Author Topic: Big Brands Failing  (Read 697 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #30 on: May 24, 2018, 07:37:12 pm »
I don't like eating non-organic foods, I don't like that organic foods are more expensive, but that's inescapable from laws of physics and the basic realities of agriculture unfortunately.   Non-organic foods are cheaper because GMOs and non-organic pesticides and fertilizers combine to create larger food yields, which means more food at the same cost.  Everyone has the choice to buy organic foods if they want, but they just happen to be less efficient economically and so cost a bit more.  The positives of non-organic foods is that people without a lot of money, especially in poor countries, can buy their food cheaper so have more money left over for other goods/services.  For most people in Canada, it comes down to if you value organic foods enough to want to pay the extra cost, and for most people they choose to buy non-organic, which is their choice.  If consumers didn't like non-organic foods they wouldn't buy them.  The people have spoken, regardless of what you and I think of that.

I think if you do a little research you will find that organic is pretty much a waste of money. But it does support a niche market I guess.

Offline cybercoma

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2956
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #31 on: May 25, 2018, 07:30:18 am »
I don't like that organic foods are more expensive, but that's inescapable from laws of physics and the basic realities of agriculture unfortunately
It's not inescapable. Like I already said, the only reason organic foods exist is because non-organic foods were created due to the way our economy and society values accumulation, rather than provision. The economic structure of our society was created by various government actions in Europe through the 18th and 19th centuries. Those "laws" of economics are not laws at all, but false assumptions about the nature of society.

Online Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #32 on: May 25, 2018, 07:55:35 am »
How can you argue that industrialization and private enterprise have not provided more food at lower cost with less labour ?

I'm on board with lamenting the faults of our economic systems, but you have to argue in reality.   
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #33 on: May 25, 2018, 10:47:47 am »
Those "laws" of economics are not laws at all, but false assumptions about the nature of society.
No matter how much you might wish otherwise, human beings are fundamentally selfish and driven only by a desire to look after themselves and their family. Humans are good at collaborating in groups but in any group individuals are expected to "do their share" which basically means the group assigns a price to the contribution of the individual and compares to the cost of supporting the individual. Individuals that fail to produce enough value will find that they are denied access to resources. The process of placing a value on the contribution of an individual is the core of economics. This is not an assumption but way to describe and explain the real world.
Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

Online Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #34 on: May 25, 2018, 10:51:55 am »
No matter how much you might wish otherwise, human beings are fundamentally selfish and driven only by a desire to look after themselves and their family. 

Hyperbole.  Humans balance self-interest and altruism, which is why the system we have reflects both human attributes.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #35 on: May 25, 2018, 11:28:12 am »
Hyperbole.  Humans balance self-interest and altruism, which is why the system we have reflects both human attributes.
A lot of the support for the social safety net comes from the desire/fear that an individual might need to depend on the same net in the future. I don't call that altruism. It is self interest. True altruism is very rare.

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #36 on: May 25, 2018, 11:38:00 am »
No matter how much you might wish otherwise, human beings are fundamentally selfish and driven only by a desire to look after themselves and their family. Humans are good at collaborating in groups but in any group individuals are expected to "do their share" which basically means the group assigns a price to the contribution of the individual and compares to the cost of supporting the individual. Individuals that fail to produce enough value will find that they are denied access to resources. The process of placing a value on the contribution of an individual is the core of economics. This is not an assumption but way to describe and explain the real world.

That's certainly not the real world I live in. Lets take socialized health care for instance. I have been contributing to that in various ways since the first day I went to work and I'll happily continue to do that until the day I drop and I'll be quite happy if I never have to use it until that day. (Full disclosure I was born in a hospital, had to have a cast put on a broken ankle once and was treated once for malaria) Even at that I'm sure I have contributed a lot more to the system than I have received from it, and will be happy to continue on that path. It's reassuring to know it's there and I bet most people in the real world of Canada prefer out system to that of the US where if you get sick you lose your house which seems to suit your world.

Online Michael Hardner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12532
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #37 on: May 25, 2018, 12:17:31 pm »
A lot of the support for the social safety net comes from the desire/fear that an individual might need to depend on the same net in the future. I don't call that altruism. It is self interest. True altruism is very rare.

Yes, but I have also seen you project your values onto others.  Caring for others is natural, whether or not you feel it yourself.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

guest4

  • Guest
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #38 on: May 25, 2018, 12:30:19 pm »
No matter how much you might wish otherwise, human beings are fundamentally selfish and driven only by a desire to look after themselves and their family.
There are millions of examples daily proving you wrong, starting with cops, firemen and soldiers.  Altruism is as much of a human attribute as is selfishness.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline ?Impact

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #39 on: May 25, 2018, 01:43:50 pm »
Go into any large corporation, and you will find Ted and Larry; and they are paid the same.

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #40 on: May 25, 2018, 02:07:40 pm »
Yes, but I have also seen you project your values onto others.  Caring for others is natural, whether or not you feel it yourself.
What does this have to do with my point? Lots of people care for others when it benefits them (or at least does not harm them). When it does not benefit them causes them harm they don't give a damn. You can find example over example of places where so called altruistic people screw over others when it suited them. That is why you can't claim that true altruism is common.

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #41 on: May 25, 2018, 02:12:22 pm »
There are millions of examples daily proving you wrong, starting with cops, firemen and soldiers.
They are all paid to do a job. In the case of cops and firemen they are paid extremely well. Needing to risk their lives once and awhile is a obligation of the job that they sign up for. That is not altruism.

Offline ?Impact

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #42 on: May 25, 2018, 02:17:39 pm »
firemen they are paid extremely well

Depends on where you live

Offline TimG

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #43 on: May 25, 2018, 02:24:16 pm »
Depends on where you live
Paid well is relative to the job opportunities available to person given where they live. Pay also include any pension which can be extremely generous.

Offline Omni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8563
Re: Big Brands Failing
« Reply #44 on: May 25, 2018, 02:32:13 pm »
Paid well is relative to the job opportunities available to person given where they live. Pay also include any pension which can be extremely generous.

Here's another one for you. In my real world I don't have any kids, but I do help pay for the public education system which supports others children. And I don't jump up and down screaming humbug. I like having educated people in my neighborhood, even though I don't benefit personally. You seem to have a very downtrodden view of the world.