You obstinately refuse to acknowledge that what humans are doing to this planet is not a natural phenomena and there is no reason to believe that being able to adapt is a given.
I never said that. I am saying that:
if we can't adapt then emission reductions are also futile and we are screwed;
if we can adapt then emission reductions are still futile but also cause harm by limiting our ability to adapt;
There is no plausible future scenario where emission reductions makes sense as a primary policy objective.
That does not mean we should not make some effort to reduce emissions. Just that these efforts should be limited to things which are cost effective. The more important point is we need to reject the notion that emission reductions will make any difference because they can't.