Glossing over the reality of indigenous title is a good place to start the misinformation.
I personally don't see anything to gain by glossing over the fact that Canada's courts have consistently upheld indigineous titles. But I see some hope in the fact that two sets of laws must somehow coexist together.
And so I'll go back to my example of the gillnet strung across the entire river and say that their indigenous titles doesn't give them the right to wipe out endangered salmon runs for profit. Especially when it's being done on the faked excuse of it being done in the name of their food fishery.
What is your dog in this fight? Do you not understand that what I'm saying is completely true and is happening right now on some B.C. rivers?
It's certainly my opinion that anybody who supports this willful
**** of the environment must be motivated by more profit and greed.
I have to keep my comments to my local issue that I can claim to understand very well. If that's off-topic for you as a general discussion then so be it, we'll be done.