Author Topic: WE Scandal  (Read 3282 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline eyeball

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
Re: WE Scandal
« Reply #120 on: January 31, 2021, 11:40:09 am »
Maybe part of public governance design is to treat public discourse as a limited resource, and ensure it gets directed to the right places.  This could mean determining who/what/where/when/why/how much dialogue should happen on:
"The sign said you got to have a membership card to get inside, uh!"

Who gets to determine that and how much public input goes into the determination? To me public governance is not the same as party governance. The latter is far more like a private club - that comes with private ornate wood panelled smoke filled rooms too or so I've been told.

As laid out in other threads, a public government would look more like an assembly of citizens randomly picked like jurors that are guided by a civil service of experts from all fields, including people skilled at facilitating public discourse. The country is the club and everyone's a member.