There's no right to a vasectomy.
Then you clearly do not even understand the very basics of what a right actually is.
Regardless, the labour issue isn't a straw man, unless you think doctors are slaves of the state.
As I explained, even where there is no one to perform a particular medical procedure, you still have a right to get that procedure, whether it’s an abortion, a vasectomy or lazer eye surgery.
What if a doctor isn't comfortable preforming an abortion? Do you want the state to compel them to?
Straw man. No one says any doctor has to perform any surgical procedure they do not wish to. That applies to appendix removal, abortions, vasectomies or amputation of limbs etc, etc, etc.
Stay focused. No one advocated forcing doctors to perform abortions.
By your logic, people don’t have a right to end their own lives with the assistance of a medical professional. And yet the courts have stated clearly that this is a RIGHT.
You still need a doctor to perform it, but that’s not relevant to whether it’s a right or not.
In a unanimous decision on February 6, 2015, the Court struck down the provision in the Criminal Code, thereby giving Canadian adults who are mentally competent and suffering intolerably and enduringly the right to a doctor's assistance in dying.
Here’s the case, if you want to read it.
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14637/index.do The terms RIGHT to assisted death is interspersed throughout the judgement. It also mentions that doctors do not need to perform it.
So it is still a RIGHT whether or not a doctor is there to perform it.
See where your confusion lies now?
In our view, nothing in the declaration of invalidity which we propose to issue would compel physicians to provide assistance in dying. The declaration simply renders the criminal prohibition invalid. What follows is in the hands of the physicians’ colleges, Parliament, and the provincial legislatures. However, we note — as did Beetz J. in addressing the topic of physician participation in abortion in Morgentaler — that a physician’s decision to participate in assisted dying is a matter of conscience and, in some cases, of religious belief (pp. 95-96). In making this observation, we do not wish to pre-empt the legislative and regulatory response to this judgment. Rather, we underline that the Charter rights of patients and physicians will need to be reconciled.