Hubbard came out of retirement to compete as a woman…. He was a washed up male, but had a legit chance against females.
Kimmy explained this very well in a previous post that you apparently didn’t bother reading.
We are on page 136 of this thread, Kimmy has said a lot of things. The post I was addressing was that particular one wherein she lays the basis of why biological men should be excluded from women's sports.
I'm not sure you read her example from the post which I was quoting, but here it is again:
Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[56] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world's top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple of bottles of ice cold lager".[57][56] The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park,[58] after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two shandies. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2.[56] Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun"[59] and that the big difference was that men can chase down shots much easier and put spin on the ball that female players can't handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350.[56]
IOW, long before she discussed Hubbard specifically, she implied that a mediocre man has a good chance against a GOAT woman as the reason why transwomen should not be competing with biological women. When BD brought up the mediocre man's loss, she called his argument stupid as though it has no relevance when just a few pages back she'd implied it herself.
Then everyone pounced on BD for his tone when truthfully it was Kimmy's post (which I quoted) that had been proven incorrect.
Hopefully it's clearer now why I revived that old post of hers.