Ok.
Especially for white people, like you and me. That's my point. You look at the justice system as the arbiter of questions because it mostly works... for you.
I dare you to find a single point in time where I've ever said ANYTHING good about our legal system.
No, there are lots of outcomes. It's not binary.
No, it IS binary. Either they move, or there's no parade. Which leaves another binary decision. Either you do what they say so they agree to move, or you force them to move.
What happened to Occupy Wall Street ? It just stopped.
They were repeatedly arrested and broken up by the police.
Yes, that's clear and I'm not trying to change your mind. But your solution is still not workable, regardless of how you feel about it:
My proposed 'solution' is clearly to ignore it.
Absent evidence of disproportionate violence committed by police on Blacks (disproportionate to their interaction with police, nor their numbers in the population) I see no need to take action.
The difference between you and me is that I want to work within a process, whether I believe in the matter at hand or not. I didn't agree with the court ruling on Trinity University but you have to take the wins with the losses and trust in dialogue above all.
I'm fine with dialogue, even if the head of BLM Toronto is clearly a racist, but I'm not for punishing police because so many Blacks are involved in criminality and run afoul of... the police.
Police misuse of authority and the use of violence against innocent people infuriates me. I just seldom see it. In the closest case to me, geographically speaking, which has got BLM upset, the death of a Somali man, I literally could not care less. He was sexually harassing women, fought off those who tried to hold him for police, ran from police, and resisted arrest. The SUI has laid what I regard as a politically influenced charge against an Ottawa cop for manslaughter. I have little doubt he'll be found not guilty by a jury.