Canadian Politics Today

Like what?

Daniel Radcliffe cancels JK ...

https://exclaim.ca/film/article/daniel_radcliffe_doubles_down_on_speaking_out_against_j_k_rowling_not_everybody_in_the_franchise_felt_that_way?utm_source=facebookpage&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=fbpwall&fbclid=IwAR1HLjHqgohCM6aqgnPSSeWTRCTZnSRr3qB7d3yGlwcAIqlizY2jhjVREgE

Any rich person is.  But rich folks also want to be popular for some reason...

She has an opinion on Trans women that is at odds with the new thinking NewSpeak on this, that's all I know.

Wokies can never ...


 -k

Wokies can never actually articulate what it is that Rowling has said that is so awful, but are convinced that it must have been something because otherwise the other wokies wouldn't be so mad at her.  It's accepted as an article of faith among the faithful, and they just need to keep reassuring each other that it's true.

"Rowling is a terrible transphobe!"
"It is known!"
"It is known!"

Stuff that Rowling has actually said:
 -biological sex is real
 -female people need and deserve single-sex spaces
 -people should be free to advocate for female people without abuse and harassment and discrimination
 -and she mocked the shitbags who want people to use "inclusive" language like "uterus havers" and "birthing bodies" and similar despicable dogshit.

All of this stuff is completely reasonable to normal sane people. But it's utter blasphemy to you Woko Haram types. 

You guys face the dilemma of trying to convince everybody that she has been saying terrible things, while not telling them that the terrible things she has been saying are things that most people actually agree with.  Which is why whenever somebody asks what Rowling has said that's so terrible, we always get this "oh my brother, there is far too much to list and it is far too terrible to repeat, but trust me it is terrible beyond belief" routine.

LOL he says the same stuff every few months. Nothing new about this.

You'd be hard-pressed to come up with a better example than a washed-up child actor who is trying to stave off being forgotten by bagging on the world's most successful woman.

Radcliffe could spend the rest of his life sailing around in a private yacht, or buy his own Scottish castle with all the money he made from being part of Rowling's creations.  Emma Watson keeps doing this as well; her career has pretty much fizzled out too.

As for Rowling, it is as Shady said: if she wanted to be popular she could very easily have stayed out of this debate.   

Calls wokies "woko-haram", now is Shady-level poster.

Tells posters to kill themselves, now is freedom fighter fighting Nazis.

Winner! 😂😂😂

I identify as black so don't assume my race please.  Thanks.

If you don't care about message boards rhetoric then I assume you don't care about it on Twitter and you would allow verbal abuse on that app.

Hey let's all go on Rowlings Twitter and tell her she's a stupid piece of **** that should go kill themselves.