I think we all understand who is having the "bug eyed rage".
It's me. Let there be no confusion as to that. I am god-damned livid.
You can feel it, but you are being played is all.
Yes, that.
Sure, go ahead. It's not a significant event, though. It's playing because of the reaction...
I don't care why it's in the news, the fact that it happened is rage-inducing.
You say it's not a significant event. You've dismissed it as one decision made by one women's department at one university.
And then you told me you wouldn't dare post this to your Facebook feed because you'd be "vilified" for it. It sounds to me like your Facebook friends have all made up their minds and would be angry at you for questioning this.
If that's the case, then this Eastern Michigan University decision isn't actually an outlier at all. It's an indicator, a sign-post of what you earlier referred to as "an emerging consensus". Somewhere along the way, this debate already decided before I even knew it was happening.
-k