Author Topic: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks  (Read 1109 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« on: April 15, 2018, 04:38:23 pm »
Or helpless Black victims of racism arrested by evil police after being thrown out of restaurant by racist manager. Take your pick.

So yeah, this is apparently a thing now. Two black guys were in Starbucks waiting to meet some guy. They asked to use the bathroom and when they didn't want to order anything were told to leave. They refused. Police were called. Police told them they had to leave. They refused, and were arrested. This is being described as pretty blatant racism. I saw some panel on MSNBC a short time ago where the chick leading it was astonished the (black)police chief would say they didn't do anything wrong.

But to me, the issue isn't as clear cut. Or actually it is, from the police perspective. When you're told to leave some private premise you leave. End of story. It doesn't matter why. It doesn't matter if it's fair. You have no right to be there and if they want you gone you leave. If the police tell you this (which they did) and you refuse to leave you're arrested. It doesn't matter what your skin is. You don't make your case to the cops that the owner is being unfair you make it to a lawyer and he makes the case to the company, possibly through the courts later.

So to me the question is why did the manager called the cops. Was it because they were Black or because they were Black and weren't ordering anything? Most restaurants refuse to let people off the street use their bathroom facilities. They're reserved for customers. Most restaurants will kick you out if you don't want to order anything. Starbucks is kind of different, though, in that they encourage people to hang around, use their wifi, etc. But the company seems to suggest they were following policy.  Would they have called the cops if these guys were white or Asian? Would they have called the cops if they'd been wearing suits and ties? You have to get into the head of the manager to find that out. But everyone seems to have already decided.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/04/15/two-black-men-were-arrested-waiting-at-a-starbucks-now-the-company-police-are-on-the-defensive/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f33908fe237d
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2018, 05:11:09 pm »
Or helpless Black victims of racism arrested by evil police after being thrown out of restaurant by racist manager. Take your pick.

So yeah, this is apparently a thing now. Two black guys were in Starbucks waiting to meet some guy. They asked to use the bathroom and when they didn't want to order anything were told to leave. They refused. Police were called. Police told them they had to leave. They refused, and were arrested. This is being described as pretty blatant racism. I saw some panel on MSNBC a short time ago where the chick leading it was astonished the (black)police chief would say they didn't do anything wrong.

But to me, the issue isn't as clear cut. Or actually it is, from the police perspective. When you're told to leave some private premise you leave. End of story. It doesn't matter why. It doesn't matter if it's fair. You have no right to be there and if they want you gone you leave. If the police tell you this (which they did) and you refuse to leave you're arrested. It doesn't matter what your skin is. You don't make your case to the cops that the owner is being unfair you make it to a lawyer and he makes the case to the company, possibly through the courts later.

So to me the question is why did the manager called the cops. Was it because they were Black or because they were Black and weren't ordering anything? Most restaurants refuse to let people off the street use their bathroom facilities. They're reserved for customers. Most restaurants will kick you out if you don't want to order anything. Starbucks is kind of different, though, in that they encourage people to hang around, use their wifi, etc. But the company seems to suggest they were following policy.  Would they have called the cops if these guys were white or Asian? Would they have called the cops if they'd been wearing suits and ties? You have to get into the head of the manager to find that out. But everyone seems to have already decided.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/04/15/two-black-men-were-arrested-waiting-at-a-starbucks-now-the-company-police-are-on-the-defensive/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f33908fe237d

Seems as though you have taken your pick, but that was easily predictable. As the article points out these two were waiting for their lawyer to join them, and who did arrive. Who hasn't gone into a coffee shop with a plan to meet a friend and announced so to the barista without being led away in handcuffs? I know I have, but then I'm in Canada and I'm white.   

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2018, 06:47:08 pm »
Seems as though you have taken your pick, but that was easily predictable. As the article points out these two were waiting for their lawyer to join them, and who did arrive. Who hasn't gone into a coffee shop with a plan to meet a friend and announced so to the barista without being led away in handcuffs? I know I have, but then I'm in Canada and I'm white.

No, I've decided the police did nothing wrong. I said I don't know what was in the mind of the manager. Starbucks seems to suggest that they were following company policy, because they said they'll look at whether the policy is appropriate. I would suggest that if the individuals were dressed in suits and ties they wouldn't have been thrown out, but that's just a guess.
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

guest4

  • Guest
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2018, 08:02:05 pm »
No, I've decided the police did nothing wrong. I said I don't know what was in the mind of the manager. Starbucks seems to suggest that they were following company policy, because they said they'll look at whether the policy is appropriate. I would suggest that if the individuals were dressed in suits and ties they wouldn't have been thrown out, but that's just a guess.

While I was single and dating, I waited at plenty of places - including coffee shops - without ordering. Sometimes, I even wore jeans. Never was I asked to leave, and never were the police called.   I'd consider this more of the racism some people are so convinced does not exist.   

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2018, 09:00:32 pm »
While I was single and dating, I waited at plenty of places - including coffee shops - without ordering. Sometimes, I even wore jeans. Never was I asked to leave, and never were the police called.   I'd consider this more of the racism some people are so convinced does not exist.

Who said racism doesn't exist? Did you wait at these coffee shops without ordering anything, and then ask to use the bathroom?

Mind you, women are given a lot more leeway than men. Women aren't considered threatening in any way. Men are, especially if dressed poorly, and most especially, I grant you, if they're young and black.
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Offline msj

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 368
  • I'm outta here...
  • Location: Vancouver Island
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2018, 09:08:19 pm »
Mind you, women are given a lot more leeway than men. Women aren't considered threatening in any way. Men are, especially if dressed poorly, and most especially, I grant you, if they're young and black.

Maybe you should watch the video so you can make an informed comment rather than bore us with your usually speculative drivel?
I've gotta have more cow bell! -Bruce Dickinson
Like Like x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2018, 09:11:14 pm »
Who said racism doesn't exist? Did you wait at these coffee shops without ordering anything, and then ask to use the bathroom?

Mind you, women are given a lot more leeway than men. Women aren't considered threatening in any way. Men are, especially if dressed poorly, and most especially, I grant you, if they're young and black.

"Dressed poorly"? Explain how you see that. Maybe in your world you put on a suit and tie to go for a **** cup of coffee, but not in the real world. What they are wearing matters much less to you than the color of their skin. You're famous for that.
Like Like x 2 View List

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2018, 03:59:30 pm »
"Dressed poorly"? Explain how you see that. Maybe in your world you put on a suit and tie to go for a **** cup of coffee, but not in the real world. What they are wearing matters much less to you than the color of their skin. You're famous for that.


There are many demands for the police who dealt (properly) with this to be fired. Many demands the manager be fired, even though she appears to have acted within company policy. I'm sure you'd be one of those shrill types who has no problem making up your mind on scant evidence too.

« Last Edit: April 16, 2018, 09:08:35 pm by JMT »
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2018, 04:20:08 pm »
You're famous for your brainless, knee-jerk reactions to things. I mean, granted there are a lot of **** on this site from the far left, but they're all smarter than you are.

There are many demands for the police who dealt (properly) with this to be fired. Many demands the manager be fired, even though she appears to have acted within company policy. I'm sure you'd be one of those shrill types who has no problem making up your mind on scant evidence too.

Your mother wears army boots. And you do do always resort to insults when you're refuted. But if you seem to think you are so smart how come you didn't know the Starbucks manager has already been fired? tsk, tsk
Like Like x 3 View List

Offline BC_cheque

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1753
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #9 on: April 16, 2018, 04:25:25 pm »
While Argus doubles down on the shameless racial profiling, Starbucks CEO was on Goodmorning America apologizing sincerely for the error in judgment. .

Like Like x 1 View List

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2018, 04:32:20 pm »
While Argus doubles down on the shameless racial profiling, Starbucks CEO was on Goodmorning America apologizing sincerely for the error in judgment. .

I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact these guys were in fact waiting to meet with their lawyer who did show up.

Offline BC_cheque

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1753
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2018, 04:35:52 pm »
Maybe it was all planned that way and the poor white manager just fell right into their dirty trap by calling the police.

I bet George Soros even paid them out.

Funny Funny x 3 View List

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2018, 04:48:22 pm »
Your mother wears army boots. And you do do always resort to insults when you're

Insulted. Yes, I do.

Quote
But if you seem to think you are so smart how come you didn't know the Starbucks manager has already been fired? tsk, tsk

Nope. She/he was not fired. All Starbucks says is she is 'no longer at that store'. She violated no company policy. I've seen several reports which seem to indicate that the men might have asked to use the rest room and then sat down. Which makes sense because people just sitting there might not come to the attention of the counter staff very quickly at a Starbucks. Since they weren't customers they were asked to leave. Which the restaurant had a perfect right to do.

According to Starbucks, figuring out how to deal with people who aren't customers is left to the discretion of the local managers. Most eateries have policies that limit the use of restrooms to paying customers, and almost all prohibit loitiering and/or trespassing. These are common and sinsible policies for business that want to cultirivate an environment conducive to their customers.

So because of this I"m not SURE if she did this improperly. I AM sure the men deserved to be arrested, though. If you're told to leave someone else's premises you leave. If you don't, the cops will arrest you. How do people not understand that?

https://www.phillymag.com/business/2018/04/16/starbucks-manager-philadelphia-arrest/
« Last Edit: April 16, 2018, 04:50:56 pm by SirJohn »
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #13 on: April 16, 2018, 05:08:35 pm »
Insulted. Yes, I do.

Nope. She/he was not fired. All Starbucks says is she is 'no longer at that store'. She violated no company policy. I've seen several reports which seem to indicate that the men might have asked to use the rest room and then sat down. Which makes sense because people just sitting there might not come to the attention of the counter staff very quickly at a Starbucks. Since they weren't customers they were asked to leave. Which the restaurant had a perfect right to do.

According to Starbucks, figuring out how to deal with people who aren't customers is left to the discretion of the local managers. Most eateries have policies that limit the use of restrooms to paying customers, and almost all prohibit loitiering and/or trespassing. These are common and sinsible policies for business that want to cultirivate an environment conducive to their customers.

So because of this I"m not SURE if she did this improperly. I AM sure the men deserved to be arrested, though. If you're told to leave someone else's premises you leave. If you don't, the cops will arrest you. How do people not understand that?

https://www.phillymag.com/business/2018/04/16/starbucks-manager-philadelphia-arrest/

 I have a starbucks a 10 minute walk from my house and I've gone there and logged into their wifi while waiting for a friend to show and then we ordered coffee's.  The waiter was happy to wait. You keep trying to dodge the likelihood these men were asked to leave because of an attitude similar to yours.

Offline SirJohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
Re: Black troublemakers arrested at Starbucks
« Reply #14 on: April 16, 2018, 06:17:59 pm »
I have a starbucks a 10 minute walk from my house and I've gone there and logged into their wifi while waiting for a friend to show and then we ordered coffee's.  The waiter was happy to wait. You keep trying to dodge the likelihood these men were asked to leave because of an attitude similar to yours.

My attitude is, if you're a customer, welcome, if not, gtfo.
Starbucks doesn't have waitresses, as far as I'm aware. The ability of the staff at the counter to tell how long people have been sitting at tables, esp without ordering, is limited compared to restaurants that have waitresses. Thus if you don't actually approach them and, say ask for the key/code for the rest room, they might not notice you for a while. In this case they asked to use the rest room. I guarantee you at that point they were asked if they were going to order something. It is possible they said they'd order something when their friend arrived. If that was the case, I don't see why anyone would have a problem. Unfortunately, the information is not clear. If they just said no, they didn't want to order anything it's entirely reasonable they were told to leave.

Everything which happened after that is entirely their responsibility. When you're told to leave, you leave. Especially when it's a cop telling you. You are not entitled to one damn thing in a private restaurant, and certainly not entitled to stay when told to leave.
"When liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won't do." David Frum