Calling something stupid and telling other posters good luck 'normalizing' this, is shutting down debate.
Nothings been shut down. Debate to your hearts content. Neither Cyber nor I nor anyone else can stop you or anyone else.
This debate will be shut down once people realize that there are huge mountains that need be climbed in regards to what is killing and responsibility.
The debate here was shut down once abortion was called genocide. How does one surmount that? Whats to discuss?
Am I, or anyone else, to now accept that abortion is genocide in order to then have a rational debate on the reasonable ethical limits of genocide?
There is no debate because there is no common ground with which to maintain a rational discussion?
It seems to me that the only people who have any hope of engaging PG in rational debate are those that fundimentally agree that abortion is killing/murder/genocide but may think that perhaps some little leeway in extreme cases might perhaps be allowed. Those are the only folks that can possibly engage in a supposed debate with PG.
Look whats happened here, on this very thread: PG issued the challenge "Why should abortion be allowed. Convince me. Its mass murder. Its genocide. Lets debate"
Me: Its not any of those things. Not even a little bit.
. Whats to discuss. For anything to continue either I accept it is indeed murder or he accepts that it is not.
Debate ends. Shut down. There is nowhere to go.