I'm sure JWR or any AG would have written "The reasons for the deferral include lost jobs, a willingness for the federal and provincial Liberals not to lose upcoming elections, and sustained lobbying efforts by the accused corporation whose officials have donated large sums of funding to the Liberal Party."
So no I don't want a "do-over".
but... JWR has not written anything... or rather, as I understand/read, has not presented a written explanation to support her position. You're apparently attempting to deflect from my pointed request to you; particularly when you seemed so sure of yourself, here, try again:
great - you appear to have a missing piece! Many have noted an absence of the legal foundation JWR used to support her unwillingness to act to have the DPPSC re-evaluated. Please provide, as you say, "the basis of justice her decision relied upon"... one you call her "legal decision". Thanks in advance - waiting.......
and you come back again with the same/like unsupported claim/statement where you now say: "
the accused corporation whose officials have donated large sums of funding to the Liberal Party."
I provided an Elections Canada accounting of improper contributions... what you called a "generous amount".
Again, one company executive was charged for his personal actions to solicit individual employees to make political contributions - a total of 117K over 8 years (2004-2011)... contributions made to both the Liberal & Conservative parties, individual politicians and individual riding associations. I asked you if you have additional information beyond what I provided.
Apparently you do not since you simply choose to repeat your unsubstantiated statement/claim.