Author Topic: The Definition of Trolling  (Read 130 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JMT

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
  • Location: Waterhen, Manitoba
Re: The Definition of Trolling
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2017, 01:49:27 pm »
Can repetitively referring to a topic be trolling?

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: The Definition of Trolling
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2017, 02:12:58 pm »
i.e. dropping a one line post that says "lefties are snowflakes" is trolling. Making the same statement with a link to article provides an example of thin skinned behavior from people with progressive views along with an explanation on why you think that people should not get upset at whatever triggered the incident is not trolling even if the underlying message is the same.

I think the real difference is whether you're simply saying it to cause **** to fly or whether you actually believe it.
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Offline bcsapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1377
Re: The Definition of Trolling
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2017, 02:37:18 pm »
I think the real difference is whether you're simply saying it to cause **** to fly or whether you actually believe it.

Who wouldn't believe that?

(was that a troll?)
Time for bed said Zebedee...

guest4

  • Guest
Re: The Definition of Trolling
« Reply #18 on: February 04, 2017, 04:41:29 pm »
I think everyone with strongly held opinions on controversial subjects is going to say things that upset people (a.k.a. "troll").

I think what separates trolling from controversial opinions is context and support for the argument.

i.e. dropping a one line post that says "lefties are snowflakes" is trolling. Making the same statement with a link to article provides an example of thin skinned behavior from people with progressive views along with an explanation on why you think that people should not get upset at whatever triggered the incident is not trolling even if the underlying message is the same.

I can agree with that, by why does any discussion have to include name calling at all?    If respectful discussion is the goal, wouldn't avoiding denigration 90% of the time (giving room for some slipups) be helpful?   On MLW, it seems some posters can't say anything without slipping in an insult to the 'other side' in there.

I suppose if argument and mutual flaming is the goal, then the more slights-that-aren't-outright-name-calling the better.

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: The Definition of Trolling
« Reply #19 on: February 04, 2017, 05:06:24 pm »
Quote
I can agree with that, by why does any discussion have to include name calling at all?
Name calling is a separate offence. Trolls use name calling. Non-trolls don't have to use it but if they do it does not automatically mean they are a troll.