So far, I have a problem with these terms used by the article:
‘social contagion’
'disproportionate number of girls'
'prominent campaigner for transgender rights'
'Trans rights have gone wrong'
These are all subjective terms and claims, or pejoratives, and the culmination of fears is presented as:
'All raise serious issues of public policy, yet politicians are silent, fearful of questioning the trans-rights advocates and the consequences of their orthodoxy.'
My response is: be brave and state your case. If you have a valid point you will have people behind you. That is, after all, the role of a public figure: to speak out.
As for the concerns, maybe start with a more established group such as:
http://www.pfc.org.uk/index.htmlAs the article itself states: 'Under reforms advocated by many (but not all) transgender campaigners, '. Yes, that is to say that all LGBT and feminists are not on the same page with regards to gatekeepers or the sometimes-vague situations conveyed in the article.
And please keep in mind as all of this becomes law, conservatives will be stating how Canada's progressive trans rights are a good reason to screen Muslims who want to come to Canada...