Ultimately the discussion comes down to what qualifies anyone to be a desirable citizen of Canada. Unless someone has an objective criteria they can show me, its necessarily results in people expressing their subjective opinions as to what they think makes a good Canadian. Their religious views may impact negatively on that question depending on what beliefs it "inspires" in them.
Anyone of any religion conceivably could be a negative citizen depending on how their religion influences their method of believes and in particular towards others and its existing state laws.
Even if its true someone can show me a negative citizen "tendency" , "characteristic", "pattern" of belief or behaviour within a certain group does this then mean we assume all people in that group have this same tendency, characteristic, etc.
Making assumptions as to how an individual will behave as a citizen based soley on the fact that may be a member of a particular religious group for me is both illogical and not necessarily accurate,
Let's face it, if you want to assume anyone of a specific religion is "bad" I doubt you have objective data that could prove that. I think you could show a higher propensity to certain diseases based on particular blood types or genetic predispositions which could predict someone'sw likely dependency on the medical system of Canada, but fo rit to be able to infer other things? I myself would still want to see evidence of each person on an individual level and base any analysis or assessment on their individual behaviour and not merely assume behavioural characteristics on the fact they call themselves a follower of a particular religion.
If I assumed all Jews think the same would be illogical. I certainly won't make that illogical inference with Christians so I won't do it with Muslims, Hindus, etc. I think its a bit more complex than that analyzing an individual's behavioural profile. However tempting it may be ot find repeat patterns in this dimension we live in, they may not be patterns at all but subjective projections as to the patterns existing.
It depends on the preconditions and tools you use to then see what you see. A microscope sees different things depending on what level of vision you ask it to take on. So do people when they analyze the behaviour of their fellow humans.
Our own values, emotions, preconceived views/opinions, necessarily adjust the level of vision we then look through.
In conclusion I hate all humans equally and Judge all of us identically as poo heads.
I prefer animals.
I do place these humans on my exemption list of blanket condemnation:
Justin Trudeau's psychiatrist
Melania Trump