toole; the most comical photoshop of his oversized bulging calf muscles led the way! Now we get Poilievre wearing some kinda 'girdle' under his undersized tee! Too bad, so sad!
(https://i.imgur.com/JXDZKWG.jpg)
I see you continue to focus on the substantive issues of the day. 😂
Easier that way than examining the disastrous situation Junior has left Canada in.
-
I see you continue to focus on the substantive issues of the day. 😂
says the guy, YOU, with your quite liberal posting of "substantive memes"... the ones so easy to swat down/aside!
-
says the guy, YOU, with your quite liberal posting of "substantive memes"... the ones so easy to swat down/aside!
You’re both equally sh!tty.
-
I see you continue to focus on the substantive issues of the day. 😂
Like how cartoons are too dang woke?
-
says the guy, YOU, with your quite liberal posting of "substantive memes"... the ones so easy to swat down/aside!
You’re both equally sh!tty.
it speaks! Squiggy, you have caused me to pursue some serious introspection - I'll need some significant time away to get over your scathing beat-down! Ok... I'm back - all good now! Carry on, hey! LOL!
-
homophobia: the fear, hatred, discomfort with, or mistrust of people who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual.
(https://i.imgur.com/t2fRwyS.jpg)
-
domestic terrorism freedumb supporter Poilievre says what?
(https://i.imgur.com/bV37h9T.gif)
-
homophobia: the fear, hatred, discomfort with, or mistrust of people who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual.
(https://i.imgur.com/t2fRwyS.jpg)
That's just not fair - how can I be expected to read the tee-shirts of everyone I take photos with!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmFG5RSXoAAkTvS?format=jpg)
-
gettin' jiggy wit it!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1679826300662345728/BAnTH4Dl?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
oh my! As a part of the continued Poilievre 2.0 makeover, the norm has become for PeePee to always publicly appear with his wife... sumthin, sumthin about, "further image softening and attempts to help with Poilievre's dearth of support with women voters":
(https://i.imgur.com/2uP1A5h.jpg)
-
another facet of the PeePee2.0 makeover has the "brain trust" wanting to project a more "buffed" body image! LOL!
geezaz waldo, they tried that with the 'athletic running' O'Toole; the most comical photoshop of his oversized bulging calf muscles led the way! Now we get Poilievre wearing some kinda 'girdle' under his undersized tee! Too bad, so sad!
(https://i.imgur.com/JXDZKWG.jpg)
Bulletproof or stabbyproof vest?
nope - just fake muscle enhancer!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1IYyE-acAIGpkh?format=jpg)
-
... now also referencing PeePee's Shadow Minister for Finance, Jasraj Singh Hallan - who holds nothing more than an 'accounting diploma' from the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology (SAIT). You're welcome!
geezaz waldo, does Poilievre have a 'deep bench', or what! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/DVolW3A.jpg)
oh my! When they show you who they are - believe them! Calgary CPC MP Jasraj Singh Hallan, PeePee's shadow finance critic... taking a photo with 2 guys wearing T-shirts that read “leave our kids alone.” The shirts also show a smaller, stylized image of a family beneath an umbrella sheltering them from the rainbow of colours associated with LGBTQ Pride flags.
(https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/politics/federal/2023/07/16/poilievres-office-calgary-mp-silent-over-latest-photo-with-controversial-message/20230715160712-c2e13feaf82e5e4267e08375913e8b35222f1ef69c79190aa99b30ad1be2646d.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/KkwBkVV.gif)(https://media.tenor.com/3WpDDjIaIuAAAAAM/fabulous-milhousevanhouten.gif)
#BringItHomePeePee
-
hey now waldo! Does this seem right - that PeePee's campaign was in discussion with said whistleblower prior to 'whistle blowing'? LOL!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1m-STqXsAAONS4?format=jpg)
Brown originally blamed his ejection from the race on members of the Conservative Party establishment and supporters of leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre, who he said worked to disqualify him from the leadership race because they feared his progressive approach to conservatism was going to win.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1whfIHXwAM5xlc?format=jpg)
-
Now he looks like a man who forgot his glasses and had to assemble a vacation wardrobe after the airline lost his luggage.
(https://i.imgur.com/3q1I6OL.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/OqDABbf.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/3q1I6OL.jpg)
His makeover seems a little non-binary. His boobs are fabulous.
-
hey now waldo! Does this seem right - that PeePee's campaign was in discussion with said whistleblower prior to 'whistle blowing'? LOL!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1m-STqXsAAONS4?format=jpg)
Brown originally blamed his ejection from the race on members of the Conservative Party establishment and supporters of leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre, who he said worked to disqualify him from the leadership race because they feared his progressive approach to conservatism was going to win.
so, notwithstanding said whistleblower went to the Poilievre campaign and not to the CPC party proper, 'the media' finally stepped up today and actually asked Poilievre why his campaign paid the whistleblower's legal costs. video: PeePee's nonsensical, non-answer was to state: "Because we are the campaign that supports whistleblowers" (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1684359747619758080/pu/vid/1280x720/h-arwylZHqAYpzUZ.mp4?tag=12)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/PoUrIzB.jpg)
-
going to... pump-you-up!
(https://i.imgur.com/DNiYGPS.jpg)
-
going to... pump-you-up!
(https://i.imgur.com/DNiYGPS.jpg)
(https://media.tenor.com/3rGvbCLEjZQAAAAd/skinny-homer-skinny.gif)
-
PM Trudeau gravel-thrower sentenced to 90 days house arrest, one year probation --- An Ontario man, Shane Marshall, threw gravel at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a 2021 federal election campaign event marred by protest.
PeePee 'congratulating' Shane Marshall:
(https://i.imgur.com/mFUl6ga.jpg)
-
In defence of civic responsibility - Mr. Poilievre’s political strategy appears to rest on persuading Canadians to care less, think little, and yell louder (https://www.thespec.com/opinion/contributors/in-defence-of-civic-responsibility/article_d5869cfb-1abd-5292-88bf-f16b6524f872.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share)
Since the so-called freedom convoy occupied Ottawa, small but aggressive groups of individuals angry and misinformed about everything from vaccination policies to school curriculums have frequently monopolized public attention, their tactics disturbing the nation’s conscience. These are not isolated acts of insolence, but the consequence of more sophisticated efforts to normalize cruelty in our discourse, selfishness in our policy, and distrust in our democracy.
.
Yet a growing network of dark money funded think tanks, alt right media, and online agitators appears intent on relitigating long-settled debates, including on policies dealing with pollution, privatization of Medicare, and the place of guns in our society. Not surprisingly, each of these issues correlate with a powerful profit motive.
Many of these same voices also seek to rehabilitate rejected opinions on harm reduction, residential schools, LGTBQ rights, and election financing.
In this endeavour the network has found a champion in federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre. Fittingly, Mr. Poilievre’s political strategy appears to rest on persuading Canadians to care less, think little, and yell louder.
-
In defence of civic responsibility - Mr. Poilievre’s political strategy appears to rest on persuading Canadians to care less, think little, and yell louder (https://www.thespec.com/opinion/contributors/in-defence-of-civic-responsibility/article_d5869cfb-1abd-5292-88bf-f16b6524f872.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share)
Complete nonsense. His strategy is to lower the cost of living in Canada. We haven’t had a government interested in doing that since 2014. Keep linking to the pro-Turdeau opinion pieces though! 😂
You guys are gettin scared! I love it!
-
His {PeePee's} strategy is to lower the cost of living in Canada. We haven’t had a government interested in doing that since 2014.
oh my, lil' buddy! You know what happens when you actually make economic related claims referencing, as you refer to it, the, 'Harper regime'. Here, don't ignore the following again, hey!
...from the mid 90s to the mid 2010s were with balanced budgets and surpluses. ... incapable of balancing a budget, regardless of the circumstances.
since you're making the claim: over the Harper, as you say, "regime decade", list the years that Harper Conservatives DIDN'T run deficits? Or how many balanced budgets if you prefer!
per economists Standord & Brennan: Harper’s economic record the worst in Canada’s postwar history - The Conservatives portray themselves as capable economic managers. But their record proves the opposite.
(https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5cd634552500003300a4c0ae.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale&format=webp)
-
In defence of civic responsibility - Mr. Poilievre’s political strategy appears to rest on persuading Canadians to care less, think little, and yell louder (https://www.thespec.com/opinion/contributors/in-defence-of-civic-responsibility/article_d5869cfb-1abd-5292-88bf-f16b6524f872.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share)
His {PeePee's} strategy is to lower the cost of living in Canada. We haven’t had a government interested in doing that since 2014.
care to detail, to reference, the Poilievre "strategy" you're referring to - sure you can!
-
The advantage of never telling anyone your policies is that people can then imagine they are perfectly in line with their own.
-
oh my! An extract copy from yesterday's Globe & Mail (Shannon Proudfoot)... I guess the media can only ignore PeePee's antics for so long!
Pierre Poilievre, the class tourist who didn’t read the guidebook (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-pierre-poilievre-the-class-tourist-who-didnt-read-the-guidebook/)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3TQEi2WMAANw3i?format=png)
-
This was the first story on CBC News this morning lol. it was also carried as a top headline at CTV News:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-world-economic-forum-rhetoric-1.6935294
-
This was the first story on CBC News this morning lol. it was also carried as a top headline at CTV News:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-world-economic-forum-rhetoric-1.6935294
He’s speaking your conspiratard language! No wonder you like him.
-
He’s speaking your conspiratard language! No wonder you like him.
I don't particularly like him.
I dislike our public broadcaster running partisan propaganda as their lead story.
-
Ok but CTV is also carrying it.
And it's remarkably strange, as a strategy.
-
I think the next election will come down to, I don't like PP but I can't afford JT.
-
care to detail, to reference, the Poilievre "strategy" you're referring to - sure you can!
surprisingly (not)... Shady hasn't offered up... ANYTHING!
The advantage of never telling anyone your policies is that people can then imagine they are perfectly in line with their own.
of course, tis the Conservative way! Stephen Harper says Pierre Poilievre should save his policy platform for federal election (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-stephen-harper-says-pierre-poilievre-should-save-his-policy-platform/)
of course, Harper even took that to a higher level of not informing the electorate what policies they were actually following, actually campaigning on - like even waiting past the second national debate before succumbing to other party/media pressure to finally release their campaign platform!
-
run Forrest run... bring it home, PeePee - bring it home! (https://video.twimg.com/tweet_video/F3XUGJFa8AAHEVL.mp4)
-
Poilievre's Conservative Party embracing language of mainstream conspiracy theories (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-world-economic-forum-rhetoric-1.6935294) --- Tory leader's summer stump speeches include ramped-up rhetoric about the World Economic Forum
I dislike our public broadcaster running partisan propaganda as their lead story.
a syndicated Canadian Press article (Mickey Djuric, The Canadian Press)... nothing really stays long as the 'lead story' within the CBC Politics section - new stories are always cycling through. In any case:
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been hitting the summer barbecue circuit with ramped-up rhetoric around debunked claims that the World Economic Forum is attempting to impose its agenda on sovereign governments.
.
It's far past time we rejected the globalist Davos elites and bring home the common sense of the common people.
Poilievre peddled the WEF control claims during the Conservative leadership race in 2022, and it has emerged again as a regular talking point following the federal byelection in southern Manitoba.
.
The number and uptake of conspiracy theories began to grow after the 2016 presidential election in the United States, aided by social media and encrypted messaging apps. The biggest trigger was the COVID-19 pandemic.
Populism has driven politicians to feed into conspiracy theories because they need votes, and fear is a great motivator. They get less interest peddling for votes using their record. It's very easy to appeal to people that something is a threat. For example, your identity, your livelihood, your religious values. It is affecting our democracy, pitting groups against each other, creating suspicion and harming national security by spreading misinformation that eventually affects policy.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/hruaWy6.jpg)
-
This was the first story on CBC News this morning lol. it was also carried as a top headline at CTV News:
(https://i.imgur.com/hcohJuf.gif)
-
oh my! PeePee's minions have been out in full force against the Canadian Press (CP) article highlighting his/CPC's attachments to WEF related conspiracy attacks! And now Poilievre himself is scrambling... wildly calling the CP's most accurate coverage of his/CPC's conspiracy laden WEF attacks as, "a hit piece against him"! LOL!
and best of all his tweet (as follows) was tagged with a 'Community Note' correcting statements within his tweet!
(https://i.imgur.com/LpC54EL.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/hruaWy6.jpg)
Sounds like Junior!
-
Tell us more about Ray Epps, loser. Starting to realize you were duped yet?
-
Tell us more about Ray Epps, loser. Starting to realize you were duped yet?
You mean the guy that’s on video telling people to go into the capital building?
-
You mean the guy that’s on video telling people to go into the capital building?
Yes just like hundreds of other Trump supporters. Are they all feds too? Very funny that your brain has been so pickled by online conspiracy theories and partisanship that you can't fathom the fact that a Trump supporter and militia member may have been doing exactly what his cult leader was asking.
-
You mean the guy that’s on video telling people to go into the capital building?
Yes, why wasn't he charged like the retard on mapleleafweb ranting during the riot to "burn it down!"? Or was that retard not charged either? Why is that?
-
Yes, why wasn't he charged like the retard on mapleleafweb ranting during the riot to "burn it down!"? Or was that retard not charged either? Why is that?
It’s a good question. Why wasn’t he charged? He was in video the night before telling people to storm the capital. He was on video January 6th saying the same thing. Seems much more significant than somebody trespassing huh? Odd that it’s the only January 6th protester that you and your ilk and the mainstream media have come to the defence of. Why is that? Wasn’t he trying to overturn an election and subvert democracy too?
-
It’s a good question. Why wasn’t he charged? He was in video the night before telling people to storm the capital. He was on video January 6th saying the same thing. Seems much more significant than somebody trespassing huh?
No, I'd say some loser cracker talking s**t about storming the Capitol to a bunch of other loser crackers is less significant than someone actually storming the Capitol.
Odd that it’s the only January 6th protester that you and your ilk and the mainstream media have come to the defence of. Why is that? Wasn’t he trying to overturn an election and subvert democracy too?
Why do you want this guy charged for exercising his free speech rights?
-
No, I'd say some loser cracker talking s**t about storming the Capitol to a bunch of other loser crackers is less significant than someone actually storming the Capitol.
Why do you want this guy charged for exercising his free speech rights?
Is there free speech for inciting violence? Why don’t you recognize other people’s free speech? Like when Trump told people to make their voices heard? Why is this Epps guy the only January 6th protestor that you and your ilk defend and d**k ride? Seems odd. So him breaching the second barrier is free speech?
https://youtu.be/erafzh-YahE
-
It’s a good question. Why wasn’t he charged? He was in video the night before telling people to storm the capital. He was on video January 6th saying the same thing. Seems much more significant than somebody trespassing huh? Odd that it’s the only January 6th protester that you and your ilk and the mainstream media have come to the defence of. Why is that? Wasn’t he trying to overturn an election and subvert democracy too?
I didn't come to his defence. I just noted that lots of you crazy retards didn't get charged for obviously illegal acts. Even you felt you had gone too far at the time, declaring you were retiring from internet forums in fear. What makes you feel superior to your fellow retard Epps? What makes you different?
I ask because I know you're too stupid to answer.
-
I didn't come to his defence. I just noted that lots of you crazy retards didn't get charged for obviously illegal acts. Even you felt you had gone too far at the time, declaring you were retiring from internet forums in fear. What makes you feel superior to your fellow retard Epps? What makes you different?
I ask because I know you're too stupid to answer.
I didn’t do anything illegal, and feared nothing. You still can’t grasp the satire even years later? I still don’t understand why this one guy of all the January 6th protesters gets your defence. He’s literally on video telling people to go into the capital. Those are his EXACT words.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/hcohJuf.gif)
Andrew Scheer asking "collusion?" is a conspiracy theory.
The fact that our Liberal government parrots policies created and pushed by the World Economic Forum, which is made up of the most powerful financial and political elites in the western world, is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact. Chrystia Freeland is even a member of WEF's board of trustees:
https://www.weforum.org/about/leadership-and-governance
https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland
The article was a hit piece and many left-leaning mainstream Canadian online media outlets picked it up and ran it, including our "fair and balanced" state broadcaster, which ran it as their lead story. These are all facts. Kinda looks like our state broadcaster is actively campaigning against a recently-surging-in-the-polls CPC whose leader has threatened to defund the state broadcaster due to its political bias, doesn't it? Hmm...is that a conspiracy theory? LOL
I read the article, and therefore already knew it was written by the Canadian Press, a for-profit organization that apparently creates poorly-written op-eds now. According to the article, if you criticize the WEF and want Canadian policy to come from Canada rather than an uber-elite international financial organization led by some super-wealthy weirdo socialist then you're "a conspiracy theorist".
-
I didn’t do anything illegal, and feared nothing. You still can’t grasp the satire even years later? I still don’t understand why this one guy of all the January 6th protesters gets your defence. He’s literally on video telling people to go into the capital. Those are his EXACT words.
You literally wrote "Burn it down!" while the riot was happening. That isn't satire, that's incitement.
Maybe Ray Epps was just kidding too? Or, more likely, he just wasn't charged like lots of you retards weren't charged, even though you obviously broke the law. Might happen yet though. I'm pretty sure I still have the screenshots. lol
-
Andrew Scheer asking "collusion?" is a conspiracy theory.
The fact that our Liberal government parrots policies created and pushed by the World Economic Forum, which is made up of the most powerful financial and political elites in the western world, is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact. Chrystia Freeland is even a member of WEF's board of trustees:
I read the article, and therefore already knew it was written by the Canadian Press, a for-profit organization that apparently creates poorly-written op-eds now. According to the article, if you criticize the WEF and want Canadian policy to come from Canada rather than an uber-elite international financial organization led by some super-wealthy weirdo socialist then you're "a conspiracy theorist".
Have you seen Sound of Freedom yet? It's right up your alley.
-
You literally wrote "Burn it down!" while the riot was happening.
And? If I write burn it down again, right now, with no context again, does that mean it’s associated with the Maui fires? What if it was? What law has been broken? Answer, zero. Your closet fascism is showing again. Stick to d**k riding the only January 6th protestor you care about. Seems weird though. A guy walking around dressed as a shaman gets your ire, but a guy that’s literally on video telling people to commit illegal acts gets defended by you and your butt buddy.
-
I would never defend you people. You're all idiots and I'm glad you're getting indicted.
The context was clear in your post that you were gullibly enraged by Trump's lies and wanted violence. Both you and Epps should be charged because you're both pieces of sh!t.
-
I would never defend you people. You're all idiots and I'm glad you're getting indicted.
The context was clear in your post that you were gullibly enraged by Trump's lies and wanted violence. Both you and Epps should be charged because you're both pieces of sh!t.
The only piece of sh*t is you, for fostering in a new type of fascism. Whether it’s using the justice system to attack your political enemies, or eroding important principles like medical privacy and body autonomy. And even mocking the importance of freedom as freedumb. You’re a useful tool for the powerful and elite. You make people like Xi and Putin smile from ear to ear. Do better.
-
The only piece of sh*t is you, for fostering in a new type of fascism. Whether it’s using the justice system to attack your political enemies, or eroding important principles like medical privacy and body autonomy. And even mocking the importance of freedom as freedumb. You’re a useful tool for the powerful and elite. You make people like Xi and Putin smile from ear to ear. Do better.
Holding people accountable for their crimes is what we do in western society. Why do you think Trump deserves a pass because of his political standing? Why do you think you deserve a pass but fellow retard Epps doesn't?
-
Is there free speech for inciting violence? Why don’t you recognize other people’s free speech? Like when Trump told people to make their voices heard? Why is this Epps guy the only January 6th protestor that you and your ilk defend and d**k ride? Seems odd. So him breaching the second barrier is free speech?
https://youtu.be/erafzh-YahE
Maybe you’d have a stronger case if anyone actually listened to this dipshit but your own video clearly shows even his fellow MAGAtards weren’t buying it. But also if you think I’d give a good goddamn if they did charge this guy you’re even dumber than you come off. Finally, if you’re so concerned about hypocrisy I wonder why you’re so mad about this guy not catching charges for duelling stuff but got so upset when they ventilated that dumbfuck who was climbing through a broken window. Actually I know the answer: because the media you consume told you Epps Bad, Babbitt innocent and you swallow that the way your mom should have swallowed the load that turned into your stupid ass.
-
Andrew Scheer asking "collusion?" is a conspiracy theory.
PeePee calls the CP article a "hit piece"... says, "Trudeau's media are desperate" {for using the CP wire service article}. So you decide, is PeePee (hence weakAndy) implying said media colluded... or conspired? You decide, hey! LOL!
The fact that our Liberal government parrots policies created and pushed by the World Economic Forum, which is made up of the most powerful financial and political elites in the western world, is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact.
name 3, "parroted policies - those that were created and pushed by the WEF" - sure you can!
The article was a hit piece and many left-leaning mainstream Canadian online media outlets picked it up and ran it...
how much is a many? Can you name em?
-
PeePee calls the CP article a "hit piece"... says, "Trudeau's media are desperate" {for using the CP wire service article}. So you decide, is PeePee (hence weakAndy) implying said media colluded... or conspired? You decide, hey! LOL!
Scheer questioned whether they were colluding. It was a Canadian Press piece, there's no evidence they colluded. I've never seen PP make the claim it was "collusion". But you don't need collusion to have independent agendas that are biased against a specific party and spread propaganda to that effect.
name 3, "parroted policies - those that were created and pushed by the WEF" - sure you can!
"The Great Reset", and "Build Back Better".
The CPC is campaigning that federal policy should be designed by Canadian politicians for regular working Canadians, not by the mega-wealthy from an international organization of global financial and political uber-elites. Agree or disagree?
how much is a many? Can you name em?
CBC, Toronto Star, City TV, CTV. You just posted this.
-
Scheer questioned whether they were colluding. It was a Canadian Press piece, there's no evidence they colluded. I've never seen PP make the claim it was "collusion". But you don't need collusion to have independent agendas that are biased against a specific party and spread propaganda to that effect.
LOL (https://twitter.com/_llebrun/status/1691276015123722240)
"The Great Reset", and "Build Back Better".
A shiny nickel for you if you can explain what those are, why they are bad, the connection to WEF and, most importantly, what specific policies the government has adopted that are directly related.
The CPC is campaigning that federal policy should be designed by Canadian politicians for regular working Canadians, not by the mega-wealthy from an international organization of global financial and political uber-elites. Agree or disagree?
You'd have to have been born five minutes ago to think the CPC gives a tinker's damn about "regular working Canadians."
-
LOL (https://twitter.com/_llebrun/status/1691276015123722240)
A shiny nickel for you if you can explain what those are, why they are bad, the connection to WEF and, most importantly, what specific policies the government has adopted that are directly related.
You'd have to have been born five minutes ago to think the CPC gives a tinker's damn about "regular working Canadians."
Multiple carbon taxes, record immigration, vaccine mandates, etc. Unfortunately, the CPC are the only option for working Canadians. The left has been take over by rich elites, that push policies that make everything worse and more expensive for every day Canadians.
-
Multiple carbon taxes, record immigration, vaccine mandates, etc. Unfortunately, the CPC are the only option for working Canadians. The left has been take over by rich elites, that push policies that make everything worse and more expensive for every day Canadians.
You're impossibly stupid and gullible if you believe this, or that the CPC isn't also working in the interest of rich elites. Just look at all the provinces where Cons are in charge, you see the same thing: a singleminded commitment to siphoning public wealth into private hands. It's literally the only thing conservatives believe in.
-
You're impossibly stupid and gullible if you believe this, or that the CPC isn't also working in the interest of rich elites. Just look at all the provinces where Cons are in charge, you see the same thing: a singleminded commitment to siphoning public wealth into private hands. It's literally the only thing conservatives believe in.
I’m looking at actual policies that affect people’s lives directly. One that cause everything to be more expensive than it should be. That’s all progressive governments do now. They stopped supporting every day Canadians.
-
I’m looking at actual policies that affect people’s lives directly. One that cause everything to be more expensive than it should be. That’s all progressive governments do now. They stopped supporting every day Canadians.
It's funny because I can list a number of ways the Conservative provincial government here has made life more expensive such as removing caps on auto insurance and electricity rates, privatizing lab testing, jacking up post-secondary tuition and school fees while overseeing a mass exodus of doctors and teachers (to name a few).
Oh, and those vaccine mandates you love to whine about? Conservative governments had those too.
-
whaaa! MAGA Republican 'Mike Roman' who was indicted in Georgia along with Trump and 17 others... the same 'Mike Roman' who worked as an Assistant Chairman of the IDU under Stephen Harper, the same 'Mike Roman' who worked on weakAndy's 2019 election campaign... the same 'Mike Roman' who participated in the Ottawa "Freedumb Convoy". Has PeePee advised he didn't/doesn't even know the guy?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3lSo0IacAAGm4H?format=jpg)
-
Del
-
LOL (https://twitter.com/_llebrun/status/1691276015123722240)
A shiny nickel for you if you can explain what those are, why they are bad, the connection to WEF and, most importantly, what specific policies the government has adopted that are directly related.
Well on the one hand I have a life so I can't keep writing high school exams for you guys. But on the other hand Build Back Better has led to me really needing that nickel.
-
The fact that our Liberal government parrots policies created and pushed by the World Economic Forum, which is made up of the most powerful financial and political elites in the western world, is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact.
name 3, "parroted policies - those that were created and pushed by the WEF" - sure you can!
"The Great Reset", and "Build Back Better".
The CPC is campaigning that federal policy should be designed by Canadian politicians for regular working Canadians, not by the mega-wealthy from an international organization of global financial and political uber-elites.
A shiny nickel for you if you can explain what those are, why they are bad, the connection to WEF and, most importantly, what specific policies the government has adopted that are directly related.
hey now conspiratard Nipples! Don't forget the resultant 'New World Order'!
-
Well on the one hand I have a life so I can't keep writing high school exams for you guys. But on the other hand Build Back Better has led to me really needing that nickel.
(https://media.tenor.com/txjtFoV4pgsAAAAd/dave-peace.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/hcohJuf.gif)
geezaz weakAndy! When you lose John Ivison... "deliberately trying to stoke conspiracy and disinformation"! Oh my!
(https://i.imgur.com/jh6eZIb.gif)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F31K26iXwAAe88D?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F33GIjOXsAAYrDj?format=jpg)
-
further coverage of Poilievre/CPC stoking conspiracy and disinformation - G&M (Shannon Proudfoot):
Pierre Poilievre and colleagues sniff out a scandal that doesn’t exist – and they know it
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F35vC9RWcAAAhhg?format=jpg)
-
coming through... we be bringing it!
(https://i.imgur.com/PYTHVHo.jpg)
-
lipstick-on-a-pig... it's still a pig!
(https://i.imgur.com/GgUDMOr.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3-9k_WXQAAv1-w?format=jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3-W5NsXkAAtH59?format=jpg)
-
recent days presser: Poilievre flat out lies - claims PM Trudeau/Liberals benefited from Chinese election interference... and no one from the meek/mild media asked for specifics/details of said claim! Again, this from PeePee who still hasn't obtained the needed security clearance to review related classified documents - what's PeePee afraid of?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4G9zkRacAASLAE?format=jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/pc8JFHE.jpg)
-
He still seems poised to win.
My impression is that Trudeau can't hope to turn it around...
I don't disagree with Waldo's impressions but the people are moving along...
-
My impression is that Trudeau can't hope to turn it around...
I don't disagree with Waldo's impressions but the people are moving along...
should you choose to give any degree of legitimacy to these latest polls... well outside any possibility of an election call:
- in an unprecedented move outside of a formal election campaign, PeePee has been in non-stop campaign mode for the better part of the last year... travelling all across Canada unchallenged by any party and with, most notably, a complicit media that refuses to fact-check his purposeful lying/misinformation.
- the Liberal machine hasn't even been dusted off... the war-room has been shuttered for some time! ... cause like is anyone predicting an election call this fall... or before June 2025. Who is claiming NDP Singh will bust the "coalition" agreement! Oh my, the waldo said the coalition word!
- geezaz waldo, most of those polls are national polls... not regional.
- again, these polls directly counter the actual results of recent by-elections; in 5 of the 6 by-elections, Liberal candidates significantly increased the party percentages as compared to 2021.
- in some pointed cases, key poll questions have being scrutinized... 'push polling'!
- more pointedly, these polls counter the internal polling of the respective parties; otherwise why the need for the PeePee2.0 makeover if those poor CPC by-election results didn't scare the CPC "brain trust" into scramble mode... like why the makeover if the internal CPC party polls were agreeing with the results of these recent polls?
- most pointedly, why is the CPC spending 3 million in an ad-buy over the next months... if it's "in the bag"?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/xlTA8Ph.jpg)
-
should you choose to give any degree of legitimacy to these latest polls... well outside any possibility of an election call:
- in an unprecedented move outside of a formal election campaign, PeePee has been in non-stop campaign mode for the better part of the last year... travelling all across Canada unchallenged by any party and with, most notably, a complicit media that refuses to fact-check his purposeful lying/misinformation.
- the Liberal machine hasn't even been dusted off... the war-room has been shuttered for some time! ... cause like is anyone predicting an election call this fall... or before June 2025. Who is claiming NDP Singh will bust the "coalition" agreement! Oh my, the waldo said the coalition word!
- geezaz waldo, most of those polls are national polls... not regional.
- again, these polls directly counter the actual results of recent by-elections; in 5 of the 6 by-elections, Liberal candidates significantly increased the party percentages as compared to 2021.
- in some pointed cases, key poll questions have being scrutinized... 'push polling'!
- more pointedly, these polls counter the internal polling of the respective parties; otherwise why the need for the PeePee2.0 makeover if those poor CPC by-election results didn't scare the CPC "brain trust" into scramble mode... like why the makeover if the internal CPC party polls were agreeing with the results of these recent polls?
- most pointedly, why is the CPC spending 3 million in an ad-buy over the next months... if it's "in the bag"?
You're posting non-stop anti-PP memes and posts. This means you are very nervous about PP. If he wasn't a threat you would ignore him like you ignore Maxime Bernier and Liz May. You are, in fact, completely obsessed with PP to the point of clear panic and I enjoy watching you and your corrupt party squirm.
-
You're posting non-stop anti-PP memes and posts. This means you are very nervous about PP. If he wasn't a threat you would ignore him like you ignore Maxime Bernier and Liz May. You are, in fact, completely obsessed with PP to the point of clear panic and I enjoy watching you and your corrupt party squirm.
complete nonsense(™)
-
You're posting non-stop anti-PP memes and posts. This means you are very nervous about PP. If he wasn't a threat you would ignore him like you ignore Maxime Bernier and Liz May. You are, in fact, completely obsessed with PP to the point of clear panic and I enjoy watching you and your corrupt party squirm.
And what’s funny is that because conservatives have had no legislative power since 2014, he can’t blame any of Canada’s litany of problems on Pierre. They’re all on Junior and waldo knows that. Canadians know that too, that’s why a majority of Canadians want Junior to resign. Because he has the reverse Midas touch. Everything Junior touches turns to sh*t. He inherited a Canada in very good shape, and completely turned that around. Waldo’s beside himself because he knows Juniors finished, and his legacy is utter garbage.
-
And what’s funny is that because conservatives have had no legislative power since 2014, he can’t blame any of Canada’s litany of problems on Pierre. They’re all on Junior and waldo knows that. Canadians know that too, that’s why a majority of Canadians want Junior to resign. Because he has the reverse Midas touch. Everything Junior touches turns to sh*t. He inherited a Canada in very good shape, and completely turned that around. Waldo’s beside himself because he knows Juniors finished, and his legacy is utter garbage.
complete nonsense(™)... one could ask you what problems but why bother since you ignore everything that rebuts your parroting of PeePee talking points and his/CPC's purposeful misinformation. You got no game, lil' buddy!
-
one could ask you what problems
LOL, you're accusing me of parroting talking points???? YOU ARE? Bwahhhaaahaaa! That's all you do buddy! Regardless, you're also asking what problems??? Are you serious? Do you not watch the news? Do you not listen to voters? Omg, you're so out of touch its ridiculous. Wow.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eXrsl06.gif) (https://i.imgur.com/wrSZdzx.gif)
receiving Royal Assent, Bill C-18 - the Online News Act that requires big tech giants (like Google & Meta) to compensate media outlets... to pay media outlets for news content that's shared and repurposed on their platforms.
timing is everything: continuing its year-over-year "crash dive", the failing Postmedia chain is in a 'life-saving' attempt seeking a merger with Nordstar (the owner of Metroland Media Group and the Toronto Star).
shockingly, PeePee has a different take - seeing censorship while wanting to, "Bring Home free speech"... #BringItHomePoilievre
-
c'mon Shady - you're not addressing the Bill C-18 policy itself - why is the policy, as you say, stooopid? Why so gun-shy in parroting PeePee's claim that it's censorship?
stoogeShady! Again, address the policy itself... sure you can! Before you were schooled on the fact Bill C-18 isn't even in effect yet, you ignorantly asked why PM Trudeau just doesn't rescind it... temporarily... in regards the wildfire impacts? Yet you somehow don't make the same ask of Meta - who is presently blocking Canadian news from it's Canadian platforms!
waldo factoid: just who is driving this Meta policy? Why that would be Rachel Curran - Meta's head of public policy in Canada... the same Rachel Curran who was Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper's policy director!
-
{In the 2021 federal election} Conservatives ran on similar media policy as Liberals, but now claim it's censorship (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/conservatives-ran-on-similar-media-policy-as-liberals-but-now-claim-it-s-censorship-1.6504343?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3A%7B%7Bcampaignname%7D%7D%3Atwitterpost%E2%80%8B&taid=64cac88dea98280001084cd1&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter)
However, the Conservatives' 2021 campaign platform under then-leader Erin O'Toole proposed a similar policy, calling on tech giants to fairly compensate media for the content they create through an arbitration process.
.
When Australia introduced a similar law in 2021, Meta temporarily blocked news from Facebook. In that country Meta eventually entered into agreements with news publishers, and the minister never went through a designation process that would cause the law to specifically apply to Meta.
The Canadian government will not decide which companies are captured under the law. Instead, firms will be identified through a regulatory process of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, an arm's-length administrative branch.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4kRMIHXIAEUd7g?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
oh my! A most damning video of Poilievre making the rounds now... no amount of 'making over' PeePee can change his vile racist underpinnings (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1690842885305040896/vid/1278x718/RU_ThvpDtXkjFZGe.mp4?tag=14):
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4mtS1MXYAA98bn?format=jpg)
-
oh my! A most damning video of Poilievre making the rounds now... no amount of 'making over' PeePee can change his vile racist underpinnings (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1690842885305040896/vid/1278x718/RU_ThvpDtXkjFZGe.mp4?tag=14):
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4mtS1MXYAA98bn?format=jpg)
Lol! Says a supporter of Justin Blackface! 😂😂😂
-
short 30 second video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1697079409964953600/pu/vid/720x1280/QhZU69JZ180A6Sev.mp4?tag=12): recent days PeePee2.0 "campaigning"... calling both former PM Pierre Trudeau and current PM Justin Trudeau... Marxists!
-
short 30 second video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1697079409964953600/pu/vid/720x1280/QhZU69JZ180A6Sev.mp4?tag=12): recent days PeePee2.0 "campaigning"... calling both former PM Pierre Trudeau and current PM Justin Trudeau... Marxists!
So what? Junior calls all of his opponents nazis.
-
So what? Junior calls all of his opponents nazis.
did nahtzee that coming! C'mon Shady - all opponents? Opponents... like who... was called a nazi by PM Trudeau?
-
Pierre building on his lead, now up to +10 points! 39% - 29%, 338Canada now projecting a majority Conservative government.
https://338canada.com/federal.htm
-
did nahtzee that coming! C'mon Shady - all opponents? Opponents... like who... was called a nazi by PM Trudeau?
-
did nahtzee that coming! C'mon Shady - all opponents? Opponents... like who... was called a nazi by PM Trudeau?
Those who were against vaccine mandates. You forgot already? Nazis and racists! You know, the usual meaningless claptrap.
-
Those who were against vaccine mandates. You forgot already? Nazis and racists! You know, the usual meaningless claptrap.
If you want to get technical, he used the term "'people who wave swastikas" which is exactly what some antivaxx whackos did.
-
Choose your fighter:
Pierre building on his lead, now up to +10 points! 39% - 29%, 338Canada now projecting a majority Conservative government.
https://338canada.com/federal.htm
Besides, polls right now are completely meaningless.
-
Choose your fighter:
Choose your country! LOL!
-
Choose your country! LOL!
"Polls matter when they are positive for my side and don't when they don't."-Shady
-
"Polls matter when they are positive for my side and don't when they don't."-Shady
No, I'm saying historically in the United States, they don't. In Canada, it's somewhat different.
-
No, I'm saying historically in the United States, they don't. In Canada, it's somewhat different.
Nah.
-
short 30 second video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1697079409964953600/pu/vid/720x1280/QhZU69JZ180A6Sev.mp4?tag=12): recent days PeePee2.0 "campaigning"... calling both former PM Pierre Trudeau and current PM Justin Trudeau... Marxists!
(https://i.imgur.com/xnF65xZ.jpg)
-
another facet of the PeePee2.0 makeover has the "brain trust" wanting to project a more "buffed" body image! LOL!
geezaz waldo, they tried that with the 'athletic running' O'Toole; the most comical photoshop of his oversized bulging calf muscles led the way! Now we get Poilievre wearing some kinda 'girdle' under his undersized tee! Too bad, so sad!
(https://i.imgur.com/JXDZKWG.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4_eQB9XIAAg_67?format=jpg)
-
PeePee's 'convoluted conspiracy!
(https://i.imgur.com/iRmwJWe.gif)
-
PeePee's 'convoluted conspiracy!
(https://i.imgur.com/iRmwJWe.gif)
Deflect, deflect, deflect. Juniors on his last leg and you’re finally recognizing it. If he runs against PP, he loses. He’s done. It’s over buddy. The sooner you accept it, the sooner you’ll be able to begin the grieving process.
-
I hope you live long enough that I may enjoy your bitter disappointment in 2025.
-
geezaz waldo... from the G&M's Editorial Board, no less - PeePee's CPC has no viable climate plan!
(https://i.imgur.com/791UQTH.gif)
-
That's a G&M anti-Liberal conspiracy!
-
geezaz waldo... from the G&M's Editorial Board, no less - PeePee's CPC has no viable climate plan!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5SI8CJaYAMqike?format=jpg&name=small)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5SI8CJaYAMqike?format=jpg&name=small)
Canada has absolutely no effect on the climate.
-
Cite?
-
Canada has absolutely no effect on the climate.
Actually 1.5% worth.
-
see dedicated 'Climate Change' thread..... over here (https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/the-world/climate-change/msg111003/#msg111003):
-
(https://i.imgur.com/5lEBf5o.gif)
geezaz waldo! Just when did PM Trudeau, as PoiLIEvre says, "tell Canadians to take on massive mortgages because debt was consequence free"? Anyone, anyone, anyone... Shady, Shady, Shady?
-
so... in his speech PeePee gives a huge shout-out/thank you to former PM Harper!
waldo reminders on Poilievre's record - current and during his happyHarperDays:
(https://i.imgur.com/1wHl2ga.jpg)
-
geezaz waldo! Conmedia is really playing up Anaida Poilievre's bit player role at the recent Quebec 'CPC policy convention'.
ok, ok... not sure who started referring to her as 'AnaConda' - but that's got to stop! And those so sure that IDU Harper was instrumental in forging their 'arranged marriage'... from, apparently, nothing more than a photo she posted of herself attending an IDU reception in Venezuela - that shyte's just got to stop! The waldo still isn't sure what referring to her as his 'beard' actually means... but I'm sure it has questionable intent; so, again, just stop it! Families should be off limits even if, it seems, PeePee's handlers won't let him out in public unless she prominently accompanies him.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5rKbWBXsAACuyx?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5rKbWBXsAACuyx?format=jpg)
Pretty much all pathetic Liberal lies. The only thing that's remotely true is defunding the CBC, which it should be.
-
oh my! It's tough having a cook, maids and a nanny to set the stage for, 'bringing home PeePee'!
geezaz waldo! She calls him her, 'partner in crime' - wtf!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5wDuWsWgAAQuCt?format=jpg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/OW7fyGi.gif)
quite the kerfuffle over PeePee using a WestJet aircraft PA system to spew his 'common sense' nonsense - video of (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1701672897587339265/pu/vid/avc1/540x960/36sYnA7WxWhmQUna.mp4?tag=12):
-
(https://i.imgur.com/OW7fyGi.gif)
quite the kerfuffle over PeePee using a WestJet aircraft PA system to spew his 'common sense' nonsense - video of (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1701672897587339265/pu/vid/avc1/540x960/36sYnA7WxWhmQUna.mp4?tag=12):
Not really a surprise, as companies tend to want to stay out of politics.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F50teOlXMAAPSli?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F50teOlXMAAPSli?format=jpg)
You’re damn right people are angry. Angry at a broken and unaffordable Canada, all thanks to Junior. You’re gonna see just how angry whenever the next election is called. Juniors gonna be thrown out on his a$$.
-
Angry at a broken and unaffordable Canada...
(https://i.imgur.com/zj97XAT.gif)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/zj97XAT.gif)
Subjective lists don’t discount how unhappy Canadians are with the current situation. You and your ilk keep telling Canadians how great they have it, but they don’t share your rose coloured opinions. Weird.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/OW7fyGi.gif)
quite the kerfuffle over PeePee using a WestJet aircraft PA system to spew his 'common sense' nonsense - video of (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1701672897587339265/pu/vid/avc1/540x960/36sYnA7WxWhmQUna.mp4?tag=12):
and Shady pulls out the ole' chestnut...'drama teacher'. Hey now Shady, can you help fill in the gaps between when Poilievre had a paper-route and when he worked on Stockwell Days campaign - sure you can!
(https://i.imgur.com/HZJfxS7.gif)
-
Subjective lists don’t discount how unhappy Canadians are with the current situation.
Shady speaking for ALL Canadians!
#subjectiveShadyOpinion
-
Shady speaking for ALL Canadians!
#subjectiveShadyOpinion
Just look at the polls. Not good.
-
PoiLIEvre - Liar of the Opposition!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6AdsvnWwAAO1CT?format=png)
-
Peepee thinks his followers are stupid enough to believe freedom of speech means freedom to talk on airplane address systems?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/OW7fyGi.gif)
quite the kerfuffle over PeePee using a WestJet aircraft PA system to spew his 'common sense' nonsense - video of (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1701672897587339265/pu/vid/avc1/540x960/36sYnA7WxWhmQUna.mp4?tag=12):
Peepee thinks his followers are stupid enough to believe freedom of speech means freedom to talk on airplane address systems?
geezaz waldo! It's only coincidental that backroomDealingHarper met with WestJet's CEO on Sept 2 - just happenstance!
(https://cdn.mastdn.ca/media_attachments/files/111/053/290/050/977/736/original/bbed01ef4aae8fca.png)
so, first a company spokesperson throws the plane's cabin-crew under the bus... and ConMedia et al runs with that! Eventually the cabin-crew claims it had no involvement in allowing PeePee to use the plane PA system - and, of course, the related union is now demanding an apology from Poilievre.
and now PeePee is doubling down... in taking a question from media he claims, the flight-crew, multiple times, gave their ok/invitation for him to use the PA... and that the union should apologize for, "trying to silence freedom of speech" - video of (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1702363719232012288/vid/avc1/888x498/JfrIy0e_lVFydOjL.mp4?tag=14): what a complete azzhole!
-
This WestJet thing is the dumbest fake controversy, my god who cares?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/zj97XAT.gif)
Womp-womp: https://www.numbeo.com/quality-of-life/rankings_by_country.jsp
-
Womp-womp:
canya explain, hey Nipples? To the waldo is seems you're drawing equivalence to the methodology from WPP/Kantar/USN and your one-man show from some guy in Serbia relying upon crowd-sourced data that can be manipulated by... anyone!
-
...so, first a company spokesperson throws the plane's cabin-crew under the bus... and ConMedia et al runs with that! Eventually the cabin-crew claims it had no involvement in allowing PeePee to use the plane PA system - and, of course, the related union is now demanding an apology from Poilievre.
and now PeePee is doubling down... in taking a question from media he claims, the flight-crew, multiple times, gave their ok/invitation for him to use the PA... and that the union should apologize for, "trying to silence freedom of speech" - video of (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1702363719232012288/vid/avc1/888x498/JfrIy0e_lVFydOjL.mp4?tag=14): what a complete azzhole!
of course, video from Brittlestar - Freedom of Speech Airlines (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1703087125279789056/vid/avc1/1280x720/ekYakq0bti0BYJp0.mp4?tag=14)
-
oh my! - "PeePee is pestilence made flesh"
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6NiQY_XoAAiJgO?format=jpg&name=small)
-
PeePee taking media questions in regards the allegation of India's role in the killing of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nijjar:
He {PM Trudeau} provided a statement and I'll just emphasize that he didn't tell me any more in private than he told Canadians in public.
hey now PeePee, is your continued evasion and/or denial of requests for comprehensive background security checks a factor? Does you not obtaining a security clearance factor - well does it?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwAxUTRXgAAVXMw?format=jpg)
-
Sept 20, 2023 - the group Centre Ice
Conservatives Canadians announced its plans to form a new party called Canadian Future.
You've got a current Conservative CPC party that seems to be channelling, increasingly, basically American politics.
MadMax Bernier, leader of the People's Party of Canada, was unavailable for comment.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6bO6sfXEAA_7_s?format=jpg)
-
Sept 20, 2023 - the group Centre Ice Conservatives Canadians announced its plans to form a new party called Canadian Future.
MadMax Bernier, leader of the People's Party of Canada, was unavailable for comment.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6bO6sfXEAA_7_s?format=jpg)
Sounds like a pathetic attempt by the Liberals to try to salvage the election.
-
Sounds like a pathetic attempt by the Liberals to try to salvage the election.
geezaz Shady! I trust you did your stretches before reaching hard for that stoopid comment!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6kzOy6WkAAYpiH?format=jpg)
-
PeePee... the ultimate Gatekeeper - the muzzlerInChief!
Conservative MPs told not to talk to media, post about 'parental rights' protests (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/conservative-mps-told-not-to-talk-to-media-post-about-parental-rights-protests-1.6570570?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3A%7B%7Bcampaignname%7D%7D%3Atwitterpost%E2%80%8B&taid=650b82d3d651b4000102dd70&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter)
-
PeePee... the ultimate Gatekeeper - the muzzlerInChief!
Conservative MPs told not to talk to media, post about 'parental rights' protests (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/conservative-mps-told-not-to-talk-to-media-post-about-parental-rights-protests-1.6570570?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3A%7B%7Bcampaignname%7D%7D%3Atwitterpost%E2%80%8B&taid=650b82d3d651b4000102dd70&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter)
(https://i.imgur.com/fPpTkkP.jpg)
-
I don't understand how calling out hate is butting in on parents raising their kids.
And dog whistles are supposed to be more subtle than that. Only dogs are supposed to hear them.
-
I don't understand how calling out hate is butting in on parents raising their kids.
And dog whistles are supposed to be more subtle than that. Only dogs are supposed to hear them.
Because what you consider hate isn’t hate. That’s just a tool to silence people into going along with the latest fad. I’m sorry it bothers you, but trans women aren’t women. They’re men who think they’re women and who’d like to be like women. If that’s how they want to lives their lives, more power to them. Just don’t insist everyone else validate it.
-
Because what you consider hate isn’t hate. That’s just a tool to silence people into going along with the latest fad.
Yeah all the lunatics foaming at the mouth about made up nonsense like litter boxes in classrooms or sterilizing children are definitely the type to live and let live.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6qkzq5bwAA9L6J?format=jpg)
-
an unfortunate mistake - one made entirely and completely by the Speaker of the HoC... a mistake that had no involvement by the government, no involvement by PM Trudeau, no involvement by the PMO. Did PeePee politicize this? Why, of course, PoiLIEvre did...equally, of course, even though the Speaker has fully qualified his mistake, PeePee has not deleted his most misinforming tweet - cause PeePee is a 'cockwomble'!
(https://i.imgur.com/7jGwqak.jpg)
-
a summary showcasing the politicization, misinformation and outright lies from PoiLIEvre!
(https://i.imgur.com/pulYMLI.jpg)
-
the way to tell nobody knew this guy was a Nazi is that no CPC MPs were photographed with him.
-
Does anybody here sincerely believe that Anthony Rota hatched this idea all on his own without discussing it with anybody in the LPC?
-k
-
oh my! - "PeePee is pestilence made flesh"
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6NiQY_XoAAiJgO?format=jpg&name=small)
I follow Kinsella on Twitter, he's a must-read for anybody interested in Canadian politics. Ever read what he writes about yer boy and the Sunshine Gang? Just wondering.
-k
-
Ever notice that you can change a waldo post to a passage from Orwell just by changing the names "Harper" or "Poilievre" to "Goldstein" or "Snowball"?
-k
-
Does anybody here sincerely believe that Anthony Rota hatched this idea all on his own without discussing it with anybody in the LPC?
such kimmy insight - profound! More please... like the alternate conspiracy being floated that says {former} Speaker Rota was setup by CPC Putin apologists.
-
Ever notice that you can change a waldo post to a passage from Orwell just by changing the names "Harper" or "Poilievre" to "Goldstein" or "Snowball"?
ever notice that kimmy's hate-on for PM Trudeau is persistent and unrelenting? But let the waldo keep asking: will you continue to refuse to state what federal political party you support - and why?
-
I follow Kinsella on Twitter, he's a must-read for anybody interested in Canadian politics. Ever read what he writes about yer boy and the Sunshine Gang? Just wondering.
a "must-read"? Really? Geezaz kimmy, you need to expand your political horizons! How shocking that the kimster finds a kindred spirit - haters-r-us, hey! Since you're so enamoured with, 'the guy', I'll leave it to you to qualify just why, 'the guy' has fallen out-of-party-favour... the waldo trusts you won't just start with the most recent inner-circle, cause you know, the self-styled "Prince" casts a loooong shadow - amirite?
-
such kimmy insight - profound! More please... like the alternate conspiracy being floated that says {former} Speaker Rota was setup by CPC Putin apologists.
So you're going to tell me that Rota did indeed undertake this of his own accord without discussing it with the rest of his party? That's fascinating. I'm a Nigerian prince, and I've got a fantastic proposition for you. PM me with your banking details.
Say, didn't Katie Telford tell us that Justin is briefed on "everything"?
ever notice that kimmy's hate-on for PM Trudeau is persistent and unrelenting? But let the waldo keep asking: will you continue to refuse to state what federal political party you support - and why?
Ever notice that if you read "Animal Farm" and replace the word "Squealer" with "the waldo", it reads more or less like this thread?
Who do I support? I have voted NDP the past 3 Federal elections, believe it or not. Jagmeet doesn't get my vote this time, though. Right now I support whichever party gets rid of your boy. He has got to go. Simple as that. End of story.
But it doesn't really matter who I vote for, because I get a Conservative MP, regardless. My riding will be won handily by Conservative MP Dan Albas; the other candidates might as well save themselves the nomination fee. If only some party had run on the promise of electoral reform and ending "First Past The Post". If only. I can vote CPC and ad to the pile on, or I can vote Rhinoceros (if they have a candidate in my riding?) or I can spoil my ballot. I can't vote Liberal until they fix their problem, and I can't vote NDP as long as they continue to prop up the problem and his dilapidated regime.
a "must-read"? Really? Geezaz kimmy, you need to expand your political horizons! How shocking that the kimster finds a kindred spirit - haters-r-us, hey! Since you're so enamoured with, 'the guy', I'll leave it to you to qualify just why, 'the guy' has fallen out-of-party-favour... the waldo trusts you won't just start with the most recent inner-circle, cause you know, the self-styled "Prince" casts a loooong shadow - amirite?
Kinsella is a must-read because of his long years of experience in the world of politics, working in election campaigns, and first-hand experience of what actually goes on inside the "inner circle". I think that his distaste for Super Justin is evidence that his judgment exceeds his partisanship.
-k
-
So you're going to tell me that Rota did indeed undertake this of his own accord without discussing it with the rest of his party? That's fascinating. I'm a Nigerian prince, and I've got a fantastic proposition for you. PM me with your banking details.
have ya got anything to expand on your conspiracy zeal? By the by, by definition, the Speaker of the House, is non-partisan... must be seen/perceived to be independent. Wait now waldo - given how Rota has allowed the PeePee/CPC clown show to run rampant in the House...
-
a "must-read"? Really? Geezaz kimmy, you need to expand your political horizons! How shocking that the kimster finds a kindred spirit - haters-r-us, hey! Since you're so enamoured with, 'the guy', I'll leave it to you to qualify just why, 'the guy' has fallen out-of-party-favour... the waldo trusts you won't just start with the most recent inner-circle, cause you know, the self-styled "Prince" casts a loooong shadow - amirite?
Kinsella is a must-read because of his long years of experience in the world of politics, working in election campaigns, and first-hand experience of what actually goes on inside the "inner circle". I think that his distaste for Super Justin is evidence that his judgment exceeds his partisanship.
c'mon kimmy! Don't hesitate now... don't backpedal now! I asked challenged you to qualify just why, 'the guy' has fallen out-of-party-favour. Deferring to your stated, "long years of experience", I asked challenged you not to just start with the most recent {the current} 'inner-circle'. Clearly, ya gots nuthin!
-
But let the waldo keep asking: will you continue to refuse to state what federal political party you support - and why?
Who do I support? I have voted NDP the past 3 Federal elections, believe it or not. Jagmeet doesn't get my vote this time, though. Right now I support whichever party gets rid of your boy. He has got to go. Simple as that. End of story.
I can't vote Liberal until they fix their problem, and I can't vote NDP as long as they continue to prop up the problem and his dilapidated regime.
wow, finally you {partially} answer - even though your reply clearly shows your hate-on for PM Trudeau supersedes any attachments to, any considerations of, party policy. Quite telling that you would accept the CPC party, accept PeePee, accept CPC policy (even if they continue to actually hide just what that policy is... or will be once superOverlordHarper says it's ok to release it!).
-
ver notice that kimmy's hate-on for PM Trudeau is persistent and unrelenting?
Lots of people hate him, because he's done a terrible job. It's perfectly reasonable to hate him and not support any others yet, as there is no election coming up soon. You're just upset because you can't deflect to another candidate. Sorry buddy, but Junior might go down as the worst PM in the history of Canada.
-
Lots of people hate him, because he's done a terrible job. It's perfectly reasonable to hate him and not support any others yet, as there is no election coming up soon. You're just upset because you can't deflect to another candidate. Sorry buddy, but Junior might go down as the worst PM in the history of Canada.
member kimmy finally answering was gold - putting her hatred before party policy! Clearly her stated voting history positions her as progressive. However, her stated willingness to act on her long-standing expressed hatred, in favour of blindly aligning with CPC party policy (whatever the hell that policy actually is), aligning with PeePee - that's profoundly naive... even coming from her!
-
member kimmy finally answering was gold - putting her hatred before party policy! Clearly her stated voting history positions her as progressive. However, her stated willingness to act on her long-standing expressed hatred, in favour of blindly aligning with CPC party policy (whatever the hell that policy actually is), aligning with PeePee - that's profoundly naive... even coming from her!
Even progressives want affordable housing, energy prices, food, etc. Surly that kimmy’s opinion should illustrate to you just how badly Junior has governed. Your policies are dog sh*t.
-
Your policies are dog sh*t.
my... mine? Oh right, Liberal party policies, hey! Asking a nimrod like you to speak of/to CPC party policies is a waste of time - ya gots nuthin!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7oj-wcXIAALhJ2?format=jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7nPEdOWwAA-pJ6?format=jpg)
-
hey now Shady! After 8 years are you able to afford one of PeePee's elitist birds from Longo's?
(https://i.imgur.com/Og4eoAe.jpg)
-
lying PeePee says what? GlobalNews - June 2023: Canada Bread pleads guilty to price-fixing bread prices, fined $50M (https://globalnews.ca/news/9783925/canada-bread-price-fixing-guilty-fine/)
(https://i.imgur.com/KOdEvfj.png)
Ontario Superior Court fined the Canada Bread Company $50 million on Wednesday after it pleaded guilty to price-fixing.
It is the highest price-fixing fine in Canada ever, according to the Competition Bureau of Canada.
.
The price-fixing resulted in two price increases — one in 2007 and one in 2011.
-
PeePee, the "great" statesman! Such a poser/pretender! Following their 'blame PM Trudeau for everything' playbook, Poilievre and numerous CPC MPs pushed hard on the misinformation/lies that Canada was purposely excluded from a joint statement issued by the leaders of the U.S., UK, France, Germany & Italy... cause... PM Trudeau has diminished Canada's importance/standing! This, of course, was echoed by Postmedia "journalists"... like the CPC propagandist LilleyPad.
PeePee also, hilariously and falsely, stated PM Trudeau found out about the joint statement through the media... through the media, FFS!. You know, like how someone without a security clearance would find out... like YOU PeePee, like YOU!
of course, the joint statement was issued by the leaders of Quint (the U.S., UK, France, Germany & Italy) - an international organization that Canada is not a part of! A joint statement issued a day after Canada's official statement was released!
hey waldo, what's worse?
=> that PeePee/CPC MPs/Postmedia had no idea what Quint was, or
=> that PeePee/CPC MPs/Postmedia knew what Quint was and purposely misinformed, or
=> that PeePee/CPC MPs/Postmedia, after belatedly finding out what Quint was, choose not to delete/retract misinforming and lying statements made
(https://i.imgur.com/prK5lUX.png)
-
raptureReady, hey PeePee!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8Kh66iWwAA0EUe?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8P5i9JbQAAoFBR?format=jpg&name=small)
-
So Pollievre's father in law is part of the Venezuelan mafia and has terrorism charges against him? I guess that's why Pierre won't undergo a security check.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/2bj3FhA.jpg)
-
bringing home the lying! PoiLIEvre says what?
(https://i.imgur.com/HYWxFnd.png)
-
taking questions... PoiLIEvre, such a condescending asshat!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8iDp8VWAAAM06G?format=jpg)
short (2 min) video: PeePee says, "Common sense. Common... sense. For a change, we're going to make common sense common in this country. We don't have any common sense in the current government". (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1713648498074324992/vid/avc1/1280x720/7S5k555RjBP2jdin.mp4?tag=14)
-
What a f**king legend Pierre is, total alpha!
[attachimg=1]
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1714276316382683511?s=46&t=C8Zj6S2wjnbPysohBCizdg
-
What a f**king legend Pierre is, total alpha!
(Attachment Link)
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1714276316382683511?s=46&t=C8Zj6S2wjnbPysohBCizdg
Pierre’s gone viral on X and other platforms. Various US media outlets are also reporting on it. 😁
-
Shady gushing like a school girl about Pierre strangely reminds me a lot of Waldo and Justin.
-
Pierre’s gone viral on X and other platforms. Various US media outlets are also reporting on it. 😁
The guy should have called him alt-right too.
-
Shady gushing like a school girl about Pierre strangely reminds me a lot of Waldo and Justin.
no - the waldo plays the Liberal Party... not the man! Try again, try harder!
pragmatic justifiable support isn't being a cheerleader! In any case, {h/t U.S. politician Rumsfeld} you go with the leader you have --- not the leader you might wish you have.
-
Pierre’s gone viral on X and other platforms. Various US media outlets are also reporting on it. 😁
what's heeelarious is PeePee's "comms team" actually thinks this is a good look for him! Chomping an apple with condescending arrogance - ya, that's a win for Poilievre! LOL!
-
What a f**king legend Pierre is, total alpha!
Asa beta cuck, I can see why you would be so attracted. lol
But he's lying and he should close his mouth when he chews.
https://x.com/ItsDeanBlundell/status/1714433714560639471?s=20
-
what's heeelarious is PeePee's "comms team" actually thinks this is a good look for him! Chomping an apple with condescending arrogance - ya, that's a win for Poilievre! LOL!
It’s a great look and I’d make an ad out of it. The fact that you think this is a negative shows how out of touch you are. Regardless, it’s funny listening to a junior supporter complaining about somebody else being condescending! Pierre wasn’t condescending, the so called journalist was, pushing an agenda using the “same people say” canard. He was asked to be specific and had nothing.
Junior probably eats apples with a knife and fork. 😂
-
You actually buy his denial that he's constantly referring to the "radical left"?
-
You actually buy his denial that he's constantly referring to the "radical left"?
It doesn't matter. If Trump has shown us anything, it's that these days, some people will simply believe what they want.
I don't know if PP is smart enought to knowingly use that tactic, but it sure looks like what he is doing there.
That said, has anyone seen that reporter's marks from journalism school?
-
what's heeelarious is PeePee's "comms team" actually thinks this is a good look for him! Chomping an apple with condescending arrogance - ya, that's a win for Poilievre! LOL!
PeePee's comms team! (h/t DeanBlundell)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8uCmcwWAAAtAdq?format=jpg)
-
You actually buy his denial that he's constantly referring to the "radical left"?
video: ya, ya... PoiLIEvre says he never talks about that... that he doesn't believe in that ideology 'left-right' thingee! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714376568603054080/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/J3b3xTNpE_PhM7LZ.mp4?tag=12)
-
Dean Blundell! LOL.
-
video: ya, ya... PoiLIEvre says he never talks about that... that he doesn't believe in that ideology 'left-right' thingee! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714376568603054080/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/J3b3xTNpE_PhM7LZ.mp4?tag=12)
Uh oh, it's too bad the "journalist" didn't call him on it, instead of being completely humiliated. But I understand why you'd rather focus on that, than actual policy, considering Junior's epic failure over the last 9 years.
-
Aren't you the one who brought it up (before realizing that "alpha" peepee was totally lying)?
-
hat said, has anyone seen that reporter's marks from journalism school?
local guy in Oliver/Osoyoos - smallish newspaper... has historical attachments as a 'food/travel' writer for larger newspapers - hardly a political "left-wing" pinko! But don't let that stop PeePee's crew from backSlappin' & highFivin', calling it a slam-dunk! LOL!
-
Dean Blundell! LOL.
is there a problem... for you - and PoiLIEvre?
-
video: PoiLIEvre's "dollar for dollar principle"... savings as in CUTS... cuts to what, hey PeePee? (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714761210409648128/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/ECZQTxvx8VF6Srmc.mp4?tag=12)
-
It doesn't matter. If Trump has shown us anything, it's that these days, some people will simply believe what they want.
I don't know if PP is smart enought to knowingly use that tactic, but it sure looks like what he is doing there.
That said, has anyone seen that reporter's marks from journalism school?
The sooner we get a government in place that’s fiscally competent, the easier balancing the budget will be. Right now, even just slowing the rate of growth of a few things would do it. But the current government is as incompetent as I’ve seen in the last 30+ years.
-
video: PoiLIEvre's "dollar for dollar principle"... savings as in CUTS... cuts to what, hey PeePee? (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714761210409648128/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/ECZQTxvx8VF6Srmc.mp4?tag=12)
The sooner we get a government in place that’s fiscally competent, the easier balancing the budget will be. Right now, even just slowing the rate of growth of a few things would do it. But the current government is as incompetent as I’ve seen in the last 30+ years.
and yet you ignore the opportunity to highlight PoiLIEvre's "dollar for dollar principle". As you imagine a CPC government, in terms of realizing said PeePee principle, what CPC cuts would you favour... would you support?
as for your nattering on about "just slowing the rate of growth of a few things", why that's the very outcome of reduced inflation:
(https://i.imgur.com/h8DpHiT.jpg)
e.g., StatCan said Canadians saw prices at the grocery store rise 5.8% in September, cooling from the 6.9% increase in August. There you go lil' buddy - there you go!
-
and yet you ignore the opportunity to highlight PoiLIEvre's "dollar for dollar principle". As you imagine a CPC government, in terms of realizing said PeePee principle, what CPC cuts would you favour... would you support?
as for your nattering on about "just slowing the rate of growth of a few things", why that's the very outcome of reduced inflation:
(https://i.imgur.com/h8DpHiT.jpg)
e.g., StatCan said Canadians saw prices at the grocery store rise 5.8% in September, cooling from the 6.9% increase in August. There you go lil' buddy - there you go!
I’d first slow the rates of growth that the irresponsible Liberals have made the status quo over the past 8 years. When we lived within our means with balanced budgets, inflation was much lower, interest rates were much lower, the dollar was stronger, etc. Massive deficit spending doesn’t improve people’s lives long term. It’s a short term sugar fix and it’s unsustainable and leads to many economic problems that we’re experiencing today.
The massive Trudeau deficits over the last 9 years have not lead to a better life for Canadians. That’s a fact.
-
c'mon Shady... don't run away from it! PoiLIEvre so wanted to highlight his so-called "dollar for dollar" principle. Accordingly, to realize his described savings in terms of CUTS, what CPC cuts would you favour... would you support?
-
c'mon Shady... don't run away from it! PoiLIEvre so wanted to highlight his so-called "dollar for dollar" principle. Accordingly, to realize his described savings in terms of CUTS, what CPC cuts would you favour... would you support?
I already explained to you that no real cuts are necessary. Simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget. And yes, the Bank of Canada has definitely helped slow Trudeau’s high inflation a little. No thanks to any of juniors policies. If he cared at all about inflation, he would have curbed inflationary spending and axed the taxes on energy. But he has the economic background of a 5th grader. He still doesn’t understand the concept of supply and demand.
-
I already explained to you that no real cuts are necessary. Simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget.
Mr. Wizard, can you elaborate on the practical aspects of, as you say, "slowing the rate of growth"... and how that would actually balance the budget? So no CPC/PoiLIEvre cuts to... to... ANYTHING? Really, Mr. Wizard? Really?
-
Big news! Remember that Harper won back to back majorities, something Trudeau hasn't even done.
Poilievre polls as Canada’s pick for PM, first Conservative leader to do so since Harper
According to the latest Nanos survey, Poilievre is polling at 32.9 per cent, well ahead of his main rival, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who polled at 23.3 per cent
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/poilievre-harper-nanos-poll#:~:text=Pierre%20Poilievre%20is%20the%20first,according%20to%20a%20new%20poll.
-
Remember that Harper won back to back majorities, something Trudeau hasn't even done.
sure, sure! LOL! Would you like a do-over?
-
c'mon Shady! What's your boy PoiLIEvre hiding?
over the last weeks its come to light that Poilievre refuses to undergo a security background check... which dovetails with his refusals to take briefings on foreign interference in elections. Of course the supposed/stated rationale is that he would be "silenced"... that he would no longer be free to spout conspiracy theories, to misinform/disinform, to rage farm.....
ya, ya - PeePee is quite the leader!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ft6g9WDWAAIKBNE?format=jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwAxUTRXgAAVXMw?format=jpg)
-
I already explained to you that no real cuts are necessary. Simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget.
Mr. Wizard, can you elaborate on the practical aspects of, as you say, "slowing the rate of growth"... and how that would actually balance the budget? So no CPC/PoiLIEvre cuts to... to... ANYTHING? Really, Mr. Wizard? Really?
still waiting Shady! Still waiting...
-
geezaz waldo! Why is PoiLIEvre so quiet about, so absent in, offering comment on his/CPC's position in this regard? Anyone, anyone, anyone?
...does anyone take anything that this guys says seriously?
take seriously? C'mon Shady! Seriously, do you not take seriously what Alberta Conservative Premier Smith says about wanting to take Alberta out of the Canada Pension Plan? Have you no comment in that regard... like your boy PoiLIEvre has nothing to say in that regard? Seriously Shady, don't you think your boy PeePee has an obligation to say where he stands on the matter? Seriously?
Seems like a provincial issue that voters in Alberta should have to decide.
-
sure, sure! LOL! Would you like a do-over?
Your tears are energizing! LOL!
Junior's out on his a$$.
-
geezaz Shady! All it took to get PeePee to offer a statement/position was for PM Trudeau to send that 'open letter' to Alberta Premier Smith... just one day later and PoiLIEvre sends his comments; albeit exclusively, to the National Post:
(https://i.imgur.com/tbIWrKh.png)
is there anything more moronic than PoiLIEvre saying, "Albertans are looking for a way to get some of their money back"? Apparently PeePee has no view that an Alberta withdrawal from the CPP would:
=> compromise, "the pensions of millions of seniors and hardworking people in Alberta and right across the country".
=> expose, "millions of Canadians to greater volatility and would deny them the certainty and stability that has benefited generations".
-
geezaz Shady! All it took to get PeePee to offer a statement/position was for PM Trudeau to send that 'open letter' to Alberta Premier Smith... just one day later and PoiLIEvre sends his comments; albeit exclusively, to the National Post:
(https://i.imgur.com/tbIWrKh.png)
is there anything more moronic than PoiLIEvre saying, "Albertans are looking for a way to get some of their money back"? Apparently PeePee has no view that an Alberta withdrawal from the CPP would:
And???
-
Remember that Harper won back to back majorities, something Trudeau hasn't even done.
sure, sure! LOL! Would you like a do-over?
Your tears are energizing! LOL!
c'mon, don't deflect! State the elections where Harper won a majority government... back-to-back, you say! LOL! Can ya actually win 'back-to-back' with just one majority government? Well can ya, lil buddy? Can ya?
-
LOL!
According to an Angus Reid poll conducted this month, 57 per cent of Canadians believe Trudeau should step down as Liberal Party leader.
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/poilievre-harper-nanos-poll#:~:text=Pierre%20Poilievre%20is%20the%20first,according%20to%20a%20new%20poll
-
And???
and... nuthin! Your boy finally offers a statement/position on Alberta leaving the CPP - and its so ludicrous he should have just kept quiet!
is there anything more moronic than PoiLIEvre saying, "Albertans are looking for a way to get some of their money back"? Apparently PeePee has no view that an Alberta withdrawal from the CPP would:
=> compromise, "the pensions of millions of seniors and hardworking people in Alberta and right across the country".
=> expose, "millions of Canadians to greater volatility and would deny them the certainty and stability that has benefited generations".
-
LOL!
LOL! National Post... Angus Reid!
-
is there anything more moronic than PoiLIEvre saying, "Albertans are looking for a way to get some of their money back"? Apparently PeePee has no view that an Alberta withdrawal from the CPP would:
=> compromise, "the pensions of millions of seniors and hardworking people in Alberta and right across the country".
=> expose, "millions of Canadians to greater volatility and would deny them the certainty and stability that has benefited generations".
-
and... nuthin! Your boy finally offers a statement/position on Alberta leaving the CPP - and its so ludicrous he should have just kept quiet!
We can agree to disagree. You that I don't share every single opinion of Pierre right?
-
hey now Shady! Have to run - seeya... don't bustaGut with all your LOLs!
-
hey now Shady! Have to run - seeya... don't bustaGut with all your LOLs!
No problem, have a great afternoon buddy.
-
Pierre set himself up pretty badly it seems. Does he understand how video recordings work?
https://fb.watch/nOSHM3ftRr/
-
Pierre set himself up pretty badly it seems. Does he understand how video recordings work?
https://fb.watch/nOSHM3ftRr/
in the ignoring/deflecting way that member Shady does, he actually replied to the original posting of this video! Of course, he replied in the manner that PeePee's commsTeam views that overall (rather lengthy) exchange as a bigTimeFlex win for them. Why... they're actually presuming to 'throw shade' by quoting some of the more prolific U.S. MAGAites who are just luvin this; of note, that from actor/activist/right-wing nutjob, James Woods (https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1714670018041188369):
but you're right - from that rather lengthy 'orchard exchange', there are an assortment of video extracts already circulating to showcase the varying responses from PoiLIEvre. Given the career politician PeePee is, I'm sure there's no shortage of 'attack videos' stored up... just waiting for the right moment(s) to begin releasing them in a targeted manner to showcase the real PoiLIEvre!
You actually buy his denial that he's constantly referring to the "radical left"?
video: ya, ya... PoiLIEvre says he never talks about that... that he doesn't believe in that ideology 'left-right' thingee! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714376568603054080/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/J3b3xTNpE_PhM7LZ.mp4?tag=12)
Uh oh, it's too bad the "journalist" didn't call him on it, instead of being completely humiliated. But I understand why you'd rather focus on that, than actual policy...
-
... but you're right - from that rather lengthy 'orchard exchange', there are an assortment of video extracts already circulating to showcase the varying responses from PoiLIEvre.
an earlier one: PeePee & 'common sense'
taking questions... PoiLIEvre, such a condescending asshat!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8iDp8VWAAAM06G?format=jpg)
short (2 min) video: PeePee says, "Common sense. Common... sense. For a change, we're going to make common sense common in this country. We don't have any common sense in the current government". (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1713648498074324992/vid/avc1/1280x720/7S5k555RjBP2jdin.mp4?tag=14)
yet another video extract on PoiLIEvre's 'common sense' (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1713917211432103936/vid/avc1/576x1024/ai2zhOhmMtHsipkJ.mp4?tag=14):
-
video: Woke dammit! Woke! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1715047329596686337/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/DN6VKiiEW5zObk-i.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/IO9jodg.png)
We really don’t need far left Cuban style politics in Canada anymore. We’ve seen the results. But yet again, waldo turns another thread into a Poilievre one. 😂
"far-left Cuban style politics"... in Canada, you say? How so?
(hey now Shady - recognizing your sensitivities and your expressed concern, I've copied the Woke related post (from the Woke Culture thread) to this thread:)
-
Pierre set himself up pretty badly it seems. Does he understand how video recordings work?
https://fb.watch/nOSHM3ftRr/
He said he doesn’t really use left wing/right wing. Meaning, not very much. I guess it depends on how you define very much. I also think he was referring to his campaigning. Regardless, it’s funny to see just how out of touch the Liberals have become thinking they’ve got something with this. Especially when their own party leader called protesters nazis, racists and white supremacists.
-
He said he doesn’t really use left wing/right wing. Meaning, not very much. I guess it depends on how you define very much. I also think he was referring to his campaigning. Regardless, it’s funny to see just how out of touch the Liberals have become thinking they’ve got something with this. Especially when their own party leader called protesters nazis, racists and white supremacists.
no - quit imagining! There was no qualification from PeePee - he unequivocally says he never talks about that... that he doesn't believe in 'left-right' ideology. Seems that video says otherwise, hey! You were previously challenged to show/cite just where PM Trudeau, as you say, "called protestors nazis, racists and white supremacists". Please come back with your same prior reference cite! LOL!
-
no - quit imagining! There was no qualification from PeePee - he unequivocally says he never talks about that
No. He said never really. It’s funny though when that’s all you’ve got! Trudeau’s 10 points behind Pierre! 😂😂😂
-
FYI waldo et al.
used to say "no" in a way that is not very forceful or definite
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/not%20really
You guys are hilarious though! 😂
-
And notice how they couldn’t “fact check” the important parts of the discussion that involved Junior growing the money supply six times fast than the economy and the doubling of housing prices. Instead they focus on “not really”!
They must realize what’s in store for them.
[attachimg=1]
-
geezaz Shady! What's, as you say, heeelarious, is your rushing to 'parse' PeePee's words... while you also imagined for him and you thought he was referring to campaigning!!! Somehow you have not word one to say about the many, many examples of his using the references... mostly within the House of Commons! Campaigning in the House, hey!
polls? Meaningless... is there an election called? PoiLIEvre has been campaigning (on the taxpayers dime) for over a year now! Campaigning without any real participation or countering from other parties. Your kind of campaigning - amirite? While getting a free-pass from ConMedia!
-
Trudeau’s 10 points behind Pierre! 😂😂😂
Trudeau is PM until at least 2025. 😂😂😂
-
Trudeau is PM until at least 2025. 😂😂😂
Do you think Trudeau is angry that Sophie was bumping nasties with Pete Davidson?
-
Bumping nasties? You sound like a virgin.
-
Never heard of this Dean Blundell before. He's pretty funny.
https://x.com/ItsDeanBlundell/status/1715775747330081183?s=20
-
If I win the lottery, I will buy my old family house on Queenston Street.
-
All the trees are dying in River Heights. It's kind of depressing, but there's an awesome new AT path along the RT line that goes unobstructed from Taylor to Markham, with bridges over Mcgilivary and Bishop.
-
Never heard of this Dean Blundell before. He's pretty funny.
https://x.com/ItsDeanBlundell/status/1715775747330081183?s=20
yup! They really, really, really think this is a good look for PoiLIEvre! Hey now Shady, have you ordered yours?
(https://i.imgur.com/EDFVXQ8.png)
-
Very alpha-looking shirt. 😂
-
oh my! video: so... tell me PeePee, what does 'bring it home' mean to you? (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1716022142062743552/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/zbnMQaO1gUM575eu.mp4?tag=12)
-
yup! They really, really, really think this is a good look for PoiLIEvre! Hey now Shady, have you ordered yours?
(https://i.imgur.com/EDFVXQ8.png)
I think it’s a great look. Much better than sunny ways! 😂
I haven’t ordered mine yet, but Christmas is coming soon!
-
oh my! video: so... tell me PeePee, what does 'bring it home' mean to you? (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1716022142062743552/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/zbnMQaO1gUM575eu.mp4?tag=12)
I can’t say it much better than he did. He’s going to be great for Canada as Prime Minister. Lower energy costs, lower housing costs, lower mortgage payments, lower renting cost, lower interest rates, a stronger dollar with the stronger purchasing power that comes with it. Less centralized control of the country and a return to federalism, the way Canada was supposed to be. Instead of some door knob on Sussex making decisions for every part of the country. It’s going to be a wonderful thing. But there’s no need to worry buddy, there’s a place in that Canada for you as well.
-
I can’t say it much better than he did. He’s going to be great for Canada as Prime Minister. Lower energy costs, lower housing costs, lower mortgage payments, lower renting cost, lower interest rates, a stronger dollar with the stronger purchasing power that comes with it. Less centralized control of the country and a return to federalism, the way Canada was supposed to be. Instead of some door knob on Sussex making decisions for every part of the country. It’s going to be a wonderful thing. But there’s no need to worry buddy, there’s a place in that Canada for you as well.
Baby brain. None of that is gonna happen.
-
Baby brain. None of that is gonna happen.
Of course it can. Eliminating the carbon and energy taxes would reduce costs across the board right away. Better housing policy coupled with even just a slight decrease in immigration will allow supply to catch up demand and lead to lower housing costs. Getting back to balanced budgets will lead to lower interest rates and a stronger dollar. We used to do that on a regular basis, until Junior came into office and f**ked everything up. I’ve already told to sit down and shut up. You had your chance and you ruined everything. Sit this one out for a while dipsh*t.
-
I already explained to you that no real cuts are necessary. Simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget.
Mr. Wizard, can you elaborate on the practical aspects of, as you say, "slowing the rate of growth"... and how that would actually balance the budget? So no CPC/PoiLIEvre cuts to... to... ANYTHING? Really, Mr. Wizard? Really?
still waiting Shady! Still waiting...
Getting back to balanced budgets will lead to lower interest rates and a stronger dollar.
c'mon Shady! Still waiting for you to detail just how PoiLIEvre would balance a budget with, as you say, NO spending cuts. And about that PeePee 'dollar for dollar' principle where he presumes to find a, "dollar savings for every dollar of spending" - savings through NO CUTS? Really Shady, really?
and again, still waiting for you to elaborate on your statement that, "simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget" - how so Shady, how so?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9C0tvsWEAAa5mQ?format=png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9DJArJWoAAwq0v?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9EyNaHXEAAXmK6?format=png)
-
Very alpha-looking shirt. 😂
video: hot off the teePresses! (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1714067375698419712/vid/avc1/720x510/r8zpHF7Ynys4GZSB.mp4?tag=14)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8_Fa23XsAAUdWy?format=jpg)
-
Mr. Wizard, can you elaborate on the practical aspects of, as you say, "slowing the rate of growth"... and how that would actually balance the budget? So no CPC/PoiLIEvre cuts to... to... ANYTHING? Really, Mr. Wizard? Really?
still waiting Shady! Still waiting...
c'mon Shady! Still waiting for you to detail just how PoiLIEvre would balance a budget with, as you say, NO spending cuts. And about that PeePee 'dollar for dollar' principle where he presumes to find a, "dollar savings for every dollar of spending" - savings through NO CUTS? Really Shady, really?
and again, still waiting for you to elaborate on your statement that, "simply slowing the irresponsible Liberal rate of growth can balance the budget" - how so Shady, how so?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9C0tvsWEAAa5mQ?format=png)
I'm actually in favour of what the fiscally responsible Liberal parties of Jean Chretien and Paul Martin did, which was an across the board budget cut. But that doesn't seem to be in Polievre's plain, he wants to get to a balanced budget more slowly. But it's basic economics, so it doesn't surprise me that you don't understand, as your beloved leader Junior doesn't understand basic economics either. If your budget increases are less than revenue increases, you can still increase spending, while slowly bringing the budget in balance. Btw, what ever happend to the strong fiscially responsible Liberal Party? Or did that stop existing when Junior took office? Do you think if he was office for say 50 years, he'd eventually manage to balance a budget at some point?
-
😂😂😂
[attachimg=1]
-
limited edition Shady! Don't hesitate - get yours now!
(https://i.imgur.com/dh788el.png)
-
wifey hawking the merch! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/vjKJFS9.jpg)
-
wifey hawking the merch! LOL!
(https://i.imgur.com/vjKJFS9.jpg)
You've never heard of fund raising? Junior has his "Trudeau Foundation" to do it for him, so he doesn't have to do it himself.
-
You've never heard of fund raising? PM Trudeau has his "Trudeau Foundation" to do it for him, so he doesn't have to do it himself.
Shady's trolling! Don't be Shady...
The independent and non-partisan Pierre Trudeau Foundation is a most respected charity... one that PM Justin Trudeau has had nothing to do with for over a decade. The foundation publishes annual reports and audited financial statements performed by the most reputable accounting firms. A leading recognized organization that rates charity's, Charity Navigator, rates the Pierre Trudeau Foundation as 4 Star based on a score of 99 out of a possible 100 points: weighted as 90% Accountability & Finance and 10% Leadership & Adaptability.
The foundation helps fund and promote academic and public interest research. It awards up to 20 doctoral scholarships each year and finances up to five research fellowships. It also supports a network of "mentors" to help young academics and organizes public events, such as book launches and lectures on public policy issues.
-
Shady's trolling! Don't be Shady...
Lol, keep worrying about t-shirts that are completely legal and above board.
The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation misled Canadians when it said that a controversial donation made by two Chinese businessmen qualified as a Canadian donation
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6825761
-
c'mon Shady! Why troll and lie about PM Trudeau fundraising through the Pierre Trudeau foundation. How desperate are you?
-
c'mon Shady! Why troll and lie about PM Trudeau fundraising through the Pierre Trudeau foundation. How desperate are you?
Why does the Trudeau foundation lie about where it gets its donations? Do you thinks it’s possible that when somebody or some foreign entity donates to the Trudeau Foundation it’s a back door way of currying favour of the current PM? Is it a bit of a conflict of interest?
-
Shady, again: why troll and lie about PM Trudeau fundraising through the Pierre Trudeau foundation? Will you retract your baseless and unsubstantiated trolling and lying statement? Well, will you?
-
PeePee's mask mandate!
(https://i.imgur.com/GDQpow0.jpg)
-
some of those global forces, hey parrotingShady!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9M1m7_WQAAKRcY?format=jpg)
-
Whoa!!!!!
[attachimg=1]
-
Looks like a classic case of peaking too early in the season.
-
But how can peepee be PM if he can't get security clearance? What happens if he's elected?
-
But how can peepee be PM if he can't get security clearance? What happens if he's elected?
Who says he can’t get a security clearance? So it’s ok that he’s the leader of the opposition and is allowed in the House of Commons everyday without a “security clearance”? He was housing minister for several years as a member of the cabinet without a “security clearance”? You can’t be that dumb.
-
He can't be briefed about the Israeli conflict because he refuses to allow the security check. He can't be briefed about the Indian assassination of the Sikh Canadian because he refuses to allow the security check. He couldn't be briefed on the China spy situation because he refuses to allow the security check, but that didn't stop him from attacking David Johnston's character. You guys believed the ridiculous story that he would be "silenced" if he learned information that required a security check, which made no logical sense at all.
He doesn't need security clearance to be in opposition like he would if he were PM. Will he still refuse a security check then?
-
He can't be briefed about the Israeli conflict because he refuses to allow the security check. He can't be briefed about the Indian assassination of the Sikh Canadian because he refuses to allow the security check. He couldn't be briefed on the China spy situation because he refuses to allow the security check, but that didn't stop him from attacking David Johnston's character. You guys believed the ridiculous story that he would be "silenced" if he learned information that required a security check, which made no logical sense at all.
He doesn't need security clearance to be in opposition like he would if he were PM. Will he still refuse a security check then?
So what if he hasn’t been briefed? I’d imagine he’d get a security clearance if he were elected PM as it would be required. It’s not currently required, therefore not necessary. But I understand that it’s all that you’ve got, when the PM you support has so badly mismanaged this country.
-
It's kind of weird and embarrassing. What's he hiding? This doesn't raise a red flag?
-
geezaz waldo! With everything else going on right now... PolioPierre still finds the time to appease his wing-nut base - go figure, hey!
video: PeePee and all Conservatives MPs in the House voted to push an anti-vaccine mandate bill. (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1717568911023968256/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/BP54ECgBdAQGeGcu.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/nzggjKj.png)
Pierre Poilievre is choosing to "wear a tinfoil hat" by backing this sort of divisive legislation.
-
It's kind of weird and embarrassing. What's he hiding? This doesn't raise a red flag?
How so? Jagmeet Singh didn’t have security clearance until recently, yet was part of the coalition government. Nobody said a word. Why are you so insistent that Pierre do unnecessary things? I don’t think Trudeau had security clearance until he was PM, because again, it’s not necessary. But when your party is responsible for so badly mismanaging Canada, I can understand why it’s the only thing you can focus on.
-
geezaz waldo! With everything else going on right now... PolioPierre still finds the time to appease his wing-nut base - go figure, hey!
video: PeePee and all Conservatives MPs in the House voted to push an anti-vaccine mandate bill. (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1717568911023968256/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/BP54ECgBdAQGeGcu.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/nzggjKj.png)
Body autonomy is now right wing huh? That’s crazy. The left is ceding rights and freedoms to conservatives on a daily basis. I remember when they cared about those things a lot.
-
Body autonomy is now right wing huh? That’s crazy.
c'mon Shady... I said wing-nut, not right wing! But you do you, hey!
I support bodily autonomy and believe all Canadians can decide for themselves what they put in their own bodies.
at the early September CPC policy convention: ~68% of delegates in Quebec City voted to affirm that Canadians should have the freedom and right to refuse vaccines.
-
geezaz waldo! With everything else going on right now... PolioPierre still finds the time to appease his wing-nut base - go figure, hey!
video: PeePee and all Conservatives MPs in the House voted to push an anti-vaccine mandate bill. (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1717568911023968256/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/BP54ECgBdAQGeGcu.mp4?tag=12)
(https://i.imgur.com/nzggjKj.png)
Bill should have passed. Mandates from foreign travelers is fine though, they have no right to enter.
-
Squid wants to control your speech and coerce you to inject medicine you don't want. Good on ya squiggly!
-
It’s not anti vaccine to decide whether or not you want to take a medicine. It’s actually a right.
External review found military's COVID-19 vaccine policy violated Charter of Rights
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/military-covid-19-vaccine-policy-charter-1.6924862
meaningless! Now, if the 'Military Grievances External Review Committee' actually launched a Charter Rights Infringement case, well then... did that happen, hey pontificatingShady? Well, did it?
-
But how can peepee be PM if he can't get security clearance?
He can't be briefed about the Israeli conflict because he refuses to allow the security check. He can't be briefed about the Indian assassination of the Sikh Canadian because he refuses to allow the security check. He couldn't be briefed on the China spy situation because he refuses to allow the security check, but that didn't stop him from attacking David Johnston's character. You guys believed the ridiculous story that he would be "silenced" if he learned information that required a security check, which made no logical sense at all.
PeePee end days... the writing is on the wall! There's a reason the IDU puppet-master Harper has been courting Kenney!
(https://i.imgur.com/QgHerg8.jpg)
-
Pierre Poilievre is choosing to "wear a tinfoil hat" by backing this sort of divisive legislation.
(https://i.imgur.com/q009gYD.jpg)(https://i.imgur.com/nzggjKj.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/q009gYD.jpg)(https://i.imgur.com/nzggjKj.png)
It's only divisive to fascists.
-
It's only divisive to fascists.
A universal vaccine mandate is already unconstitutional. So why is pee pee, a so called small government conservative, looking to curtail the rights of private entities to set terms of employment?
-
A universal vaccine mandate is already unconstitutional. So why is pee pee, a so called small government conservative, looking to curtail the rights of private entities to set terms of employment?
But vaccine mandates WERE instituted for work and travel. The unconstitutionality of it was ignored.
-
If that's true, why has there been no challenge? You guys implemented the notwithstanding clause to take away gay kids' rights before there was even a challenge because you knew it went against the Charter. Are you saying you could win a challenge but you just don't want to try?
-
But vaccine mandates WERE instituted for work and travel. The unconstitutionality of it was ignored.
Then cash in your cryptocurrency, hire a lawyer and sue.
-
Victory for the middle class!
[attachimg=1]
-
Nothing more emasculating than having to try to pretend you have power from opposition. Does it trick anyone but the rubes?
-
Nothing more emasculating than having to try to pretend you have power from opposition. Does it trick anyone but the rubes?
What’s embarrassing is having to admit that your policies are sh*t for most Canadians, so you have to pause them for several years! You’re also admitting that the rebate scheme doesn’t reimburse the full cost of the tax. So you have to suspend it temporarily. When Pierre is PM, he’ll be suspending it permanently! 😂
-
Did you cash your carbon tax cheque or did you refuse to so you could continue to pretend it didn't happen?
-
Did you cash your carbon tax cheque or did you refuse to so you could continue to pretend it didn't happen?
You didn’t address your failed policies. Why do you think they suspended your beloved carbon tax on home heating?
-
To give people more of a break after listening to their concerns, obviously. Having a government not completely bound by ideology that can adapt its positions to real-world events is a good thing.
Since I answered your question, now you can cite where I parrotted Hamas. Feeling powerless?
-
To give people more of a break after listening to their concerns, obviously. Having a government not completely bound by ideology that can adapt its positions to real-world events is a good thing.
Since I answered your question, now you can cite where I parrotted Hamas. Feeling powerless?
Why do they need to get a break if the rebate program reimburses them for the full cost?
-
Victory for the middle class!
geezaz Shady! Get your meme generating act together, hey! PeePee says its all a scam - are youse guys taking credit for a "scam"? LOL!
This is a scam designed to trick oil-heating households into voting for him one more time so he can hit them with his big tax hike
-
geezaz Shady! Get your meme generating act together, hey! PeePee says its all a scam - are youse guys taking credit for a "scam"? LOL!
Maybe the waldo can tell us why there’s a 3 year pause of the carbon taxing of home heating? Why does the waldo think that this happened if the rebate fully reimburses all the victims of the added expense? Do you think that his sample principle might apply to other aspects of the carbon taxes, like food and fuel? Seems like it! 😂
#CostlyCoalition
-
Why do they need to get a break if the rebate program reimburses them for the full cost?
Why do working people need a break? Because global inflation has been bad, albeit not as bad in Canada as the rest of the world, but some people are still struggling. Where have you been?
Fortunately they have a government that will listen to them.
Still no cite, eh? I guess that's an admission of lying. I accept your reluctant apology.
-
Why do working people need a break? Because global inflation has been bad, albeit not as bad in Canada as the rest of the world, but some people are still struggling. Where have you been?
Fortunately they have a government that will listen to them.
Still no cite, eh? I guess that's an admission of lying. I accept your reluctant apology.
But the rebate fully reimburses the cost right? So why the 3 year pause? Something doesn’t add up. 😂
-
Why do only working in Atlantic Canada get a break? Is it because that’s where the liberals are struggling the most! 😂😂😂
-
But the rebate fully reimburses the cost right? So why the 3 year pause? Something doesn’t add up. 😂
It doesn't necessarily fully reimburse everyone, obviously. It depends on how much you pollute, obviously. I get far more back than what I put in because I have a low carbon footprint. Rural people, by their lifestyle and need to travel more, would obviously have a higher one. You must have misunderstood something you read again.
I realize it's hard to debate when your understanding of issues is limited. It makes you resort to making claims people said things you can't substantiate with a simple cite, and then you look like you're playing far out of your league again. Sometimes it gets so bad you have to quit the forum forever in a huff. LOL
-
It doesn't necessarily fully reimburse everyone, obviously. It depends on how much you pollute, obviously. I get far more back than what I put in because I have a low carbon footprint. Rural people, by their lifestyle and need to travel more, would obviously have a higher one. You must have misunderstood something you read again.
I realize it's hard to debate when your understanding of issues is limited. It makes you resort to making claims people said things you can't substantiate with a simple cite, and then you look like you're playing far out of your league again. Sometimes it gets so bad you have to quit the forum forever in a huff. LOL
Wait just a minute now, it doesn’t fully reimburse the cost? You mean the government’s been lying? Is that the case with fuel and food as well? Why does Atlantic Canada get relief but nobody else does? Do you think lower and middle class in other parts of the country don’t need relief as well? Or is it just because Atlantic Canada is a must have if Junior wants to be re-elected? Why don’t we stop purposely making everything most expensive so that Canadians are better off?
-
Wait just a minute now, it doesn’t fully reimburse the cost? You mean the government’s been lying? Is that the case with fuel and food as well? Why does Atlantic Canada get relief but nobody else does? Do you think lower and middle class in other parts of the country don’t need relief as well? Or is it just because Atlantic Canada is a must have if PM Trudeau wants to be re-elected?
blusteringBlatheringShady says what?
the federal government has always profiled that '80%' figure - that 80% of households get more money back in rebates (Climate Action Incentive payments) than they pay (directly) in relation to carbon pricing.
as for this particular incentive 'shift to heat pump' program, it's one starting in Atlantic Canada (but will eventually apply to all of Canada); that is to say, with this particular focus, an affordability incentive for those heating homes with oil to shift to heat pumps. Since you simply parrot talking points, let the waldo highlight that:
=> {only} about 20% of Newfoundland households heat with oil
=> {only} about about 10% of New Brunswick households heat with oil
=> {only} about 35% of Nova Scotia households heat with oil
=> about 50% of PEI households heat with oil
as for timing, the Atlantic Liberal caucus has been working on this particular shift to heat pump incentive program for over a year. More pointedly, the "Oil to Heat Pump Affordability (OHPA) Program (https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-efficiency/homes/canada-greener-homes-initiative/oil-heat-pump-affordability-program-part-the-canada-greener-homes-initiative/24775)" was actually introduced in Nov '22, applying to all of Canada. This particular Atlantic Canada focus is one that leverages the existing federal-provincial government programs already in place to deliver this particular incentive to Atlantic Canadians right now... the existing programs in Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia and PEI.
-
Weird that someone would want to hang out with bonesaw regimes on their own time. I wonder what's in it for him.
https://x.com/stephenharper/status/1718262425886052526?s=20
-
puppetMasterHarper... Livin' la Vida Loca!
-
Weird that someone would want to hang out with bonesaw regimes on their own time. I wonder what's in it for him.
https://x.com/stephenharper/status/1718262425886052526?s=20
geezaz, Harper says, "May we continue to foster strong relationships between our two countries nstions". Since when did that azzhole speak for Canada?
(https://i.imgur.com/Kb2fLmX.png)
-
But how can peepee be PM if he can't get security clearance?
3... count em'... 3 profiled instances where PM Trudeau asked all the respective party leaders to meet & view classified information on:
=> foreign interference,
=> India & now
=> Gaza/Hamas - Israel
PeePee missed them all - cause he has no appropriate security clearance! What the hey is wrong here? What's PoiLIEvre hiding? What's he afraid of becoming public?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/z4wbe9j.png)
oh my! 'Venezuelan handbag'... stay classy, hey waldo!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/z4wbe9j.png)
oh my! 'Venezuelan handbag'... stay classy, hey waldo!
I was wondering what randos on Twitter were saying today! 😂
-
Harper says
Let me just stop you there. Harper hasn’t been in office for 9 years. Fack off.
-
So you agree with waldo?!? Since when does that happen?
-
So you agree with waldo?!? Since when does that happen?
own goal by Shady! Shady highlights Harper hasn't been PM for '9 years', but has no qualms with Harper speaking on behalf of/for Canada... with his ignorant and ill placed statement: "May we continue to foster strong relationships between our two nations"
(https://i.imgur.com/Kb2fLmX.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eJ1USfo.jpg)
whaaaa! PeePee & the apple orchard - the gift that keeps giving... video: "taking the page out of Donald Trump's book --- the page highlighted (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1719084940069834752/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/X-syapP-tJgK_fOB.mp4?tag=12)"
What are you talking about? What page? What page? Can you give me the page? Give me the page!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eJ1USfo.jpg)
whaaaa! PeePee & the apple orchard - the gift that keeps giving... video: "taking the page out of Donald Trump's book --- the page highlighted (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1719084940069834752/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/X-syapP-tJgK_fOB.mp4?tag=12)"
He really shook you guys huh? LOL! Your panic is exhilarating! 😂😂😂
-
He really shook you guys huh? LOL! Your panic is exhilarating! 😂😂😂
that's weak, even by your standards! Highlighting the commonality between PeePee & Trump is gold, real gold!
hey now lil' buddy - don't forget about your own goal with your stooopid comment concerning Harper still thinking he's Prime Minister! LOL!
-
that's weak, even by your standards! Highlighting the commonality between PeePee & Trump is gold, real gold!
hey now lil' buddy - don't forget about your own goal with your stooopid comment concerning Harper still thinking he's Prime Minister! LOL!
I heard they both drink coffee too! Omg, just like Trump!
-
Waldo, your scare tactics don’t work anymore.
[attachimg=1]
-
Trump drinks coffee? I thought he just snorted ground-up Adderall.
-
hey now lil' buddy - you should revel in that aggregate that's based on a small sampling of closed shop surveys... of those who choose to sign-up for incentive rewards that hardly present legitimate random sampling!
-
geezaz, Harper says, "May we continue to foster strong relationships between our two nations". Since when did that azzhole speak for Canada?
(https://i.imgur.com/Kb2fLmX.png)
own goal by Shady! Shady highlights Harper hasn't been PM for '9 years', but has no qualms with Harper speaking on behalf of/for Canada... with his ignorant and ill placed statement: "May we continue to foster strong relationships between our two nations"
again! Yet another ShadyOwnGoal! Fostering a strong relationship between the boneSawNation & Canada! Sure, sure, hey Shady!
-
again! Yet another ShadyOwnGoal! Fostering a strong relationship between the boneSawNation & Canada! Sure, sure, hey Shady!
Harper is irrelevant. Stop deflecting.
-
hey now lil' buddy - you should revel in that aggregate that's based on a small sampling of closed shop surveys... of those who choose to sign-up for incentive rewards that hardly present legitimate random sampling!
Juniors done such a bad job that Pierre’s gonna win a majority government! 😂😂😂
-
Juniors done such a bad job that Pierre’s gonna win a majority government! 😂😂😂
PM Trudeau was behind in the polls for all the elections where he 'mopped the floor' with the failed Conservative leaders. Stay strong lil' buddy - stay strong!
c'mon Shady... quit ignoring PeePee not being able to get a security clearance!
3... count em'... 3 profiled instances where PM Trudeau asked all the respective party leaders to meet & view classified information on:
=> foreign interference,
=> India & now
=> Gaza/Hamas - Israel
PeePee missed them all - cause he has no appropriate security clearance! What the hey is wrong here? What's PoiLIEvre hiding? What's he afraid of becoming public?
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eJ1USfo.jpg)
whaaaa! PeePee & the apple orchard - the gift that keeps giving... video: "taking the page out of Donald Trump's book --- the page highlighted (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1719084940069834752/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/X-syapP-tJgK_fOB.mp4?tag=12)"
(https://i.imgur.com/OzXlSKT.png)What are you talking about? What page? What page? Can you give me the page? Give me the page!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eJ1USfo.jpg)
whaaaa! PeePee & the apple orchard - the gift that keeps giving... video: "taking the page out of Donald Trump's book --- the page highlighted (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1719084940069834752/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/X-syapP-tJgK_fOB.mp4?tag=12)"
(https://i.imgur.com/OzXlSKT.png)
Trudeau = Castro.
[attachimg=1]
-
Trudeau = Castro.
ya see lil' buddy - that video shows numerous comparative examples of PeePee saying the exact/similar phrases as Trump has! video: "taking the page out of Donald Trump's book --- the page highlighted (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1719084940069834752/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/X-syapP-tJgK_fOB.mp4?tag=12)"
you're really bad at this!
(https://i.imgur.com/OzXlSKT.png)
-
groomer!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F94Qw8nXMAA3cP3?format=png&name=small)
-
Pierre’s motion to have all home heating exempt from Junior’s carbon tax is getting NDP support from BC and Saskatchewan.
-
Pierre’s motion to have all home heating exempt from Junior’s carbon tax is getting NDP support from BC and Saskatchewan.
(https://i.imgur.com/OzXlSKT.png)
-
Trudeau’s playing checkers, Pierre’s playing chess.
[attachimg=1]
-
waaah Shady! Postmedia's key Conservative mouthpiece - LilleyPad! That's heelarious!
again, these low(er) percentages are hardly vote seeking drivers:
=> {only} about 20% of Newfoundland households heat with oil
=> {only} about about 10% of New Brunswick households heat with oil
=> {only} about 35% of Nova Scotia households heat with oil
=> about 50% of PEI households heat with oil
and again, the CO2 Emissions Coefficient for home heating oil is one of the highest - which, of course, is reason enough to further extend upon the related program initiated back in Nov '22... the "Oil to Heat Pump Affordability (OHPA) Program (https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-efficiency/homes/canada-greener-homes-initiative/oil-heat-pump-affordability-program-part-the-canada-greener-homes-initiative/24775)"
-
waaah Shady! Postmedia's key Conservative mouthpiece - LilleyPad! That's heelarious!
again, these low(er) percentages are hardly vote seeking drivers:
=> {only} about 20% of Newfoundland households heat with oil
=> {only} about about 10% of New Brunswick households heat with oil
=> {only} about 35% of Nova Scotia households heat with oil
=> about 50% of PEI households heat with oil
and again, the CO2 Emissions Coefficient for home heating oil is one of the highest - which, of course, is reason enough to further extend upon the related program initiated back in Nov '22... the "Oil to Heat Pump Affordability (OHPA) Program (https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-efficiency/homes/canada-greener-homes-initiative/oil-heat-pump-affordability-program-part-the-canada-greener-homes-initiative/24775)"
So you want to only exempt the most polluting form of heating? That makes no sense, and is not fair to other people. It’s time we got common sense back in government.
-
So you want to only exempt the most polluting form of heating? That makes no sense, and is not fair to other people. It’s time we got common sense back in government.
'common sense'! The common sense that eludes you is recognizing this is a part of the program incentive to shift away from the expensive and highly polluting oil heating... to shift toward heat pumps.
-
'common sense'! The common sense that eludes you is recognizing this is a part of the program incentive to shift away from the expensive and highly polluting oil heating... to shift toward heat pumps.
If you want to incentivize a shift away from heating oil, why are you exempting it from the carbon tax? 😂😂😂
-
If you want to incentivize a shift away from heating oil, why are you exempting it from the carbon tax? 😂😂😂
you and your 'crying with laughter' emojis... with 3 of em' here, oh my!
you're such a stooge! Again, the pause exemption is part of an affordability incentive towards shifting from home oil heating to heat pumps... providing more money to put towards heat pump(s); where I've read purchase/install costs for heat pumps can be higher than $10K
again, heating oil is highly expensive with {one of} the highest CO2 Emissions Coefficients. As follows, representative costing examples:
(https://i.imgur.com/MHzWiGW.png)
-
[video: This is specifically about ending the use of home heating oil which is more polluting, more expensive and impacts lower-income Canadians to a greater degree. (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1719423982602964992/vid/avc1/1280x720/9XS-tH-Kmti5MMlr.mp4?tag=14)
-
whaaa! PoiLIEvre3.0 - FaceFiller! Hey now Shady, is it time for an intervention?
(https://i.imgur.com/tZ09nNz.jpg)
-
Looks like Snapchat filters. That hair though
-
Looks like Snapchat filters. That hair though
This is rich coming from Trudeau supporters. The diva of all divas! 😂
-
Trudeau supporter? Me????
I have been quite open about my disdain of him and the Liberal Party as a whole.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Liberals are Conservatives who go to pride parades.
-
whaaa! PoiLIEvre3.0 - FaceFiller! Hey now Shady, is it time for an intervention?
(https://i.imgur.com/tZ09nNz.jpg)
Trudeau... The diva of all divas! 😂
c'mon Shady! At some point you'll just need to get over PM Trudeau's socks...
-
(https://i.imgur.com/Fak5TTW.jpg)
geezaz! It's pathetic misinformation in how PoiLIEvre & his minions continually refer to the Liberal-NDP agreement as a coalition! And today, given how the BQ voted with the Liberals to punt PeePee's carbon tax related motion, he also stoopidly & ignorantly referred to the 'Liberal-BQ' coalition!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/nSDhE9c.jpg)
-
Nice try Waldo trying to paint the NDP with the same brush as climate change deniers. Singh clarified that he wants a more universal approach which I kinda understand.
Your guy came into power by maligning Harper with his "a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian"... remember?
-
Nice try Waldo trying to paint the NDP with the same brush as climate change deniers. Singh clarified that he wants a more universal approach which I kinda understand.
Your guy came into power by maligning Harper with his "a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian"... remember?
Well Toots, there are plenty of climate change deniers where I live. I think the Israel-Palestine conflict may be the final nail in the coffin for the Trudeau Liberals. PP has pulled far ahead, and unless something radical happens, it looks like they will form the next Government.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/Fak5TTW.jpg)
geezaz! It's pathetic misinformation in how PoiLIEvre & his minions continually refer to the Liberal-NDP agreement as a coalition! And today, given how the BQ voted with the Liberals to punt PeePee's carbon tax related motion, he also stoopidly & ignorantly referred to the 'Liberal-BQ' coalition!
It’s sad that the Liberals have been relegated to having to partner with separatists in order to save their disastrous policy of dishing out tax exemptions for areas of the country that vote for them.
-
They partnered with the UCP?
-
They partnered with the UCP?
No, actual separatists.
-
Alberta separatists aren't real? You've clearly never been anywhere near Alberta.
-
Alberta separatists aren't real? You've clearly never been anywhere near Alberta.
There is definitely a separatist movement in Alberta, and the flames are being fanned by Danielle Smith and "Take Back Alberta." The idea of Alberta breaking off from Canada is popular in the rural areas.
-
Alberta separatists aren't real? You've clearly never been anywhere near Alberta.
Let me know when they force a referendum. Until then, stop deflecting from your disastrous PM.
-
He's your PM too...unless you're one of those separatists.
-
He's your PM too...unless you're one of those separatists.
I don’t support him the way you do though.
-
I was wondering how you would make it about me.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/Fak5TTW.jpg)
geezaz! It's pathetic misinformation in how PoiLIEvre & his minions continually refer to the Liberal-NDP agreement as a coalition! And today, given how the BQ voted with the Liberals to punt PeePee's carbon tax related motion, he also stoopidly & ignorantly referred to the 'Liberal-BQ' coalition!
Nice try Waldo trying to paint the NDP with the same brush as climate change deniers. Singh clarified that he wants a more universal approach which I kinda understand.
geezaz! How the hey did you get that inference from my post???
but ya, let's actually speak to the PoiLIEvre/CPC motion - the motion that PeePee falsely claimed was binding! Of course the fact is that NDP Singh voted in alignment with the Conservatives; something he did knowing full well the BQ would vote with the Liberals and defeat the motion... it gave Singh an avenue to pretend he/NDP are actually relevant beyond propping up the Liberal government - when needed!
you say, "Singh wanted a more universal approach"... don't be hesitant to state outright that Singh/NDP wanted to pause all carbon pricing; going beyond the Liberal move to simply help shift those heating their homes with oil to heat pumps. Singh/NDP: carbon pricers of convenience, hey!
-
geezaz! How the hey did you get that inference from my post???
but ya, let's actually speak to the PoiLIEvre/CPC motion - the motion that PeePee falsely claimed was binding! Of course the fact is that NDP Singh voted in alignment with the Conservatives; something he did knowing full well the BQ would vote with the Liberals and defeat the motion... it gave Singh an avenue to pretend he/NDP are actually relevant beyond propping up the Liberal government - when needed!
you say, "Singh wanted a more universal approach"... don't be hesitant to state outright that Singh/NDP wanted to pause all carbon pricing; going beyond the Liberal move to simply help shift those heating their homes with oil to heat pumps. Singh/NDP: carbon pricers of convenience, hey!
Singh wanted a universal pause on home heating. Not carbon pricing in general. Stop lying.
-
Singh wanted a universal pause on home heating. Not carbon pricing in general. Stop lying.
Shady is stoopid; don't be Shady! The motion that Singh/NDP voted in favour of:
(https://i.imgur.com/yWclIze.png)
you're welcome Shady - carry on!
-
Shady is stoopid; don't be Shady! The motion that Singh/NDP voted in favour of:
(https://i.imgur.com/yWclIze.png)
you're welcome Shady - carry on!
That’s exactly what I said. But why would you want to exempt the dirtiest form of heating?
-
That’s exactly what I said.
no it wasn't! You stooge... read the PoiLIEvre motion, you moron!
But why would you want to exempt the dirtiest form of heating?
you dullard! Already asked... and answered! This was your, dump of "crying while laughing" emojis!
-
you dullard! Already asked... and answered! This was your, dump of "crying while laughing" emojis!
What was the answer? If the goal of the carbon tax is to change behavior, why would you exempt people that use the worst form of heating from the carbon tax? Especially when you say most household receive more in rebates. It's not adding up buddy.
-
What was the answer?
again, you already asked... and I already answered! But c'mon Shady - how about you step up and actually answer the following. Quit running away from this, hey:
still waiting Shady! Still waiting...
That’s just not true. The actually truth is that some 60% of households pay more than they get back in rebates.
cite request (no go-fetch links, please & thankee)... let's see you {try to} verbalize an interpretation of your reference - sure you can!
still waiting Shady - still waiting!
-
If the goal of the carbon tax is to change behavior, why would you exempt people that use the worst form of heating from the carbon tax? Especially when you say most household receive more in rebates. It's not adding up buddy.
again, as below - more pointedly, given the high cost, those who heat with oil most certainly don't receive more in rebates!
again, the pause exemption is part of an affordability incentive towards shifting from home oil heating to heat pumps... providing more money to put towards heat pump(s); where I've read purchase/install costs for heat pumps can be higher than $10K
again, heating oil is highly expensive with {one of} the highest CO2 Emissions Coefficients. As follows, representative costing examples:
(https://i.imgur.com/MHzWiGW.png)
-
again, as below - more pointedly, given the high cost, those who heat with oil most certainly don't receive more in rebates!
Isn't that because people that use that kind of oil to heat their homes are suppose to have to pay a higher cost in order to change their behavior and move to a cleaner form of home heating? So why are the Liberals now subsidizing that dirtiest form of heating?
-
Carbon taxes have been raised several times over the last few years and we're still failing miserably at our target emissions reduction. Just how high do these taxes have to go before we achieve our goals? Canadians have a right to know. Canadian tax payers have a right to know.
Liberal government set to miss 2030 emissions targets, says environment commissioner audit
The report painted a grim picture of emission reductions in Canada over the past 20 years, saying that the only significant drops in emissions came during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, which had little to do with emissions reduction policy.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/environment-comissioner-audit-emissions-charging-stations-1.7020689
In otherwords, these carbon taxes need to significantly curb economic growth to achieve any meaningful emissions reduction. Liberals need to finally be honest with Canadians, and acknowledge the economic pain needed in order to achieve their goals.
-
again, you already asked... and I already answered! But c'mon Shady - how about you step up and actually answer the following. Quit running away from this, hey:
still waiting Shady - still waiting!
Yves Giroux says when the negative economic impact of the carbon tax is factored in, 60% of Canadian households are already paying hundreds of dollars more annually in carbon taxes than they receive in rebates — numbers that will increase as the carbon tax keeps rising.
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-despite-carbon-tax-rebates-canadians-falling-further-behind
-
again, as below - more pointedly, given the high cost, those who heat with oil most certainly don't receive more in rebates!
again, the pause exemption is part of an affordability incentive towards shifting from home oil heating to heat pumps... providing more money to put towards heat pump(s); where I've read purchase/install costs for heat pumps can be higher than $10K
again, heating oil is highly expensive with {one of} the highest CO2 Emissions Coefficients. As follows, representative costing examples:
(https://i.imgur.com/MHzWiGW.png)
Isn't that because people that use that kind of oil to heat their homes are suppose to have to pay a higher cost in order to change their behavior and move to a cleaner form of home heating? So why are the Liberals now subsidizing that dirtiest form of heating?
until relatively recently (with technological advances in heat pumps) there was little to no alternate choice - lack of infrastructure is a beeatch, hey! You self-servingly and agenda driven call it a "subsidy"... thinking & knowledgeable persons see it as an incentive to help allay the exorbitant costs associated with shifting from heating by oil to heat pumps.
-
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-despite-carbon-tax-rebates-canadians-falling-further-behind
Yves Giroux says when the negative economic impact of the carbon tax is factored in, 60% of Canadian households are already paying hundreds of dollars more annually in carbon taxes than they receive in rebates — numbers that will increase as the carbon tax keeps rising.
geezaz Shady! The waldo kept goading you into providing a reference to support your claim... and you got me good, real good!
oh wait now, not so fast: of course it was a given that, if you actually responded, you would bring notice to the latest (2023 updated) report from the PBO/Yves Giroux. That you actually linked to yesterday's "SunLorrie" POS, well, that's gold Shady - real gold! Hey Shady - do you find it odd that SunLorrie doesn't actually quote Giroux directly... isn't that odd, hey Shady?
ya see Shady, the (first part of that) updated 2023 PBO/Giroux report aligns with the earlier 2023 report in terms of the '80/20' rebate distribution that the federal government has year-over-year iteratively highlighted. It's the second part of the update where Giroux introduced a model that presumes to speak to the economic costs associated with carbon pricing. But Shady... that's data modeled for the year 2030-2031 under the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan. Without even dealing with the model and assumptions made/not made, (and many astute experts have done just that in criticizing the approach Giroux took), again, that's 2030-2031. Not present day as those disingenuous "journalists" from the SUNstable (and YOU) presume to falsely say/claim!
and Shady: the first part of that updated 2023 report is accurate showing that even as the fuel charge increases to $170/tonne in 2030, rebates grow accordingly, and 80 per cent of families come out better off. It also shows, as federal government intended, that the rebate policy is “broadly progressive,” with the poorest households coming out ahead.
again Shady, you're really not good at this, are you? LOL!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/qtRp09B.jpg)
-
until relatively recently (with technological advances in heat pumps) there was little to no alternate choice - lack of infrastructure is a beeatch, hey! You self-servingly and agenda driven call it a "subsidy"... thinking & knowledgeable persons see it as an incentive to help allay the exorbitant costs associated with shifting from heating by oil to heat pumps.
You think that heat pumps are a technological advance? Perhaps decades ago. Regardless, why would anyone switch to heat pumps anytime soon if the high cost of heating oil is subsidized? Btw, why wasn’t the exorbitant cost detailed to Canadians when the carbon taxes were first proposed by the Liberals. Why did they proclaim that there wouldn’t be any cost to Canadians? Also, what will the exemption and subsidy on the dirtiest form of heating do to the Liberals emissions targets? They’re already falling well behind if their goals, and that was before this exemption/subsidy.
-
geezaz Shady! The waldo kept goading you into providing a reference to support your claim... and you got me good, real good!
oh wait now, not so fast: of course it was a given that, if you actually responded, you would bring notice to the latest (2023 updated) report from the PBO/Yves Giroux. That you actually linked to yesterday's "SunLorrie" POS, well, that's gold Shady - real gold! Hey Shady - do you find it odd that SunLorrie doesn't actually quote Giroux directly... isn't that odd, hey Shady?
ya see Shady, the (first part of that) updated 2023 PBO/Giroux report aligns with the earlier 2023 report in terms of the '80/20' rebate distribution that the federal government has year-over-year iteratively highlighted. It's the second part of the update where Giroux introduced a model that presumes to speak to the economic costs associated with carbon pricing. But Shady... that's data modeled for the year 2030-2031 under the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan. Without even dealing with the model and assumptions made/not made, (and many astute experts have done just that in criticizing the approach Giroux took), again, that's 2030-2031. Not present day as those disingenuous "journalists" from the SUNstable (and YOU) presume to falsely say/claim!
and Shady: the first part of that updated 2023 report is accurate showing that even as the fuel charge increases to $170/tonne in 2030, rebates grow accordingly, and 80 per cent of families come out better off. It also shows, as federal government intended, that the rebate policy is “broadly progressive,” with the poorest households coming out ahead.
again Shady, you're really not good at this, are you? LOL!
This is a heckuva word salad that actually says absolutely nothing. Bravo buddy! Bravo. Btw, what’s the difference between a progressive policy and a policy that’s broadly progressive? 😂😂😂
At least you’re finally admitting that there are economic costs to carbon pricing. Good on ya! Hopefully the LIEberals will finally admit that to the Canadian public at some point too.
Regardless, the rebates only try to return the estimated amount of the carbon tax directly paid by families or individuals. It doesn’t not, nor can it, return the money that’s paid by families or individuals on the indirect carbon tax. Such as goods and services that now cost more to produce and/or transport because of the increased cost of energy.
-
You think that heat pumps are a technological advance? Perhaps decades ago.
moronic stoogeShady! Yes... advances in heat pump tech such that cold climate air source heat pumps have been designed to work in lower temperatures well below freezing and can now work... efficiently... down to –25°C temperatures.
Regardless, why would anyone switch to heat pumps anytime soon if the high cost of heating oil is subsidized?
again, you're floundering with your stoopid use of the word 'subsidy'! Try a googly; you're clearly in need of educating yourself about the benefits of heat pumps... here's your first clues: both heating & cooling and efficiency!
you're a waste of time! You gotsNoGame - p i s s off, hey!
-
This is a heckuva word salad that actually says absolutely nothing.
what it says/shows is you, once again, display you're a knowNothing parrot... one that relies on so-called "SUN journalists" to ply their misinforming/lying ways! Don't you feel embarrassed to falsely claim something, as today, that presumes upon 2030-2031 modeling... even as disputed as that modeling is! Again, you gotsNoGame! You're a waste of time!
-
Peepee is trying to sell the idea that Justin is promoting his "dangerous gender ideology" in schools? Have they no respect for their base at all to think they would just accept that the federal government has anything to do with the public school system?
Preying on the dimwits to try to stoke hatred of marginalized groups is a new low for Canada
https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-under-fire-after-video-surfaces-of-homophobic-and-transphobic-speech/
-
Peepee is trying to sell the idea that Justin is promoting his "dangerous gender ideology" in schools? Have they no respect for their base at all to think they would just accept that the federal government has anything to do with the public school system?
Preying on the dimwits to try to stoke hatred of marginalized groups is a new low for Canada
https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-under-fire-after-video-surfaces-of-homophobic-and-transphobic-speech/
In ALberta, they just had a UCP convention, and it was one of the main issues.
Not health care
Not climate change
Not inflation
Not crime
Not poverty
It was transgender grooming.
-
Peepee is trying to sell the idea that Justin is promoting his "dangerous gender ideology" in schools? Have they no respect for their base at all to think they would just accept that the federal government has anything to do with the public school system?
Preying on the dimwits to try to stoke hatred of marginalized groups is a new low for Canada
https://pressprogress.ca/pierre-poilievre-under-fire-after-video-surfaces-of-homophobic-and-transphobic-speech/
If he’s insisting children be taught that there are 100+ genders, then yes, it’s radical ideology.
-
If he’s {PM Trudeau} insisting children be taught that there are 100+ genders, then yes, it’s radical ideology.
'insisting', how so Shady... how so?
It remains unclear how the Prime Minister of Canada would personally impose a “radical gender ideology” on Canadian schools — education falls under provincial, not federal, jurisdiction, and most schools are governed by elected school boards.
-
'insisting', how so Shady... how so?
But we know how the federal government can influence provincial policy through funding mandates. See the BC/Ottawa health care funding deal. Perhaps Trudeau just believes that gender nonsense for now, but hasn't acted out on it.
-
But we know how the federal government can influence provincial policy through funding mandates. Perhaps Trudeau just believes that gender nonsense for now, but hasn't acted out on it.
all rightee then, hey Shady! As you say, 'can influence'... 'but hasn't acted on' that influence! So divisive PeePee is just makin' shyte up again - yes?
It remains unclear how the Prime Minister of Canada would personally impose a “radical gender ideology” on Canadian schools — education falls under provincial, not federal, jurisdiction, and most schools are governed by elected school boards.
-
all rightee then, hey Shady! As you say, 'can influence'... 'but hasn't acted on' that influence! So divisive PeePee is just makin' shyte up again - yes?
Nope. Pierre said Trudeau was promoting it. That’s an absolute fact.
-
Pierre said... That’s an absolute fact.
(https://i.imgur.com/nSDhE9c.jpeg)
-
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1722738573126828032/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/zoQGVU9uH_9VbK9d.mp4?tag=12): ala America’s far-right, PoiLIEvre bullying vulnerable kids to score political points:
Justin Trudeau does not have a right to impose his radical gender ideology on our kids
-
(https://i.imgur.com/nSDhE9c.jpeg)
That’s rich coming from a Trudeau supporter! 😂😂😂
-
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1722738573126828032/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/zoQGVU9uH_9VbK9d.mp4?tag=12): ala America’s far-right, PoiLIEvre bullying vulnerable kids to score political points:
Sorry buddy, only radicals believe that there are 100+ genders. Nobody normal believes that nonsense.
-
Sorry buddy, only radicals believe that there are 100+ genders. Nobody normal believes that nonsense.
If he’s insisting children be taught that there are 100+ genders, then yes, it’s radical ideology.
Shady plying a strawman - don't be Shady!
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1722738573126828032/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/zoQGVU9uH_9VbK9d.mp4?tag=12): ala America’s far-right, PoiLIEvre bullying vulnerable kids to score political points:
Justin Trudeau does not have a right to impose his radical gender ideology on our kids
-
100+ genders.
How many genders do you think there are?
-
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1722738573126828032/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/zoQGVU9uH_9VbK9d.mp4?tag=12): ala America’s far-right, PoiLIEvre bullying vulnerable kids to score political points:
Justin Trudeau does not have a right to impose his radical gender ideology on our kids
(https://i.imgur.com/9hIUlQ6.png)
-
Maybe he means biological males of female gender competing with biological females because people can't understand the difference between sex and gender all of a sudden?
-
Maybe he means biological males of female gender competing with biological females because people can't understand the difference between sex and gender all of a sudden?
Waldo doesn’t understand that he and Trudeau are in the fringe minority.
-
so... media finally starts to ask PoiLIEvre to explain his LIES! Strangely, PeePee can't muster response to either The Hill Times or CBC's Power & Politics! Go figure, hey Shady/Nipples - go figure!
(https://i.imgur.com/m4RlxFO.png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_DlTbaW8AAbQxv?format=jpg)
-
so... media finally starts to ask PoiLIEvre to explain his LIES! Strangely, PeePee can't muster response to either The Hill Times or CBC's Power & Politics! Go figure, hey Shady/Nipples - go figure!
(https://i.imgur.com/m4RlxFO.png)
The more we see of peepee, the more we see he is a chickenshit who isn't very intelligent at all. 😂
-
The more we see of peepee, the more we see he is a chickenshit who isn't very intelligent at all. 😂
G&M's Coyne continues to be openly critical of PoiLIEvre!
(https://i.imgur.com/C4o8Jis.png)
-
G&M's Coyne continues to be openly critical of PoiLIEvre!
(https://i.imgur.com/C4o8Jis.png)
It doesn’t seem to be working. 😂😂😂
[attachimg=1]
-
It doesn’t seem to be working. 😂😂😂
only PeePee/CPC lapdogs believe those polls! Again, until recently, media has been giving PoiLIEvre a free ride... much like how U.S. media refused to challenge Trump. Even before he cheated to win the CPC leadership, PoiLIEvre has been in non-stop unchallenged campaign mode... most of that time spreading misinformation, disinformation and outright lies.
-
how revealing! PoiLIEvre - such a coward... couldn't even handle a smattering of protesters calling out for a ceasefire in Gaza... and PeePee cried out for police to come to his aid - right after talking about the importance of having a government that listens to the people! Oh my - such a
leader w a n k e r! video: (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1725563453153357824/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/g-xs3XIO4c6C3uWe.mp4?tag=12)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_UF7NeXEAAxl0q?format=jpg)
-
only PeePee/CPC lapdogs believe those polls! Again, until recently, media has been giving PoiLIEvre a free ride... much like how U.S. media refused to challenge Trump. Even before he cheated to win the CPC leadership, PoiLIEvre has been in non-stop unchallenged campaign mode... most of that time spreading misinformation, disinformation and outright lies.
Don’t believe the polls? You sound like Trump! 😂😂😂
I love it!
-
such a coward - PoiLIEvre paid a $50 thousand 'fine' to avoid debating during the CPC leadership campaign! Such a loser.
hey now Shady, isn't that the Trump play... to avoid debating?
(https://i.imgur.com/KA2rKvX.jpg)
-
such a coward - PoiLIEvre paid a $50 thousand 'fine' to avoid debating during the CPC leadership campaign! Such a loser.
hey now Shady, isn't that the Trump play... to avoid debating?
(https://i.imgur.com/KA2rKvX.jpg)
I think that’s Biden. Or Trudeau avoiding debate during question period. Sorry buddy but it’s not gonna help Junior and his failed policies. People don’t feel better off under Trudeau. That’s just a fact. Everything’s gotten worse during his time in office. People are done with him. It’s about time you came to terms with that fact.
-
Don’t believe the polls? You sound like Trump! 😂😂😂
I love it!
I think I missed it when you realized that you were being played and Trump really lost the election. For the first half of 2020, you were calling Biden the pResident, meaning you felt he wasn't duly elected. When did you realize you were wrong?
-
I think I missed it when you realized that you were being played and Trump really lost the election. For the first half of 2020, you were calling Biden the pResident, meaning you felt he wasn't duly elected. When did you realize you were wrong?
Deflect, deflect, deflect. In almost every thread now.
-
Deflect, deflect, deflect. In almost every thread now.
It was an honest question. Your refusal to answer is the only deflection. I can see why though. How humiliating to be taken by such an obvious scam. Next you'll be buying crypto. 😂
-
such a coward - PoiLIEvre paid a $50 thousand 'fine' to avoid debating during the CPC leadership campaign! Such a loser.
hey now Shady, isn't that the Trump play... to avoid debating?
(https://i.imgur.com/KA2rKvX.jpg)
I think that’s Biden. Or Trudeau avoiding debate during question period.
Deflect, deflect, deflect. In almost every thread now.
says YOU, the guy deflecting from the fact the cowardly PoiLIEvre paid a $50K fine to avoid debating... paid with funds received by party donors, no less!
thanks for reminding the waldo that a many times followed practice in the House saw PeePee, "calling out a not present PM Trudeau", as if he was actually present... all for the benefit of a photo-op. It got so bad that other party leaders (in particular Green Party leader May) highlighted PoiLIEvre's juvenile ploy! There's also no shortage of video clips showing PM Trudeau repeatedly getting the better of PeePee during Question Period - no shortage!
-
going to... pump-you-up!
(https://i.imgur.com/DNiYGPS.jpg)
an actual price tag for the makeover - $3 million! Oh my!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_SvzE-WUAAU88R?format=jpg)
-
Girdle technology has come a long way. 😂
-
will 'axe-the-tax' PoiLIEvre switch to a chainsaw now that the chainsaw wielding nutter, Javier Milei, has won the Presidency in Argentina?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nANz-aAl_sA (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F92dtWUWMAAjFEo?format=jpg)
-
yes, of course, taxpayers pay the costs for MPs to travel back & forth to their home ridings. Wait, what... PeePee's riding is in Ottawa!
but what we have here is PoiLIEvre campaigning across Canada since Sept 22 when he stole the CPC leadership... campaigning on the taxpayer dime! Travel costs sans expenses are now in for just the first 6 months of 2023... no election called; no writ has been dropped - the taxpayer is on the hook for ~$250K for PeePee travel!
(https://i.imgur.com/GV5jwVn.jpg)
-
says YOU, the guy deflecting from the fact the cowardly PoiLIEvre paid a $50K fine to avoid debating... paid with funds received by party donors, no less!
thanks for reminding the waldo that a many times followed practice in the House saw PeePee, "calling out a not present PM Trudeau", as if he was actually present... all for the benefit of a photo-op. It got so bad that other party leaders (in particular Green Party leader May) highlighted PoiLIEvre's juvenile ploy! There's also no shortage of video clips showing PM Trudeau repeatedly getting the better of PeePee during Question Period - no shortage!
Dude. Nobody likes your sh*tty policies. They’ve literally made everything worse. You inherited a strong Canada and turned it to sh*t. Your time is up, resign already and let somebody else clean up your mess.
[attachimg=1]
-
You think Waldo is actually Trudeau?
-
You think Waldo is actually Trudeau?
I’m starting to think so.
-
I’m starting to think so.
Shady is a stooge! Don't be Shady!
-
Shady is a stooge! Don't be Shady!
Pot calling kettle.
-
Pot calling kettle.
no - not at all! That stooopid comment from member Shady was deserving of the 'stooge labelling'. What's your beef with the waldo, hey?
-
no - not at all! That stooopid comment from member Shady was deserving of the 'stooge labelling'. What's your beef with the waldo, hey?
waldo, you are the ultimate political stooge on this forum. Just an LPC mouthpiece.
-
ya ya, wilber - apparently, to you, your long-running, long-established, Conservative leaning & bias doesn't count - yes?
-
ya ya, wilber - apparently, to you, your long-running, long-established, Conservative leaning & bias doesn't count - yes?
I am a fiscal conservative but that doesn't mean I can't be critical of the CPC. PP hasn't explained how he will get spending in order but clearly it won't be done without some major spending cuts regardless of who is in power.
Scotia Bank says government spending has added 2% to the bank rate. We can turn ourselves into another Argentina if we don't learn to live within our means.
-
I am a fiscal conservative but that doesn't mean I can't be critical of the CPC. PP hasn't explained how he will get spending in order but clearly it won't be done without some major spending cuts regardless of who is in power.
spending & cuts! Good on ya wilber - good on ya! If only ShadyMan had a brain!
-
I am a fiscal conservative but that doesn't mean I can't be critical of the CPC. PP hasn't explained how he will get spending in order but clearly it won't be done without some major spending cuts regardless of who is in power.
So far he's indicated spending caps on government spending.
-
No cuts needed if you just slow the rate of growth.
So far he's indicated spending caps on government spending.
geezaz Shady! Member wilber just stated that, "PP hasn't explained how he will get spending in order but clearly it won't be done without some major spending cuts"... and you slide right on by that - of course you do!
-
So far he's indicated spending caps on government spending.
ya ya, Shady! Why can't you point to an official PoiLIEvre/CPC fiscal policy intent statement? Is there a problem... for you?
-
re: explosion at Rainbow Bridge near Niagara Falls - sloganeering PeePee is right on top of it!
PoiLIEvre: "Bring Home Security For Our People"
(https://i.imgur.com/nD5jC44.jpg)
-
re: Rainbow Bridge explosion:
CNN: Waiting for facts
MSNBC: Waiting for facts
CBS: Waiting for facts
ABC: Waiting for facts
Fox News: IT'S A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!
oh my! So PeePee calls it a terrorist attack - of course he does! Meanwhile NY Governor & NY police say it wasn't terrorism!
-
In all fairness, didn't the NYPD or some other authority say that they're investigating it as a terror attack? I mean, I'm not one to defend PP and Fox News, but that's the way it was presented in other news sources I read today.
-
oh my! So PeePee calls it a terrorist attack - of course he does! Meanwhile NY Governor & NY police say it wasn't terrorism!
PoiLIEvre - redefining vehicle accidents in other countries as terror attacks!
(https://i.imgur.com/Hyvd0rA.jpg)
-
PoiLIEvre - redefining vehicle accidents in other countries as terror attacks!
(https://i.imgur.com/Hyvd0rA.jpg)
[attachimg=1]
-
PoiLIEvre - redefining vehicle accidents in other countries as terror attacks!
Care to respond to PP's rebuttal and Shady's post above?
PP says CTV reported the Trudeau government was going on the assumption that it was a terror attack, and PP said he never called it a terror attack, he stated "media reports of a terror attack".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9hB0LJ-Dlo
-
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpg)
-
To be fair, 30 wingnut Republicans also irresponsibly declared it to be a terrorist attack before getting any information, so peepee was just following their lead
-
To be fair, 30 wingnut Republicans also irresponsibly declared it to be a terrorist attack before getting any information, so peepee was just following their lead
I'm betting he was mainlining Fox News for his info.
-
To be fair, 30 wingnut Republicans also irresponsibly declared it to be a terrorist attack before getting any information, so peepee was just following their lead
Was that before or after CTV declared it an act of terrorism?
-
re: Rainbow Bridge explosion:
CNN: Waiting for facts
MSNBC: Waiting for facts
CBS: Waiting for facts
ABC: Waiting for facts
Fox News: IT'S A TERRORIST ATTACK!!!
oh my! So PeePee calls it a terrorist attack - of course he does! Meanwhile NY Governor & NY police say it wasn't terrorism!
re: explosion at Rainbow Bridge near Niagara Falls - sloganeering PeePee is right on top of it!
PoiLIEvre: "Bring Home Security For Our People"
(https://i.imgur.com/nD5jC44.jpg)
I'm betting he was mainlining Fox News for his info.
bingo! PoiLIEvre lied, doubled-down on that lie and he continues to lie... all to cover-up his source reliance on Fox News!
#PeePeeFoxNews
-
Was that before or after CTV declared it an act of terrorism?
Before (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/feds-say-no-evidence-of-terrorism-in-bridge-blast-criticize-poilievre-for-terrorist-attack-remark-1.6657992?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3Actvnews%3Atwittermanualpost&taid=655ff5a8b0bd0500014e2a05&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+New+Content+%28Feed%29&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter).
Mr. Speaker, we just heard media reports about a terrorist attack at the border in Niagara. Two people may have been killed and a third injured. Can the prime minister give us any information about this terrorist attack?" Poilievre asked first in French, in a question that began at 2:23 p.m. ET, according to ParlVu.
The prime minister responded, indicating that at that time the situation was "very serious," and work continued, referencing what then were four border closures. Poilievre then asked about the situation again in English, at 2:25 p.m. ET, according to ParlVu, once again using the phrase "media reports of a terrorist attack."
...
On Thursday, Poilievre was asked during a press conference in Toronto whether he thought it was responsible to call the explosion terrorism when no U.S. or Canadian official had said that it was.
In response, Poilievre pointed to reporting by CTV News.
"CTV reported that the Government of Canada was presuming that the incident was terrorist… And that's what I said in my remarks… I said there are media reports," Poilievre said.
A back-and-forth transpired between The Canadian Press reporter and Poilievre, about the Conservative leader describing the situation as a terrorist attack, or terrorism.
"I didn't. I said there were media reports…. What I said, and I was right, was that there were media reports of a terror-related event," Poilievre said.
CTV News reported,(opens in a new tab) citing national security sources, that government officials were operating under the assumption that the incident at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, was terror-related.
This breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about "media reports about a terrorist attack.
-
Andrew Scheer doxxed a senator on twitter, leading to the police recommending she leave her home because people were threatening her? Classy!
-
Care to respond to PP's rebuttal and Shady's post above?
Was that before or after CTV declared it an act of terrorism?
you're welcome Nipples! You're welcome!
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNUxeAA.png)
#PeePeeFoxNews
-
If they want to be concerned about foreign terrorism, they might notice the real, actual terrorism in Ireland yesterday perpetrated by the far Right.
-
If they want to be concerned about foreign terrorism, they might notice the real, actual terrorism in Ireland yesterday perpetrated by the far Right.
Looked like BLM protests to me.
-
you're welcome Nipples! You're welcome!
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNUxeAA.png)
#PeePeeFoxNews
But that’s not true.
-
I’ll make it easy for waldo to understand. Question period starts after 2:00. CTV broke their story at 1:50. The real question is which officials in the Trudeau government indicated that it was terrorism. Who were CTV’s sources?
[attachimg=1]
-
If your reading comprehnsion were better, you would know that your screenshot doesn't say anybody (but peepee) concluded it was terrorism. Conducting an investigation while "acting on the assumption" it is terrorism is just being prudent until you get all the information. Forming conclusions before you get all the information is irresponsible.
-
If your reading comprehnsion were better, you would know that your screenshot doesn't say anybody (but peepee) concluded it was terrorism. Conducting an investigation while "acting on the assumption" it is terrorism is just being prudent until you get all the information. Forming conclusions before you get all the information is irresponsible.
If you knew anything about the facts you’d know that PP didn’t conclude anything. He indicated that there were media reports indicating that it was terrorism. Which government officials were the sources of the CTV report? Inquiring minds want to know!
-
Again, try reading the CTV report from the beginning with the understanding that they are talking about them investigating the matter as though it were terrorism, not concluding that it was terrorism. You're saying peepee can't read either?
-
Again, try reading the CTV report from the beginning with the understanding that they are talking about them investigating the matter as though it were terrorism, not concluding that it was terrorism. You're saying peepee can't read either?
Again, re-read CTV’s initial report at 1:50, indicating that sources within the Trudeau government were under the assumption the explosion was terror related. What we need to know now, is who are/were CTV’s sources?
-
PP shouldn't have outright called it a terrorist attack. But the guy is so desperate to find anything to attack Trudeau on.
-
A car explodes.
Media: investigation underway as terorrist attack.
The mob: why does the lame stream media jump to conclusions on everything.
Alternate universe, a car explodes:
Media: car explodes at border crossing, cause unknown.
The mob: lame stream media is afraid of saying "Islamic terrorism"
-
PP shouldn't have outright called it a terrorist attack. But the guy is so desperate to find anything to attack Trudeau on.
PP didn’t outright call it terrorism. He literally said “there are media reports indicating that”, and asked what security measures were being taken. That’s it. That’s the whole story. He didn’t attack anything or anyone. If you don’t believe me, watch question period yourself from Wednesday afternoon. It’s all right there for anyone to see.
-
I’ll make it easy for waldo to understand. Question period starts after 2:00. CTV broke their story at 1:50.
nothing sweeter than to read PeePee stooges (like Shady) trying to argue timing without regard to recognizing time zones!
again, CTV News says: "This breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about "media reports about a terrorist attack."
That’s it. That’s the whole story.
no - the real story is PeePee gave us yet another example that showed he's just not ready for prime time! LOL! PoiLIEvre's rush to terrorism judgment... based solely on Fox News reporting!
#PeePeeFoxNews
PeePee: "Bring Home Security For Our People"
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)
-
Andrew Scheer doxxed a senator on twitter, leading to the police recommending she leave her home because people were threatening her? Classy!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_u1f13XUAAGxvR?format=jpg)
-
nothing sweeter than to read PeePee stooges (like Shady) trying to argue timing without regard to recognizing time zones!
again, CTV News says: "This breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about "media reports about a terrorist attack."
no - the real story is PeePee gave us yet another example that showed he's just not ready for prime time! LOL! PoiLIEvre's rush to terrorism judgment... based solely on Fox News reporting!
#PeePeeFoxNews
PeePee: "Bring Home Security For Our People"
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)
That’s just not true. You can keep repeating a lie, but it doesn’t make it a fact. The fact is that CTV broke their story about a half hour before PP was in question period.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_u1f13XUAAGxvR?format=jpg)
You mean the names of senators are secret? 😂😂😂
-
Tell that to the police who now have to protect her from you guys
-
Tell that to the police who now have to protect her from you guys
Holy sh*t, I just found a site online that doxxes ALL Canadian senators! Bubber, do you think the police already know about this, or should I give them a call? 😂😂😂
https://sencanada.ca/en/senators/
-
That wasn't published with the intent to fuel the dimwit mob though.
-
That wasn't published with the intent to fuel the dimwit mob though.
Oh my, now you’re manufacturing intent in people’s speech huh? Well, what was posted exactly? Is it now out of bounds to criticize members of the government? Is that the previous democracy you pretend to care so much about? You’re fake outrage is amusing.
-
such a stooge is Shady! Again, per CTV News: "This breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about "media reports about a terrorist attack."
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNUxeAA.png)(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)
But that’s not true.
That’s just not true. You can keep repeating a lie, but it doesn’t make it a fact. The fact is that CTV broke their story about a half hour before PP was in question period.
geezaz Shady! How is it:
=> you're quite willing to accept that CTV News reported that government officials were operating under the assumption that the incident at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, was terror-related.
=> but you repeatedly state, "it's just not true", that the same CTV News reported that, "this breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about, "media reports about a terrorist attack."
c'mon Shady, why are you selectively choosing what CTV News reported information to accept, hey?
-
Your slavish adherence to the party line has been a joke around here forever.
ya ya, Conservative wilber appears to ignore those {other} members here that have a, as he calls it, "slavish adherence to the party line"... come on down PeePee/CPC lapdog & parrot Shady!
oh wait, Shady plays for wilber's favoured Con Party so he gets a free pass! Amirite wilber, amirite?
-
Andrew Scheer doxxed a senator on twitter, leading to the police recommending she leave her home because people were threatening her? Classy!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_u1f13XUAAGxvR?format=jpg)
Oh my, now you’re manufacturing intent in people’s speech huh? Well, what was posted exactly? Is it now out of bounds to criticize members of the government? Is that the previous democracy you pretend to care so much about? You’re fake outrage is amusing.
in the tweet, fakeInsuranceBrokerScheer shared a wanted poster-style image featuring Senator Bernadette Clement’s picture and office phone number... encouraging people to contact her office. The Scheer tweet also accused the Senator of shutting down debate on a Conservative-backed bill.
Following the tweet, Clement received a deluge of furious calls to her office, as well as racist abuse online. But the most alarming incident occurred when an unknown man made a threatening phone call claiming he intended to visit her home in Cornwall Ontario. Parliamentary security is currently investigating the incident. Senator Clement also contacted her local police in Cornwall, Ontario, who responded promptly to the threat against her safety. The Parliamentary Protective Services are also involved in the ongoing investigation.
-
wow! Sure seems like PeePee's latest tirade with a CP journalist has had an impact! PoiLIEvre's melting... he's melting!
Andrew Coyne...
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_zJ1TmXUAE_ZHN?format=jpg)
Chantal Ebert...
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1728095402954526720/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/JtFIOFFuCDDbDd5Q.mp4?tag=12): "Pierre Poilievre: An intellectual bully; Will lie whenever it suits his purpose"
-
wow! Sure seems like PeePee's latest tirade with a CP journalist has had an impact! PoiLIEvre's melting... he's melting!
Andrew Coyne...
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_zJ1TmXUAE_ZHN?format=jpg)
Chantal Ebert...
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1728095402954526720/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/JtFIOFFuCDDbDd5Q.mp4?tag=12): "Pierre Poilievre: An intellectual bully; Will lie whenever it suits his purpose"
LOL, breaking new! Panel of elites on CBC complain about Poilievre! Btw, small and insecure? That sounds more like Trudeau! Also, Pierre ain’t melting, he’s doing just fine. Canadians don’t want somebody small and insecure. They want somebody that will help make living affordable again. Somebody to stop purposely making everything more expensive. To be able to afford homes again. To stop massive deficit spending. To stop adding so much debt. You’re beloved panel is completely out of touch with average Canadians.
[attachimg=1]
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_u1f13XUAAGxvR?format=jpg)
in the tweet, fakeInsuranceBrokerScheer shared a wanted poster-style image featuring Senator Bernadette Clement’s picture and office phone number... encouraging people to contact her office. The Scheer tweet also accused the Senator of shutting down debate on a Conservative-backed bill.
Oh noes! Something critical of a politician! Encouraging people to, checks notes, contact her office! 😂😂😂
That used to be called democracy. What a big nothing burger. You guys also have no f**king clue what doxxing is. Btw, I found a couple of examples of people “doxxing” Harper! 🤣
Somebody call the RCMP!
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
-
wow! Sure seems like PeePee's latest tirade with a CP journalist has had an impact! PoiLIEvre's melting... he's melting!
Andrew Coyne...
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_zJ1TmXUAE_ZHN?format=jpg)
Chantal Ebert...
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1728095402954526720/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/JtFIOFFuCDDbDd5Q.mp4?tag=12): "Pierre Poilievre: An intellectual bully; Will lie whenever it suits his purpose"
LOL, breaking new! Panel of elites on CBC complain about Poilievre!
trying to diminish the impact by referencing the CBC is a most telling desperation move on your part - both Coyne & Ebert are well known journalists published regularly outside of anything to do with their weekly/once a week appearances on a short, 15-minute or so, CBC panel show...
hey now wilber, wouldn't you call this member Shady's, as you labelled it, "slavish adherence to the party line"? Hey wilber?
-
Andrew Scheer doxxed a senator on twitter, leading to the police recommending she leave her home because people were threatening her? Classy!
in the tweet, fakeInsuranceBrokerScheer shared a wanted poster-style image featuring Senator Bernadette Clement’s picture and office phone number... encouraging people to contact her office. The Scheer tweet also accused the Senator of shutting down debate on a Conservative-backed bill.
Following the tweet, Clement received a deluge of furious calls to her office, as well as racist abuse online. But the most alarming incident occurred when an unknown man made a threatening phone call claiming he intended to visit her home in Cornwall Ontario. Parliamentary security is currently investigating the incident. Senator Clement also contacted her local police in Cornwall, Ontario, who responded promptly to the threat against her safety. The Parliamentary Protective Services are also involved in the ongoing investigation.
Oh noes! Something critical of a politician! Encouraging people to, checks notes, contact her office! 😂😂😂
again, Shady rushes forward to attempt to diminish the impact of what azzhole Scheer did... ignore the resulting threats made towards the Senator, ignore the resulting police involvement, ignore the involvement of Parliamentary Security, ignore the involvement of Parliamentary Protective Services.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_u1f13XUAAGxvR?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_3FNwwW8AAn5PI?format=jpg)
-
bingo! PoiLIEvre lied, doubled-down on that lie and he continues to lie... all to cover-up his source reliance on Fox News!
#PeePeeFoxNews
geezaz Shady! How is it:
=> you're quite willing to accept that CTV News reported that government officials were operating under the assumption that the incident at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, was terror-related.
=> but you repeatedly state, "it's just not true", that the same CTV News reported that, "this breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about, "media reports about a terrorist attack."
c'mon Shady, why are you selectively choosing what CTV News reported information to accept, hey?
(https://i.imgur.com/60d2sZl.png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_yH5t6XIAA2XyD?format=jpg)
-
editorial boards comeACallin'! PoiLIEvre so misunderstood... fer sure!
(https://i.imgur.com/Aebj3kN.png)
-
(https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/thestar.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/c1/fc10970c-8195-5e60-896d-5c5b37ea9816/656107ca507a4.image.jpg)
-
(https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/thestar.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/c1/fc10970c-8195-5e60-896d-5c5b37ea9816/656107ca507a4.image.jpg)
Why isn’t the kid asking CTV and their sources within the Trudeau government?
Regardless, I do have another fairytale. Affordable housing under Trudeau, and the budget balancing itself! 😂😂😂
-
Facts.
[attachimg=1]
-
Why isn’t the kid asking CTV and their sources within the Trudeau government?
Again, CTV didn't report on the terrorism angle until after Pee Pee spouted off in QP.
Facts.
(Attachment Link)
What are time zones?
-
Again, CTV didn't report on the terrorism angle until after Pee Pee spouted off in QP.
That's just not true. CTV indicated they had sources within the Trudeau government. They posted their story at 1:50 EST, question period didn't start until 2:15. You zealots really hate facts for some reason.
-
That's just not true. CTV indicated they had sources within the Trudeau government. They posted their story at 1:50 EST, question period didn't start until 2:15. You zealots really hate facts for some reason.
I'm MST. My screenshot shows the post was made at 12:50 MST or 2:50 EST. QED.
-
What are time zones?
time zones? Hey waldo, didn't you mention Shady's time zone failure... like... like... days ago now? Why yes, yes I did! What a stooge that Shady is...
nothing sweeter than to read PeePee stooges (like Shady) trying to argue timing without regard to recognizing time zones!
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)
again Shady, c'mon:
such a stooge is Shady! Again, per CTV News: "This breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about "media reports about a terrorist attack."
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNUxeAA.png)
geezaz Shady! How is it:
=> you're quite willing to accept that CTV News reported that government officials were operating under the assumption that the incident at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, was terror-related.
=> but you repeatedly state, "it's just not true", that the same CTV News reported that, "this breaking information was first reported on CTV News approximately 15 minutes after Poilievre rose in the House to ask Trudeau about, "media reports about a terrorist attack."
c'mon Shady, why are you selectively choosing what CTV News reported information to accept, hey?
-
Someone who would lie and blame others for their own mistakes is not fit to be PM.
-
Someone who would lie and blame others for their own mistakes is not fit to be PM.
Then Trudeau should’ve resigned years ago.
-
time zones? Hey waldo, didn't you mention Shady's time zone failure... like... like... days ago now? Why yes, yes I did! What a stooge that Shady is...
again Shady, c'mon:
Why do you keep repeating a lie over and over again, and then posting a picture of yourself err Pinocchio, which is quite Orwellian! 😂😂😂
Lol, now your excuse for lying is time zone! Yes, CTV had their Newfoundland office post the breaking story happening in Ontario! 🤣🤣🤣
Despite their headquarters being in Toronto! Makes total sense! 🤡
You zealots just can’t accept facts. Look, I get it. You don’t like Pierre. You find him annoying. It’s extra annoying that he’s going to be the next PM with a majority government. But you can’t make up facts to suit your feelings. Get over it already. Sheesh!
-
Why do you keep repeating a lie over and over again, and then posting a picture of yourself err Pinocchio, which is quite Orwellian! 😂😂😂
Lol, now your excuse for lying is time zone! Yes, CTV had their Newfoundland office post the breaking story happening in Ontario! 🤣🤣🤣
Despite their headquarters being in Toronto! Makes total sense! 🤡
You zealots just can’t accept facts. Look, I get it. You don’t like Pierre. You find him annoying. It’s extra annoying that he’s going to be the next PM with a majority government. But you can’t make up facts to suit your feelings. Get over it already. Sheesh!
I can’t believe you bounce on Elon Musk’s dick like a trampoline but don’t know how his products work. Time stamps on Twitter posts are from the account holders’ time zone, not that of whatever account they’re following. The screenshot you posted was from a user in central time, assuming of course it wasn’t otherwise doctored.
-
Peepee lies because he seeks the support of Trumpers, and Trumpers like being lied to. It doesn't bother them at all.
He lied about the bridge accident being a terrorist attack and then lied about the media report.
On Jan. 2, he lied about a Calgarian named “Mustafa” who (he claimed) missed his wedding in Cuba because he didn’t receive the passport he applied for 10 months earlier. Mustafa didn't exist, even though he still exists on peepee's twitter feed
Peepee lied when he said Trudeau refuses to "confront local gatekeepers who block construction of new affordable apartments." The Trudeau government is spending billions of dollars on housing projects across Canada, and residential rental rates and land use policies are provincial government responsibilities.
Last week, peepee claimed up to 1,600 South Koreans could be working on an EV battery plant being constructed in Windsor, and he demanded a “full inquiry into how many of these taxpayer-funded jobs are going to temporary foreign workers.” He argued that the $15 billion in federal support for the project should only fund jobs for Canadian workers. He failed to mention that South Koreans are eligible to work in Canada under the terms of a free trade agreement negotiated by the Harper government, in which Poilievre served as employment minister. He also ignored the fact that fewer than 100 South Koreans have actually entered Canada for the project and they are training Canadians who will be working on the project.
Peepee and his caucus also voted against the updated Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement because he claimed it would impose a carbon tax on Ukrainians. But that was a lie. It doesn't. He just didn't want to say the real reason they voted against it.
And despite ranking first in quality-of-life rankings, he said Canada is fundamentally broken. That one I can believe, however, because if such a lying Trumper is really doing so well in the polls, it must be so.
-
Peepee lies because
PP hasn't lied about anything, but why does Justin lie then? Better question, why don't you care about any of Justin's lies? Why don't you care about the record number of ethics violations? Instead, more deflection and whataboutisms about Trump.
-
I cited peepee's lies and you were unable to refute them, do you resorted to a weak whataboutism with no citations whatsoever. You're bad at this.
-
I cited
You didn't actually cite anything. Just opinions with no sources.
-
[attachimg=1]
-
he said Canada is fundamentally broken.
You're pathetic.
Most Canadians agree 'Canada is broken' — and they're angry about it: National poll
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/canada-is-broken-poll
-
You didn't actually cite anything. Just opinions with no sources.
Are you disputing anything specific or would that be too embarrassing for you in the long run?
-
You're pathetic.
Most Canadians agree 'Canada is broken' — and they're angry about it: National poll
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/canada-is-broken-poll
Gullible conservatives believe the lies their leaders tell them. Remember when you were literally up in arms because you believed the 2020 election was fixed? How did that turn out for you? 😂
-
Gullible conservatives
Most Canadians are conservatives? LOL. More deflection I see.
-
Most Canadians who read the National Post are.
-
Most Canadians who read the National Post are.
Your denial of polls is Trumpian! LOL
-
Yes, I know peepee has to disparage everything about Canada and the western democratic system. Something to do with why he can't get security clearance. Regardless, Canada is still the best country in the world.
Meanwhile:
https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1609949861821947904?s=20
Total fabrication. The guy never existed.
-
Your denial of polls is Trumpian! LOL
Still hurts, doesn't it? Remember when he got you so riled up you were calling for terrorism in response to the "fixed election"? Sort of like that Epps sap who they told you was an FBI agent but wound up getting charged for being stupid like you. 😂
-
Yes, I know peepee has to disparage everything about CanadaNo, he disparages Trudeau's sh*tty policies that have made Canada worse, and Canadians worse off.
Canada is still the best country in the world.
It used to be better and more affordable, until Trudeau took office.
Meanwhile:
https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1609949861821947904?s=20
Total fabrication. The guy never existed.
You didn't hear about the massive backlog in passport applications and renewals? You must live under a rock, or just ignore any bad news related to the Trudeau regime.
-
Still hurts, doesn't it? Remember when he got you so riled up you were calling for terrorism in response to the "fixed election"? Sort of like that Epps sap who they told you was an FBI agent but wound up getting charged for being stupid like you. 😂
More deflection. I think you're incapable of staying on topic. Btw, that's usually a sign of early dementia.
-
Still embarrassed that you fell for the story that Epps was a federal agent? That was pretty funny. He was just a loser like you. 😂
-
Still embarrassed that you fell for the story that Epps was a federal agent? That was pretty funny. He was just a loser like you. 😂
Deflect, deflect, deflect. I don't blame you, Trudeau has been an utter disaster.
-
Deflect from what? You're the one trying to change the subject from peepee's imaginary passport seekers, his misrepresentation of the Ukraine trade deal and why he voted against it, and his false claims of terrorism. Why do you like politicians who lie to you? Why do you repeat their lies even when they are obviously untrue? The Epps story is just another example of you being pathetically gullible and then totally craven and irresponsible once your lies are discovered.
-
Deflect from what? You're the one trying to change the subject from peepee's imaginary passport seekers, his misrepresentation of the Ukraine trade deal and why he voted against it, and his false claims of terrorism. Why do you like politicians who lie to you? Why do you repeat their lies even when they are obviously untrue? The Epps story is just another example of you being pathetically gullible and then totally craven and irresponsible once your lies are discovered.
We've already been over this, and you fail to accept facts. The fact is, passports seekers were waiting up to 5 months to renew their passports. 5 months!
The Ukraine trade deal has explicit language, detailing such things as carbon taxes.
CTV posted a story 30 minutes before question period started, quoting sources within the Trudeau government indicating they were treating the incident as terrorism.
All those things are true. The fact that you deny them all because you have some unhealthy obsession with the current PM is troubling. But I don't blame you from doubting and deflecting. Trudeau's been so bad for Canada, most of his supporters have resorted to the same action as you.
-
"Mustafa" was fiction.
The CP story was posted after QP started. You're just repeating a lie.
The Ukraine trade deal does not impose a carbon tax in Ukraine. Again, you're repeating a lie like you did when you said the 2020 U S. election was fixed and when you said Epps was an FBI plant. Among many others.
Inevitably, when the lies are exposed, you scurry away and look for new lies to spread
-
This Liberal MP is getting flak for criticizing the "burn it down" approach peepee is importing into Canada from the U.S.
As someone who has advocated burning it down yourself, do you think this criticism is unfair?
https://x.com/KenHardie/status/1729164590532198844?s=20
-
"Mustafa" was fiction.
I have no idea that was fiction. What wasn't fiction is Canadians waiting 5-6 months to renew their passports.
The CP story was posted after QP started. You're just repeating a lie.
The CTV story was posted on Twitter at 1:50. Question period starts at 2:15. Stop your lying nonsense. Even if what you say is true, CP and CTV said they had sources within the Trudeau government. Either way you lose.
The Ukraine trade deal does not impose a carbon tax in Ukraine.
It was under discussion until Pierre blew it up by making it public.
Again, you're repeating a lie like you did when you said the 2020 U S. election was fixed and when you said Epps was an FBI plant.
It absolutely was fixed, and big tech and the mainstream media colluded to censor a story, and stories negative to Joe Biden. That's not a free and fair election. Epps was charged with only a misdemeanor for actually participating in getting people to storm the capital. Meanwhile, people that just walked around the capital building were charged with felonies. Explain that a$$hole.
-
This Liberal MP is getting flak for criticizing the "burn it down" approach peepee is importing into Canada from the U.S.
As someone who has advocated burning it down yourself, do you think this criticism is unfair?
https://x.com/KenHardie/status/1729164590532198844?s=20
I'm for free speech. You're an authoritarian piece of trash, that bends down and grabs his ankles for the government.
-
Yes, I know peepee has to disparage everything about Canada and the western democratic system. Something to do with why he can't get security clearance. Regardless, Canada is still the best country in the world.
Meanwhile:
https://x.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1609949861821947904?s=20
Total fabrication. The guy never existed.
Wow.
PP is not PM material.
-
Wow.
PP is not PM material.
Canadians disagree. Projected for 208 seats.
https://338canada.com/federal.htm
-
He'll still lose because, once people are paying attention, they'll realize he's a liar, and not everybody likes to be lied to like you do.
-
He'll still lose because, once people are paying attention, they'll realize he's a liar, and not everybody likes to be lied to like you do.
Trudeau's an even bigger liar, with worse policies. Cope and seethe buddy.
-
Cite?
-
Cite?
Ever heard of SNC Lavilin? Or did you block that out of your memory?
-
Wasn't that something to do with him working to get good jobs in Canada?
-
.
The CTV story was posted on Twitter at 1:50. Question period starts at 2:15. Stop your lying nonsense. Even if what you say is true, CP and CTV said they had sources within the Trudeau government. Either way you lose.
I like how you keep pushing this fiction despite me proving you completely wrong and CTV posting the times of their reporting. Loser.
-
I like how you keep pushing this fiction despite me proving you completely wrong and CTV posting the times of their reporting. Loser.
[attachimg=1]
Even if what you said was true. CTV cited them having sources within the Trudeau government. So either way your claim makes no sense.
-
I'm for free speech. You're an authoritarian piece of trash, that bends down and grabs his ankles for the government.
Nobody's speech is being impeded. You think free speech means being free of expressions of disagreement, because for some reason this makes you a victim. I guess it's because you always get humiliated in those situations.
-
(Attachment Link)
Even if what you said was true. CTV cited them having sources within the Trudeau government. So either way your claim makes no sense.
Yeah dummy you already posted that. And I showed how the timestamp depends on where the user is.
-
Yeah dummy you already posted that. And I showed how the timestamp depends on where the user is.
Then who are the sources within the Trudeau government?
-
Nobody's speech is being impeded. You think free speech means being free of expressions of disagreement, because for some reason this makes you a victim. I guess it's because you always get humiliated in those situations.
Then I’m not sure what the purpose of your post was.
-
Then who are the sources within the Trudeau government?
lol the tweet didn’t say anything about that.
-
lol the tweet didn’t say anything about that.
Lol, they actually state sources. You’re a f**king clown 🤡
-
Then I’m not sure what the purpose of your post was.
To criticize imported MAGA politics. My freedom of speech allows that. It's not fascist at all, dum-dum.
-
Lol, they actually state sources. You’re a f**king clown 🤡
Sources could be a lot of things like local cops moron. You’re really desperate here it’s hilarious.
-
Sources could be a lot of things like local cops moron. You’re really desperate here it’s hilarious.
So they came up with sources that confirmed it was being assumed as a terrorist attack? Thanks for making my point. Or were to believe that they didn’t post the story until they got confirmation from Pierre during question period? That’s quite the conspiracy theory! 😂😂😂
-
You are completely misunderstanding everything. The CTV report, published after the QP question, said that, because it was an explosion on a critical international bridge, as a matter of course it was being investigated as though it were a terrorist event. This is how they operate as a matter of procedure. That article gives peepee no excuse to declare it to be terrorism.
Foxnews, however, declared it to be terrorism before QP even started. Maybe that's what peepee was referring to, but doesn't want to admit he believes what Foxnews tells him?
-
So they came up with sources that confirmed it was being assumed as a terrorist attack? Thanks for making my point.
Or were to believe that they didn’t post the story until they got confirmation from Pierre during question period? That’s quite the conspiracy theory! 😂😂😂
The point here is PP lied about the media source he was citing in QP in his exchange with the CP reporter since CTV's report came out after he spoke, probably because it was FoxNews or something similarly dubious and embarrassing. Everything else, including the content of the report that came out after PP spoke, is irrelevant.
-
The CTV story was posted on Twitter at 1:50. Question period starts at 2:15. Stop your lying nonsense.
It was 2:50 ET. Even though you know you got confused by time zones, you're going to double down and call others liars instead of admitting you're wrong? You don't worry about being too pathetic? LOL
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-explosion-rainbow-bridge-1.7038425#:~:text=Poilievre%20timeline%20in%20question&text=Subsequent%20tweets%20from%20the%20article's,before%20CTV's%20article%20was%20published.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_3vQuHWUAAhwp-?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GANNQjDWQAAtslk?format=jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_3vQuHWUAAhwp-?format=jpg)
-
If I did not know any better, I would swear that Waldo is a Conservative shill, trying to make Liberal supporters look bad...lol.
-
I don't know any better...
good on ya Foolio, good on ya!
-
Question for the forum. Since the NDP are now tied with the Liberals and poised to move ahead in the coming weeks. Will Singh decide to stop supporting the government if it means he could be official opposition or possibly PM in another coalition with the Liberals?
-
seems the CPC/PoiLIEvre 'brain trust' has moved on... yet again!
the waldo misses, "powerful pay cheques"... and misses, "after 8 years of Trudeau"... and misses, "bring {it} home". But surely, surely, "axe the tax" still has some mileage left before being dropped!
as the insider you are Shady, what's in the sloganeering pipe... what's next, hey!
-
Question for the forum. Since the NDP are now tied with the Liberals and poised to move ahead in the coming weeks. Will Singh decide to stop supporting the government if it means he could be official opposition or possibly PM in another coalition with the Liberals?
If I was Singh, and had a chance to increase the presence of the NDP in the HoC, I would definitely bring down the Government. The Liberals are going to get decimated, and there may even be an Orange wave like there was in 2011.
-
...and there may even be an Orange wave like there was in 2011.
pro tip: TikTok Singh ain't no Jack Layton!
(https://i.imgur.com/3BhCUNq.jpg)
-
underlying reference: expert language interpreters are present at the HoC's committee level
Conservative MP Rachel Thomas has been accused of trying to undermine bilingualism for asking Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge, a Francophone from Quebec, to provide English answers to her questions... shockingly this is not going over well in Quebec!
Conservative MP's effort to question official bilingualism 'absolutely reprehensible'
some are saying: providing answers in French messes with the CPC's efforts to create English language rage-farming videos!
-
geezaz waldo! How did you miss, "not worth the cost"?
seems the CPC/PoiLIEvre 'brain trust' has moved on... yet again!
the waldo misses, "powerful pay cheques"... and misses, "after 8 years of Trudeau"... and misses, "bring {it} home". But surely, surely, "axe the tax" still has some mileage left before being dropped!
as the insider you are Shady, what's in the sloganeering pipe... what's next, hey!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GAVrPI0XYAAy00O?format=jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/yS2q2ok.jpeg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_3vQuHWUAAhwp-?format=jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GANNQjDWQAAtslk?format=jpg)
-
He can't be briefed about the Israeli conflict because he refuses to allow the security check. He can't be briefed about the Indian assassination of the Sikh Canadian because he refuses to allow the security check. He couldn't be briefed on the China spy situation because he refuses to allow the security check, but that didn't stop him from attacking David Johnston's character. You guys believed the ridiculous story that he would be "silenced" if he learned information that required a security check, which made no logical sense at all.
(https://i.imgur.com/Q4iqKkk.png)
-
The waldo sure does love potato salad!
-k
-
Uh-oh, looks like the waldo had too much potato salad!
c'mon weakSaucekimmy! Is that the best you can do?
The waldo sure does love potato salad!
you need new material weakSaucekimmy!
-
CSIS says peepee's leadership campaign was funded by Indian organized crime? Maybe that's why he can't get security clearance.
https://twitter.com/scoopercooper/status/1733474550703104042
-
Peepee is an India/China puppet What a surprise!
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-did-china-and-india-meddle-in-the-conservative-leadership-race/
https://www.baaznews.org/p/cpc-leadership-race-indian-foreign-interference
-
Has anyone ever seen peepee and Mike Johnson in the same room? 😂
https://twitter.com/Glen4Climate/status/1734982447803093045?t=AbXqlUIWIYJSys_PspwyOA&s=19
-
Peepee is an India/China puppet What a surprise!
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-did-china-and-india-meddle-in-the-conservative-leadership-race/
paywall... here's a graphic of Coyne's article:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBObKxFWgAIsdhb?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBO06GuX0AAlVDO?format=jpg)
-
Liberal MP calls out the Conservatives for voting against continued aid for Ukraine. He was heckled and shouted down five times, even as the speaker of the house called for decorum. I also noticed that the latest polls indicate that Conservative lead has narrowed. They now lead the Liberals by 10 points, as opposed to 17 points, the narrowest gap in three months.
https://twitter.com/Yvan_Baker/status/1735078569791914028
The more PP is in the spotlight, the less Canadians seem to like him. This could be a major issue going into the next election.
-
Liberal MP calls out the Conservatives for voting against continued aid for Ukraine. He was heckled and shouted down five times, even as the speaker of the house called for decorum. I also noticed that the latest polls indicate that Conservative lead has narrowed. They now lead the Liberals by 10 points, as opposed to 17 points, the narrowest gap in three months.
https://twitter.com/Yvan_Baker/status/1735078569791914028
Wait until Trudeau has to explain his new green slush fund scandal. Regardless…
[attachimg=1]
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBeRSkbXUAAudTs?format=jpg)
-
Peepee is the first opposition leader in Canada ever to say that getting security clearance is a "trap" and absolutely refuse to renew it. I wonder why. He wasn't married when he got it last time when he was in government, was he? I bet it's something to do with his wife's family's "business" connections.
-
Peepee is the first opposition leader in Canada ever to say that getting security clearance is a "trap" and absolutely refuse to renew it. I wonder why. He wasn't married when he got it last time when he was in government, was he? I bet it's something to do with his wife's family's "business" connections.
Incorrect. Singh said the exact same thing, and did the exact same thing until he finally bent the knee after behind closed doors promises by the Trudeau regime. The RCMP and CSIS doesn’t need Pierre to have any clearances to continue their investigations into the Chinese related interference in our elections, in which several Liberal MPs were elected with the help of the communist Chinese government.
However, I understand that this is all you have, considering the sad state of the country. It’s much easier to fall back to these talking points than to try to solve the housing crisis that you created! 😂😂😂
-
...in which several Liberal MPs were elected with the help of the communist Chinese government.
you keep stating this absolute, unwavering statement; but you refuse to provide a verifiable citation to support your claim!
again, citation request - sure you can, hey ShadyMan!
-
Peepee is the first opposition leader in Canada ever to say that getting security clearance is a "trap" and absolutely refuse to renew it. I wonder why. He wasn't married when he got it last time when he was in government, was he? I bet it's something to do with his wife's family's "business" connections.
Incorrect. Singh said the exact same thing, and did the exact same thing until he finally bent the knee after behind closed doors promises by the Trudeau regime.
cite Shady - sure you can!
-
you keep stating this absolute, unwavering statement; but you refuse to provide a verifiable citation to support your claim!
again, citation request - sure you can, hey ShadyMan!
I’ve already provide several citations, at the beginning of this topic. I’m not reposting just because you ignore them.
-
cite Shady - sure you can!
Did Trudeau finally close those China run police stations in Canada? Why did he let them operate in Canada in the first place?
-
...in which several Liberal MPs were elected with the help of the communist Chinese government.
you keep stating this absolute, unwavering statement; but you refuse to provide a verifiable citation to support your claim!
again, citation request - sure you can, hey ShadyMan!
I’ve already provide several citations, at the beginning of this topic. I’m not reposting just because you ignore them.
oh my, Shady! Are you sure you've provided a citation that can be verified... that isn't conspiratorial... that isn't from a claimed anonymous source? And you so sure, so definite, so precise in your claim! Are you sure, ShadyMan? Are you sure?
-
Jagmeet underwent the security clearance so he could do his job. Peepee might be refusing to do so because of his wife's familiy's questionable dealings. It also might have something to do with how China and India got him the CPC leadership.
-
Jagmeet underwent the security clearance so he could do his job. Peepee might be refusing to do so because of his wife's familiy's questionable dealings. It also might have something to do with how China and India got him the CPC leadership.
Which job is that? Jagmeet is also part of the government in power, as it only exists with this cooperation. Notice that since his security clearance he’s been completely silenced on the issue? I get it though, focus on that instead of the sad state of Canada. It’s all you e got.
-
He's been silenced or he found out the facts and has nothing more to say? It's true they aren't allowed to share secrets, which is the point of a security clearance, but they aren't silenced in any other way. How would that even work? Are you saying every other opposition leader was silenced when they agreed to undergo the security check that allows them to do their job as opposition leader?
They're relying on you to just parrot their inane excuses without you even thinking about it first. You are complying just like they hoped.
-
Peepee is the first opposition leader in Canada ever to say that getting security clearance is a "trap" and absolutely refuse to renew it. I wonder why. He wasn't married when he got it last time when he was in government, was he? I bet it's something to do with his wife's family's "business" connections.
Only reason he doesn't have security clearance is that he doesn't want it. Once he has it, he can't say whatever the **** he wants anymore. As long as he doesn't have it, he can mouth off and bullshit however he pleases.
-
Why can't he say what he wants anymore? He's only restricted from sharing secrets...which as of now he is not privy to.
-
Why can't he say what he wants anymore? He's only restricted from sharing secrets...which as of now he is not privy to.
Makes it more difficult to make stuff up.
-
Not really. If he wants to lie, he can still lie. He just can't give away secrets, just as he can't now when he doesn't know them.
-
Not really. If he wants to lie, he can still lie. He just can't give away secrets, just as he can't now when he doesn't know them.
Singh didn’t want it either, until he got his demands met. Regardless, it’s irrelevant to the ongoing investigation by the RCMP and CSIS into China’s election interference on behalf of the Trudeau government.
-
You must be livid about how China interfered and got peepee the leadership of the CPC, especially after Johnston found there was nothing to the Liberal investigation.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/mqB0Av7.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/mqB0Av7.png)
More lame pictures from waldo. Juniors off to Jamaica for Christmas, after making everything more expensive for average Canadians though his terrible policies.
[attachimg=1]
-
...after making everything more expensive for average Canadians though his terrible policies.
everything? Which policies? Sure you can!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBeRSkbXUAAudTs?format=jpg)
-
everything? Which policies? Sure you can!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GBeRSkbXUAAudTs?format=jpg)
Immigration policy, carbon tax policy, inflationary spending policy.
-
Also, good on you waldo for finally admitting that Trudeau tries to play Santa instead of actually governing responsibly.
-
...after making everything more expensive for average Canadians though his terrible policies.
everything? Which policies? Sure you can!
Immigration policy, carbon tax policy, inflationary spending policy.
of course we've had extensive debate/argument on the impact of carbon pricing... economists & BoC Governor stating its impact is small/minimal. Care to dip your wick in defining just how much the government's immigration and spending "policies" make, as you say, EVERYTHING more expensive. Something that goes beyond you simply parroting PeePee talking points! Sure you can, hey!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/mqB0Av7.png)
More lame pictures from waldo.
replayed cause I added a new image to the growing mix! What's the common theme the images have/present, hey Shady?
-
so ya, PoiLIEvre was so afraid of taking questions from (usually softball thrower) Vassy, that he reached into his "deep bench" for Melissa Lantsman - and wow, Vassy pressed & Lantsman failed!
but, of course, PeePee has no qualms in sitting for Rebel News and supposed "journalist" Lawton - with a MAGAsee-MAGAdo moment that's getting a lot of play:
Justin Trudeau is a radical authoritarian. He's the opposite of liberal, very illiberal
(https://i.imgur.com/UHt9fAV.png)
-
so PM Trudeau & fam are in Jamaica for the holidays... and, of course, PM Trudeau haters have been raging for days now! But where is PeePee? No one knows/is sayin'. On the 24th, the PoiLIEvre Xfeed presents a recycled 2 year old video of PeePee & Anaconda mixing a XMas drink... but where's PeePee? Was Ana called back to Venezuela, or what?
-
so PM Trudeau & fam are in Jamaica for the holidays... and, of course, PM Trudeau haters have been raging for days now! But where is PeePee? No one knows/is sayin'. On the 24th, the PoiLIEvre Xfeed presents a recycled 2 year old video of PeePee & Anaconda mixing a XMas drink... but where's PeePee? Was Ana called back to Venezuela, or what?
I didn’t know that you were such a racist piece of sh*t. Congratulations.
-
Their marriage seems as real as Donald and Melania's. 😂
-
Their marriage seems as real as Donald and Melania's. 😂
I concur.
[attachimg=1]
-
Yeah, but they're separated. So what's your point?
-
Our country is run by Canada's biggest cuck.
-
Our country is run by Canada's biggest cuck.
Fact check: True!
-
Spoiled rich-kid virtue signalling radical feminist narcissistic fratboy PM runs country into the ground. Couldn't have seen that coming!
His communist-loving old man almost broke up the country multiple times over the creation of our Charter, which judges and politicians don't bother listening to anyways depending on which direction the wind is blowing. Great job Trudeau's.
At least they both got to pretend to be the next JFK playboys to feed their giant egos on our dime.
Eagerly awaiting the election of someone who isn't a wingnut. PP and Singh ain't it. O'Toole seemed decent. Oh well.
-
Spoiled rich-kid virtue signalling radical feminist narcissistic fratboy PM runs country into the ground. Couldn't have seen that coming!
His communist-loving old man almost broke up the country multiple times over the creation of our Charter, which judges and politicians don't bother listening to anyways depending on which direction the wind is blowing. Great job Trudeau's.
At least they both got to pretend to be the next JFK playboys to feed their giant egos on our dime.
Eagerly awaiting the election of someone who isn't a wingnut. PP and Singh ain't it. O'Toole seemed decent. Oh well.
I guess O’Toole was too normal to be accepted. You have to be eccentric in some way.
-
so PM Trudeau & fam are in Jamaica for the holidays... and, of course, PM Trudeau haters have been raging for days now! But where is PeePee? No one knows/is sayin'. On the 24th, the PoiLIEvre Xfeed presents a recycled 2 year old video of PeePee & Anaconda mixing a XMas drink... but where's PeePee? Was Ana called back to Venezuela, or what?
I didn’t know that you were such a racist piece of sh*t. Congratulations.
(https://i.imgur.com/cTKwO3m.png)
-
Eagerly awaiting the election of someone who isn't a wingnut. PP and Singh ain't it. O'Toole seemed decent. Oh well.
word on the back streets is that PeePee was instrumental in helping to remove O'Toole! But ya, you're right - compared to PoiLIEvre, O'Toole seems decent. O'Toole warns of 'performance politics,' social media perils in final Commons address (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/o-toole-warns-of-performance-politics-social-media-perils-in-final-commons-address-1.6438786)
Since being ousted by his caucus, O'Toole has kept a low profile in Parliament save for some of his writings. In late December 2022, he penned a post saying he wished the coming year would bring with it more civilized political rhetoric, specifically calling out the expletive-laden flags about Trudeau, which became one of the most memorable images of the 2022 "Freedom Convoy."
-
Journo Dale Smith: highlighting PoiLIEvre's interview safety net... an article extract highlighting the 'tightrope' PeePee walks around immigration targets!
(https://i.imgur.com/K1uxCTc.png)
-
Journo Dale Smith: highlighting PoiLIEvre's interview safety net... an article extract highlighting the 'tightrope' PeePee walks around immigration targets!
(https://i.imgur.com/K1uxCTc.png)
Oh the hand wringing of rando person Dale Snith! 😂😂😂
Who da f**k is he? Too bad he didn’t hand wring over what juniors done to this country.
-
Oh the hand wringing of rando person Dale Snith! 😂😂😂
Who da f**k is he? Too bad he didn’t hand wring over what juniors done to this country.
rando? No more rando than the likes of Rebel News' Andrew Lawton... who recently (softball) interviewed PeePee. But geezaz ShadyMan! The waldo gave you an opening to discuss "immigration targets"; gave you a chance to trumpet PoiLIEvre's target figures. Oh wait, never mind... that's a topic PeePee won't touch; one he refuses to address, hey! Considering you incessantly natter on about immigration, why is your boy afraid to speak about immigration targets? Why so, hey ShadyMan? Why so?
-
and she does it again! In a year-end interview, CPC MP Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough-Kawartha), again, improperly takes credit for a local Peterborough housing project in relation to a bill she/CPC voted against! Lying lies!
(https://i.imgur.com/jcLj63t.png)
Peterborough: City breaks ground on new affordable housing project - Feds covering almost $19 million toward six-storey structure
hey now waldo! Oh my! Conservative hypocrisy is ripe here - CPC MP Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough-Kawartha) taking credit in relation to the bill she/CPC voted against!
(https://i.imgur.com/5ByyZsA.png)
video: HOC QP - Housing Minister Sean Fraser reinforcing CPC MP Ferreri's blatant hyprocrisy! (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1714414409521434624/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/Pq7TUJHLs2Ocv1co.mp4?tag=12)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GCcXYOxXEAAvk27?format=jpg)
-
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1686386394363793408/pu/vid/1280x720/Nl5c3MgJ9eYh0GeX.mp4?tag=12): this... this is the real PoiLIEvre - hardly the now trumpeted "people's champion"!
-
one of PoiLIEvre's prominent 'front benchers', Leslyn Lewis... typically shows in HOC photos of PeePee. Lewis, who wants to remove Canada from the UN (and its subsidiary orgs), is starting off the New Year with the following:
(https://i.imgur.com/FCFCkS2.png)
hey Shady, is this now CPC foreign affairs policy? Surely you would know, right? C'mon waldo, what do you expect with such deeeep bench strength for PeePee to draw from?
-
video (https://i.imgur.com/scj5i4W.mp4): seriously, PoiLIEvre needs a wellness check - (on at least) 4 separate occasions PeePee has claimed that electricians are capturing “lightning from the sky” and running it through a copper wire to light up the world... to light up rooms.
-
PoiLIEvre's 'no nothing populism'... anti-expert, anti-intellectual, anti-knowledge, anti-science!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDACRPfakAAGH_Q?format=jpg)
-
uhhh... CPC MP Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough-Kawartha) - is that how it works now?... CPC sponsored petitions supersede elections! Good to know!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GC9Sm6kaYAAgJ0F?format=jpg)
-
c'mon weakSaucekimmy! Is that the best you can do?
you need new material weakSaucekimmy!
Oh, okay waldo!
(https://i.imgur.com/nC9GCa8.gif)
-k
-
Oh, okay waldo!
(https://i.makeagif.com/media/1-05-2024/BAusp8.gif)
-
video (https://i.imgur.com/scj5i4W.mp4): seriously, PoiLIEvre needs a wellness check - (on at least) 4 separate occasions PeePee has claimed that electricians are capturing “lightning from the sky” and running it through a copper wire to light up the world... to light up rooms.
purrfect!
(https://i.imgur.com/y3XDq8e.png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDeXzs7WwAAq1xK?format=jpg)
-
one of PoiLIEvre's prominent 'front benchers', Leslyn Lewis... typically shows in HOC photos of PeePee. Lewis, who wants to remove Canada from the UN (and its subsidiary orgs), is starting off the New Year with the following:
(https://i.imgur.com/FCFCkS2.png)
hey Shady, is this now CPC foreign affairs policy? Surely you would know, right? C'mon waldo, what do you expect with such deeeep bench strength for PeePee to draw from?
(https://i.imgur.com/aJpGDWI.png)
-
c'mon waldo... that's just such 'low hanging fruit'!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDhV8B2WMAAvvCo?format=png)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDm36VqXcAA5MHa?format=jpg)
-
geezaz waldo! PoiLIEvre finally surfaced in recent days - oh my, the caked-on foundation and (bordering on) 'frosted tips'! Clearly, the makeover continues! Still no word on where PeePee & fam vacationed over xmas/New Year...
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDqoruPW0AAkM5-?format=jpg)
-
#OrangeMenBad
consensus had been PeePee's caked-on foundation was an attempt to 'hide' the vacation tan! But then PoiLIEvre's orange collar took over!
(https://i.imgur.com/P0CmVj7.jpg)
-
#OrangeMenBad
consensus had been PeePee's caked-on foundation was an attempt to 'hide' the vacation tan! But then PoiLIEvre's orange collar took over!
(https://i.imgur.com/P0CmVj7.jpg)
That’s quite the conspiracy theory! 😂😂😂
-
What would be the conspiracy? Do you not know what conspiracy means either? lol
-
recent interview between the, 'little guy from Shawinigan' & Vassy; she asks former PM Chretien about all this 'Canada is broken' bullshyte...
G&M's Mason continues on with his column: "Negativity: the political stripe du jour"... touching upon the 3 stooges - PoiLIEvre, Scott Moe & Danielle Smith:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GECycfhXYAAFUn1?format=jpg)
-
Interesting that Harper's government introduced the carbon restrictions lying CPCers like to blame on the Liberals. I get the impression Stephen Harper will look like an NDPer if the CPC ever gets in power again.
-
... about that recent PeePee vaca trip, where did he go; why is the PoiLIEvre "brain trust" so determined to continue to hide where he went? Is it because the continuing makeover 'rumours' that PeePee had cosmetic work done are true?
(https://i.imgur.com/YeGEW4g.jpg)
-
oh my! PoiLIEvre says, "he won't lie to get votes"!
(https://i.imgur.com/x5hGZLB.png)
-
oh my! PoiLIEvre says, "he won't lie to get votes"!
(https://i.imgur.com/x5hGZLB.png)
Has he ever ignored warnings and completely screwed Canadians?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/government-was-warned-two-years-ago-high-immigration-could-affect-housing-costs-1.6720963
-
oh c'mon! The latest media play of PoiLIEvre's droll, monotone and clownish 'Canada is broken' nonsense is just so over-the-top! Of course Canada is not broken...
(https://i.imgur.com/CcUnrFa.jpg)
-
I just watched Mr. Poilievre's press conference in the greater Vancouver area and I finally figured out why he irritates me so much. It was like watching an infomercial with a slick salesman, but he wasn't trying to sell me his product. He spent the entire event blaming his competitor for every international crisis since WW2. I don't know what his product is because he won't tell me. All he says is his competitor is bad and have faith that is we only elect him, we will have sunny ways...ohhh, wait a minute. In 2025, we have a choice between Trudeau 2.0 or Trudeau 3.0.
The similarities are amazing. They both promise to fix things without specifying how. Most of the problems Mr. Poilieve highlights are caused by international events over which the Canadian government has no control. His problem is, he will be elected on the basis of unrealistic expectations. He will be judged by the same measure he uses against his cometiters.
When Mr. Trudeau was elected in 2015, he quickly became known as the "Trump whisperer" among his peers. Mr. Poilievre will need to do the same. Mr. Poilievre will also have to deal with the looming climate crisis, just as the Liberal government did. He will face a housing crisis just as the grits did. He will face a population who has their hands out for more government services but don't want to pay for them. Most of those demands from the people will be contradictory, just as they have been for Trudeau. Our healthcare and education is in crisis for a lack of funding, and while they are a provincial responsibility, they need Federal financial assistance to restore Them.
Finally, like his competitor, Mr. Poilieve has nice hair.
-
oh c'mon! The latest media play of PoiLIEvre's droll, monotone and clownish 'Canada is broken' nonsense is just so over-the-top! Of course Canada is not broken...
(https://i.imgur.com/CcUnrFa.jpg)
Hey waldo, why do you still pretend that Junior has anything to do with Canada’s good credit rating? Canada’s credit rating is due to the tough choices previous governments have made, most notably the Chrétien and Martin governments. You should be thanking them.
-
Hey waldo, why do you still pretend that PM Trudeau has anything to do with Canada’s good credit rating? Canada’s credit rating is due to the tough choices previous governments have made, most notably the Chrétien and Martin governments. You should be thanking them.
oh c'mon Shady!
But waldo seems to think that Canada's great credit rating is due to Trudeau for some reason.
the waldo simply pointed out to you that credit rating agencies assign current/latest ratings based on positions & results of a respective country's government in standing. Somehow you think the agencies assign ratings by going back multi-decades to find results that suit your self-serving & agenda-driven narrative! #ShadyEconomicIlliterate
-
Hey waldo, why do you still pretend that Junior has anything to do with Canada’s good credit rating? Canada’s credit rating is due to the tough choices previous governments have made, most notably the Chrétien and Martin governments. You should be thanking them.
It sure wasn't thanks to Harper's Social Credit government that ran up tens of billions in debt, undoing the fiscal success of Chretien / Martin.
-
It sure wasn't thanks to Harper's Social Credit government that ran up tens of billions in debt, undoing the fiscal success of Chretien / Martin.
That’s just not true. The deficits Harper ran were because of the global economic crisis in 2007/2008. Trudeau inherited a balanced budget, yet has added over a trillion dollars in debt. If you’re upset with Harper you must be very angry with Trudeau right?
-
oh c'mon Shady!
the waldo simply pointed out to you that credit rating agencies assign current/latest ratings based on positions & results of a respective country's government in standing. Somehow you think the agencies assign ratings by going back multi-decades to find results that suit your self-serving & agenda-driven narrative! #ShadyEconomicIlliterate
Trudeau has no legacy other than failure, so you try to take credit for other governments accomplishments! 😂😂😂
-
That’s just not true. The deficits Harper ran were because of the global economic crisis in 2007/2008. Trudeau inherited a balanced budget, yet has added over a trillion dollars in debt. If you’re upset with Harper you must be very angry with Trudeau right?
Wait till you hear about the COVID shutdown and the economic effects of that. Canada actually came out of it way better than the rest of the world. It was so devastating, you had to resort to denying the existence of the virus.
-
Wait till you hear about the COVID shutdown and the economic effects of that. Canada actually came out of it way better than the rest of the world. It was so devastating, you had to resort to denying the existence of the virus.
I don’t count/blame the government for running a deficit in 2020, 2021, and 2022. It’s 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2023 that I’m talking about. Particularly deficits in times of good economic growth and non-crisis. Governments are suppose to run deficits in recessions or situations of crisis. Not when times are good, and not for successive years.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/eJ1USfo.jpg)
purrfect! Just purrfect!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GEe1HUzWQAAZSnu?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GEfqu-bWcAArPje?format=png)
-
In true wannabe-Trunp fashion, peepee also has people beaten at his rallies if they express disagreement with him.
https://twitter.com/Canadian_logic_/status/1749523575315554699?t=YMbIqU-mRxQd7A1KISS1fA&s=19
-
(https://i.imgur.com/edRgsbr.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/CKRTadz.jpg)
video: (https://i.imgur.com/ESeZn5L.mp4) MAGA PeePee!
-
In true wannabe-Trunp fashion, peepee also has people beaten at his rallies if they express disagreement with him.
https://twitter.com/Canadian_logic_/status/1749523575315554699?t=YMbIqU-mRxQd7A1KISS1fA&s=19
Huh? Where did he do this?
-
short video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1750717989731864576/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/C00U-60gSx7GuANt.mp4?tag=12): oh my! Apparently, the CPC "brain trust" is scrambling over their internal polling... could PoiLIEvre be any more unhinged in what he's saying here?
-
oh c'mon! The latest media play of PoiLIEvre's droll, monotone and clownish 'Canada is broken' nonsense is just so over-the-top! Of course Canada is not broken...
(https://i.imgur.com/CcUnrFa.jpg)
of course PeePee... Canada is not broken!
(https://i.imgur.com/aQsSLFU.jpeg)
-
continuing the growing series!
(https://i.imgur.com/6bY2h0L.png)
#lyinPeePee
-
a most deserving State funeral for {NDP} Ed Broadbent - an assortment of speakers presented a common theme of Broadbent's passion in the pursuit of his hope of social justice and fairness for all; passionate, but not personal!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BTJtjSAAC8
impressed by Wab Kinew's remarks and how he presented them...
(https://www.ctvnews.ca/content/dam/ctvnews/en/images/2024/1/28/kinew-remembers-broadbents-compassion-as-a-leader-1-6745856-1706479790396.jpg)
-
oh my! Criticism is being directed toward PoiLIEvre, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, the leader of the Official Opposition, for not attending Ed Broadbent's state funeral! Real Conservatives, former Prime Minister Joe Clark was there; former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was there virtually in a video tribute - but, surprisingly, no PeePee!
-
oh my! Criticism is being directed toward PoiLIEvre, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, the leader of the Official Opposition, for not attending Ed Broadbent's state funeral! Real Conservatives, former Prime Minister Joe Clark was there; former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was there virtually in a video tribute - but, surprisingly, no PeePee!
I see you're focused on the important issues of the day! LOL. I know that's on the minds of all Canadians when they can't afford rent, etc.
-
I see you're focused on the important issues of the day! LOL. I know that's on the minds of all Canadians when they can't afford rent, etc.
geezaz Shady! Why wasn't "leader" PeePee there?
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFDpyEzaYAAk-UT?format=png&name=small)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFDpyEzaYAAk-UT?format=png&name=small)
LOL, you're killing me today waldo, my sides are literally hurting. My favourite is the secret words in his YouTube videos to manipulate brains! LOL!!!!
-
My favourite is the secret words in his YouTube videos to manipulate brains! LOL!!!!
good on ya for supporting your fellow incels!
Global News reported that the phrase – #mgtow, or “Men Going Their Own Way” – was hidden in hundreds of Poilievre’s videos since early 2018.
The #mgtow movement includes men that attempt to cut women completely out of their lives, but anti-hate researchers have noted it can overlap with other forms of “male supremacy,” including the involuntary celibate or “incel” movement.
-
good on ya for supporting your fellow incels!
Sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory! I've heard that if you play some records backwards, there's pro-Pierre messages in them. Similar to the secret messages that you cite, designed to manipulate people's brains.
-
Sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory!
so "crazy"... that the CPC claims they undertook an internal investigation to determine how the #mgtow tag was included within those hundred+ PoiLIEvre videos. So crazy, hey!
-
so "crazy"... that the CPC claims they undertook an internal investigation to determine how the #mgtow tag was included within those hundred+ PoiLIEvre videos. So crazy, hey!
You know what buddy waldo. I bet Pierre did it himself. I bet it was his effort to manipulate people's brains. But I bet you that tinfoil helps with brain manipulation though. Spread the word, we gotta put a stop to this, now!
-
You know what buddy waldo. I bet Pierre did it himself.
good on ya for supporting your fellow incels!
-
waldo buddy, I'm agreeing with you. I'm strongly against secret brain manipulation!
-
waldo buddy, I'm agreeing with you. I'm strongly against secret brain manipulation!
(https://mericamagazinedotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/morans.jpg)
-
(https://mericamagazinedotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/morans.jpg)
Down with secret brain manipulation!
-
of course PeePee... Canada is not broken!
(https://i.imgur.com/CcUnrFa.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/aQsSLFU.jpeg)
and now we have the IMF out with it's Jan, 2024 World Economic Update... within Advanced Economies, Canada is forecast to have the 3rd fastest growing economy in 2024 (behind the U.S. & slightly behind Spain) - and forecast to lead all Advanced Economies in 2025!
(https://i.imgur.com/agwS2yr.png)
-
Most Canadians have very rich friends who own villa resorts in Jamaica where they can stay for free. Man of the people.
c'mon Nipples! The PM Trudeau trip was cleared by the Ethics Commish...
video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1752417544156127232/pu/vid/avc1/720x1280/0kL-ajzAZniaaoUK.mp4?tag=12): by the by, why is the CPC "brain trust" so determined to keep the specifics of PoiLIEvre's 3-week vacation secret?
{h/t Dean Blundell}
-
Apparently, I'm living rent-free in his head.
Mr. Speaker, I'm going to leave aside the question of where exactly he's living rent-free...
as PeePee desperately tries to champion himself as a, "MAGAman of the people", empathizing over the cost of rent... this is exactly where PoiLIEvre lives rent free courtesy of the Canadian taxpayer:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFM_e15WEAAziZe?format=jpg&name=small)
-
rate the PoiLIEvre makeover:
▢ worth every penny
▢ meh
▢ what the absolute f.ck?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFCv5zcWQAAgzIj?format=jpg)
-
as PeePee desperately tries to champion himself as a, "MAGAman of the people", empathizing over the cost of rent... this is exactly where PoiLIEvre lives rent free courtesy of the Canadian taxpayer:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFM_e15WEAAziZe?format=jpg&name=small)
He lives where he’s suppose to, just as Justin does under the same circumstances. Nobody has ever criticized Junior for living at 24 Sussex.
-
Nobody has ever criticized PM Trudeau for living at 24 Sussex.
oh yeese! Because 24 Sussex is uninhabitable, since October 2015 PM Trudeau has lived in Rideau Cottage... the state of 24 Sussex reflects principally upon Harper for refusing to fund reno costs during his, as you refer to it, "regime"!
by the by, notwithstanding PeePee's fake empathy, as a multiple dwelling landlord, has PoiLIEvre offered his tenants any rent breaks?
-
He lives where he’s suppose to, just as Justin does under the same circumstances. Nobody has ever criticized Junior for living at 24 Sussex.
When asked what he thinks the appropriate accommodations for a prime minister should be, Poilievre said they "should be reasonable and practical to provide for the ability to receive dignitaries… and most important of all, have security."
The Conservative leader suggested many of the buildings currently in the parliamentary precinct could be used for bigger events and that where the prime minister calls home should be "a very basic, secure place where a prime minister can live safely, at a reasonable cost to taxpayers."
Poilievre says a new house for the PM not a priority (https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/scrap-it-or-salvage-it-future-of-24-sussex-under-review-poilievre-says-a-new-house-for-the-pm-not-a-priority-1.6539591)
-
policy, smolicy! BringEmHome, hey PoiLIEvre! Clearly PeePee has other priorities - like misinforming, like rage farming, like casting blame towards PM Trudeau for everything...
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFQNgZiWQAA_c4P?format=jpg)
-
the real PoiLIEvre!
(https://i.imgur.com/fbhI3ms.jpeg)
-
Peepee's campaign manager is an "active" lobbyist for Loblaws---the company whose profits skyrocketed as they exploited the chance to raise prices during the pandemic.
Should party officials be any special interests' lobbyists? I'm sure there are many whataboutisms that could be used, but maybe it's time to change that.
-
Peepee's campaign manager is an "active" lobbyist for Loblaws---the company whose profits skyrocketed as they exploited the chance to raise prices during the pandemic.
Should party officials be any special interests' lobbyists? I'm sure there are many whataboutisms that could be used, but maybe it's time to change that.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFWn301bkAEZs0S?format=jpg)
-
Peepee's campaign manager is an "active" lobbyist for Loblaws---the company whose profits skyrocketed as they exploited the chance to raise prices during the pandemic.
Should party officials be any special interests' lobbyists? I'm sure there are many whataboutisms that could be used, but maybe it's time to change that.
This seems like a clear conflict of interest. I know there's rules for public employees including politicians but not sure it extends to party employees.
I'm sure waldo knows though.
-
geezaz waldo! Back in the day, PoiLIEvre and Ms. Byrne were an item... but to this day, she's never married - clearly PeePee set the bar too high!
(https://i.imgur.com/988SnOY.jpeg)
-
well... ok then - Not Galen Weston!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFgkjmgXcAAZVYw?format=jpg)
-
hey now PoiLIEvre - how do you like these apples?
(https://i.imgur.com/QJNsz7o.jpeg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFqEGn9WgAAlait?format=jpg)
oh my waldo! Of course, PeePee/CPC are in mega distraction mode over their lobbying ties to Loblaws... feverously trying to resurrect the “Nazi in the HoC” faux scandal!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFWn301bkAEZs0S?format=jpg)
geezaz waldo! NDP Singh calls out Scott Reid (CPC MP for Lanark - Frontenac - Kingston) for his ties to retailer 'Giant Tiger':
(https://i.imgur.com/gZjhmAQ.png)
-
geezaz waldo! NDP Singh calls out Scott Reid (CPC MP for Lanark - Frontenac - Kingston) for his ties to retailer 'Giant Tiger':
(https://i.imgur.com/gZjhmAQ.png)
Now do all the Liberals! 😂😂😂
-
hey now PoiLIEvre - how do you like these apples?
(https://i.imgur.com/QJNsz7o.jpeg)
Again, now do all the Liberals! 😂😂😂
-
Now do all the Liberals! 😂😂😂
Again, now do all the Liberals! 😂😂😂
do²... dodo! Oh waldo, you said dodo! C'mon ShadyMan, do² yourself!
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFlE79aWYAEB2F-?format=jpg)
-
Wait until Trudeau raises the carbon tax again. Wait until another record migration happens by the end of the year. Just wait to see what gas prices, food prices, rent and housing cost then. It’s only going up, just like the number of seats conservatives will win, to end all this absolute madness that has made everything worse in Canada.
[attachimg=1]
-
NDP Angus' private members bill (C-372) intends to target corporate 'misleading, deceptive, greenwashing' advertising... of course the misinforming Alberta Premier Smith and the propaganda arm of the CPC (National Post) were leading the charge to falsely portray it - of course!
(https://i.imgur.com/0fpx3qK.png)
-
NDP Angus' private members bill (C-372) intends to target corporate 'misleading, deceptive, greenwashing' advertising... of course the misinforming Alberta Premier Smith and the propaganda arm of the CPC (National Post) were leading the charge to falsely portray it - of course!
(https://i.imgur.com/0fpx3qK.png)
It’s more of the war against speech by the costly coalition.
-
It’s more of the war against speech by the costly coalition.
(https://i.imgur.com/Ymhs3rx.jpeg)
-
The costly coalition trying to regulate speech related to their preferred politics. Absolutely disgusting.
[attachimg=1]
-
The costly coalition trying to regulate speech related to their preferred politics. Absolutely disgusting.
no matter how hard you squawk... there is no coalition! Notwithstanding, of course, the bill is a private members NDP bill - you moron, nothing to do with the Liberal party...
and again, the NDP private members bill intends to target corporate 'misleading, deceptive, greenwashing' advertising
quit making shyte up, hey ShadyMan!
-
There has always been truth in advertising legislation. Now it's a free speech issue? You've never even considered the possibility that it was before.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/fnOdFyQ.jpeg)(https://i.imgur.com/KKx84Fi.png)
-
MAGA gained power by discrediting the MSM with no evidence and now peepee is ham-handedly trying to do the same. Every journalist who asks a question he doesn't like, he accuses of working for the PMO.
-
😍😍😍
[attachimg=1]
-
MAGA gained power by discrediting the MSM with no evidence and now peepee is ham-handedly trying to do the same. Every journalist who asks a question he doesn't like, he accuses of working for the PMO.
yup! PeePee took exception to a question from a Canadian Press journalist - accused her of being a mouthpiece for PM Trudeau... what a sad phacker PoiLIEvre is!
(https://i.imgur.com/Z7XbmOq.png)
-
yup! PeePee took exception to a question from a Canadian Press journalist - accused her of being a mouthpiece for PM Trudeau... what a sad phacker PoiLIEvre is!
(https://i.imgur.com/Z7XbmOq.png)
LOL, it’s funny hearing the most unhinged media personalities calling somebody else unhinged. They’re so out of touch with Canadians it’s appalling. Go figure though, tax sucking leeches like these two coming to the defence of another tax sucking reporter demanding more tax money to stay profitable. Meanwhile they cheer on the carbon tax increases they see Canadian farmers lose competitiveness to American and Mexican farms. I can’t wait until all these people are fired and laid off. Particularly Bruce Arthur. Who literally wanted to jail people for not getting vaccinated. These people are the scum of the earth.
-
Liberals sh*tty policies yield expected results.
Conservatives open up a 19-point lead over the Liberals.
https://abacusdata.ca/abacus-data-conservatives-poilievre-lead-19-liberals-canada/
-
Peepee's inevitable crushing defeat is going to be that much sweeter to watch. 😂
-
LOL, it’s funny hearing the most unhinged media personalities calling somebody else unhinged. They’re so out of touch with Canadians it’s appalling. Go figure though, tax sucking leeches like these two coming to the defence of another tax sucking reporter demanding more tax money to stay profitable.
video: (https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1757097623452819456/vid/avc1/886x486/qOwGic8KHcteovR_.mp4?tag=14) the waldo will give you a smarmy and arrogant PeePee unhinged... wailing on about claimed bias in the face of tough questioning from journalists! The lying PoiLIEvre stating he/Conservatives, "don't want to give any money to the mainstream media"!
inconveniently for PeePee, it was the Conservatives that backed a 2022 amendment to the Online Streaming Act - an amendment opposed by the governing Liberals; one that allowed Canada's private broadcasters to save about $120 million a year in regulatory fees. By the by, Bell's share of those savings was $40 million — the exact total of annual operating losses its parent, BCE Inc., cited when it cut 4,800 jobs last week.
-
a Liberal motion was passed calling for Bell Inc/Bell Canada executives to appear before the House of Commons Heritage Committee to testify about the company's decision to cut ~9% of its workforce this year.
the Liberal motion to invite the executives on Feb. 29 was supported by the NDP and Bloc Quebecois, with the Conservatives on the committee abstaining from voting.
It was a garbage decision by a corporation that should know better.
-
a Liberal motion was passed calling for Bell Inc/Bell Canada executives to appear before the House of Commons Heritage Committee to testify about the company's decision to cut ~9% of its workforce this year.
the Liberal motion to invite the executives on Feb. 29 was supported by the NDP and Bloc Quebecois, with the Conservatives on the committee abstaining from voting.
Maybe that's because they care about 'the little guy' ?
-
To add: I heard several of the execs are short in stature.
-
Maybe that's because they care about 'the little guy' ?
It's none of the government's business as to why/how businesses make decisions. But this is exactly why Conservatives didn't want to give media companies tens of millions in tax payer money. The government shouldn't be involved in media companies at all. They should care more about CBC shelling out bonuses to executives while cutting thousands of jobs and losing $150 million dollars this year. But the Liberals want to use Bell as a campaign event.
-
It's none of the government's business as to why/how businesses make decisions. But this is exactly why Conservatives didn't want to give media companies tens of millions in tax payer money. The government shouldn't be involved in media companies at all. They should care more about CBC shelling out bonuses to executives while cutting thousands of jobs and losing $150 million dollars this year. But the Liberals want to use Bell as a campaign event.
Man you should tell the conservatives that since their last platform included trying to force streaming platforms to make more CanCon lol.
-
Man you should tell the conservatives that since their last platform included trying to force streaming platforms to make more CanCon lol.
Link? If that's the case than I disagree with them. Regardless, what I said is true. But you should care more about CBC paying out bonuses to executives while losing $150 million dollars and laying off thousands.
-
Link? If that's the case than I disagree with them. Regardless, what I said is true. But you should care more about CBC paying out bonuses to executives while losing $150 million dollars and laying off thousands.
Our alternative approach will:
• Require large digital streaming services like Netflix, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video to reinvest a significant portion of their Canadian gross revenue into producing original Canadian programming, of which a mandated proportion must be French language programming.
° If they fail to do so on their own in a given year, they will be required to pay the difference into the Canadian Media Fund.
° The proportion chosen will vary based on the nature of the streaming service and would be determined based on the best practices of other jurisdictions, such as those in Europe and Australia, as well as the nature of the Canadian market.
° Content reinvestment requirements will also recognize and incentivize partnerships with Canadian independent media producers.
link (https://www.cmg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Conservative-Party-of-Canada-Our-Plan-for-Broadcasting-Media-and-Culture-.pdf)
Also one would think if they believed the government shouldn't be involved in media companies, they would advocate eliminating the Canada Media Fund, but they don't.
-
link (https://www.cmg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Conservative-Party-of-Canada-Our-Plan-for-Broadcasting-Media-and-Culture-.pdf)
Also one would think if they believed the government shouldn't be involved in media companies, they would advocate eliminating the Canada Media Fund, but they don't.
Well, I disagree with that platform. Regardless, this is why Trudeau's giving tax money to big media companies was a terrible idea, and a complete waste of money. It's not the tax payers job to subsidize Bell, Rogers, or anyone else. But that's what he does best, waste money. This whole getting Bell executives to testify, etc is just a cover your a$$ type of maneuver.
-
Regardless, this is why Trudeau's giving tax money to big media companies was a terrible idea, and a complete waste of money. It's not the tax payers job to subsidize Bell, Rogers, or anyone else.
care to describe/detail your stated, "tax money to big media companies" - sure you can!
-
care to describe/detail your stated, "tax money to big media companies" - sure you can!
Yes, the money that went to Bell. Why does Trudeau think that a billion dollar media company deserves tax money?
-
But this is exactly why Conservatives didn't want to give media companies tens of millions in tax payer money.
whaaa! Oh it is, is it?
inconveniently for PeePee, it was the Conservatives that backed a 2022 amendment to the Online Streaming Act - an amendment opposed by the governing Liberals; one that allowed Canada's private broadcasters to save about $120 million a year in regulatory fees. By the by, Bell's share of those savings was $40 million — the exact total of annual operating losses its parent, BCE Inc., cited when it cut 4,800 jobs last week.
the Conservative backed amendment allowing private broadcasters to save ~$120 million a year... a year, hey ShadyMan!
-
care to describe/detail your stated, "tax money to big media companies" - sure you can!
Yes, the money that went to Bell. Why does Trudeau think that a billion dollar media company deserves tax money?
what money related to what initiative, what decision(s)... and how much money are you speaking of?
-
(https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/edit-toon-09022024-resized.jpg)
-
Peepee proposes a bill in Parliament to allow compromised MPs the ability to forgo background checks for security clearances. What is this guy hiding?
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-377/first-reading
-
Yes, the money that went to Bell. Why does Trudeau think that a billion dollar media company deserves tax money?
Are you serious ?
-
(https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/edit-toon-09022024-resized.jpg)
It's kinda his job though. He is only restrained by public understanding of what 'goes too far'
-
Liberals sh*tty policies yield expected results.
Conservatives open up a 19-point lead over the Liberals.
https://abacusdata.ca/abacus-data-conservatives-poilievre-lead-19-liberals-canada/
CPC polling at 43%. Any party polling at 43% is very high in Canada. This points to people being very upset with the status quo in the country and wanting change. I think my opinions on this government are pretty mainstream in Canada.
-
Peepee proposes a bill in Parliament to allow compromised MPs the ability to forgo background checks for security clearances. What is this guy hiding?
geezaz waldo! Clearly, since PoiLEvre can’t get a security clearance, the CPC has tabled a private members bill to automatically give him clearance if he applies for one - just give him one; no investigation necessary! Just what the hey is PeePee hiding?
(https://i.imgur.com/cjYpsZy.jpeg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/yWEkdyy.png)
oh my! The Conservative Party now states Canada is, "the greatest country in the world"! So, uhhh... Canada is not broken anymore, hey!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/yWEkdyy.png)
oh my! The Conservative Party now states Canada is, "the greatest country in the world"! So, uhhh... Canada is not broken anymore, hey!
Canada is a great country, but it’s pretty broken, thanks to 9 years of terrible globalist, anti middle class policies.
-
This is how Canadians feel about the Trudeau regime.
[attachimg=1]
-
whaaa! Hey ShadyMan, are you (and Nipples) trying to convince yourselves by posting and reposting... and reposting?
by the by, care to predict the winner of the Durham by-election on March 4th? Durham... a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole)
we know PeePee paid $50,000 so he didn't have to debate other candidates for the CPC leadership... but it now comes to light that PoiLIEvre has also advised his parachuted in Durham candidate (Jamil Jivani) NOT TO DEBATE other party candidates. What's the problem with debating, hey ShadyMan?
-
(https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/edit-toon-09022024-resized.jpg)
It's kinda his job though. He is only restrained by public understanding of what 'goes too far'
no restraint here! video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1757895831124848640/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/_jX8NQv62umRLhEI.mp4?tag=12): Belated Valentine from PoiLIEvre...
-
@waldo
Did you get any video of Poilievre attacking the Canadian Press reporter who asked him about the Bell cuts and implying that CP was funded by Canadian taxpayers ? It was pretty dodgy.
-
It's an effective strategy, as Trump has proven. If you get enough idiots believing their lying blogs are telling the truth and the MSM is the one that is lying, you can control the narrative and win an election.
-
@waldo
Did you get any video of Poilievre attacking the Canadian Press reporter who asked him about the Bell cuts and implying that CP was funded by Canadian taxpayers ? It was pretty dodgy.
Canadian Press did receive an awful lot of money from the Trudeau regime. What’s dodgy is a “reporter” advocating for more taxpayer money for her industry. That’s called a lobbyist. Why do you people think that media companies deserve tax money? But it’s Pierre that’s dodgy! You guys live in an alternate universe.
-
Yes, and part of their strategy is to bleed the MSM dry to clear the landscape so their lying blogs can tell gullible idiots how mass shooters are trans, etc., without the truth getting in the way.
-
by the by, care to predict the winner of the Durham by-election on March 4th? Durham... a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole)
we know PeePee paid $50,000 so he didn't have to debate other candidates for the CPC leadership... but it now comes to light that PoiLIEvre has also advised his parachuted in Durham candidate (Jamil Jivani) NOT TO DEBATE other party candidates. What's the problem with debating, hey ShadyMan?
c'mon Shady! Again, the upcoming Durham by-election... your prediction - sure you can! Asking again, what's the problem PoiLIEvre has with debating?
-
Why do you people think that media companies deserve tax money?
again... shift down from your blathering gear and quit ignoring the following:
care to describe/detail your stated, "tax money to big media companies" - sure you can!
Yes, the money that went to Bell. Why does Trudeau think that a billion dollar media company deserves tax money?
what money related to what initiative, what decision(s)... and how much money are you speaking of?
-
again: the Conservative backed amendment allowing private broadcasters to save ~$120 million a year... ~120 million a year!
But this is exactly why Conservatives didn't want to give media companies tens of millions in tax payer money.
whaaa! Oh it is, is it?
inconveniently for PeePee, it was the Conservatives that backed a 2022 amendment to the Online Streaming Act - an amendment opposed by the governing Liberals; one that allowed Canada's private broadcasters to save about $120 million a year in regulatory fees. By the by, Bell's share of those savings was $40 million — the exact total of annual operating losses its parent, BCE Inc., cited when it cut 4,800 jobs last week.
the Conservative backed amendment allowing private broadcasters to save ~$120 million a year... a year, hey ShadyMan!
-
Yes, and part of their strategy is to bleed the MSM dry to clear the landscape so their lying blogs can tell gullible idiots how mass shooters are trans, etc., without the truth getting in the way.
and... how long before 'MapleMAGA' PoiLIEvre begins to regularly add "Fake News" to his put downs of journalists asking him legitimate (but so inconvenient) questions?
-
and... how long before 'MapleMAGA' PoiLIEvre begins to regularly add "Fake News" to his put downs of journalists asking him legitimate (but so inconvenient) questions?
Why do big media companies need tax money? Answer: They don't, and shouldn't get any. Bell is a billion dollar company, so is Rogers. The Toronto Star, Globe & Mail, Canadian Press, etc are owned by corporations that make millions of dollars a year. This particular reporter isn't a reporter, she's a lobbyist.
-
@waldo Did you get any video of Poilievre attacking the Canadian Press reporter who asked him about the Bell cuts and implying that CP was funded by Canadian taxpayers ? It was pretty dodgy.
yes member Hardner! video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1757102745683693568/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/V7nVu8OG6PGEDPol.mp4?tag=12): PeePee taking exception to a question from a Canadian Press journalist - accusing her of being a mouthpiece for PM Trudeau... what a sad phacker PoiLIEvre is!
meanwhile, member Shady has labelled this CP journalist, multiple times now... a lobbyist - go figure!
This particular reporter isn't a reporter, she's a lobbyist.
-
There is nothing far right wingers want more than the complete destruction of the MSM because then they can say things like mass shooters are trans and there will be no one to show the rest of us they are lying.
-
yes member Hardner! video (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1757102745683693568/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/V7nVu8OG6PGEDPol.mp4?tag=12): PeePee taking exception to a question from a Canadian Press journalist - accusing her of being a mouthpiece for PM Trudeau... what a sad phacker PoiLIEvre is!
meanwhile, member Shady has labelled this CP journalist, multiple times now... a lobbyist - go figure!
A reporter begging for tax money isn’t a reporter. Please answer as to why media companies deserve tax money?
-
Because legacy media was decimated by the collapse of advertising and subscription revenue as the model switched from print to online. And our whole democratic system relies on the reliable, trustworthy spread of information. Without it, we would have halfwits making up BS about how mass shooters are trans, etc., and there would be no credible information source to correct the record.
-
A reporter begging for tax money isn’t a reporter. Please answer as to why media companies deserve tax money?
"a reporter begging for tax money"... quit making shyte up... the CP journalist asked a legitimate question that PeePee wigged out on!
you keep nattering on about media companies & tax money, yet you repeatedly give Conservatives a pass over their backing of a regulatory amendment allowing private broadcasters to save ~$120 million a year... ~120 million a year! And why are you running away from Bubber's response to your question; again:
Because legacy media was decimated by the collapse of advertising and subscription revenue as the model switched from print to online. And our whole democratic system relies on the reliable, trustworthy spread of information. Without it, we would have halfwits making up BS about how mass shooters are trans, etc., and there would be no credible information source to correct the record.
-
Feb 12, 2024: Hansard transcript of wingnut CPC MP Cheryl Gallant (riding of Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) accusing the Liberal Party of giving fentanyl to children!
(https://i.imgur.com/a9lDC53.jpeg)
-
PoiLIEvre is #1 in claimed travel expenses... taxpayers covering his long running Canada wide campaigning for an election that hasn't been called!
(https://i.imgur.com/zqwRS5V.png)
-
"a reporter begging for tax money"... quit making shyte up... the CP journalist asked a legitimate question that PeePee wigged out on!
you keep nattering on about media companies & tax money, yet you repeatedly give Conservatives a pass over their backing of a regulatory amendment allowing private broadcasters to save ~$120 million a year... ~120 million a year! And why are you running away from Bubber's response to your question; again:
Bubber’s response is nonsensical. Lots of industries have to adjust to changing times. The horse and buggy industry was wiped out by automobiles. Music retail stores were wiped out by digital music applications. Local retail has been wiped out by Amazon. There are thousands and thousands of other examples. How about Kodak and Blockbuster? Why do big media companies worth billions need tax money? It’s not the government’s job. Media success is based on subscribers, views, clicks, readers, etc. It’s not for tax payers to subsidize them. The fact that you and idiot Bubber thinks it is is astonishing.
Regardless, what was the legitimate question this particular lobbyist was asking Pierre? Why he won’t shovel more tax money to billion dollar media companies so that they can keep up a bloated workforce? Nobody else gets that special treatment. Tax money should be spent on important things like health care, education, etc. btw, do you think that a media company that receives large amounts of tax money from a particular government will be more or less favourable to that government? We all know the answer. We already have CBC. We don’t need more media companies feeding off the government t*t.
-
Democracy can't afford truthful journalism to be wiped out because then we get inundated with brainwashed idiots telling us stupid things they read on their far-right Russian blogs and no one to tell the rest of us they're idiots. (See the idiot on this board who claimed a mass shooter was trans but was quickly set straight by actual journalism. It's not even like these idiots correct themselves when they spew their stupid lies and find out they were manipulated like gullible fools. They just slither away like vermin and do it again.)
-
Are you saying the CBC had a conservative bias when Harper was PM? Or does that reality not suit your narrative so it must be ignored?
-
I do not like peepee because, like the worst Republicans, he uses half-baked conspiracy theories to gin up rage among halfwits. It is the worst part of modern politics and Canada should be above that.
https://twitter.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1759365436796203246?t=_7Y0P3wNNh5M9jcKApdNFg&s=19
Hint to the halfwits: nobody suggested we stop road building. Peepee is counting on you not really understanding what you read because he thinks you're stupid
But it's interesting how the NP opinion piece creates the absurdity for peepee to run with. It's almost like they're working in concert
-
A lot of crafty politicians brought good policy by lying though.
-
This is how great Trudeau’s policies have been for Canadians, and how Canadians feel about it.
[attachimg=1]
-
You done f**ked up the country Junior. Resign already.
-
You done f**ked up the country Junior. Resign already.
I doubt he reads this forum.
-
This is how great Trudeau’s policies have been for Canadians, and how Canadians feel about it.
still tryin' to convince yourself, hey! But c'mon, asking for the 3rd time now... could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham - and yet you refuse to offer comment/prediction about the coming Durham by-election - is there a problem... for you? And again, about that debating thing that PeePee refuses to engage in - what's PoiLIEvre afraid of, hey?
whaaa! Hey ShadyMan, are you (and Nipples) trying to convince yourselves by posting and reposting... and reposting?
by the by, care to predict the winner of the Durham by-election on March 4th? Durham... a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole)
we know PeePee paid $50,000 so he didn't have to debate other candidates for the CPC leadership... but it now comes to light that PoiLIEvre has also advised his parachuted in Durham candidate (Jamil Jivani) NOT TO DEBATE other party candidates. What's the problem with debating, hey ShadyMan?
-
still tryin' to convince yourself, hey! But c'mon, asking for the 3rd time now... could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham - and yet you refuse to offer comment/prediction about the coming Durham by-election - is there a problem... for you? And again, about that debating thing that PeePee refuses to engage in - what's PoiLIEvre afraid of, hey?
Judging by the polls I would expect the Conservatives to cruise to victory. However, by elections can be different in that turn out is usually much lower, and the election doesn’t affect whose PM. So it could be a bit unpredictable. The quality of the candidate matters as well. However, I expect it to easily remain blue. However, if the Liberal candidate can convince Trudeau to stay out of the riding, he or she may have a shot.
-
by the by, care to predict the winner of the Durham by-election on March 4th? Durham... a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole). Could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham...
we know PeePee paid $50,000 so he didn't have to debate other candidates for the CPC leadership... but it now comes to light that PoiLIEvre has also advised his parachuted in Durham candidate (Jamil Jivani) NOT TO DEBATE other party candidates. What's the problem with debating, hey Shady?
However, I expect it to easily remain blue.
hey Shady! Thanks for your Durham by-election prediction... and the unwillingness of PoiLIEvre to debate - what's PeePee afraid of?
-
hey Shady! Thanks for your Durham by-election prediction... and the unwillingness of PoiLIEvre to debate - what's PeePee afraid of?
Probably because he didn’t need to. I know that he looks forward to debating Junior though. He’d probably agree to debate Junior every week, outside of the beating he gives him during question period.
-
But the rules were that he needed to debate and he actually paid a fine to avoid it. That's chickensh!t.
-
But the rules were that he needed to debate and he actually paid a fine to avoid it. That's chickensh!t.
also chickenshyte is PoiLIEvre telling the CPC candidate in the upcoming Durham by-election not to debate the other party candidates!
-
Pierre’s playing chess and triggering all of you! I love it! 😂😂😂
-
But the rules were that he needed to debate and he actually paid a fine to avoid it. That's chickensh!t.
I guess the rules allow for it. I know he’d debate Junior any day of the week.
-
I guess the rules allow for it. I know he’d debate Junior any day of the week.
No, they don't. Hence the fine. He's scared of being put on the spot by a question about why he refuses to undergo a security check.
-
No, they don't. Hence the fine. He's scared of being put on the spot by a question about why he refuses to undergo a security check.
Incorrect. The rules allow it with a paid fine. No big deal. Regardless, you should care more about actual government policy and the current government in power. Your concern trolling is amusing though! 😂
-
When you say things like, "The rules allow it with a paid fine", can you see why I call you an idiot?
Yeah, probably not. 😂
-
When you say things like, "The rules allow it with a paid fine", can you see why I call you an idiot?
Yeah, probably not. 😂
What’s confusing you? It’s similar to the way the NDP recently paid a find for campaign finance violations. Fine is paid, issue is done with. Sounds like you need some help coping.
-
If they paid a fine, that means they broke the rules.
You're welcome. I'm always glad to help you with the simplest concepts.
-
If they paid a fine, that means they broke the rules.
You're welcome. I'm always glad to help you with the simplest concepts.
And what would you like to happen now? The issue is over and dealt with. Just like all of Justin Trudeau’s ethics violations.
-
Yes, it's all resolved except the question of what he needed to avoid talking about.
-
Is PDS a thing yet? If not, it should be! 🤣
-
Of course it is. That's always your fallback when you've got nothing. It was TDS that people should have been outraged by Trump's insurrection attempt, after all.
-
historically, federal governments have selectively invested in targeted road projects (along with the other provincial and municipal governments). As the current Environment Minister stated:
Ottawa will stop putting up the cash for "large" road projects. Of course we're funding roads. We have programs to fund roads. Certainly the federal government will be there to support provinces paying for existing road maintenance.
I do not like peepee because, like the worst Republicans, he uses half-baked conspiracy theories to gin up rage among halfwits. It is the worst part of modern politics and Canada should be above that.
https://twitter.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1759365436796203246?t=_7Y0P3wNNh5M9jcKApdNFg&s=19
Hint to the halfwits: nobody suggested we stop road building. Peepee is counting on you not really understanding what you read because he thinks you're stupid
But it's interesting how the NP opinion piece creates the absurdity for peepee to run with. It's almost like they're working in concert
well of course! The National Post is the propaganda arm of the CPC...
oh my! Andrew Coyne, no less... referring to PoiLIEvre's donors as rubes!
(https://i.imgur.com/rhmuGx7.png)
-
historically, federal governments have selectively invested in targeted road projects (along with the other provincial and municipal governments). As the current Environment Minister stated:
well of course! The National Post is the propaganda arm of the CPC...
oh my! Andrew Coyne, no less... referring to PoiLIEvre's donors as rubes!
(https://i.imgur.com/rhmuGx7.png)
That's standard politics. It's just that there is finally a Conservative leader that isn't pulling punches, and playing the same way that Trudeau and the Liberals do/have, and now you can't stand it. It's no different than the Liberal attacks on Harper of having a "secret agenda" or of wanting to put troops in the streets of Canadian cities. I think it's just that you and your party have finally figured out that Canadians hate you, and no longer want you in any kind of power. You're out on your a$$ whenever the next election takes place. You've made everything in Canada worse.
-
That's standard politics.
no! PoiLIEvre's continued lying and stoking his base with conspiracy themes is definitely a standard - one that you certainly embrace!
-
no! PoiLIEvre's continued lying and stoking his base with conspiracy themes is definitely a standard - one that you certainly embrace!
Suggesting that the Liberals have a no road policy isn't a conspiracy theory, it's just standard politics. Just like when the Liberals suggested that Conservatives like Harper had a "secret agenda". That's literally a conspiracy theory! I don't blame you for not liking the taste of your own medicine.
-
historically, federal governments have selectively invested in targeted road projects (along with the other provincial and municipal governments). As the current Environment Minister stated:
Ottawa will stop putting up the cash for "large" road projects. Of course we're funding roads. We have programs to fund roads. Certainly the federal government will be there to support provinces paying for existing road maintenance.
well of course! The National Post is the propaganda arm of the CPC...
oh my! Andrew Coyne, no less... referring to PoiLIEvre's donors as rubes!
(https://i.imgur.com/rhmuGx7.png)
Suggesting that the Liberals have a no road policy isn't a conspiracy theory, it's just standard politics.
it's a CPC/PeePee lie... boosted into conspiracy by you and your ilk!
-
well of course! The National Post is the propaganda arm of the CPC...
oh my! Andrew Coyne, no less... referring to PoiLIEvre's donors as rubes!
(https://i.imgur.com/rhmuGx7.png)
it's a CPC/PeePee lie... boosted into conspiracy by you and your ilk!
I’m not sure if it’s a lie. Regardless, you’ve never had a problem with Liberal campaign lies. Me thinks thou doth protest too much.
-
Meh... roads are overrated.
In other news... am reading online that Pierre wans trans gals and guys to have to use bathrooms that align to their private parts and that we are going to have to scan our ID to watch **** ?!?
My oh my...
Either that's wrong or his political GPS glitched.
-
I’m not sure if it’s a lie.
staunch Conservative supporter Coyne called the lie... and conspiracy out! Geezaz, when you lose Coyne...
-
whaaa! The CPC "brain trust" realized so much of politics comes down to superficial aspects... 3+ million later and we've now gone through PeePee2.0 & PeePee3.0 makeovers! And... oh my - they still need to rely on "Photoshop" cause it's a tough benchmark measure to follow, to challenge!
(https://i.imgur.com/0ELkJIu.jpeg)
-
Meh... roads are overrated.
In other news... am reading online that Pierre wans trans gals and guys to have to use bathrooms that align to their private parts and that we are going to have to scan our ID to watch **** ?!?
My oh my...
Either that's wrong or his political GPS glitched.
Roads are more important than trans nonsense.
-
Roads are more important than trans nonsense.
My 'roads are overrated' comment was designed to be ridiculous.
If you think I would think roads are unimportant, then you believe me to be a moron. And yet you are still civil to me.
I guess you give lollypops to retarded kids on the street.
And I love you for that.
-
It's p0rn we will have to show ID to watch.
-
It's p0rn we will have to show ID to watch.
The CPC has said they support age verification but not digital ID. I don't think they specified how they would verify age. When I visit p0rn sites (I like b00bies) the age checks are a joke because anyone can lie, it really just acts as a warning of adult content, which is fine for what that is.
-
But the rules were that he needed to debate and he actually paid a fine to avoid it. That's chickensh!t.
also chickenshyte is PoiLIEvre telling the CPC candidate in the upcoming Durham by-election not to debate the other party candidates!
I guess the rules allow for it. I know he’d debate PM Trudeau any day of the week.
oh c'mon Shady! PoiLIEvre was even afraid to debate Charest... chickenshyte PeePee! By the by:
Rules adopted by the CPC Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC), stipulate that “failure to participate in a Party sanctioned debate shall result in an automatic $50,000 penalty” deducted from the $100,000 refundable compliance deposit requested as part of the candidates’ entry fee.
and below, the guy so afraid of debating Charest was the guy on the right... not the other guys!
(https://i.imgur.com/KDy7tJN.png)
-
also chickenshyte is PoiLIEvre telling the CPC candidate in the upcoming Durham by-election not to debate the other party candidates!
oh c'mon Shady! PoiLIEvre was even afraid to debate Charest... chickenshyte PeePee! By the by:
and below, the guy so afraid of debating Charest was the guy on the right... not the other guys!
(https://i.imgur.com/KDy7tJN.png)
Why would he need to debate Charest? He’s irrelevant.
-
Why would he need to debate Charest? He’s irrelevant.
try to keep up! That was during the CPC leadership campaign (where Charest was quite relevant)... you know, the campaign where PeePee cheated his way to the leadership!
-
The CPC has said they support age verification but not digital ID. I don't think they specified how they would verify age. When I visit p0rn sites (I like b00bies) the age checks are a joke because anyone can lie, it really just acts as a warning of adult content, which is fine for what that is.
I don't know that exposure is a social problem at the moment, that warrants action. Exposure to under 18 I mean.
This is the CPC equivalent of social engineering stuff that the liberals like.
In the spirit of redeeming myself from flippancy, I will offer points of hope that a Poilievre government will rise above the politics to provide real solutions:
-An analysis on Canadaland recently indicated he knows the LGBTQ divisiveness is not a boon for his party, and includes two LGBTQ MPs in his inner circle. The CPC also had a trans candidate last election.
-His promotion of a long documentary style video on the topic of housing prices reveals a penchant for substantive discussion
-His background is in economics
-The problems of unity, climate change, and economic desperation for the Lowest Classes are our most pressing ones, they're the ones that have hit Trudeau hardest, and they're not going to be solved by more neoliberal policies of the past. PP is exceedingly political, and his penchant to control the message to make the politics work won't be the answer either. He seems to be willing to try new approaches so hopefully he'll be doing lots of that.
-
try to keep up! That was during the CPC leadership campaign (where Charest was quite relevant)... you know, the campaign where PeePee cheated his way to the leadership!
Ok, well that didn't happen. Probably because Pierre had such a big lead that he didn't feel it was worth doing.
-
Pierre was at a local health store yesterday, taking questions from the media. He stated that immigration rates would be tied to housing when he's Prime Minister. That we need to build more houses than population growth for a while so that housing prices can get back to more affordable levels.
This seems so logical, that you'd think this would've been part of the equation with the current government. But apparently not. It's not even a consideration, which shows you just how reckless and irresponsible they've been. Pierre also said that the number of doctors would also in some way be tied to population growth as well. Finally an adult in the room.
-
Ok, well that didn't happen. Probably because Pierre had such a big lead that he didn't feel it was worth doing.
Probably because he copies what Trump does and Trump didn't debate so he didn't either.
-
Probably because he copies what Trump does and Trump didn't debate so he didn't either.
Biden has dodged debates too, cry harder, nobody cares. Pierre will debate Trudeau anytime, anywhere, but Trudeau's afraid of him. He barely shows up to question period anymore, he has his minions take questions from Pierre now.
-
Yes, nobody cares about fundamental elements of democracy like candidate debates, just like they don't care about journalism or foreign interference. I get where you're coming from.
-
Yes, nobody cares about fundamental elements of democracy like candidate debates, just like they don't care about journalism or foreign interference. I get where you're coming from.
Debates aren't forced. If Conservatives voters had a problem with it, they would have made their voices, and votes known during the leadership vote. That's literally democracy. Regardless, when there is an election called, Pierre will be there to debate Junior and all the other buffoons. I care alot about foreign interference, like what China did in Canadian elections, it's too bad people like you don't. China interferred to help your preferred candidate, that's why you don't care. I also care a lot about journalism, but it shouldn't be getting tax payer money. That's a direct conflict of interest. Billion dollar media companies especially shouldn't get tax money, that's an even worse policy.
-
Bwaaaahaaaahaaaa! Trudeau skipped a FEDERAL debate during an election! Bwaaahaaaahaaaa! Taht's a fundamental element of democracy right Bubber?! Why does Trudeau hate democracy!?
Opponents pounce on Liberal record after Trudeau's no-show at leaders' debate
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tasker-leaders-debate-trudeau-no-show-1.5281618
-
You're starting to make stuff up about me again. I guess you must feel forgoing debates is unacceptable. Particularly if Trudeau does it
-
You're starting to make stuff up about me again. I guess you must feel forgoing debates is unacceptable. Particularly if Trudeau does it
Why are you ok with Trudeau skipping debates? Particularly during a federal election?
-
I'm not. That's just you arguing with yourself again.
-
I'm not.
Then why haven't you ever said anything about Trudeau refusing to debate in a federal election? Why are you only concerned with Pierre's non-debate during a leadership election? Does Trudeau hate democracy?
-
oh c'mon Shady! PoiLIEvre was even afraid to debate Charest... chickenshyte PeePee! By the by:
Rules adopted by the CPC Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC), stipulate that “failure to participate in a Party sanctioned debate shall result in an automatic $50,000 penalty” deducted from the $100,000 refundable compliance deposit requested as part of the candidates’ entry fee.
Bwaaaahaaaahaaaa! Trudeau skipped a FEDERAL debate during an election! Bwaaahaaaahaaaa! Taht's a fundamental element of democracy right Bubber?! Why does Trudeau hate democracy!?
sorry lil' buddy - not at all the same! Near the campaign start, formal notice was given that PM Trudeau would attend {only} 3 debates - the 2 official sponsored debates put on by the 'Debates Commission' (one in English, one in French) and the TVA debate in Quebec. PeePee ran away from the debate sponsored by the CPC Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) and paid the $50K fine in so doing... ran away because he 'wet the bed' in a prior debate and couldn't face another trouncing from the other CPC leadership candidates.
by the by: it was Harper who put an end to the media officially sponsoring debates... apparently he couldn't stomach further partisan media bias - too many inconvenient questions from the wascally media! The alternative became the 'Leaders Debates Commission' - the independent Canadian government agency which is charged with organizing leaders' debates during federal elections.
-
Then why haven't you ever said anything about Trudeau refusing to debate in a federal election?
Show me where I never said that.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG9xsM5X0AEqeZ3?format=jpg&name=small)
-
It’s really astonishing how unpopular the Trudeau Liberals are. Their policies suck and have sucked. Their policies have made Canada worse, but they’re so intransigent that they won’t even budge a little, like delaying the 23% carbon tax increases in April.
[attachimg=1]
-
like I said lil' buddy... you keep drop referencing to the same polls - are YOU trying to convince yourself? I can assure you the respective party internal polling does not align with that...
-
geezaz Shady! Will PeePee even be the CPC leader 'down the stretch'? Once it's revealed why the guy can't get a security clearance, what then, hey?
-
geezaz waldo! Back in the day, PoiLIEvre and Ms. Byrne were an item... but to this day, she's never married - clearly PeePee set the bar too high!
(https://i.imgur.com/988SnOY.jpeg)
geezaz waldo! Take Back Alberta's David Parker unleashed a shyte-storm with this X/tweet:
(https://i.imgur.com/T3GGyln.png)
there's a follow-up interview with Dean Blundell (on Youtube)... the waldo watched only a bit of it! Turns out Parker has some 'legitimate' positioning as a staffer in the Harper PMO - where he has history with Ms. Byrne. The vid has Parker openly stating Alberta Premier Smith asked him not to do the interview with Blundell - oh my!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/fsafreG.jpeg)
-
Online harms against minors, victims must be criminalized, not regulated.
to stop the spread of child pornography, self-harm algorithms or p edophile networks, 'free speech warrior' PeePee doesn’t want to regulate social media companies.
Conservatives believe in enforcing laws against sexually victimizing children, and favour criminalizing "bullying a child online" and "inducing a child to harm themselves.
Existing criminal bans on the non-consensual sharing of intimate images must be enforced and expanded, including when it comes to deepfakes generated by artificial intelligence.
Such conduct should be handled by police and the courts, not pushed off to new bureaucracy that would fail to better protect children.
Common-sense Conservatives will protect our kids and punish criminals instead of creating more bureaucracy and censoring opinions.
the PM Trudeau Liberal government introduced the Online Harms Act, which proposes setting up a new digital safety commission. The bill would compel social media platforms to outline how they plan to reduce risk and require them to promptly remove certain content, including child sex abuse images and intimate images shared without consent.
so... for example, PeePee doesn’t want social media companies to be forced to take down child p orn right away to prevent further harm; rather, his "common sense" says it would be better to wait 'years' to have the justice system lay criminal charges and process on through to trials and punishment as warranted. "Common... sense Conservatives"!
-
the PM Trudeau Liberal government introduced the Online Harms Act, which proposes setting up a new digital safety commission. The bill would compel social media platforms to outline how they plan to reduce risk and require them to promptly remove certain content, including child sex abuse images and intimate images shared without consent.
so... for example, PeePee doesn’t want social media companies to be forced to take down child p orn right away to prevent further harm; rather, his "common sense" says it would be better to wait 'years' to have the justice system lay criminal charges and process on through to trials and punishment as warranted. "Common... sense Conservatives"!
Yay, another government safety commission! This time digital!
Anyways, this is all nonsense anyways. Social media companies already try to pull down child p orn as soon as possible. It serves them no purpose to keep it up. The devil is in the details, what kind of "certain content", and how do you know whether an image is shared without consent? You'd have to contact all parties involved in the image, so it's not something that can be pulled down right away anyways. Btw, please define intimate image. Intimate is subjective.
-
like I said lil' buddy... you keep drop referencing to the same polls - are YOU trying to convince yourself? I can assure you the respective party internal polling does not align with that...
You’re just like Trump! 😂😂😂
Takes issue with polls that show him losing, it’s literally right out of his playbook! 🤣
-
And you would invariably repeat Trump's talking points. Hilarious to see your self-loathing for doing so surface now after all these years. 😂
-
And you would invariably repeat Trump's talking points. Hilarious to see your self-loathing for doing so surface now after all these years. 😂
Please quote me in any response if you wish a response from me in any thread.
-
Trumper says wot?
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHcfnciXUAAe2Hf?format=jpg&name=small)
-
Fact check true.
[attachimg=1]
-
sniff sniff
Smells like potato salad.
-k
-
A while back I saw one of the polls asked follow-up questions about why respondents supported the party they support. 24% of respondents chose Liberal, 15% because they don't want Poilievre to win, and only 9% because they support the current government.
Liberals trailing in most demographic categories now. They used to have a significant lead among female voters, but now trail. Trudeau swept to power largely due to young voters in 2015, but now trail both the CPC and NDP among young voters.
-k
-
Uh-oh, looks like the waldo had too much potato salad!
sniff sniff
Smells like potato salad.
the ever self-aggrandizing member kimmy says what? C'mon kimmy... quit your 'speaking in tongues' act - it stinks... like your potato salad fetish!
-
(https://i.imgur.com/W703tHf.png)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/W703tHf.png)
Bwaaahaaaahaaaa! Too funny! What a bunch of snowflakes.
-
The press is integral to democracy and freedom. The first thing fascists do is try to discredit it.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHx6HGEW8AARYmF?format=jpg)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHx6HGEW8AARYmF?format=jpg)
What funny is that he's answered all of those questions! LOL
-
What funny is that he's answered all of those questions! LOL
clearly... PeePee's outright avoidance of questions, even running away from inconvenient questions, is a hallmark of his media "strategy". Perpetually blaming everything and anything on PM Trudeau, while denigrating, disrespecting, belittling and casting aspersion towards journalists simply shows PoiLIEvre for what he truly is - a pompous azzhole extraordinaire!
-
clearly... PeePee's outright avoidance of questions, even running away from inconvenient questions, is a hallmark of his media "strategy". Perpetually blaming everything and anything on PM Trudeau, while denigrating, disrespecting, belittling and casting aspersion towards journalists simply shows PoiLIEvre for what he truly is - a pompous azzhole extraordinaire!
Pompous azzhole with better policies. I’d take that over an economic illiterate and complete incompetent any day of the week.
-
Hey waldo, the Conservatives easily win the Durham by election. At margins not seen since the Harper majorities.
-
by the by, care to predict the winner of the Durham by-election on March 4th? Durham... a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole). Could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham...
we know PeePee paid $50,000 so he didn't have to debate other candidates for the CPC leadership... but it now comes to light that PoiLIEvre has also advised his parachuted in Durham candidate (Jamil Jivani) NOT TO DEBATE other party candidates. What's the problem with debating, hey Shady?
hey Shady! Thanks for your Durham by-election prediction... and the unwillingness of PoiLIEvre to debate - what's PeePee afraid of?
I’m on a roll, another correct prediction! 🥳🥳🥳
-
It's one of Canada's safest CPC seats. You really feel so poorly about yourself that you need to pump yourself up for getting obvious predictions right? Next you'll be congratulating yourself for predicting the Leafs lose in the first round.
-
It's one of Canada's safest CPC seats. You really feel so poorly about yourself that you need to pump yourself up for getting obvious predictions right? Next you'll be congratulating yourself for predicting the Leafs lose in the first round.
You're not understanding that the riding is a bell weather. During the Trudeau years, the riding went Conservative by 12-16 points. During the Harper years, the riding went Conservative by 30-33 points. Last night's victory was 35+. Regardless, waldo asked me for a prediction. I have no idea why as the riding is a safe Conservative seat, but he asked me anyways. I think his Liberal leaning polls must have showed a narrower defeat. Looking to see how waldo spins this one! LOL.
-
Pompous azzhole with better policies.
policies? PoiLIEvre has... policies? Well, ok Shady - we've seen how PeePee's "housing policy" has been significantly critiqued... the waldo can replay a couple of related posts if you'd like!
but Shady, can ya help a brother out here? What other PoiLIEvre policies are you speaking of... waiting Shady... waiting!
-
You're not understanding that the riding is a bell weather.
Looking to see how waldo spins this one! LOL.
ya ya, a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole). Could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham? And it's spelled, "bellwether"! But if you say so... is it predicting more CPC parachute candidates (as your guy doesn't even live in Durham). Is it predicting more CPC candidates that refuse to debate? Is it predicting more controversial CPC candidates; one's that carry a whole lotta baggage? The waldo is quite partial to a CPC candidate claiming he was fired for not being woke enough... for being too black... for not being black enough... etc.. In any case, this election result will prove itself to be a gold mine as the guy just exudes far-right bullshyte!
-
oh my! Shady's bellwether! Durham election and byelection results:
2024: Conservative
2021: Conservative
2019: Conservative
2015: Conservative
2012: Conservative
2011: Conservative
2008: Conservative
2006: Conservative
2004: Conservative
-
(https://i.imgur.com/W703tHf.png)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GH2vF-dXEAA1xYs?format=jpg)
-
oh my! Shady's bellwether! Durham election and byelection results:
2024: Conservative
2021: Conservative
2019: Conservative
2015: Conservative
2012: Conservative
2011: Conservative
2008: Conservative
2006: Conservative
2004: Conservative
Now examine the margins of victory. I’ll give you a hint, it coincides with conservative majorities! Mid teens when not in office, mid twenties up to mid thirties when conservatives are poised to take office. Last nights margin was 35+!
-
You're not understanding that the riding is a bell weather.
oh my! The supposed disgruntled MagaMaple bunch that parrots PeePee's 'everything is broken' claims sure came out in force registering a whopping 12% of the overall votes for your parachuted candidate you doesn't even live in the Durham riding! Bellwether, hey Shady - bellwether!
-
oh my! The supposed disgruntled MagaMaple bunch that parrots PeePee's 'everything is broken' claims sure came out in force registering a whopping 12% of the overall votes for your parachuted candidate you doesn't even live in the Durham riding! Bellwether, hey Shady - bellwether!
Lol, I was wondering what your spin would be after that absolute drubbing! Weird why you asked me to make a prediction. You thought you inaccurate partisan polls showed the Liberals keeping it close I bet! 😂😂😂
-
Lol, I was wondering what your spin would be after that absolute drubbing! Weird why you asked me to make a prediction. You thought you inaccurate partisan polls showed the Liberals keeping it close I bet! 😂😂😂
75% of the riding didn't even bother to vote... such a... drubbing in one of the safest Conservative ridings in Canada! Again, for your declared bellwether:
ya ya, a Conservative riding since 2004 (held by Conservative MPs Bev Oda and Erin O'Toole). Could there be a more safe CPC riding than Durham? And it's spelled, "bellwether"! But if you say so... is it predicting more CPC parachute candidates (as your guy doesn't even live in Durham). Is it predicting more CPC candidates that refuse to debate? Is it predicting more controversial CPC candidates; one's that carry a whole lotta baggage? The waldo is quite partial to a CPC candidate claiming he was fired for not being woke enough... for being too black... for not being black enough... etc.. In any case, this election result will prove itself to be a gold mine as the guy just exudes far-right bullshyte!
-
75% of the riding didn't even bother to vote... such a... drubbing in one of the safest Conservative ridings in Canada! Again, for your declared bellwether:
Then why did you ask me for a prediction?
-
Then why did you ask me for a prediction?
reading more of your general pomposity and your forever penchant to pump PeePee's tires... ya, that was it!
-
reading more of your general pomposity and your forever penchant to pump PeePee's tires... ya, that was it!
Fair enough. I wish I would have predicted a record margin of victory, not seen even during the Harper years! 🤣
-
I just found out the the Liberal candidate in Durham last night tried to run as a conservative last year! 😂😂😂
-
You're not understanding that the riding is a bell weather.
the waldo's crack research team has just informed me that:
=> in a wrongful dismissal suit after being fired by Bell Media, Jivani claimed he was fired, "when he didn’t match liberal views white executives expected from a Black man".
=> in a statement of defence, Bell Media alleged Jivani displayed “open disdain for the company’s efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion,” citing his alleged “discriminatory comments” about the “2sLGBTQ+ community” and “skepticism over the validity of trans- and other gender identities.”
=> Bell Media also had serious concerns that Jivani invited guests to his show who espoused ‘anti-vax’ views and spread false information about the necessity and efficacy of vaccines and alternative therapies such as hydroxychloroquine. Bell Media stated that Jivani allowed these guests to espouse such views without challenging such views or offering a balancing counterpoint.”
=> in a less than amicable split, Jivani quit the advocacy position he held in the Doug Ford government; one advising Ontario’s Ministry of Education. After his recent day by-election win, the newly elected Conservative MP Jivani denounced the Ford government as ‘liberal elites’.
bellwether, hey Shady! Bellwether!
-
the waldo's crack research team has just informed me that:
=> in a wrongful dismissal suit after being fired by Bell Media, Jivani claimed he was fired, "when he didn’t match liberal views white executives expected from a Black man".
=> in a statement of defence, Bell Media alleged Jivani displayed “open disdain for the company’s efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion,” citing his alleged “discriminatory comments” about the “2sLGBTQ+ community” and “skepticism over the validity of trans- and other gender identities.”
=> Bell Media also had serious concerns that Jivani invited guests to his show who espoused ‘anti-vax’ views and spread false information about the necessity and efficacy of vaccines and alternative therapies such as hydroxychloroquine. Bell Media stated that Jivani allowed these guests to espouse such views without challenging such views or offering a balancing counterpoint.”
=> in a less than amicable split, Jivani quit the advocacy position he held in the Doug Ford government; one advising Ontario’s Ministry of Education. After his recent day by-election win, the newly elected Conservative MP Jivani denounced the Ford government as ‘liberal elites’.
bellwether, hey Shady! Bellwether!
Who cares? Voters didn’t. The by election is over buddy, better luck next time.
-
Who cares? Voters didn’t. The by election is over buddy, better luck next time.
you cared... see your prior post! As for voters... you're right - voters didn't vote as only 25% of eligible voters bothered to actually turn out and vote. Effectively, your guy got 12% of eligible voters - that's quite a mandate, hey! Bellwether says Shady - bellwether!
but hey now! Aren't you impressed with your guys recent work history... of course the kicker was his "victory speech" where he labelled the Ford Conservative government as "liberal elites". Bellwether!
-
you cared... see your prior post! As for voters... you're right - voters didn't vote as only 25% of eligible voters bothered to actually turn out and vote. Effectively, your guy got 12% of eligible voters - that's quite a mandate, hey! Bellwether says Shady - bellwether!
but hey now! Aren't you impressed with your guys recent work history... of course the kicker was his "victory speech" where he labelled the Ford Conservative government as "liberal elites". Bellwether!
It's not my fault that Liberal voters are depressed and unenergized, and didn't turn out to vote. Regardless, you're purposely ignoring the big picture as to the fact that nobody feels better off under Junior, and nobody likes his policies. You keep defecting, probably because you know what's coming next year. Junior's out on his a$$ and the carbon tax is completely axed. Go have a good cry about it, you'll feel a little better.
-
It's not my fault that Liberal voters are depressed and unenergized, and didn't turn out to vote.
again, one of the 'safest CPC seats' in the country... Conservative since 2004! But ya, your doofusguy got a merry/energized 12% of all eligible voters. And you keep beating your chest over it!
asking again: aren't you impressed with your guys recent work history... of course the kicker was his "victory speech" where he labelled the Ford Conservative government as "liberal elites". Bellwether, hey Shady! Bellwether!
-
oh my! Notwithstanding the significant praise/endorsement that former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney repeatedly directed toward PM Trudeau... now we have this from yet another former Conservative Prime Minister, Kim Campbell - "PoiLIEvre is a liar and a hate-monger":
(https://i.imgur.com/2pmq6nI.png)
-
oh my! PoiLIEvre has a 'X' entry where he states, "he {PM Trudeau} will send out his MPs from Jewish ridings"
of course there's a real buzz on PeePee's use of the words "Jewish ridings"! What's a Jewish riding? Anyone, anyone... even you Shady?
oh barney!
(https://i.imgur.com/EUgFIwv.png)
-
RCMP warns that peepee is a fuckin Nazi and he is assembling an army of halfwits.
Law enforcement should expect continuing social and political polarization fuelled by misinformation campaigns and an increasing mistrust for all democratic institutions
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-police-future-trends-1.7138046
-
RCMP warns that peepee is a fuckin Nazi and he is assembling an army of halfwits.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-police-future-trends-1.7138046
Fascist says what?
-
Keep licking your wounds. 😂
-
oh my! Notwithstanding the significant praise/endorsement that former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney repeatedly directed toward PM Trudeau... now we have this from yet another former Conservative Prime Minister, Kim Campbell - "PoiLIEvre is a liar and a hate-monger":
(https://i.imgur.com/2pmq6nI.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNsxtGN.jpeg)
-
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNsxtGN.jpeg)
Cry harder.
-
The latest beautiful projection!
[attachimg=1]
-
The latest beautiful projection!
PoiLIEvre sycophants, like YOU, keep trying to convince themselves? Of course, there's also those past polls showing Conservatives significantly ahead in past polling - and what happened there, hey! Oh wait now waldo, has an election been called? Just because PeePee has chosen to campaign, outside of an actual election campaign - on the taxpayer dime the past years, it means Jack!
(https://i.imgur.com/yEhTEu0.jpeg)
-
PoiLIEvre sycophants, like YOU, keep trying to convince themselves? Of course, there's also those past polls showing Conservatives significantly ahead in past polling - and what happened there, hey! Oh wait now waldo, has an election been called? Just because PeePee has chosen to campaign, outside of an actual election campaign - on the taxpayer dime the past years, it means Jack!
(https://i.imgur.com/yEhTEu0.jpeg)
How’d the by election go again? 😂
-
Yep.
[attachimg=1]
-
Peepee had a journalist arrested at a rally, and then said "an apple a day keeps journalists away."
So he discredits and hinders the free press in this country, and he makes the lamest sound bites possible.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/ZNsxtGN.jpeg)
Cry harder.
as I previously mentioned: notwithstanding the significant praise/endorsement that former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney repeatedly directed toward PM Trudeau... now we have this from yet another former Conservative Prime Minister:
Kim Campbell - "PoiLIEvre is a liar and a hate-monger".
(https://i.imgur.com/2pmq6nI.png)
-
as I previously mentioned: notwithstanding the significant praise/endorsement that former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney repeatedly directed toward PM Trudeau... now we have this from yet another former Conservative Prime Minister:
Kim Campbell - "PoiLIEvre is a liar and a hate-monger".
(https://i.imgur.com/2pmq6nI.png)
Everyone hates Pete.
-
How’d the by election go again? 😂
again, one of the 'safest CPC seats' in the country... Conservative since 2004 - (held by Conservative MP Bev Oda and former CPC leader Erin O'Toole)! In your declared 'bellwether', 75% of the riding didn't even bother to vote. But ya, your doofusguy got a merry/energized 12% of all eligible voters - such a mandate! And you keep beating your chest over it - even labelling it an absolute drubbing.
in your declared bellwether, is it predicting more CPC parachute candidates (as your guy doesn't even live in Durham). Is it predicting more CPC candidates that refuse to debate? Is it predicting more controversial CPC candidates; one's that carry a whole lotta baggage? The waldo is quite partial to a CPC candidate claiming he was fired for not being woke enough... for being too black... for not being black enough... etc.. In any case, this election result will prove itself to be a gold mine as your guy, Jamil Jivani, just exudes far-right bullshyte!
asking again: aren't you impressed with your guys recent work history... of course the kicker was his "victory speech" where he labelled the Ford Conservative government as "liberal elites". Bellwether, hey Shady! Bellwether!
-
oh my! PoiLIEvre has a 'X' entry where he states, "he {PM Trudeau} will send out his MPs from Jewish ridings"
of course there's a real buzz on PeePee's use of the words "Jewish ridings"! What's a Jewish riding? Anyone, anyone... even you Shady?
asking again Shady, what's a Jewish riding?
-
Everyone hates Pete.
PP does sell some snake oil. But why would she target him, especially in her party? It's not like any major party leader has not been a habitual liar in some way.
-
Maybe it has something to do with his unwillingness to get security clearance.
-
again, one of the 'safest CPC seats' in the country... Conservative since 2004 - (held by Conservative MP Bev Oda and former CPC leader Erin O'Toole)! In your declared 'bellwether', 75% of the riding didn't even bother to vote. But ya, your doofusguy got a merry/energized 12% of all eligible voters - such a mandate! And you keep beating your chest over it - even labelling it an absolute drubbing.
in your declared bellwether, is it predicting more CPC parachute candidates (as your guy doesn't even live in Durham). Is it predicting more CPC candidates that refuse to debate? Is it predicting more controversial CPC candidates; one's that carry a whole lotta baggage? The waldo is quite partial to a CPC candidate claiming he was fired for not being woke enough... for being too black... for not being black enough... etc.. In any case, this election result will prove itself to be a gold mine as your guy, Jamil Jivani, just exudes far-right bullshyte!
asking again: aren't you impressed with your guys recent work history... of course the kicker was his "victory speech" where he labelled the Ford Conservative government as "liberal elites". Bellwether, hey Shady! Bellwether!
You fail to understand why the margin of victory matters. The margin of victory was higher than it was during the Harper years. It was almost +40. When Trudeau won his elections it was in the mid teens. It's definitely a bellwether, whether you like it or not, pun intended!
-
asking again Shady, what's a Jewish riding?
Probably a riding that features predominantly Jewish voters. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
-
Everyone hates Pete.
Not as much as people hate Trudeau. He's completely ruined Canada.
-
Probably a riding that features predominantly Jewish voters. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
Maybe because there isn't such a thing in Canada.
-
Maybe because there isn't such a thing in Canada.
I don't know the composition of each riding, but I'm sure there are some with significant Jewish populations. I'm not sure what the big deal is. I guess it's just another thing to feign outrage over.
-
Woot!
Poilievre polls as Canada’s pick for PM, first Conservative leader to do so since Harper
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/poilievre-harper-nanos-poll
-
If the Conservative Party ran their platform as efficiently as rge Winnipeg Jets, they would have a majority government by now.
-
If the Conservative Party ran their platform as efficiently as rge Winnipeg Jets, they would have a majority government by now.
Agreed. However, I only really care/want the Conservatives to do a few things. Get the budget towards being balanced within the next 5 years, link immigration to housing, axe the carbon tax and fix some of the soft on crime policies of the Trudeau regime. If Pierre just does that, it would be amazing for all Canadians.
-
Shady! Your new profile icon - you're welcome!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIakV7ZWoAERuNM?format=jpg)
-
PeePee's freedom ain't free!
(https://i.imgur.com/rzQieb3.png)
-
PeePee's freedom ain't free!
(https://i.imgur.com/rzQieb3.png)
Says a CBC "journalist". How much federal Liberal tax money has old Max taken so far? LOL! I like that he has a special focus on the Smith Alberta government! Spicey!
We're not sure how he finds so much time to write three substantial, searing columns a week and tweet through the day. Yet proof that he can and does is vivid on Twitter, where he engages in intense, irreverent conversations on politics and policy, with a special focus on the Smith government of Alberta.
[/i]
https://www.nationalobserver.com/u/max-fawcett
-
Shady! Your new profile icon - you're welcome!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIakV7ZWoAERuNM?format=jpg)
Sounds like Junior and his carbon rebate. You know, the one has insists reimburses everyone for their carbon tax, but in reality, comes far short, even according to the Parliamentary budget office.
-
PeePee's freedom ain't free!
(https://i.imgur.com/rzQieb3.png)
Says a CBC "journalist". How much federal Liberal tax money has old Max taken so far? LOL! I like that he has a special focus on the Smith Alberta government! Spicey!
Max Fawcett's writings have appeared in several media outlets - other than you lining up with azzhole PoiLIEvre's broad attacks against the media and his pointed targeting of the CBC... what is your basis for labelling Fawcett a, as you say, "CBC journalist". Considering he's lived and worked in Alberta for some time now (in Edmonton, now Calgary), has been an editor of an oil industry related magazine... and actually worked in the Alberta government Climate Change office (2017-2019), that might suggest having interest in the current Alberta 'petro' government - yes?
the waldo is shocked you won't touch what was actually written in that "PeePee's freedom ain't free!" National Observer article... shocked I tells ya!
-
Sounds like PM Trudeau and his carbon rebate. You know, the one has insists reimburses everyone for their carbon tax, but in reality, comes far short, even according to the Parliamentary budget office.
you persist in knowingly lying - quit your, 'Axing The Facts'!
-
Max Fawcett's writings have appeared in several media outlets
Absolutely, he seems like a fantastic opinion writer.
-
Says a CBC "journalist". How much federal Liberal tax money has old Max taken so far? LOL! I like that he has a special focus on the Smith Alberta government! Spicey!
Max Fawcett's writings have appeared in several media outlets - other than you lining up with azzhole PoiLIEvre's broad attacks against the media and his pointed targeting of the CBC... what is your basis for labelling Fawcett a, as you say, "CBC journalist". Considering he's lived and worked in Alberta for some time now (in Edmonton, now Calgary), has been an editor of an oil industry related magazine... and actually worked in the Alberta government Climate Change office (2017-2019), that might suggest having interest in the current Alberta 'petro' government - yes?
Absolutely, he seems like a fantastic opinion writer.
the waldo is shocked you won't touch what was actually written in that "PeePee's freedom ain't free!" National Observer article... shocked I tells ya!
-
PeePee's (and Shady's) panacea!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIeC3dnWIAAIRz3?format=jpg)
-
[attachimg=1]
-
[attachimg=1]
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIqBpvIWAAAGJ0Q?format=jpg)
oh wait waldo - in that toon, is that broken house... Canada? And careful waldo, you know you just can't trust a/that bigBadWolf!
-
PoiLIEvre is a gdamn liar... of course he is! PeePee and his CPC MPs are purposely misinforming about the April 1st carbon pricing increase - purposely lying with word play by stating the increase, "amounts to an extra 18¢ on a litre of fuel". Of course, the actual increase will only account for an increase of ~3¢/litre... bringing the total since carbon pricing inception to 18¢/litre.
then we have B.C. Premier Eby calling PoiLIEvre out after PeePee asks him to not administer the April 1st tax hike! Geezaz waldo, doesn't PoiLIEvre understand that B.C. has its own carbon pricing program... surely someone so invested in raging to 'Axe The Tax' would know this - surely!
video: (https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1768754598091661312/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/v5pwiABztwbKVowz.mp4?tag=12) B.C. Premier Eby - I don't live in the Pierre Poilievre campaign office and baloney factory!
-
sure, sure ShadyMan! A meme-standoff you say?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIy7FE4WUAAgOjw?format=png)