considering there appears to be no formalization of said JWR "final decision"... no formalized/documented legal basis for said JWR "final decision", just what are you presenting here, other than parroting St. Jody's "truth"?
Well we have both the University of Waldo Law School and Waldo Land where fantasies come ttrue.
In this fantasy world the AG never turned down the dpa because Waldo says it and I quote" does not appear in writing".
The reality is something Waldo can't handle and that is in fact that the Director of Public Prosecutions not just JWR rejected SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.’s request to negotiate a remediation agreement.
In fact it was because it was turned down by Ms. Roussel that the Prime Minister then did what he did through his PMO office and Privy Council head to "repeatedly ask" but according to Waldo not pressure JWR to overturn this decision of Ms. Roussel.
Reality is not something Waldo cares to deal with.
In fact what the testimony shows before Trudeau shut it down was that the PMO fully expected the Director of Public Prosecutions, Kathleen Roussel, to offer SNC-Lavalin a deal and when she did not started "repeatedly asking" but hey Waldo says that was not pressuring, JWRto overrule Ms. Roussel and in fact JWR refused.
In Waldoland he pretends Ms. Roussel is not independent, did not exist, did not make the actual decision and that the decision rejected negotiations.
In fact there was an agreement to use dpa's in principle but never specifically for the on-going Lavalin matter.
Let's have Waldo produce his evidence that Ms. Roussel or JWR stated they agreed to a dpa with Lavalin for its bribery case with Libya. It does not exist.
In fact when Ms. Roussel refused to consider a dpa, Lavalin then went to the federal court arguing she overstepped her authority in denying SNC-Lavalin’s request to negotiate a remediation agreement arguing that it was and I quote from Lavalin" “the decision is based on an unreasonable exercise of her discretion and must be set aside for several reasons.”
The Federal Court throughout Lavalin's attempt to second guess Ms. Roussel's decision.
So just what world does Waldo live in where he spews off at the mouth about "its just a legal assessment" and according to him we can ignore the express preconditions and factors that must be considered as set out in the dpa for one to be considered?
What world does Waldo live in where he ignores the clear prohibition when considering public interest to ignore national economic interest, i.e., potential unproven potential loss of jobs?
What world does Waldo live in where he ignores reality and the Federal Court ruling and when given the express preconditions and factors and prohibition the prosecutor had to apply, pretends they don't exist?
Has anyone seen Waldo?
When he does show up he engages in an alternative reality and won't address the dpa wording. Does anyone know why? Could it be the Mandela effect?
Home
Contact
Login
Register