Which activists now ? Are all 'activists' bad ? What are the homosexual activists up to these days ? Do activists just quit after equality reaches near-total acceptance.
Which activists? Any and all activists who are calling for gender identity recognition on demand, and any and all activists who demand that trans-women be treated identically to cisgendered women. As far as I can tell, those positions seem to be near universal among trans rights activists.
If you agree with those two positions, then you have to agree that "JY" has done nothing wrong and that the villains here are those 16 aestheticians who refused service.
If you accept those two positions staked out by trans rights activists, then you can't argue that "JY" is doing anything wrong, and you can't suggest he is "gaming the system".
People used to say that if we allowed gays to marry people would start marrying dogs next. What is likely to happen ? We don't know but I would guess that at a certain point, the public will wake up and see what's happening and either people will be ok with it or they will push back and something will change.
People marrying dogs as a result of gay marriage was a poorly reasoned attempt at "slippery-sloping". It's a poor analogy to what we're discussing.
People were never really that interested in marrying dogs, so marrying dogs just never took off the way that some people seemed to think it would.
On the other hand, perverts and predators are very interested in gaining access to women's safe spaces.
So you're saying that as assault becomes more common, there will be more of it. I would think that as something becomes a problem the public becomes aware and there's a reaction.
I am saying that as men identifying themselves as women becomes more common and more accepted, more people will do so for malicious reasons. ie, not because they sincerely believe they are women or because they suffer genuine gender dysphoria, but because they want to invade women's privacy, or live out their sexual fetishes, or claim victimhood, or access to things that have been set aside for women-- like scholarships for girls or equal opportunity placements or women's athletics.
They're creating a system that's tailor made to be abused, and it's going to be abused. It already is being abused.
Your nightmare scenario doesn't seem realistic to me.
This stuff is happening in real life. Why do you find it unrealistic when it's already happening?
-k