Canadian Politics Today

Exactly the type of immigrant Sir John claims to like.....     except...  he doesn’t like then either.

I don't care how foreign students do. I care about whether they're making it harder for Canadians.

“Human Reaction to **** Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon”

 “Do dogs suffer oppression based upon (perceived) gender?” the paper asks.

In “Rubbing One Out: Defining Metasexual Violence of Objectification Through Nonconsensual ****,” the fictitious author argues that men who masturbate while thinking about a woman without her consent are perpetrators of sexual violence

By drawing upon empirical studies of psychological harms of objectification, especially through depersonalization, and exploring severel veins of theoretical literature on nonphysical forms of sexual violence, this articles seeks to situate non-concensual male autoerotic fantasizing about women as a form of metasexual violence that depersonalizes her, injures her being on an affective level, contributes to consequent harms of objectification and **** culture, and can appropriate her identity for the purpose of male sexual gratification.

“Academics,” Alison Phipps wrote on Twitter, “please stand by colleagues in Gender Studies/Critical Race Studies/Fat Studies & other areas targeted by this journal article hoax. This is a coordinated attack from the right.”

That too is intellectually dishonest. For one, Lindsay, Pluckrose and Boghossian describe themselves as left-leaning liberals. For another, it is nonsensical to insist that nonsense scholarship doesn’t matter because you don’t like the motives of the people who exposed it, or because some other forms of scholarship may also contain nonsense. If certain fields of study cannot reliably differentiate between real scholarship and noxious bloviating, they become deeply suspect. And if they are so invested in overcoming injustice that they are willing to embrace rank cruelty as long as it is presented in the right kind of progressive jargon, they are worsening the problems they purport to address.

But if we are to be serious about remedying discrimination, racism, and sexism, we can’t ignore the uncomfortable truth these hoaxers have revealed: Some academic emperors—the ones who supposedly have the most to say about these crucial topics—have no clothes.

published in peer-reviewed academic journals

I am not sure that "social science" journals are comparable to says physics.

oh really... per one of the "studies" Ms. kimmy highlighted, how would you refer to made-up research... like 10,000 hours of fake observation of dogs humping other dogs at dog parks?