Canadian Politics Today

You have your replies. Now go back to Gerald and ask for some fresh talking points! 

was it asking you for the citation that has you runningAway? 

your deflect/distract routine doesn't explain what would push PPSC into a plea-bargain. If PPSC had the TheCase, had TheGoods, what conceivably could bring the plea-bargain forward, particularly in such a high-profile proceeding. Wait, what's that waldo... the plea-bargain was offered by PPSC the very day before SNC-L was to make its second submission in regards the "Abuse Of Process" proceeding. You know, the abuse of process that came to light as a part of the Justice Committee testimonies. Is that what caused PPSC to 'turn tail & run', hey member kimmy?  Timing is just so coincidental - yes?

If the prosecution had no case, why did SNC-Lavalin agree to plead guilty and pay $280 million in fines?

sweet to read you wiggin' out! Again, if TheCase/TheGoods were as strong as you imply, why would PPSC stay all but the one single charge... and effectively provide like/less than what a DPA would have realized?

by the by, are you really asking why SNC-L would agree to terms less impacting than what a DPA would have provided to them? Really, that's your ask?