Did I say anything about CO2 emissions here? I sure didn't, but you seem to have a whole position laid out for me and are arguing against that. What is that called again?
You care to address the problem with your do nothing argument? Namely, the fact that you suggest climate change will reverse itself, in spite of the trend lines, even if we do nothing? That's clearly an indefensible position and certainly doesn't "play to the probabilities" as you claim.